Stable & Equestrian Management
Equimondo
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by EQUIMONDO SARL · equimondo.fr
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Equimondo at a glance
- Vendor
- EQUIMONDO SARL
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Equimondo 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Equimondo is a stable and equestrian management product aimed at French riding centres, and the scoring favours its money side: boarding and billing is the strongest criterion at 7-8, with monthly pensions and supplements invoicing, debiting and reconciling themselves, dunning, e-invoices in Factur-X, UBL and CII, an accounting export, and eIDAS-qualified e-signed pension contracts. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Equimondo is a stable and equestrian management product aimed at French riding centres, and the scoring favours its money side: boarding and billing is the strongest criterion at 7-8, with monthly pensions and supplements invoicing, debiting and reconciling themselves, dunning, e-invoices in Factur-X, UBL and CII, an accounting export, and eIDAS-qualified e-signed pension contracts. Facilities and lessons at 6-7 and sovereignty at 6-7 follow, the latter on hosting by OVH with servers and backups in France, processing stated to stay within the EU, and named providers Yousign and Mistral AI. The weakest criterion is staff and operations at 0-4, also the one flagged disagreement: the boarder's 4 credits automatic care reminders and a planning module for bookings, while the stable manager's 0 records no public information on task assignment, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, or time recording. Horse care records at 5-6, the owner portal at 4-6 and pricing transparency at 5-6 sit mid-table; beyond "Dès 19 € HT/mois" and the free Découverte tier, a real annual cost is not computable from the pages.
Speaks for it
- Boarding and billing scored 7-8: monthly pensions and supplements invoice, debit and reconcile themselves, with dunning, accounting export, cash book and eIDAS-qualified e-signed pension contracts.
- Facilities and lessons scored 6-7: around-the-clock online booking with waiting lists, lesson cards and packages billed automatically, and commission-free guest-horse hosting.
- Horse care records scored 5-6: care, shoeing, deworming, vaccinations, teeth and feeding tracked per horse with automatic reminders, with identification from the IFCE SIRE file.
- Sovereignty scored 6-7: OVH hosting with servers and backups in France, personal data stated to be hosted and processed within the EU, and named providers Yousign and Mistral AI.
- Pricing transparency scored 5-6: horse-related features free, money-related features paid from "Dès 19 € HT/mois", unlimited riders, horses and users, and free data export at any time.
Held against it
- Staff and operations scored 0-4, with no public information on task assignment, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers.
- Boarder portal scored 4-6: the portal is named, with no public information on what an owner sees of their horse's records and invoices.
- Horse care records stop short of audit grade, with no public information on a medication log naming dose, date and administrator, or on changes dated and attributed.
- A real annual cost is not computable from the pages, with no public information on the tier ladder, setup fees or minimum term.
- No public information on the processors behind payment and push notifications, on a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or on a security certification, and the contracting entity's jurisdiction was not confirmed on the captured pages.
Best for
- You run a boarding or livery yard and want monthly invoicing, direct debit, dunning and e-signature handled automatically — the bench's strongest criterion, at 7-8.
- You run a teaching yard and want online bookings, waiting lists and lesson packages billed through the same system, with per-rider progress and FFE Galops quizzes; facilities and lessons scored 6-7.
- You want a named French and EU chain — OVH hosting with servers and backups in France, processing stated to stay within the EU, Yousign signature, Mistral AI assistant; sovereignty scored 6-7.
- You want to start on the free side of the rule — horses, riders and users unlimited, care and planning free — before paying for money features from "Dès 19 € HT/mois".
Avoid if
- Your staff's day must live inside the system — tasks assigned to named people, feeding rounds, rotas, time recording — where the bench scored lowest, at 0-4.
- You must know your real annual cost before committing; the pages publish a from-price and one named free tier, and the annual cost is not computable from them.
- You need care records at audit grade — a medication log naming who administered what dose, changes dated and attributed — before trusting the file in front of the vet; horse care records scored 5-6.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 4 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 3 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 1 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2.5 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
This is close to what I bleed money for: "Chaque début de mois, les pensions se facturent, se prélèvent et se pointent toutes seules, suppléments compris", with SEPA direct debit, dunning, e-invoice formats Factur-X/UBL/CII, e-signed pension contracts and an accounting export with a cash book. It falls short of full discharge though: the accounting export names no tool, and we found no public information on VAT rates configurable per service type, credit notes, or several payers per horse such as a Reitbeteiligung. 2 3 4 6
The Stable Manager
Monthly pensions and supplements invoice and collect themselves, with direct debits, dunning, accounting export and e-invoices in Factur-X, UBL and CII, plus eIDAS-qualified electronic signature on pension contracts — that is the money side largely discharged in the system. I found no public information on credit notes, VAT rates configurable per service, export to a named accounting tool, prepaid balances or several payers per horse, so I stop short of the top band. 2 3 4 6
The Boarder
Every month the pensions invoice themselves, get direct-debited and reconciled automatically with supplements included, and boarding contracts are signed electronically through a French eIDAS-qualified provider — the automation I want behind my monthly bill. Dunning, card and SEPA payment, prices shown ex-VAT in Factur-X, UBL and CII formats, and accounting exports are all stated. We found no public information on credit notes, prepaid balances with warnings, or a charge being traceable to the staff member who logged it. 2 3 4 6
The Riding-School Lead
Pensions and supplements invoice and collect themselves each month, with direct debits, dunning, accounting exports and invoices in Factur-X, UBL and CII at prices shown excluding VAT — that is the money side genuinely run from the system. I found no public information on credit notes, VAT rates configurable per service type, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, or an export to a named accounting tool, so it stops short of the top marks. 2 3 4 6
The Tax Adviser
Board bills and collects itself monthly with supplements included, by direct debit and online payment, with dunning, invoices in Factur-X, UBL and CII, an accounting export, a cash book and electronically signed pension contracts — that is a billing engine, not a notes app. We found no public information on VAT rates configured per service type, credit notes, a named accounting tool behind the export, or several payers per horse, so I stop at the automated end rather than the fully discharged one. 2 3 4 6
The Skeptic
This side is unusually concrete: board invoices and collection including supplements run automatically each month, with direct debit, dunning, electronic-invoice formats (Factur-X, UBL, CII), accounting export and a cash book, and electronically signed pension contracts. What keeps it down is the detail a tax adviser asks for — we found no public information on VAT rates per service type, credit notes or a named accounting tool behind the export, and nothing on prepaid balances or shared payers per horse. 2 3 4 6
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Vaccines, worming, shoeing, teeth and feeding are "tracé, rappelé et partagé avec les bonnes personnes", horse identification pulls from the IFCE SIRE file, and the client can export all data free at any time in reusable formats. We found no public information on a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, on blanket or turnout instructions visible to whoever does the round, or on a per-horse file handed over in a documented export format when the horse leaves. 2 3 6
The Stable Manager
Vaccines, worming, shoeing, teeth and feeding are described as tracked per horse with automatic reminders, horse identification comes from the IFCE SIRE file, and all data exports free at any time in reusable formats. I found no public information on a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, feeding plans laid out per round for the night shift, or vet and farrier entries by external professionals — those are what I need before I trust the file in front of the vet. 2 3 6
The Boarder
Care, shoeing, deworming, teeth, vaccinations and feeding are tracked and reminded automatically, and sharing is said to go to "the right people" — so the farrier work I want to see on my mare is recorded somewhere structured. Horse identification comes from the IFCE SIRE file, and the stable can export its data free at any time in reusable formats. We found no public information on a medication log with dose and who administered it, on owner turnout and blanket instructions, or on every change being attributed and dated. 2 3 6
The Riding-School Lead
Care, shoeing, worming, teeth, vaccinations and feeding are tracked per horse with automatic reminders and shared with the right people, and horse identification comes from the IFCE SIRE file, with free full data export at any time. I found no public information on a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, vaccination due dates against the federation schedule, or a documented export format for a horse's complete file. 2 3 6
The Tax Adviser
Vaccines, worming, farrier, teeth and feeding are traced with automatic reminders, and horse identities come from the IFCE SIRE file, which is proper structured master data rather than free text. We found no public information on a medication log naming who administered what dose, on changes attributed and dated, or on handing the complete file to a new stable as a document, so the record sits between structured care planning and audit grade. 2 3 6
The Skeptic
Care, shoeing, deworming, vaccinations, teeth and feeding are tracked with automatic reminders and shared with the right people, and identification comes from the IFCE SIRE file, which clears the structured-record bar. But we found no public information on a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, on attributed and dated changes, or on a per-horse file handed to a new stable in a documented format; the free export in reusable formats is described for the client's data as a whole. 2 3 6
Staff, rotas & daily operations
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The planning module organises bookings and activities with unlimited users, but that is the riding-school day, not the yard's day. We found no public information on recurring tasks and feeding rounds assigned to grooms, completion ticked on the phone, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, so as published the staff side runs outside what the vendor shows. 3 4
The Stable Manager
Everything captured is bookings, planning, teaching and money; we found no public information on tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, or boarder duty rotas. On the published scale that reads as the day still being organised outside the system. 3 4
The Boarder
Scheduled care work carries automatic reminders and the planning module handles bookings and reservations, which covers part of the daily round. But we found no public information on tasks assigned to named people with completion ticked on the phone, on shift or holiday planning, or on time recording for employees. Nothing in the captured pages evidences boarder duty rotas, offline use, or an audit trail answering who fed or turned out which horse. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
We found no public information on tasks, feeding-round assignment, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. The only fragments are unlimited users and care records shared with the right people, which is permissioning rather than daily yard operations. 3 4
The Tax Adviser
Nothing here I could run a payroll or a minimum-wage check from: we found no public information on task assignment, rotas, holiday planning or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. The only operational features evidenced are automatic care reminders and a planning module that serves bookings and lessons, not who did which work on the yard. 2 3
The Skeptic
We found no public information on task assignment to people, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers; the planning features shown are online bookings and registrations, not who works when. Unlimited users are advertised, but no roles, no completion history per task and no record of who did what are described anywhere I can see. 3 4
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
An owner portal is named alongside the automated pensions, with online booking 24/7 "sans appel ni message", online registrations and re-registrations, and care records shared with the right people. We found no public information on separate scoping for co-owners or part-boarders, push notifications for due dates and charges, or acknowledgement when a staff member reads an instruction. 3 4
The Stable Manager
An owner portal is named alongside automated pensions, care records are shared with the right people, and clients book online around the clock with registrations and re-registrations taken online. I found no public information on owners seeing their own horse's released records and invoices, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, or per-owner data scoping, so this sits between a yard-wide feed and a real portal. 3 4 7
The Boarder
An owner portal is named alongside the automated pension billing, horse files are shared only with "the right people", and reservations run online around the clock without a call or a message — the bones of what a working owner needs. The privacy policy covers the app and states data is never sold, and the AI functions run on a French provider without training on submitted content. We found no public information on owners sending turnout instructions, on staff acknowledging them, on co-owners or riding partners scoped separately, or on owner-side export and deletion. 3 7
The Riding-School Lead
The pension description names an owner portal and riders book online around the clock without calls or messages, with a privacy policy covering how their data is processed. I found no public information on per-owner release of records, push notifications, instructions acknowledged by staff, or separate scoping for co-owners and riding shares. 3 7
The Tax Adviser
An owner portal is named as part of the automated pension module, riders register and book online around the clock without calls, and health data is described as shared with the right people. We found no public information on what an owner actually sees of their horse's records and invoices, on instructions being acknowledged by staff, or on how one boarder's data is kept out of another's view. 3 4
The Skeptic
An owner portal is named as part of the automated pension setup, horse records are shared with the right people, and booking and registration run around the clock online. But we found no public information on what an owner actually sees — their horse's records, the services billed to them — on instructions to the stable and their acknowledgement, on push notifications, or on per-owner export and deletion. 3 4 7
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Online reservations with waiting lists, reminders, dematerialised registration and an online shop, plus automated lesson cards and forfaits and oPaddock for hosting passing horses and opening the facilities to booking without commission — that is a teaching business running on the system. We found no public information on school-horse workload tracking, booking rules per user group, or device integration such as NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers. 3 4 5
The Stable Manager
Online booking with waiting lists and box occupancy, dematerialised registrations, a teaching module with per-rider progress, automated cards and packages, and oPaddock for guest horses and facility bookings without commission. I found no public information on booking rules per user group, equipment use billed to the account, school-horse workload or device integration, so above the middle but not the top. 3 4 5
The Boarder
Online booking runs around the clock with waiting lists, registrations are dematerialised, lesson cards and packages are automated into the billing, and passing horses and outside bookings are handled commission-free through oPaddock. Box occupancy, an online shop, a teaching module with per-rider progress and federation exam preparation round this out. We found no public information on closures or booking rules per user group, on walker, treadmill or solarium use linked to billing, on school-horse workload, or on device integration and per-facility reporting. 3 4 5
The Riding-School Lead
Planning and online bookings with waiting lists and reminders, box occupancy, guest horses hosted commission-free, a teaching module with per-rider progress, and automated lesson cards and packages that bill through the same money module as board — that covers most of a teaching yard's week. I found no public information on school-horse workload tracking or booking rules per user group, and nothing on device integration. 3 4 5
The Tax Adviser
Online booking with waiting lists, lesson cards and packages automated into the billing, guest horses hosted commission-free, an online shop, a teaching module with per-rider progress and the FFE Galops link — lessons and facility use are clearly run and charged through the system. We found no public information on booking rules per user group, school-horse workload tracking, device integration or utilisation reporting per facility. 3 4
The Skeptic
Bookings run around the clock with waiting lists, reminders, box occupancy and an online shop; teaching gets a progress module, FFE Galops quizzes, and lesson cards and packages inside the automated billing, plus commission-free hosting of passing horses. We found no public information on school horses and their workload, booking rules per user group, equipment use charged to billing or credit, or device integration and utilisation reporting. 3 4 5
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Hosting is with OVH SAS in Roubaix with servers and backups in France, personal data is stated as hosted and processed within the EU, and the named processors behind AI (Mistral AI, France) and e-signature (Yousign, eIDAS-qualified French) are European, with the Google Calendar sync optional, unidirectional and immediately revocable. We found no public information on a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data or on the processors behind online payment and push notifications, and the independent sourcing left the contracting entity unconfirmed on the captured pages even though French law governs the contract. 5 6 7
The Stable Manager
Hosting is named — OVH, servers and backups in France, the contract under French law — and the chain names its French subprocessors Yousign (eIDAS-qualified) and Mistral AI (EU processing, customer data not used for training), with Google Calendar sync strictly opt-in, scoped and revocable. I found no public information on the processors behind payments, email and push notifications, a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or a published security or certification statement. 5 6 7
The Boarder
The site and app are hosted by OVH with servers and backups in France, processing stays inside the EU, e-signature runs through French eIDAS-qualified Yousign, and the AI assistant is Mistral AI with no training on submitted content — the chain my mare's file travels is largely French and named. Export is free at any time, deletion within 30 days of contract end is published, and data is stated never to be sold or rented. We found no public information on the providers behind push notifications, payment and email, on a data processing agreement offered to the stable, on the parent company, or on any published security certification. 5 6 7
The Riding-School Lead
Hosting on OVH with servers and backups in France is stated, subprocessors Mistral AI, Yousign and OVH are named with locations, the Google Calendar link is optional via OAuth with stated scope, and free export plus deletion timelines are documented. I found no public information on a data processing agreement offered to the stable or a security certification statement, and the captured pages do not confirm the contracting entity's jurisdiction. 5 6 7
The Tax Adviser
Hosting is OVH in France with servers and backups in France, processing is stated to stay in the EU, and the processors behind the product are named with locations: Yousign in France for signature, Mistral in the EU for the assistant, Google only as an optional calendar sync; export is free at any time and deletion is documented. No security or certification statement is published, no data processing agreement offer is evidenced, and the contracting entity and ownership were not confirmed on the captured pages, so the chain is European but not evidenced end to end. 5 6 7
The Skeptic
Hosting is named and French — OVH, servers and backups in France — with EU processing stated, French law governing the terms, and Yousign and Mistral AI named as French or EU processors, alongside a privacy policy that spells out deletion timelines and that no data is sold. Still, the independently gathered profile marks entity jurisdiction and ownership as unconfirmed on the vendor's own pages, and we found no public information on the payment and push providers behind the mobile apps, on a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or on a published security or certification statement. The chain, not the server, is what I count — and half this chain is in the dark. 3 5 6 7
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
A from-price of "Dès 19 € HT/mois" is published with the money modules listed, a clear rule that horse-related features are free while money-related features are paid, unlimited riders, horses and users, and support and backups included in all plans. Only one named tier appears, and we found no public information on setup or migration fees, minimum term, or which add-ons cost extra beyond the from-price, so I cannot compute a real annual cost from the public pages alone. 3 4 6
The Stable Manager
The split is admirably plain — everything about horses free, everything about money paid, from "Dès 19 € HT/mois" — with the free Découverte tier's inclusions named and riders, horses and users unlimited. I found no public information on the full tier ladder, setup fees or the minimum term, so a stable owner still cannot compute the annual cost from the pages alone, though free export at any time answers the data-return question. 3 4 6
The Boarder
The pricing rule is unusually blunt — everything about the horses is free, everything about the money is paid from "Dès 19 € HT/mois" — with riders, horses and users unlimited, a named free tier including the website and teaching module, no commission, and support in all plans. Cancellation terms are published: free export at any time and deletion within 30 days of contract end. We found no public information on tier prices beyond that from-figure, on setup fees for the vendor-offered data migration, or on minimum term. 3 4 6
The Riding-School Lead
The rule is stated plainly — everything horse-related is free, everything money-related is paid, Dès 19 € HT/mois — with a named free tier listing the site, teaching module and online registrations, unlimited riders, horses and users, and free export with deletion at contract end. I found no public information on what sits above the from-price, setup fees or minimum term, so the real annual cost for a yard of my size is not computable from public pages. 3 4 6
The Tax Adviser
The free tier is unusually clear — teaching module, unlimited website, online registrations, unlimited riders, horses and users at zero — and the paid money features start at "Dès 19 € HT/mois", with data return free at any time and deletion 30 days after contract end. How the paid price scales with horses or modules, any setup fee and the minimum term are not published, so a real annual cost is not computable from these pages alone. 4 6
The Skeptic
A public entry figure exists — Dès 19 € HT/mois — with a free tier whose inclusions are named, unlimited riders, horses and users, free export of all data at any time, and at least a rule in the split between free horse features and paid money features. But nothing between the free tier and the from-figure is priced module by module, and we found no public information on setup fees, minimum term, or how to derive the real annual cost for a given yard. 3 4 6
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Equimondo
Is Equimondo European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Equimondo as EU-Made.
Where does Equimondo store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
Does Equimondo have a free plan?
Yes. Equimondo has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Equimondo?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), LIVERYLive (2.5/5) and HorseManager (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Equimondo alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency, Subprocessors, Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 22 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 14 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (7)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage equimondo.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (livery stables) equimondo.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page equimondo.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Pricing page equimondo.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Legal notice equimondo.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Terms of service equimondo.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Privacy policy equimondo.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →