SEO
Rank Math
Provenance unknown Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Rank Math · rankmath.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Rank Math at a glance
- Vendor
- Rank Math
- Headquarters
- Incorporated in India source, captured 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Rank Math 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Rank Math is a WordPress SEO plugin whose most consistently strong evidence is pricing transparency, at 5 to 7: every tier priced publicly, renewal prices stated (PRO €5.59 per month billed annually, renewing at €8.99 per month + taxes), and a 30-day money-back guarantee. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 4 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Rank Math is a WordPress SEO plugin whose most consistently strong evidence is pricing transparency, at 5 to 7: every tier priced publicly, renewal prices stated (PRO €5.59 per month billed annually, renewing at €8.99 per month + taxes), and a 30-day money-back guarantee. Reporting and API is the sharpest split, 4 to 7: judges crediting white-labelled email reports and Google Analytics 4 and Search Console import scored 7, while the API — one sentence in the terms, and we found no public information on endpoints, limits or credit costs — pulled lower scores down to 4 and 5. Sovereignty is weakest, 1 to 2: the contracting entity is ONE.COM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED with addresses in India, the EU Representative in Sweden is not the contracting party, and we found no public information on hosting or data residency. Technical audit scores span 2 to 4, keyword and content 2 to 3, and rank and index data 3 to 4; the documented checks are plugin-level, and on the data behind keyword research and backlinks we found no public information.
Speaks for it
- Every paid tier priced publicly with billing period, ex-VAT treatment and exact renewal prices stated, plus a 30-day money-back guarantee.
- White-labelled email reports at 7, 15 or 30 day intervals, Google Analytics 4 and Search Console data import, and client-website counts of 200 and 750 documented.
- Tracked-keyword limits stated per plan — 1,000 on PRO, 20,000 on Business, 75,000 on Agency — with a daily Google data fetch and data preserved without limit on Business.
- Software provided under GNU GPLv3 with source-code access, alongside complete import/export options and a compatible third-party importer for Rank Math field data.
- Contractual right to withdraw within 30 days even after the statutory withdrawal period, with plans cancellable at any time.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scores of 1 to 2: the contracting entity is ONE.COM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED with registered and office addresses in India, the EU Representative in Sweden is not the contracting party, and an Article 28 GDPR data processing agreement is offered only where required.
- We found no public information on hosting, data residency or subprocessors.
- The API appears only as one sentence in the terms, and we found no public information on endpoints, rate limits or credit costs.
- The documented audit tooling is plugin-level — broken link checker, orphan page detector, redirections module, automated sitemaps — and we found no public information on crawl scale, scheduled audits, Core Web Vitals or JavaScript rendering.
- We found no public information on exporting historical rankings or on retention after cancellation, and AI access may be subject to a credit or quota system whose costs are not published, so the annual invoice is not computable end to end.
Best for
- You run WordPress sites and want every plan price, renewal price and VAT treatment published before you commit.
- You manage many client sites and need white-labelled email reports on a 7, 15 or 30 day cycle, with up to 750 client websites on Agency.
- You need rank tracking with stated limits, up to 75,000 tracked keywords on Agency, and a daily Google data fetch on Business.
- You value source-code access under GNU GPLv3 and documented CSV/XML paths for your on-page field data.
Avoid if
- Your compliance review requires a European contracting party — the terms name ONE.COM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED in India as the owner, and the Swedish EU Representative is a representative, not the contracting entity.
- Your developers need a documented API to build on — the captured terms show only a sentence that users may access their data via the API.
- You need site audits at crawl scale — the documented tooling is per-install WordPress checking rather than a crawler with scheduled audits and page limits.
- You are buying primarily for keyword data such as search volume, difficulty or intent — the captured pages document the writing toolkit (40+ AI tools, 125+ templates, 30 languages), and we found no public information on the data layer underneath.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Crawling & technical audit | 1.5 of 5 |
| Keyword research & content guidance | 1.5 of 5 |
| Rank tracking & index quality | 2 of 5 |
| Reporting, integrations & API | 3 of 5 |
| Data portability & exit | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Crawling & technical audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler or audit; the product is keyword, rank or backlink data only.
3 — A site audit that crawls pages and reports broken links, missing tags and redirect problems.
5 — Scheduled site audits with a stated page limit, issues grouped by category and severity with fix hints, and page speed or Core Web Vitals reported.
8 — JavaScript rendering, log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, crawl comparison over time, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
The captured pages document on-site checks — a broken link checker, an orphan page detector, a redirections module, per-post SEO tests that AI can repair, and an indexation status check per post. We found no public information on crawl scale, scheduled audits, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript rendering or severity grouping, so this reads as a WordPress checklist rather than a diagnostic audit my developers could turn into tickets. 1 3 5 7
The Agency Owner
The captured pages show in-plugin checks a real retainer can use — a broken link checker, an orphan page detector, a redirections module, automated sitemaps, and SEO tests the marketing says AI can repair — plus per-post indexing status. We found no public information on scheduled site audits with a stated page limit, Core Web Vitals, or JavaScript rendering, so this reads as solid on-page checking rather than a crawler at scale. 3 5 6
The Technical SEO
The audit surface is plugin-level: a broken link checker, an orphan page detector, a redirections module and SEO tests that AI can repair — which covers the broken-link, missing-tag and redirect tier. We found no public information on JavaScript rendering, log-file or Search Console comparison, Core Web Vitals reporting, scheduled audits with page limits, or regressions detected between crawls. It is a per-install checklist, not a crawl at scale. 1 3 5
The Content Strategist
The captures show genuine on-site tooling — a broken link checker, an orphan page detector, a redirections module, automated sitemaps, a setup wizard applying best-practice checks, and indexation control via the Instant Indexing plugin with post-status checks and post-type exclusions. We found no public information on scheduled audits with page limits, Core Web Vitals, JavaScript rendering or crawl comparison over time, so the evidence reaches issue reporting with strong structured-data support, not diagnosis. 1 3 6 7
The Data Analyst
The captured pages document page-level checks inside WordPress — a broken link checker, an orphan page detector, a redirections module and per-post indexation status — alongside indexability control in the product description. I found no public information on a crawler that schedules audits, states page limits, or reports page speed and Core Web Vitals, so this does not read as a site audit at scale. 1 3 7
The Skeptic
What is documented is plugin-side problem reporting: a broken link checker, an orphan page detector, a redirections module, automated sitemaps, AI-assisted fixing of its SEO tests, and an index-status check per post. We found no public information on crawl limits, audit scheduling, Core Web Vitals, or JavaScript rendering and log-file comparison, so the evidence reaches basic issue reporting and no further. 1 3 5 7
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — No keyword research or content guidance; the product is a crawler or rank tracker only.
3 — Keyword suggestions with search volume, for at least one market.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and search intent for Germany and other markets, SERP features shown per keyword, and on-page or content recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor keyword gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs or a writing assistant scored on entity or topic coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
Keyword research, topic ideas, post outlines and a large AI writing toolkit (over 40 tools, more than 125 templates, 30 languages) are documented, and German-language pages exist for the content product. We found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification or per-keyword SERP features, and nothing establishing German-market keyword data specifically, so the research depth stays at the basic level. 1 3 4 5
The Agency Owner
The content side is well evidenced: keyword research, topic ideas, post outlines, a writing assistant with 40+ tools and 125+ templates across 30 languages. No captured page shows search volume, difficulty, intent classification or SERP features per keyword for Germany or any other market, so the data layer under the writing help stays undocumented. 4 5
The Technical SEO
Content AI carries the weight: 40+ AI tools, 125+ templates, post outlines, long-article drafting in 30 languages, and a keyword research task quoted at one minute of AI time against sixty minutes of human. What the pages do not show is the data underneath — we found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification, SERP features or German-market keyword depth. 4 5
The Content Strategist
Content guidance is deep — keyword research and new topic ideas among the AI tasks, over forty AI tools, over one hundred twenty-five templates, post outlines, bulk title and description generation, and content in thirty languages. But we found no public information on search volume, difficulty, search intent, SERP features, topic clustering or cannibalisation detection, so the keyword-intelligence half of the criterion rests on nothing documented. 3 4 5
The Data Analyst
Content AI is documented as keyword research, topic ideas, post outlines, 40+ AI tools and 125+ templates producing content in 30 languages, with unlimited keyword optimization on the paid plans. The pages give no search volume, difficulty, intent classification or SERP-feature data behind the keyword research, and nothing about German-market keyword data specifically — so the data layer I would actually buy is unproven. 3 4 5
The Skeptic
Keyword research appears as a time-saving claim — 'Keyword Research 1 Minute 60 Minutes' — next to topic ideas, post outlines, 40+ AI tools, 125+ templates and content in 30 languages. We found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification or SERP features, for Germany or any other market, so the data depth behind the feature name cannot be assessed. 3 4 5
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — No rank tracking and no backlink data; the product is an audit or content tool only.
3 — Rank tracking for chosen keywords in a chosen country, or a backlink checker.
5 — Rank tracking with country, device and update frequency selectable or stated (daily or weekly), local results, and a backlink database with referring domains and new and lost links.
8 — Daily rankings across many locations including city level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh frequency published, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
An advanced keyword rank tracker is documented with stated limits per plan (1,000 keywords on PRO, 20,000 on Business, 75,000 on Agency), a daily data fetch and unlimited data preservation on Business, plus an indexing plugin built on the Google Indexing API. We found no public information on country or device granularity, SERP feature attribution, any backlink database, or a ranking methodology I could use to defend figures against Search Console. 3 6 7
The Agency Owner
Rank tracking is evidenced with per-plan keyword counts from 1,000 up to 75,000, a stated daily Google data fetch with data preserved without limit on Business, and Search Console and Analytics import by country. We found no public information on ranking update frequency per keyword, device or city-level results, or any backlink index, and the vendor documents nothing about its data methodology. 3
The Technical SEO
A rank tracker with tiered limits of 1,000 / 20,000 / 75,000 tracked keywords, daily Google data fetch on the Business plan with no stated preservation limit, and an Instant Indexing plugin on the Google Indexing API that checks post indexation status and submits up to 100 URLs per batch. We found no public information on country or device granularity, city-level tracking, SERP feature attribution or any backlink index — the index story is pushing URLs at Google, not the vendor being accountable for their own data. 3 6 7
The Content Strategist
The plan pages publish tracked-keyword limits of 1,000, 20,000 and 75,000, and the Business tier documents a daily Google data fetch, data preserved with no limit, and email reports every 7, 15 or 30 days. We found no public information on country, device or city-level granularity, update-frequency choices, any backlink database, or a ranking methodology. 3 6
The Data Analyst
An advanced keyword rank tracker is documented with per-plan tracked-keyword figures up to 75,000, a stated daily Google data fetch with no-limit data preservation on the Business plan, an AI search traffic tracker, and an instant-indexing plugin using the Google Indexing API. I found no public information on ranking update frequency, location or device granularity, any backlink index, or the vendor's own data methodology. 3 6
The Skeptic
Keyword limits per tier are stated plainly — 1,000 tracked keywords on PRO, 20,000 on Business, 75,000 on Agency — and the Business plan documents a daily Google data fetch with data preserved for 'No Limit' days. We found no public information on ranking refresh frequency, device or city-level granularity, or any backlink index, and a vendor's proprietary data is only accountable where those numbers are published. 3 6 7
Reporting, integrations & API
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — No reports, exports or integrations of any kind; results can only be viewed on screen.
3 — Reports as PDF or CSV export, and a Google Search Console or analytics connection.
5 — Customisable or scheduled reports, Search Console and Google Analytics integration, and an API or a Looker Studio connector documented.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with its limits and credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
White-labelled email reports at a selectable 7, 15 or 30-day frequency, a Google Analytics 4 integration, Search Console data import by country, MCP tools and multi-client management (up to 750 client websites) are documented, and the terms state that users may access their data via API. We found no public information on API endpoints, rate limits or credit costs per endpoint, nor any data-warehouse export, which keeps this below the top tier. 2 3
The Agency Owner
This is the criterion that decides renewals for me, and it holds up: white-labelled email reports on a 7, 15 or 30 day cycle, GA4 and Search Console integration, client-website counts up to 750 on Agency, and an API named in the terms. We found no public information on API rate limits or credit costs per endpoint, nor any warehouse or BigQuery export. 3 2
The Technical SEO
White-label email reports at 7, 15 or 30 day intervals, Search Console and GA4 data import, CSV import and MCP tools cover the reporting side. The API appears only as one sentence in the terms of service stating users may access their data via it — we found no public information on endpoints, rate limits or credit costs. White-label email reports are a genuine agency touch, but this is not a documented platform a team builds on. 2 3
The Content Strategist
White-labelled email reports on a 7, 15 or 30-day cadence, Google Analytics 4 and Search Console data import, MCP tools, and client-website counts of 200 and 750 give agencies documented reporting and multi-client management. The API appears only as a statement in the terms; we found no public information on endpoints, limits or credit costs, nor on BigQuery or data-warehouse export. 2 3
The Data Analyst
White-label email reports at 7, 15 or 30 day intervals, Google Analytics 4 and Search Console connections, CSV import, MCP tools and multi-client management up to 750 client websites are all documented. The terms state users may access their data via an API, but no API documentation, rate limits or credit costs per endpoint appear on the captured pages — for my money that is the difference between a dashboard and a data source. 2 3
The Skeptic
Scheduled, white-labelled email reports at 7, 15 or 30 day intervals, Google Analytics 4 and Search Console data import, CSV import/export and MCP tools are all documented. The API exists only as a sentence in the terms — 'Users may access their data relating to this Website via the Application Program Interface (API)' — with no published endpoints, limits or credit costs, which is precisely the disclosure I look for before a team builds on a tool. 2 3
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — The vendor states that data cannot be exported at all.
3 — CSV or Excel export of the current reports and keyword lists.
5 — Export of rankings, keywords and audit results including historical data, through the interface or an API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
Export is genuinely addressed: complete import/export options, CSV import of SEO data, and unlimited CSV/XML import-export of Rank Math field data through a compatible importer with an explicit migrate-to-a-new-website use case, and the software itself is provided under GNU GPLv3 with source code access. We found no public information on exporting historical ranking data or on any retention period after cancellation, which is the part a multi-year subscription actually accumulates. 2 3 9
The Agency Owner
Complete import/export options and CSV import of SEO data are stated, a compatible third-party plugin moves Rank Math field data out as CSV or XML with unlimited imports and exports, and the terms promise cooperation to withdraw data when the service ends. We found no public information on exporting accumulated ranking history in open formats or on any retention period after cancellation, which is what I would actually need on day one of an exit. 3 9 2
The Technical SEO
Complete import/export options, CSV SEO data import and a third-party WordPress importer moving Rank Math field data as CSV/XML with unlimited import/export give settings and on-page data a way out, and the GPLv3 licence hands over the plugin's source code. We found no public information on exporting historical rank tracker data after cancellation; the terms' promise to cooperate in withdrawing personal data on termination is a legal obligation, not an archive. 2 3 9
The Content Strategist
Export is documented from several directions — complete import/export options and CSV import in the plugin, a compatible importer advertising unlimited Rank Math field-data export to CSV and XML for migrations, GPLv3 source-code access, and terms-level cooperation to withdraw data on termination. We found no public information on a retention period after cancellation or on full historical ranking export. 2 3 9
The Data Analyst
Complete import/export options and CSV import are documented, and a third-party WordPress importer advertises unlimited CSV/XML export of Rank Math field data with scheduling and bulk updates. I found no public information on exporting ranking or crawl history on exit — the terms commit only to cooperating on withdrawal of personal data after termination — so the multi-year archive question is unanswered. 2 3 9
The Skeptic
Export is addressed through 'Complete Import/Export Options', SEO data via CSV, and a compatible third-party CSV/XML importer described as unlimited for import and export of Rank Math field data. We found no public information on exporting historical rankings or audit results, or on any retention period after cancellation; the terms promise only cooperation to withdraw personal data on termination. 2 3 9
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities. Dimensions the sources do not establish are unknown, not non-EU.
0 — Proven non-EU: a non-EU vendor and contracting entity with hosting stated outside the EU.
3 — One European element proven — an EU contracting entity or EU hosting stated — with the rest of the chain undocumented.
5 — An EU contracting entity and EU hosting both stated, and a data processing agreement offered.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, a subprocessor list published with locations, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead
The terms name One.com India Private Limited, with registered and office addresses in India, as the owner, while an EU Representative in Sweden (One.com Group AB, Malmö) is appointed separately and is not the contracting side. We found no public information on hosting location or data residency; the only European hooks are that representative and a stated commitment to an Article 28 GDPR data processing agreement where required. 2
The Agency Owner
The contracting entity is documented as Indian — ONE.COM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED of Gurgaon — while the Swedish EU representative named in the terms is explicitly a representative, not the contracting party. Data residency and hosting options are unknown on the captured pages, and we found no public information establishing EU hosting; a data processing agreement under Article 28 GDPR is referenced in the terms, but that alone gives me no European element I can put in a client's compliance file. 2
The Technical SEO
The contracting entity is One.com India Private Limited with registered addresses in India, and the terms appoint an EU representative in Sweden who is not the contracting entity. Data residency, hosting infrastructure and subprocessor locations are unknown from the captured pages, and the Article 28 processing-agreement clause is conditional — nothing European is proven in the chain that matters. 2
The Content Strategist
The contracting entity is One.com India Private Limited with addresses in Gurgaon and Delhi; an EU representative in Sweden is named in the terms, but it is not the contracting entity, and a data processing agreement under Article 28 is promised only where required. Hosting and data residency are not established on the captured pages, so no European element in the chain is documented. 2
The Data Analyst
The terms name One.com India Private Limited with registered and office addresses in India as the owner entity, and I found no public information on where account or crawl data is hosted. The only European elements evidenced are a data processing agreement under Article 28 GDPR offered where required and an EU representative in Sweden named in the terms — neither is the contracting entity. 2
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is proven non-EU: ONE.COM INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, with both office and registered addresses in India. Hosting, data residency and subprocessors are unknown, and the EU Representative named in the terms (One.com Group AB, Malmö) is a representative rather than the contracting party; a data processing agreement under Article 28 GDPR is offered only 'where required'. 2
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A public "from" price or a single tier with its price.
5 — Prices per tier public with the billing period and the main limits (keywords tracked, pages crawled, projects or users) stated.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
All three tiers are priced publicly with annual billing figures, ex-VAT treatment, stated renewal prices ("Renews at €64.99 per month + taxes") and the main limits — tracked keywords and client websites — per plan, alongside a 30-day money-back guarantee and cancel-anytime statement. We found no public information on API credit costs, overage rates or per-seat pricing, and VAT display varies by section, so the annual invoice is computable only for the main plan limits. 2 3 5
The Agency Owner
All three paid tiers are publicly priced with annual billing, renewal at €8.99, €27.99 and €64.99 per month plus taxes, ex-VAT treatment, keyword limits and client-website counts — enough for me to compute a rebill without a sales call, and cancellation is possible at any time with a 30-day money-back guarantee. What holds it back: AI features run on a credit or quota system whose cost we found no public information on, Content AI is a separate €71.88 yearly line, and the terms themselves say prices display sometimes inclusive and sometimes exclusive of taxes depending on the section. 3 5 2
The Technical SEO
All three paid tiers are priced publicly with billing period, ex-VAT treatment, renewal price, and tracked-keyword and client-website limits — PRO at € 5.59 / month billed annually renewing at €8.99 per month + taxes, Business and Agency likewise. The captured pages give different signals on tax display, and we found no public information on per-seat costs, crawl or API limits, or overage rates — though stating the renewal price up front is more than most in this category do. 2 3 5
The Content Strategist
Every tier is priced publicly with billing period, renewal price and VAT treatment stated — PRO at €5.59, Business at €17.59 and Agency at €38.59 per month billed annually, each renewing at the regular monthly price plus taxes — alongside keyword limits, client-website counts, a Content AI add-on at €71.88 per year, and a stated 30-day refund right. We found no public information on API or AI credit costs, overage rates or per-seat pricing, and the terms state prices display either exclusive or inclusive of taxes depending on the section. 2 3 5
The Data Analyst
Every tier is publicly priced with its billing period, keyword limits and client-website counts, renewal prices quoted exactly — PRO renews at €8.99 per month + taxes, Business at €27.99 per month + taxes, Agency at €64.99 per month + taxes — with prices stated exclusive of taxes and a 30-day money-back guarantee. The annual invoice is still not computable end to end: AI features are described as possibly subject to a credit or quota system with no credit costs published, and no overage or per-seat rates appear. 2 3 5
The Skeptic
Prices are public per tier with billing period, VAT treatment ('Billed annually (ex VAT)', 'Prices are exclusive of taxes. Last updated on Jun 3, 2026.'), stated renewal prices ('Renews at €8.99 per month + taxes') and the main limits: tracked keywords of 1,000, 20,000 and 75,000 and client websites of 200 and 750. The annual invoice stays uncomputable because we found no public information on overage rates, per-seat costs or AI credit prices — the terms say only that AI access 'may be subject to' 'a credit or quota system' — and the terms themselves state that prices display 'either exclusive or inclusive' of taxes depending on the section. 2 3 5
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in IN ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 2 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Rank Math
Is Rank Math European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Rank Math is based. Its vendor, Rank Math, is incorporated in India, per the vendor’s page captured 3 Nov 2026.
Where does Rank Math store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
Does Rank Math have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Rank Math?
As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates SE Ranking (3.5/5), SISTRIX (3/5) and Semrush (3/5) highest among the other 37 SEO products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is SISTRIX (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Rank Math alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 3 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Open source, Hosting options. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Only a company name and office address in India are given, with no company register entry; the Terms separately appoint an EU Representative in Sweden (One.com Group AB, Malmö), which is not the contracting entity.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 5 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (9)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Terms of service — found from the homepage rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Self-hosting / on-premises installation docs — found from the homepage rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap rankmath.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →