Stable & Equestrian Management
DigiStable
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Hof Ohana · www.digistable.de
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
DigiStable at a glance
- Vendor
- Hof Ohana
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates DigiStable 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. DigiStable, from Hof Ohana in Bargteheide, Germany, is a smartphone-first, modular stable management app with prepaid credit for extra services. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
DigiStable, from Hof Ohana in Bargteheide, Germany, is a smartphone-first, modular stable management app with prepaid credit for extra services. Its strongest scoring is on horse care records and the boarder portal. The terms name feeding, vaccination and farrier appointments, medication, observations and vet reports kept per horse by staff and boarders, with photo upload; boarders hold their own accounts, book extra services, receive email and push notifications, and can opt out of publicity photos. The weak spots are staff and operations, where we found no public information on tasks, feeding rounds, shift planning or time recording, and facilities and lessons, where the documented functions are gate opening and horse walker or solarium activation via browser location. Boarding and billing scored 2-3: extra-service booking is evidenced, invoicing and payment collection are not. Sovereignty scored 3-4: the imprint names a sole trader at a Bargteheide yard, and we found no public information on hosting location or the providers behind push, email and payments. No prices appear on the captured pages.
Speaks for it
- Per-horse care records are named in the terms — feeding, vaccination and farrier appointments, medication, observations and vet reports, with photo upload for documentation.
- Boarders hold their own accounts, book extra services, and receive email and push notifications about appointments and emergencies.
- Boarders can object at any time to publication of their horse's photos.
- The only individually named external service, Nominatim of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, is sent just a postcode and country restriction.
- Presence verification works via manually released geolocation, with no persistent tracking and no GPS coordinates stored.
Held against it
- Boarding and billing scored 2-3; we found no public information on invoices generated in the system, SEPA mandates, VAT treatment or export to accounting.
- Staff and operations scored 1-3; we found no public information on task assignment, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, or time recording.
- Facilities and lessons scored 2-3; beyond gate opening and horse walker or solarium activation, we found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons, school horses or course registration.
- We found no public information on due-date reminders, on who administered which medication, or on exporting a horse's file when it leaves the stable.
- We found no public information on whether each owner's view is scoped to their own horse's records and bills.
Best for
- You run a boarding yard and want boarders themselves maintaining feeding, medication and observation records, with photo documentation.
- You want a smartphone channel to boarders for extra-service booking and appointment and emergency notifications.
- You already run invoicing, staff planning and scheduling elsewhere and want a care-record and communication layer rather than a full business system.
- You want presence on the yard verifiable through opt-in, manually released location without persistent tracking.
Avoid if
- You need recurring invoices, SEPA collection, VAT handling and an accounting export inside the system — boarding and billing scored 2-3, with extra-service booking the only evidenced piece.
- Your yard runs on recurring tasks, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning and staff time records — staff and operations scored 1-3 and we found no public information on any of these.
- You teach or rent facilities and need arena slots, school horses and course registration — the captured pages show gate opening and horse walker or solarium activation, and we found no public information on booking or lessons.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 1.5 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 1 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 1 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Extra services can be booked through the platform and the privacy policy treats billing data as existing, with retention of six to ten years per commercial and tax law — more than a paper notebook. But we found no public information on monthly invoices generated from contracts, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment per service, or an export to the accountant, which are exactly the pieces that decide whether my blanket changes actually get collected. 2 3
The Stable Manager
The terms put the booking of extra services in the platform, and the privacy policy names a billing service provider among the recipients and refers to retention periods for billing data. We found no public information on board contracts per box, recurring invoices generated and sent from the system, SEPA mandates, VAT treatment or an export to the accountant, so I cannot credit more than a service list with booking. 2 3
The Boarder
Booking of extra services is part of the platform's stated purpose, and the privacy policy speaks of accounting data under the six-to-ten-year commercial retention rules and names a billing service provider among data recipients. I found no public information on board contracts per box, invoices generated from logged services, payment status, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment or an export to an accountant — so I cannot see how the three extra wraps on my bill would be traceable to the person who logged them. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
The terms name booking of extra services as one of the platform's purposes, and the privacy policy names a billing service provider among outside recipients of data. We found no public information on board contracts, invoices generated in the system, payment status, SEPA mandates, VAT treatment or an export to the accountant — the whole money side my course payments would depend on is unproven. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
The terms position the platform for booking extra services and organising appointments, and the privacy policy names an external billing service provider among the data recipients. We found no public information on board contracts, recurring invoices, SEPA mandates, VAT rates per service type, credit notes or an export to DATEV — so the money side is not evidenced as being run in the system. 2 3
The Skeptic
Boarders book extra services in the app and the vendor describes prepaid credit for them, while the privacy policy speaks of retention duties for billing data and names a billing service provider among the recipients of data. We found no public information on board contracts per box, invoices generated and sent from the system, SEPA mandates, VAT treatment, or an export to an accounting tool — the chain from a logged service to a collected payment stays invisible to a buyer. 2 3
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The captured pages name feeding plans, box, paddock and turnout, vaccination and farrier dates, medication, vet reports and observations kept in the app by staff and boarders, with photos for documentation and notifications for appointments — that reads as structured plans and a health trail per horse rather than a whiteboard. We found no public information on vaccination schedules to the association calendar, who administered what and when, or an export of the horse's file when it leaves my yard. 2 3
The Stable Manager
The per-horse record is real: feeding, vaccination and farrier dates, medication, vet reports and observations are maintained in the app by staff and boarders, with box, paddock, turnout and feeding plans named as data categories and photos for documentation. We found no public information on FN/LPO vaccination schedules, a medication log showing who administered what, or a documented export when the horse leaves, which is what I would need for more. 2 3
The Boarder
Feeding, vaccination and farrier appointments, medication, vet reports, turnout and observations are all named as horse data maintained in the app by staff and boarders, with photos for injuries and abnormalities — a structured record rather than a whiteboard. I found no public information on feeding plans shown by feeding round, reminders for due vaccinations or farrier work, worming, or a documented export of the whole file when my mare changes stables. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
The app is confirmed to keep per-horse feeding plans, box, paddock and turnout details, vaccination and farrier appointments, medication, vet reports and photos of injuries — a genuine record backbone for my school horses. We found no public information on due-date reminders, doses recorded with who administered them, or a documented export of the horse's file when it leaves. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
Per-horse documentation of feeding, vaccination and farrier appointments, medication, observations and vet reports is stated in the terms, with photo upload for injuries and identification. We found no public information on feeding plans shown by round, reminders against a vaccination schedule, exportable history, or dose and administrator on medication — the trail a vet or inspector would ask for. 2 3
The Skeptic
The terms name feeding, vaccination and farrier appointments, medication and observations as what staff and boarders keep per horse, and the privacy policy lists health data — vaccinations, treatments, medication, vet reports — plus box, paddock, turnout and feeding plans, with photos for documentation. We found no public information on reminders, due-date vaccination schedules, a medication log with dose and who administered it, or an export of the file when the horse leaves, so this reads as named categories rather than a record built to survive scrutiny. 2 3
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The only operations facts I can hang anything on: presence on the yard can be verified through a manual, purpose-stated location release with no stored GPS data, and staff are named as users who maintain the horse records. We found no public information on recurring tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, boarder duty rotas, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. 3 2
The Stable Manager
Staff and boarders both work in the app, and presence on the yard can be verified through geolocation released manually for that purpose, with no persistent GPS tracking — that part is documented the way I want it. We found no public information on task assignment, recurring rounds, shift and holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. 2 3
The Boarder
The terms say staff and boarders together maintain horse information in the app, and the privacy policy describes manually released location data for verifying presence on the yard, with no persistent tracking and no GPS coordinates stored. I found no public information on task assignment and completion, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees, so the daily running of the yard is essentially unevidenced. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
Staff and boarders both maintain horse information in the app, appointments are organised there, and presence on the yard can be verified through location after manual release for a stated purpose — the one bright spot. We found no public information on recurring tasks with assignment, shift and holiday planning, or time records for employees and mini-jobbers. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
The operational evidence I could find is presence verification on the yard via manually released geolocation with no persistent GPS storage — one location feature properly documented as opt-in with its purpose stated — alongside appointment and operations notifications. We found no public information on task and feeding-round assignment, shift and holiday planning, or time records that would survive a minimum-wage audit. 2 3
The Skeptic
The only visible staff role is that employees maintain horse information alongside boarders; we found no public information on tasks and feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, or time recording. Presence verification by geolocation is at least described as manual release with no persistent tracking or storage of coordinates, but nothing ties it to working-time documentation. 2 3
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Boarders are clearly app users — they help maintain their horse's information, the platform's stated purpose includes booking extra services, they receive email and push notifications about appointments and emergencies, and they can object to photos of their horse being published. But we found no public information on whether an owner sees only their own horse's records and charges, on co-owners and riding shares being scoped separately, or on instructions being acknowledged by the staff member who reads them. 2 3
The Stable Manager
Boarders clearly log in: they maintain their horse's information, book extra services, receive email and push about appointments and emergencies, and can object to publicity photos, and the privacy policy names the full GDPR rights set including access and portability. We found no public information on whether owners see their invoices, or on how each owner's view is kept separate from other boarders, so I stop short of a full portal mark. 2 3
The Boarder
Boarders clearly get their own login — sharing credentials is prohibited — and they maintain their horse's feeding, medication and observations in the app, book extra services, and receive email and push notifications about appointments, emergencies and organisational changes. I found no public information on per-owner scoping of records and bills, invoices shown to the owner, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, or separate access for riding partners — nothing tells me the other boarders cannot open my mare's file. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
Boarders log in and maintain their own horse's information themselves, can book extra services, receive email and push notifications for appointments and emergencies, and can opt out of publicity use of photos. We found no public information on owners seeing their invoices or billed services, separate scoping for co-owners and ride shares, or request statuses. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
Boarders evidently log into the app: the terms have them maintaining their horse's information alongside staff, booking extra services, receiving email and push notices, and holding a photo-publicity opt-out. We found no public information on per-owner scoping of records and bills, invoice visibility, or instructions to the stable being acknowledged. 2 3
The Skeptic
Boarders hold their own accounts, keep their horse's information current, book extra services and receive email and push notifications, and can object to publication of their horse's photos. We found no public information on per-owner scoping of records and bills, on an owner's view of their invoices, or on instructions to the stable being acknowledged by staff; the data-subject rights in the privacy policy are the legal floor, not a product. 2 3
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Local stable functions are described — gate opening and activating the horse walker or solarium via the phone's location — which points at equipment tied to presence on the yard. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons with riders and school horses, or courses and events with registration and payment. 3 2
The Stable Manager
Local stable functions such as gate opening and the activation of the horse walker (Führanlage) and solarium run through the app with the browser location — a genuine device touchpoint at the barn. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons with school horses, or courses and clinics with registration and payment. 3
The Boarder
The only facility-related evidence is location-based unlocking of the gate, the horse walker or the solarium at the user's request. I found no public information on arena or equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons and school horses, courses with registration, or any link between facility use and billing — switching a solarium on is not a booking system. 3
The Riding-School Lead
The pages show gate opening and activation of the horse walker or solarium via browser location, and the terms name appointment organisation as a purpose. We found no public information on arena and indoor-school slots with capacity rules, lessons with school horses, course registration and payment, or equipment use linked to billing or credit — the heart of my teaching week is invisible in public material. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
The named local functions are gate opening and activation of a walker and solarium via the browser's location, plus a farrier search within 100 km of a preset postcode. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with rules, lessons and school horses, courses with registration, or any link between facility use and billing. 2 3
The Skeptic
On request the app uses the browser's location for local yard functions such as opening the gate or activating the horse walker and solarium, and the terms speak generally of organising appointments. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with slots and rules, lessons and school horses, courses with registration and payment, or any link between facility use and billing. 2 3
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
A privacy policy covers the app, names the OpenStreetMap Nominatim service for the radius search and states that only postcode and country are sent to it, and lists vets in emergencies, billing service providers and the hosting provider as recipient categories. But we found no public information on hosting location, the contracting entity's jurisdiction, ownership, or the named processors behind push notifications, payments and email, so I cannot tell where my boarders', staff and horses' data actually sit. 3
The Stable Manager
A privacy policy covering the app exists, the imprint names a sole trader in Bargteheide, Germany, as provider, and the OpenStreetMap geocoding service is disclosed down to what data is sent. But the hosting location is not stated, and we found no public information naming the providers behind hosting, push, email or payments beyond a general mention of a hosting provider, so the chain is not evidenced end to end. 1 3
The Boarder
The legal notice names a German sole trader in Bargteheide as provider, and the privacy policy is unusually concrete — GDPR rights listed, only the postcode sent to the map service, no stored GPS coordinates. The hosting location is not stated, the hosting provider appears only as an unnamed category of recipient, and I found no public information on the processors behind push, email or payments, on ownership, or on a data processing agreement for boarder data. 1 3
The Riding-School Lead
A detailed privacy policy covers the app, and one external service is named — the OpenStreetMap Foundation's Nominatim for place lookups — with a clear statement that only postcode and country restriction are sent. Hosting location, the contracting entity's jurisdiction and the processors behind push, email and payments are unstated or unnamed in the captured pages, so the chain cannot be followed end to end. 1 3
The Tax Adviser
The imprint points to a German sole trader in Bargteheide, and the privacy policy documents one subprocessor in detail — the Nominatim service of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, sent only a postcode and country restriction — while hosting and billing providers are named only generically. We found no public information on hosting location, the entity's jurisdiction, a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data, or any security or certification statement, so the chain beyond the map lookup stays dark. 1 3
The Skeptic
The imprint names a sole trader at a Bargteheide yard as provider and the privacy policy covers the app's data flows, but we found no public information on hosting location, ownership, the hosting provider's name, or the processors behind push notifications, payment and app-store distribution; the one named external service is Nominatim of the OpenStreetMap Foundation, sent only postcode and country. A riding stable rather than a software company as the contracting entity for horse and health records is precisely the arrangement that should make a buyer ask where the data sits and who holds it if the yard changes hands. 1 3
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Across the captured legal pages there is no price, tier, per-box, per-horse or module figure anywhere — nothing a stable owner could compute a year's cost from. We found no public information on setup fees, minimum term, or what happens to the data on cancellation, so every yard would start from a sales conversation. 1 2
The Stable Manager
The captured pages are the imprint, the terms and the privacy policy, and we found no public information on prices per box, horse or module, setup fees, minimum term, or what happens to the data on cancellation. A stable owner cannot begin to compute an annual cost from what is published here. 1 2
The Boarder
The pages captured are the legal notice, the terms and the privacy policy, and I found no public pricing information on any of them. I found no public information on prices per stable, box, horse or module, on setup fees, minimum term, or what happens to boarder and horse data on cancellation, so a stable owner cannot compute an annual cost from these pages. 2
The Riding-School Lead
In the legal notice, terms and privacy policy we found no public prices at all — nothing per horse or per module, no setup fees, no minimum term. A stable owner cannot compute any annual cost from public material; every figure would be a conversation with the provider. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
The captured legal notice, terms and privacy policy show no prices at all — we found no public information on per-box or module pricing, setup fees, minimum term, VAT treatment, or data return on cancellation. No stable owner could compute an annual cost from these pages. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
We found no public information on what a stable pays: not a per-box, per-horse or module price, not a setup fee or minimum term, and no VAT treatment or cancellation and data-return terms. An owner cannot compute even an approximate annual cost from anything published. 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about DigiStable
Is DigiStable European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies DigiStable as EU-Made.
Where does DigiStable store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
Does DigiStable have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to DigiStable?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: DigiStable alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (digistable.de/pages/agb/impressum.php, digistable.de/pages/agb/agb.php, digistable.de/pages/agb/datenschutz.php). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (3)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Legal notice www.digistable.de Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Terms of service www.digistable.de Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy www.digistable.de Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →