SEO
Netpeak Spider
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Netpeak Software · netpeaksoftware.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Netpeak Spider at a glance
- Vendor
- Netpeak Software
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Netpeak Spider 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Netpeak Spider is a desktop SEO crawler whose strength is technical auditing: technical audit scores cluster at 6-7, crediting JavaScript rendering, off by default, automatic duplicate and canonical-chain detection with internal PageRank, and robots.txt directives checked with line numbers. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Netpeak Spider is a desktop SEO crawler whose strength is technical auditing: technical audit scores cluster at 6-7, crediting JavaScript rendering, off by default, automatic duplicate and canonical-chain detection with internal PageRank, and robots.txt directives checked with line numbers. Keyword and content scores hold at 2: ranking counts arrive through Serpstat and Ahrefs integrations, with no public information on search volumes, difficulty or intent. Rank and index data scores 1-2: no public information on backlink index size, refresh cadence or update frequency. Reporting and API scores run 4-6, crediting Pro-tier white-label reports and automatic Google Drive export, while the API appears only in a customer quote. Data portability, also 4-6, credits CSV export stated to carry no limits and projects that reopen on another device, though historical export is documented only as a current-versus-previous comparison. Sovereignty spans 0 to 2 — the only zero anywhere — on a record with no sovereignty attributes; scores differ on whether local crawling and Google Drive exports offset that gap. Public pricing amounts to a 5-day free trial and "Save up to 20%. Cancel anytime."
Speaks for it
- Deep technical crawler — JavaScript rendering, automatic duplicate and canonical-chain detection with internal PageRank, and robots.txt directives checked with line numbers
- Unlimited crawling rules with regular-expression matching and AND/OR logic
- CSV export carries no limits, and XLSX files split automatically past 1,000,000 URLs
- Projects save locally and reopen on another device
- White-label reports on the Pro tier carry your logo and contact details, with automatic export to Google Drive after each monitoring session
Held against it
- Keyword and content scores sit at 2, with ranking data arriving via Serpstat and Ahrefs integrations and no public information on search volumes, difficulty or intent
- No public information on backlink index size, refresh cadence or ranking update frequency, where rank and index data scores run 1-2
- The API appears only in a customer quote, with no public documentation, endpoints or rate limits
- Historical export is documented only as a current-versus-previous-check comparison, with no public information on retention after cancellation
- No sovereignty attributes are on record — no public information on contracting entity, hosting location or subprocessors
Best for
- You need a deep, rules-based desktop crawler for technical audits and ticket-writing across large sites
- You deliver client reports and want white-label PDFs and spreadsheets exported automatically to Google Drive on the Pro tier
- You already use Serpstat or Ahrefs and want crawl-side verification and SERP checks on top of that data
- You want crawl results to live on your own machine with unmetered, open-format export
Avoid if
- You need keyword research — volumes, difficulty, intent — from the product itself rather than through Serpstat and Ahrefs integrations
- You must cite a documented ranking or backlink methodology, such as index size or update cadence, to clients or auditors
- You need a documented API with published endpoints and rate limits to build on
- Your procurement requires documented answers on contracting entity, hosting location or subprocessors before purchase — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Crawling & technical audit | 3.5 of 5 |
| Keyword research & content guidance | 1 of 5 |
| Rank tracking & index quality | 1 of 5 |
| Reporting, integrations & API | 2.5 of 5 |
| Data portability & exit | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5 of 5 |
Crawling & technical audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.
3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.
5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.
8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
The desktop crawler is genuinely deep for ticket-writing: unlimited crawling rules with regex and AND/OR logic, JavaScript rendering, subdomain and hreflang handling, automatic analysis of duplicates and canonical chains with internal PageRank, and robots.txt and meta-robots indexation checks backed by Search Console data. I found no public information on Core Web Vitals measurement, scheduled crawls, or issue prioritisation weighted by traffic impact, which keeps it short of a full diagnostic audit. 1 2 3 6
The Agency Owner
The crawler is the strongest thing here: JavaScript rendering (disabled by default), automatic duplicate detection, canonical-chain analysis and internal PageRank, robots and meta-robots indexation parameters, a structured-data testing tool among the technical features, Search Console data pulled in, and multi-domain crawling on the Pro tier. It stops short of diagnostic grade because we found no public information on Core Web Vitals, scheduled crawling, log files, or issues prioritised by the traffic a fix would recover — across forty client sites I would still be triaging by hand. 1 2 6 7
The Technical SEO
The crawler is the real thing: JavaScript rendering (off by default but supported), unlimited include/exclude rules with regex and AND/OR logic, automatic detection of canonical chains and duplicates with internal PageRank, and indexation diagnosis down to robots.txt directives with line numbers and meta robots content, with Search Console and Google Analytics data joined to crawl results. It stops short of the diagnostic tier because we found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, log-file analysis, crawl budget, or issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count; the nearest thing to regression work is an export option pairing current with previous check data. 1 2 3 6 9
The Content Strategist
This crawler diagnoses rather than just lists: post-crawl auto-analysis catches duplicates and canonical chains and computes internal PageRank, robots.txt and meta robots parameters are checked with the directive's line number, JavaScript rendering is supported, and issues carry severity down to a 'notice' tier. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals measurement, log-file comparison, or prioritisation by traffic impact — the difference between a very good checklist and a real diagnostic. 1 2 3 6
The Data Analyst
Real crawl depth: JavaScript rendering, automatic duplicate and canonical-chain analysis with internal PageRank, and indexation parameters down to the robots.txt directive and its line number, with Search Console data pulled in. We found no public information on log-file comparison, Core Web Vitals per template, or issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than severity, which is what separates a diagnostic from a very thorough list. 1 2 3 6
The Skeptic
A mid-market crawler with real depth: over 100 technical issues checked, JavaScript rendering (off by default), canonical-chain and duplicate detection with internal PageRank, hreflang and AMP handling, and robots.txt and meta-robots indexation parameters alongside Search Console data. I found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, scheduled crawls, log-file comparison, or issues prioritised by traffic impact, so the audit reads as a thorough list rather than a diagnosis. 1 2 6 8
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.
3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
Every ranking figure on these pages comes from someone else's index — keyword counts from Serpstat and Ahrefs, average position from Search Console — and content guidance stops at title, alt-text and duplicate-content checks. I found no public information on a proprietary keyword database, intent or difficulty data, SERP feature analysis, or German-market keyword data beyond interface locale settings. For a German-language programme this reads as keyword data by integration, not by product. 4 5
The Agency Owner
What's evidenced is SERP-side verification — scraping Google, Yahoo and Bing, sitelinks, cache dates and titles — plus on-page checks such as title tags, alt text and duplicate content, with keyword and ranking data attributed to Serpstat and Ahrefs rather than to the vendor. We found no public information on the vendor's own volumes, difficulty, intent classification, or German-language market depth, so there is nothing here to underwrite a content retainer. 1 4 5
The Technical SEO
This is not a keyword research product: rank counts come from Serpstat and Ahrefs integrations, and the SERP checker scrapes Google, Yahoo and Bing for cache status, sitelinks, indexation modes and the title and description as shown. We found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature tracking over time, or any German-language market depth, and content guidance amounts to on-page checkers for title tags, alt text and duplicate content. 1 4 5
The Content Strategist
Keyword capability is rank checking and SERP scraping on third-party data — positions 1-100 from Serpstat, top-3 and top-10 counts from Ahrefs, scraping across Google, Yahoo and Bing — plus on-page checks like title tags, image alt text and duplicate content. We found no public information on keyword volume, difficulty or intent classification, on German-market data depth, or on anything I would commission against: topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, content briefs and cannibalisation detection. 1 4 5
The Data Analyst
The keyword data on these pages is a count of what a domain ranks for, resold through Serpstat and Ahrefs integrations, not research data a team can plan from — we found no public information on search volumes, difficulty, intent classification, or any German-language dataset. On-page guidance amounts to a title-tag checker, an alt-text finder and a duplicate-content check. 1 4 5
The Skeptic
Keyword data is borrowed wholesale — ranking counts arrive via Serpstat and Ahrefs integrations, and the SERP checker scrapes titles, descriptions, cache status and sitelinks rather than supporting discovery. I found no public information on search volumes, difficulty, intent classification, German-language coverage or content briefs; the on-page guidance stops at title, alt-text and duplicate-content checkers. 1 4 5
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.
3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.
5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.
8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
Nothing in the captured pages states update frequency, country or device granularity, or how any ranking or backlink data is collected; the position figures are Serpstat's and Ahrefs' via integration, and the backlink product's index size and refresh cadence are undocumented. Without a published methodology I cannot defend these numbers when they disagree with Search Console. 1 4 5
The Agency Owner
Positions 1–100 come from Serpstat, top-3 and top-10 keyword counts from Ahrefs, indexation is checked against Google in root-domain, host and URL modes, and Limonity Backlinks flags link changes with notifications. But we found no public information on update frequency, country, device or city-level granularity, backlink index size or refresh cadence, or how history is retained — I cannot tell a client how fresh the numbers I rebill actually are. 1 4 5
The Technical SEO
The vendor names its sources — positions in the top 100 from Serpstat and top-3/top-10 keyword counts from Ahrefs — so the proprietary data footprint is small, and the index checker works from live checks rather than a documented index. We found no public information on ranking update frequency, country or device granularity, backlink index size or refresh cadence, or historical retention; the backlink product promises change tracking and notifications without stating an index or freshness. 1 4 5
The Content Strategist
Rankings arrive through Search Console, Serpstat and Ahrefs integrations and SERP scraping, and we found no public information on update frequency, on country, language or device granularity, or on backlink index size and refresh cadence — Limonity Backlinks promises unlimited projects and change notifications with the index itself undocumented. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, that is close to nothing. 1 4 5
The Data Analyst
We found no documented proprietary index behind these products: positioning counts come from Serpstat, Ahrefs and Search Console, and the vendor's own backlink tracker states no index size or refresh cadence. Google, Yahoo and Bing SERP scraping is the only first-party collection method named, with no public information on update frequency, location or device granularity, or methodology. 1 4 5
The Skeptic
The vendor documents no ranking or backlink data of its own: positions come from Serpstat, Ahrefs and Search Console, SERP scraping for Google, Yahoo and Bing runs on demand, and the backlink monitor claims unlimited tracking with no stated index size, refresh cadence or methodology. Update frequency, location and device granularity, and historical retention are all things I found no public information on. 1 4 5
Reporting, integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.
3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.
5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
White-label branded reports on the Pro plan, automatic Google Drive export after each monitoring session, Search Console, Google Analytics and Yandex.Metrika integrations, and XLSX, CSV and Google Sheets export with no CSV limits are all documented. The API appears only in a customer testimonial about extracting data "at high speed via API", with no documentation, limits or credit costs published, and I found no public information on warehouse or BigQuery export. 4 7 8 10
The Agency Owner
White-label reports with our logo and contact details on the Pro tier, a PDF SEO audit export, XLSX, CSV and Google Sheets delivery with automatic export to the customer's Drive after each monitoring session, plus Search Console, Google Analytics and Yandex.Metrika inputs — that is a client-ready deliverable. The operations side is thinner: the API appears only in a customer quote, and we found no public information on API limits or credit costs, data-warehouse export, or a client-access portal for managing many accounts at once. 2 4 7 9 10
The Technical SEO
The export machinery is genuinely good: XLSX, CSV and Google Sheets output with report templates, automated export to Google Drive after each monitoring session, customisable and persisted tables, and Pro-tier white-label reports with logo and contact fields. The API exists only as a testimonial about extracting data at speed, with no documentation, endpoints or limits published, and we found no public information on client access portals or data-warehouse export. 4 7 8 9 10
The Content Strategist
Reporting is agency-grade on the evidence: white-label reports on the Pro plan with logo and contact details, configurable tables and reusable templates, automatic export to Google Drive after each monitoring session, and integration with Search Console, Google Analytics and Yandex.Metrika. The API is evidenced only by a customer quote praising fast data extraction — we found no public information on API documentation, endpoints or rate limits. 2 4 7 8 9
The Data Analyst
Search Console, Google Analytics and Yandex.Metrika come in; white-label PDFs, Google Drive auto-export and CSV go out, all documented in granular detail. The only API evidence is a customer testimonial about extracting data at speed — we found no public information on endpoints, rate limits or credit costs, and without those I cannot call this something a team builds on. 2 4 7 9
The Skeptic
Exports are concrete: XLSX, CSV and Google Sheets with no CSV limits, report templates, automatic export to Google Drive after each monitoring session, Search Console and Google Analytics integration, and white-label branding on the Pro tier. The API, however, appears only in a customer quote about extracting data at high speed — no documentation, no rate limits, no per-endpoint costs — and I found no public information on data-warehouse export or client-access portals. 2 4 7 9 10
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.
3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.
5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
Current-state export is strong — almost any report, all analysed parameters, unlimited CSV, files split automatically past a million URLs — and projects save locally and reopen on another device. But historical export is documented only as a current-versus-previous-check comparison, and I found no public information on bulk export of full multi-year history in open formats or any retention period after cancellation. 2 9 10
The Agency Owner
Export is broad and, for CSV, stated as having no limits, with XLSX files auto-split past a million URLs, XL reports drawn from the database, comparison of current and previous check data, and projects that save and reopen on another machine — my crawl history is not hostage to a browser session. We found no public information on a retention or grace period after cancellation, or on API access sufficient to mirror data continuously, so a planned exit is still unwritten. 2 8 9 10
The Technical SEO
Exports are unmetered and open-format — CSV export with no stated limits, an option to export all analysed columns, and XL reports pulled from the crawl database — and saved projects can be reopened on another device, which matters for a desktop tool whose data lives on the customer's machine. We found no public information on complete historical export beyond one current-versus-previous comparison, or on any retention period after cancellation. 2 8 9 10
The Content Strategist
Crawl results export in bulk to XLSX, CSV and Google Sheets with no limits in CSV, all analyzed parameters exportable, and saved project files can be reopened on another device — real ownership for a desktop product. The multi-year part is thin: the only history handling evidenced is a current-versus-previous comparison export, and we found no public information on complete historical export or retention after cancellation. 2 9 10
The Data Analyst
Being a desktop application helps the exit story: projects reopen on another device, CSV export is stated to have no limits, and database-scale XL reports can be pulled wholesale, so crawl history leaves with the customer rather than dying in a vendor cloud. We found no public information on API-based mirroring of the archive, or on what access to the archive survives cancelling the subscription. 2 8 10
The Skeptic
Getting out looks workable: CSV export carries no limits, XLSX splits automatically past one million URLs, exports can include both current and previous check data, and saved projects reopen on another device. I found no public information on retention after cancellation or a grace period for retrieving an archive, which is the difference between exporting and exiting. 2 8 9 10
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead
None of the captured pages says where the contracting entity, hosting or subprocessors sit — there is nothing to evaluate a European chain against. The only adjacent signals are a Yandex.Metrika integration and a "complete data privacy" claim for the companion backlink product, neither of which documents where account or crawl data is processed. 1 2
The Agency Owner
We found no public information on the vendor's location or contracting entity, hosting, subprocessors, a data-processing agreement, or certification. The only structural comfort is that this is a downloadable desktop application whose projects save locally and whose exports land in the customer's own Google Drive. 2 6 10
The Technical SEO
No sovereignty information is on record for this vendor: we found no public information on hosting location, the contracting entity, a subprocessor list, certification, or a data processing agreement covering the Search Console, Google Analytics and Yandex.Metrika data the crawler ingests. The only data-location facts in evidence are that exports can be written to Google Drive and Google Sheets. 2 9 10
The Content Strategist
We found no public information on where accounts and crawl data are hosted, on the contracting entity, or on any subprocessor. The only data-flow evidence on the pages is automated exports to Google Drive and integrations with Google Analytics, Search Console and Yandex.Metrika, so the scope of site data leaving the customer's own control stays unclear. 2 9 10
The Data Analyst
We found no public information on the contracting entity's location, hosting, subprocessors, certification or a data processing agreement — the captured pages are silent on all of it. Exports land in the customer's own Google Drive and the crawler runs locally, which contains the exposure, but nothing here is evidenced. 5 10
The Skeptic
No sovereignty attributes are on record: I found no public information on the contracting entity's location, where any processing or hosting happens, or a single named subprocessor. The only geographic signal on any captured page is an interface locale choice of Russian or English, and the integrations with Google services are described without any legal basis or data-handling terms. 5 10
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.
5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
No tier price, keyword limit, crawl credit, seat cost or VAT treatment appears on any captured page; a Pro plan is named for white-label reports but unpriced. What is public is a five-day free trial, a free download, and "Save up to 20%. Cancel anytime." — the real annual invoice is not computable from public pages alone. 5 6 7
The Agency Owner
A Pro tier exists — white-label reporting sits behind it — with a five-day free trial and the words "Save up to 20%. Cancel anytime." quoted exactly, but we found no public information on what any tier costs, keyword or crawl limits, extra-seat pricing, minimum term or VAT treatment. A discount headline with no base price is precisely the invoice I cannot compute before rebilling it. 5 6 7
The Technical SEO
We found no public price figures at all: the pages show a free download, a five-day trial that activates on signup, and "Save up to 20%. Cancel anytime." without a single tier, monthly or annual figure. A plan named Pro exists — white label lives there — but we found no public information on its price, keyword or crawl limits, per-seat costs, or VAT treatment, so a real annual invoice cannot be computed from public pages. 5 6 7
The Content Strategist
The public pages give a 5-day free trial, a free download, a Pro plan that carries white-label reporting, and a 'Save up to 20%. Cancel anytime.' discount — and we found no public information on tier prices, keyword or crawl limits, per-seat costs, minimum terms or VAT treatment. From public pages alone the annual invoice is unknowable. 4 6 7
The Data Analyst
The captured pricing facts are a five-day free trial, a free download, and "Save up to 20%. Cancel anytime." — and nothing else. We found no public information on tier prices, plan limits, per-seat or API costs, or VAT treatment, so no invoice is computable from these pages. 4 6 7
The Skeptic
Not one price is published: the pages offer a free download, a five-day trial (seven days without a card for OwlySwitcher), a 'Save up to 20%. Cancel anytime.' banner, and a named Pro tier whose cost never appears. Keyword limits, crawl limits, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment are all things I found no public information on, so the annual invoice is unknowable from public pages. 1 4 6 7
Questions about Netpeak Spider
Is Netpeak Spider European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Netpeak Spider is based.
Where does Netpeak Spider store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
Does Netpeak Spider have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Netpeak Spider?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates SE Ranking (3/5), Semrush (3/5) and SISTRIX (3/5) highest among the other 32 SEO products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is SISTRIX (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Netpeak Spider alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (netpeaksoftware.com, help.netpeaksoftware.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000243610-start-crawling, help.netpeaksoftware.com/en/support/solutions/articles/103000243635-crawling-rules-configuration, netpeaksoftware.com/features/serp-checker, netpeaksoftware.com/features/keyword-rank-checker, netpeaksoftware.com/features/google-index-checker and 4 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 7 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (10)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap help.netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap help.netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap help.netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap help.netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap help.netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap help.netpeaksoftware.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →