whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

SEO

Majestic

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Majestic Marketing Ltd · majestic.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Content Strategist

Weighted verdict

Decides what gets written and can only commission so much. Wants topic clusters, honest opportunity sizing, cannibalisation caught before it happens, and briefs scored against what actually ranks rather than against keyword density.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Content Strategist

Crawling & technical audit

How this is scored

Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.

0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.

3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.

5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.

8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.

10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.

Report an error

The Content Strategist

The captured pages describe a web-scale crawler — hundreds of billions of unique URLs found and crawled — but that is Majestic crawling the open web for links, not a crawler auditing the customer's own site. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals, indexation diagnosis, JavaScript rendering or issue prioritisation, so there is nothing here to build a technical audit brief from. 1

Report an error

Keyword research & content guidance

How this is scored

Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.

0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.

3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.

5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.

8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.

10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.

Report an error

The Content Strategist

The captured pages contain no keyword discovery, volume, intent, difficulty, SERP feature detail, topic clustering, briefs or cannibalisation detection, and no German-language data signal at all. Author Explorer and topical filtering across 800-plus categories are genuinely interesting for author-level and topical discovery, but that is outreach research, not keyword and content guidance. 1

Report an error

Rank tracking & index quality

How this is scored

The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.

0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.

3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.

5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.

8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.

10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.

Report an error

The Content Strategist

The backlink index is documented at close to the top of the scale: published size and date ranges for both the 120-day Fresh Index and the Historic Index going back to 2006, a page-level update recency, and lost and deleted links flagged within the Fresh window. We found no public information on rank tracking of any kind — no frequency, country or device granularity, no methodology — which holds this at the middle. 1

Report an error

Reporting, integrations & API

How this is scored

Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.

0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.

3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.

5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.

8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.

10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.

Report an error

The Content Strategist

There is a documented API with a connector library on GitHub, multiple manageable API keys, Open Apps to push data into third-party tools, bulk upload of up to a million sites, and export to Excel, CSV, TSV and Google Sheets — an API a team could build against. We found no public information on stated API limits or per-endpoint costs, dashboards, scheduled reports, white-labelling or Search Console integration. 1

Report an error

Data portability & exit

How this is scored

Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.

0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.

3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.

5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.

8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.

10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.

Report an error

The Content Strategist

Export of the best links of any website to Excel, CSV and TSV plus on-demand Advanced Extracts give real bulk routes for link data out of the tool. We found no public information on exporting the account's own accumulated history — campaigns and saved work — or on any retention window after cancellation, so exit is only partially designed for. 1

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.

Report an error

The Content Strategist

No sovereignty attributes are on record and the captured pages leave hosting, the contracting entity's location and every subprocessor unstated; the only signal is a GDPR page in the site footer. I cannot place where account or crawl data sits from anything public here, and a footer link is not a data-processing agreement. 1

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.

5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.

8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.

Report an error

The Content Strategist

Tier names, plan descriptions, accepted payment methods and a free registration tier are public, but the captured pages contain no price figures for any plan, no seat or analysis-unit costs, no minimum term and no VAT treatment. A buyer cannot compute a year's invoice from this; the headline is a doorway to a sales conversation. 1

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Majestic? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (8)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page majestic.com Checked 22 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Terms of service — found from the homepage majestic.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap majestic.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap majestic.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap majestic.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap majestic.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap majestic.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap majestic.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →