Crawling & technical audit
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler or audit; the product is keyword, rank or backlink data only.
3 — A site audit that crawls pages and reports broken links, missing tags and redirect problems.
5 — Scheduled site audits with a stated page limit, issues grouped by category and severity with fix hints, and page speed or Core Web Vitals reported.
8 — JavaScript rendering, log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, crawl comparison over time, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The Content Strategist
The documented audit has a stated default of 100 pages with scheduling, severity tiers from Errors down to Notices, a JavaScript rendering toggle that is off by default, indexable versus non-indexable tabs, sitemap cross-checks, and pre-written auto-fixes sorted by impact. It stops short of the diagnostic tier: we found no public information on Core Web Vitals or page speed reporting, log files, Search Console comparison, structured-data validation, or crawl-budget analysis. 1 3 4