SEO
LinkResearchTools
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by LinkResearchTools GmbH · www.linkresearchtools.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
LinkResearchTools at a glance
- Vendor
- LinkResearchTools GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates LinkResearchTools 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
No written verdict for this product
The panel scored LinkResearchTools, but the summary our synthesizer wrote did not survive our own contradiction check — twice. Rather than print a paragraph we cannot stand behind, we print none. Every score, rationale and source below is unaffected; read them and draw the conclusion yourself.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Crawling & technical audit | 0.5 of 5 |
| Keyword research & content guidance | 0.5 of 5 |
| Rank tracking & index quality | 2 of 5 |
| Reporting, integrations & API | 2.5 of 5 |
| Data portability & exit | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1 of 5 |
Crawling & technical audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.
3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.
5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.
8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
Everything this product crawls is the backlink profile, not the site: the documented budget and frequency controls govern which projects' links get recrawled, and the one broken-link angle is the Link Juice Recovery tool for dead pages. We found no public information on a site crawler, Core Web Vitals, indexation diagnosis or JavaScript rendering, so nothing here would ever become a developer ticket for my site. 1 2 3
The Agency Owner
Everything documented about crawling here is link-data recrawling — recrawl from monthly down to daily, fresh data 1–30 days, Sample/Basic/Complete modes, a crawl-budget dashboard — and we found no public information on a site crawler, JavaScript rendering, Core Web Vitals or indexation diagnosis. Across forty client sites I would still need a separate technical audit tool; this one plays no part in that workflow. 2 3
The Technical SEO
The documented crawling is all aimed at their own link index — recrawl modes, a crawl budget dashboard with warnings when the budget is exceeded, even crawling robots.txt-blocked links — and we found no public information on any crawler auditing the customer's own site: nothing on JavaScript rendering, Core Web Vitals, indexation or canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, or Search Console and log-file comparison. The only on-site thread is broken-backlink recovery on the link side, which is remediation for link equity, not for the site's technical health. 1 2 3
The Content Strategist
The crawling in the captured documentation is the vendor refreshing its own backlink data — recrawl modes from sample to complete, Link Crawl Budget planning, frequencies from daily to yearly — not a crawler auditing the customer's site. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals, indexation or canonical diagnosis, rendering, or issues prioritised by traffic impact, so there is nothing here to hang a technical brief on. 1 2 3
The Data Analyst
The captured documentation covers crawling only as recrawling of the customer's backlink profile — Link Crawl Budget dashboards, weekly/monthly/yearly recrawl schedules, Basic versus Complete modes — while the vendor positions the product as backlink analysis software. We found no public information on a site crawler, Core Web Vitals, indexation diagnosis or JavaScript rendering. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
The crawling documented is of backlink profiles — recrawl modes, a Link Crawl Budget dashboard, freshness windows — not of the customer's own site; the tool categories on the vendor page are all link-side. We found no public information on a site crawler, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript rendering, indexation or canonical diagnosis. 1 2 3
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.
3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
The keyword functionality is link-prospect mining — Google queries filterable by rank, site type and age — plus ranking-keyword counts that arrive from SEMrush under the customer's own API key. We found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification or SERP feature data from the vendor themselves, so German keyword depth is a question this evidence cannot answer. 4 5 6 7
The Agency Owner
The keyword-facing pieces are link prospecting: the SERP research tool runs up to 25 combined Google queries to find link targets, filters keywords by Google rank, and surfaces SEMrush-derived ranking-keyword counts as strength indicators. We found no public information on search volumes, difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature analysis, or the depth of German-language keyword data. 4 5 7
The Technical SEO
Keyword functions exist to find link prospects, not to plan content: up to 20 keywords per report, rank filters, footprints of up to 25 combined Google queries, and country and language coverage claimed for every Google engine. The ranking-keyword metrics are counts sourced from SEMrush — the page-level one only with the user's own API key — and we found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature composition or content briefs. 4 5 7
The Content Strategist
Keywords exist here only as an input to link prospecting: up to 20 keywords and Google operators per report, results filterable by rank and linking status, with keyword counts and visibility arriving from SEMrush and Sistrix through the customer's own API keys. We found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature detail, topic clustering, competitor gap analysis or content briefs, so the German documentation is thorough for prospecting but we found no public information on keyword research itself. 4 5 6 7
The Data Analyst
Keywords appear only as input to the SERP research tool, which runs up to 20 keywords or 25 combined Google queries to surface link prospects, filterable by Google rank, page type and post age, across every Google search engine, language and country. Ranking-keyword counts for domains come from SEMrush and visibility from Sistrix through the customer's own API key, and we found no public information on keyword volumes, difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature detail or any content guidance. 4 5 6 7
The Skeptic
The SERP Research Tool searches Google for link prospects with keyword, rank, site-type and operator filters — prospecting, not keyword research — and we found no public information on volumes, difficulty, intent classification or on-page guidance from the vendor's own data. The ranking-keyword counts and visibility indexes documented arrive via SEMrush and Sistrix using the customer's own provider keys, so no German-language keyword depth of the vendor's own is evidenced. 4 5 6 7
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.
3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.
5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.
8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
What the vendor documents about their own data is recrawl behaviour: links re-crawled before display, freshness within one to thirty days, frequency configurable from daily to monthly, and robots.txt-blocked links included. We found no public information on index size, methodology or any rank tracking of their own — visibility and keyword counts come through Sistrix and SEMrush with the customer's keys. 1 2 3
The Agency Owner
They document their own link data better than most: recrawl from monthly down to daily, fresh data 1–30 days, crawl modes tied to backlink profile coverage, crawling of robots.txt-blocked links, 25+ link data sources and 150+ metrics. We found no published index size and no first-party rank tracking — visibility indexes arrive through the customer's own Sistrix API key and keyword counts through SEMrush. 1 2 3 6 7
The Technical SEO
This is where the vendor shows accountability for their own data: recrawl cadence documented from monthly down to daily, freshness stated at 1-30 days, robots.txt-blocked links crawled, and a backlink profile coverage metric with a recommended 100% target. But no index size is published, the captured pages give different recrawl intervals for the crawl budget view (weekly, monthly or yearly) and the freshness description (monthly to daily), and we found no public information on rank tracking methodology, device granularity or retained historical rankings. 1 2 3 6
The Content Strategist
Freshness claims are published — recrawls from monthly down to daily, data 1–30 days old, links recrawled before display, even robots.txt-blocked links crawled — and 25+ link data sources are combined, but we found no public information on index size or a documented collection methodology. Ranking signals come entirely from third parties via SEMrush keyword counts and the Sistrix Visibility Index; we found no public information on the vendor's own rank tracking. 1 2 3 6 7
The Data Analyst
Link data freshness is documented — links are recrawled before display, 1-30 days fresh, recrawl configurable from monthly down to daily, and the crawlers even take robots.txt-blocked links — but the data is presented as 25+ combined link data sources, and we found no public information on index size or an aggregate refresh cadence. We found no public information on rank tracking of the customer's own keywords; visibility figures arrive from SEMrush and Sistrix through the customer's own API keys, with the country selectable per project and no device granularity documented. 1 2 6 7
The Skeptic
The one thing a buyer can hold is refresh: links re-crawled before display with stated freshness of 1-30 days, recrawl selectable from monthly down to daily, crawling even of robots.txt-blocked links, and a per-domain Backlink Profile Coverage metric. But no index size or methodology is published, no rank-tracking product is evidenced, and the ranking signals documented ride on SEMrush and Sistrix keys from the customer's own accounts rather than on a proprietary index. 1 2 3 6 7
Reporting, integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.
3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.
5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
The API is genuinely documented — JSON over GET and POST, up to 10,000 URLs per query, report start and retrieval actions, example scripts — and exports cover CSV, XLSX and PDF with scheduled email delivery and disavow files. Every API query consumes report credits with monthly limits set by package, and we found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration, white-label reporting or per-endpoint credit costs. 8 9 10 11
The Agency Owner
This is a real documented API — HTTP GET/POST returning JSON, start-report and get-data actions, up to 10,000 URLs per query, PHP and Ruby examples — plus CSV/XLSX/PDF and PNG exports, scheduled repeat reports delivered by email, and a disavow file export. But every API query consumes credits against a per-package monthly limit, and we found no public information on per-call credit costs, white-label reports, client access, or Search Console and analytics connections — the three things I need to rebill across forty sites. 8 9 10 11
The Technical SEO
A real API to build on: documented start-report, get-data and list actions over GET and POST with JSON responses, PHP and Ruby example scripts, up to 10,000 URLs per query, package-based monthly query limits, and each API query consuming the same credits as a report. Scheduled email reporting and CSV, XLSX, PDF and PNG export round it out, though the API exposes only the Bulk URL Analyzer, and we found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration, white-label reporting, or per-endpoint credit costs. 8 9 10
The Content Strategist
There is a genuinely documented API — JSON over GET and POST, report start and retrieval actions, up to 10,000 URLs per query, PHP and Ruby sample code, a specification — with limits stated as monthly query caps by package and every query consuming report credits. Repeated reports can be emailed automatically and every export arrives as CSV, XLSX or PDF with filtered variants. We found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration, white-label reporting, or per-endpoint credit costs published. 8 9 10 11
The Data Analyst
A documented API exists with a key from the account settings, HTTP GET or POST with JSON responses, actions to start reports, list metrics, list reports and retrieve data, up to 10,000 URLs per query, monthly query limits by package, and example scripts in PHP and Ruby; reports can repeat automatically with results emailed. Credit costs are stated only as an API query counting like a report and therefore requiring credits, and we found no public information on per-endpoint credit costs. We also found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration, white-label reporting, or data-warehouse export. 1 6 8 9 10
The Skeptic
The API is genuinely documented — start report, get data, list reports, list value names, JSON over GET and POST, up to 10,000 URLs per query, example scripts in PHP and Ruby, and error codes — and reports can auto-repeat with results emailed. But monthly query limits are stated only as "depending on your package" with no numbers, no per-endpoint credit costs are published, the SEO-tool connections shown require the customer's own third-party keys, and we found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration, customisable dashboards, or white-label agency reporting. 6 8 9 10
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.
3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.
5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
Bulk export is well evidenced: all tables and charts as CSV, XLSX and PDF, pre-filtered exports, per-domain backlink exports including source URLs, and report data retrievable through the API. We found no public information on whether historical data is retained or retrievable after cancellation, or on any grace period for the archive. 8 9 10 11
The Agency Owner
Reports export whole or filtered as CSV, XLSX and PDF with per-domain backlink exports, email download links, and API retrieval of report data — solid bulk export of what the tool holds. But API retrieval is credit-metered like any report, and we found no public information on exporting historical data in bulk or on any retention period after cancellation, so I cannot confirm a multi-year archive survives the exit. 8 10 11
The Technical SEO
Exports are report-shaped but real: whole tables and charts as CSV, XLSX and PDF, per-domain backlink exports in three tools, filtered exports, disavow file export, and report data retrievable through the API — though every API query burns credits. We found no public information on bulk export of historical data or on any retention period after cancellation; the documented suspended status ties reports to remaining credits and subscription validity. 9 10 11
The Content Strategist
Every report's tables and charts export as CSV, XLSX or PDF, filters carry into the export, disavow files export directly, and the API can retrieve report data — though each API query costs credits. We found no public information on a documented retention period after cancellation or a grace period during which the archive stays retrievable, which is what would make exit a design decision rather than an export habit. 8 10 11
The Data Analyst
Export is bulk at the report level — all tables and charts as CSV, XLSX and PDF, per-domain backlinks included in three tools, filterable before export, files delivered by email with download links — and report data can be retrieved through the API. But the documented exports are of report results, and we found no public information on bulk historical export, retention after cancellation, or a grace period. API retrieval is credit-metered against a package-dependent monthly limit, which prices continuous mirroring in credits. 8 10 11
The Skeptic
Export is documented and specific: tables and charts as CSV, XLSX and PDF, per-domain backlink exports in three tools including the source URL field, filtered exports, a disavow file export, delivery by email with download links, and report data retrievable through the API. We found no public information on bulk export of accumulated report history or on any retention period after cancellation, which is what a multi-year subscription actually banks. 8 10 11
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead
The contracting entity presents as a German GmbH and the documentation exists in German, but we found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, certification or a DPA covering crawl and analytics data. Since a tool like this mostly holds my own strategy rather than my customers' identities this weighs less for me, but the gap is complete. 1
The Agency Owner
The contracting side presents as LinkResearchTools GmbH with German-language documentation, and that is the only sovereignty signal in the material. We found no public information on hosting location, a subprocessor list, a data processing agreement, or certification. 1 11
The Technical SEO
The vendor name carries a German legal form, and that is the entire sovereignty picture in the captured pages: we found no public information on hosting location, named infrastructure, subprocessors, certification, or a data-processing agreement covering the crawl data the tool ingests. For a vendor based in the EU, publishing nothing on where the account and crawl data live leaves a buyer guessing. 1
The Content Strategist
The vendor operates as a German GmbH and publishes its documentation in German as well as English, but the captured pages give nothing on hosting location, subprocessors, certification, or a data processing agreement covering the link and crawl data the tools ingest. We found no public information on any of those points, so I can only credit the EU contracting entity. 1
The Data Analyst
No sovereignty attributes are on record, and we found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, certification, or a data processing agreement across the captured pages. The only European signal is the vendor's German legal form, LinkResearchTools GmbH. 1
The Skeptic
No sovereignty attributes are on record: we found no public information on hosting location, the contracting entity's jurisdiction in these pages, subprocessors, a DPA or certification. The German-language documentation is the only European signal in the captured material, and everything about where account and crawl data live is unstated. 5 11
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.
5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
We found no public prices at all, while the product is demonstrably metered: credits per report, monthly query limits by package, Link Crawl Budget, add-ons to buy, and an annual-versus-monthly credit spread. I cannot begin to compute an annual invoice from anything captured — every tier is a sales conversation. 3 8 9
The Agency Owner
No price of any kind appears in the captured pages — not a headline, not a tier — while the cost mechanics are everywhere: credits, Link Crawl Budget, subscription changes and add-ons to raise it, annual upfront credit spread, and monthly API query limits set per package. As the one rebilling forty licences, I can see the meter but not the tariff: the invoice is not computable from public pages, and the Enterprise tier reads as a sales conversation. 1 3 8
The Technical SEO
Not one price figure appears in the captured pages — no tier prices, no credit costs, no add-on prices — while the documentation confirms a model built on packages, credits, link crawl budget and an upsell page for buying additional budget, so no invoice is computable from public pages. We found no public information on prices, extra seats, minimum term or VAT treatment. 3 8
The Content Strategist
No price figure appears anywhere in the captured pages — no tier prices, no per-seat cost, no add-on or overage rates — so an annual cost cannot be computed from public information at all. Credit is due for documenting the metering machinery in detail: credits, Link Crawl Budget, monthly query limits by package, annual credit spread and budget add-ons tell a buyer what will be metered, just never what it costs. 3 8 9
The Data Analyst
The captured pages name the cost drivers — Link Crawl Budget, credits, an upfront credit spread on longer billing periods, and add-ons or subscription changes to raise the budget — but we found no public information on the price of any tier, credit, add-on, extra seat or overage. API queries consume credits against a package-dependent monthly limit, likewise without a published rate, so an annual invoice is not computable from public pages. 3 8 9
The Skeptic
No price appears in the captured pages — no tier figures, no cost per credit, no per-seat or add-on amounts — only the mechanics: an API query costs the same credits as a report, monthly query limits depend on the package, and Link Crawl Budget is increased by changing the subscription or buying add-ons. A real annual invoice is not computable from public information, and we found no public information on VAT treatment, minimum term or overage rates. 3 8 9
Questions about LinkResearchTools
Is LinkResearchTools European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where LinkResearchTools is based.
Where does LinkResearchTools store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does LinkResearchTools have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to LinkResearchTools?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates SE Ranking (3/5), Semrush (3/5) and SISTRIX (3/5) highest among the other 32 SEO products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is SISTRIX (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: LinkResearchTools alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (linkresearchtools.com, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/02-concepts/accuracy/crawling, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/03-discover-lrt-smart/link-crawl-budget-management, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/07-link-building-grow/116166-serp-research-tool-serp, smart.linkresearchtools.com/doku/07-linkbuilding-grow/701248-serp-research-tool-serp, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/02-concepts/seo-metrics/domain-metrics/695770-visibility-indexes and 5 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (linkresearchtools.com, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/02-concepts/accuracy/crawling, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/03-discover-lrt-smart/link-crawl-budget-management, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/07-link-building-grow/116166-serp-research-tool-serp, smart.linkresearchtools.com/doku/07-linkbuilding-grow/701248-serp-research-tool-serp, smart.linkresearchtools.com/docs/02-concepts/seo-metrics/domain-metrics/695770-visibility-indexes and 5 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 4 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
- The panel’s written verdict is withheld: our own re-read found claims in it that the evidence does not carry, and a second synthesis did not fix them. The scores and the material below are unaffected. Know more? Tell us
Sources (11)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap smart.linkresearchtools.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →