Stable & Equestrian Management
HorseManager
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Bo Hippique · horsemanager.io
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
HorseManager at a glance
- Vendor
- Bo Hippique
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates HorseManager 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. HorseManager is stable management software from Bo Hippique, Sint-Oedenrode, Netherlands (KVK 75906198), aimed at boarding-stable holders with 10+ boxes and stated as not for riding schools. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
HorseManager is stable management software from Bo Hippique, Sint-Oedenrode, Netherlands (KVK 75906198), aimed at boarding-stable holders with 10+ boxes and stated as not for riding schools. The judges scored it strongest on boarding and billing: recurring box rent, extras logged on the phone and carried onto the invoice, split invoices for horses with several owners, and Peppol e-invoices with links to Exact, Yuki and Snelstart are all evidenced; horse care records scored 6-7. Staff and operations scores sit at 4 — workflows, task lists and staff logins are shown, but the judges found no public information on time recording, shift or holiday planning, or who did which task. Pricing transparency is weakest at 1-2: monthly modules are described with no public price per box, horse or module, and no setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment; a free forty-five-minute video call is the route in. Sovereignty scored 4-5, with Amazon Web Services hosting in EU, Frankfurt named while jurisdiction, ownership, residency and subprocessors remain unconfirmed. Scores cluster closely apart from boarder portal.
Speaks for it
- Recurring box rent and extras logged on the phone flow automatically onto the monthly invoice, with credits, corrections and split invoices for horses with several owners
- Peppol e-invoicing with UBL files, VAT and intra-community overviews, links to Exact, Yuki, Snelstart and Twinfield, and invoices retained seven years under the fiscal retention duty
- Per-horse dossiers hold feed schedules, treatments, vaccinations, worming and farrier with automatic reminders, and one bulk action writes a farrier visit into thirty dossiers
- Customers onboard themselves by link, add their data, horse and arrival date, accept the stable's terms, self-reserve facilities and sign themselves in and out of lessons
- Export is possible at any time, including after termination, with twelve months of retention before definitive deletion, and the trial does not convert automatically into a paid subscription
Held against it
- No public price figures on the pricing page — nothing per box, horse or module, and no setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment
- No public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, dunning or VAT rates per service type, with payment collection evidenced only as a Mollie payment link
- No public information on employee time recording, shift or holiday planning, or any record of who did which task when
- No public information on owners viewing their own horse's records and invoices, or on keeping one boarder's data out of another's view
- Jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure remain unconfirmed, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or a security statement
Best for
- You run a boarding stable with 10+ boxes and want box rent, extras and care records flowing into one monthly invoice run
- Your bookkeeping runs on Exact, Yuki, Snelstart or Twinfield and you need Peppol e-invoices with VAT overviews
- You keep many horses and want per-horse dossiers with automatic reminders for vaccinations, worming and farrier
- You want boarders onboarded and reserving facilities themselves, with messages from the system instead of WhatsApp threads
Avoid if
- You run a riding school and need school horses, lesson cards or clinics with registration and payment — the vendor states the product is not for riding schools
- You need time recording for employees, shift or holiday planning, or proof of who did which task when
- You must show owners their own horse's records and invoices in a login, with each boarder's data scoped
- You need published prices to budget an annual cost before the free forty-five-minute video call
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 4 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 3 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 2 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Logging an extra on the phone and having it flow onto the invoice automatically, with box rent recurring and one click generating and sending the whole month's invoices, is exactly the loop I want instead of retyping into a second tool. Credit notes and corrections, split invoices for horses with several owners, Peppol e-invoices and links to Exact, Yuki and Snelstart settle the accountant side. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, per-service VAT rates, prepaid credit or dunning, so collection still looks like chasing payment links. 1 2 3
The Stable Manager
Box rent lands on the invoice automatically each month, extras are logged on the phone where they happen and carried onto the bill, and one click sends the whole month's invoices. Credit notes and corrections, split invoices for horses with several owners, Peppol e-invoicing with UBL and VAT summaries, and links to Exact, Yuki and Snelstart are all stated. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates or prepaid credit, which keeps this a notch below the top. 1 2 3
The Boarder
Box rent recurring plus extras logged on the phone and carried automatically onto the invoice is exactly the chain I need when I query three extra wraps, and credits and corrections, Peppol e-invoices, split invoices for horses with several owners, invoicing from multiple financial accounts and exports to named accounting packages are all evidenced. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, prepaid credit, dunning, or each charge being traceable to the staff member who logged it. 1 2 3 6
The Riding-School Lead
Box rent comes back automatically on the monthly invoice, extras are logged on the phone and carried onto the invoice, and credits, corrections and split invoices for horses with several owners are all evidenced — with e-invoices via Peppol and links into Exact, Yuki, Snelstart and Twinfield, so board and course money can land in the same books. I found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, or VAT rates configurable per service type, which keeps it off the top step. 1 2 3 6
The Tax Adviser
Recurring box rent lands on the invoice automatically, extras are logged at the moment and carried into the bill, and a one-click run generates the whole month with credits and corrections; split invoices handle horses with several owners, e-invoices go out via Peppol with UBL files and VAT and intra-community overviews, and Exact, Twinfield, Snelstart and Yuki are named export targets alongside a stated seven-year fiscal retention of invoices. I found no public information on SEPA mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, per-service VAT configuration or numbering and archiving that a tax authority would certify — payment collection is evidenced only as a Mollie payment link on the invoice. 1 2 3 5 6
The Skeptic
Box rent recurs automatically onto the monthly invoice and extras are logged on the phone and carried into it, invoices go out with credits, corrections and a Mollie payment link, and split invoices handle horses with several owners — a real billing engine, not a price table. The chain runs on into Peppol e-invoices and named accounting tools (Exact, Yuki, Snelstart, Twinfield), but we found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, VAT rates per service type, dunning, or a charge traceable back to the staff member who logged it. 1 2 3
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Every horse gets a dossier with structured feed plans by type and quantity, treatments, vaccinations, worming and farrier with automatic reminders, and one bulk action writes a farrier visit into thirty individual files — the history a vet or inspector can work with, plus health reports and export at any time. We found no public information on medication entries with dose and who administered them, on blanket and turnout instructions visible to whoever does the round, or on a documented handover export format for the next stable, so the dossier stops short of what I would stake an inspection on. 1 2 3 5
The Stable Manager
Feeding plans per horse with feed types and standard amounts, vaccinations, worming and farrier kept with automatic reminders, a full treatment history per horse, and handing a horse's file to another user of the system are all stated. We found no public information on a medication log naming who administered what and at what dose, on blanket and turnout instructions visible to whoever does the round, or on passport and UELN data — the things a vet or inspector asks me for. 1 2 3 6
The Boarder
Per horse there are structured feed schedules, a health dossier with full treatment history covering treatments, vaccinations, worming and farrier with automatic reminders, plus location history, media, medical documents, dated incident notes and an anytime export, and a farrier visit for thirty horses lands in every individual file with one action. We found no public information on turnout or blanket instructions visible to whoever does the round, on a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, or on passport and UELN data being held, which is what I would need before relying on the file as an owner. 1 2 3 5
The Riding-School Lead
Every horse gets a full digital dossier — feeding plans with feed types and quantities, treatments, vaccinations, worming and farrier with automatic reminders, complete treatment and location history, medical scans, and RVO registration across multiple UBN numbers — plus export at any time. I found no public information on a medication log with dose and who administered it, on owner instructions for blankets and turnout shown to whoever does the round, or on a documented handover export when the horse leaves. 1 2 3 5
The Tax Adviser
Feeding plans per horse, vaccinations, worming and farrier with automatic reminders, a full treatment history per horse and a bulk entry that puts one farrier visit into thirty individual dossiers are all evidenced, and the data can be exported at any time or handed to another user via a shareable link. We found no public information on a medication log with dose and administering person, on owner instructions such as blankets or turnout being visible to whoever does the round, or on due dates checked against a set vaccination schedule. 1 2 3 5 6
The Skeptic
Per-horse dossiers hold treatments, vaccinations, deworming and farrier with automatic reminders, structured feed schedules with feed types and standard amounts, full location history, media and health reports — and one bulk action puts a farrier visit into thirty dossiers. We found no public information on a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, on owner instructions visible to whoever does the round, on vaccination due dates against the official schedule, or on a documented handover export; the terms only let a horse's file be shared by link or transferred to another user of the same service. 1 2 3 6
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
There is a day, week and month plan shareable with team and customers, recurring workflows, and employee accounts with their own rights, logins and languages — better than a WhatsApp list. We found no public information on tasks being assigned and ticked off on the phone, on a shift or holiday plan, on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, or on any record of who did what, so daily operations rest on plans rather than proof. 2 3
The Stable Manager
Task lists, agenda and reminders stable-wide and per horse, workflows that plan recurring work ahead, and staff accounts with their own rights and login are stated. We found no public information on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, holiday planning, completion history per task, or an audit trail of who fed or treated which horse when. 2 3
The Boarder
Recurring workflows, a task list and agenda for you and your staff with reminders, and staff accounts with their own rights and login are evidenced, with touchscreens and QR codes in the barn. We found no public information on tasks assigned to named people with completion recorded, shift or holiday planning, time recording for employees, or boarder duty rotas, so the day is planned but not evidenced per person. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
Workflows for recurring work, a task list and agenda for you and your staff with reminders, and employees with their own rights and login are all shown. I found no public information on tasks assigned to named people with completion ticked on the phone, on shift or holiday planning, on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, or on any record of who did what when. 1 2 3
The Tax Adviser
Task lists, an agenda and reminders exist stable-wide and per horse or client, team members get their own rights and logins, and recurring workflows and planning are shareable with staff. We found no public information on time recording for employees, holiday planning, boarder duty rotas or a completion history per task — nothing here would answer a minimum-wage or working-time inspection. 2 3
The Skeptic
Recurring workflows, a task list and agenda for you and your staff with reminders, and staff accounts with their own rights and language — that clears a shared to-do list, but we found no public information on task assignment with completion ticking, a shift plan, or holiday and absence planning. We also found no public information on any time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, on boarder duty rotas, on offline use in a barn without signal, or on any record of who did which task when. 2 3
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Customers onboard themselves through a link, adding their data, the horse, the arrival date and accepting my terms, reserve the arena or wash area themselves, sign in and out of lessons, and receive messages and invoices with a payment link — the WhatsApp traffic genuinely moves into the system. We found no public information on an owner login showing their own horse's released records and invoice history, on instructions being acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, or on scoping that keeps one boarder's data out of another's view, and that is what decides a portal for me. 2 3
The Stable Manager
Customers get a link to add their own details, their horse and the arrival date, reserve the arena or wash area themselves, sign up and out of lessons, and receive messages from the system instead of loose WhatsApp threads. We found no public information on owners logging in to see their own horse's records and their own invoices, or on how one boarder's data is kept out of another's view. 2 3
The Boarder
Customers are genuinely in the system: they onboard themselves via a link adding their own data, their horse, the arrival date and accepting the terms, and they self-reserve the arena, paddock or wash area, enrol in lessons themselves, and receive messages and an invoice with an online payment link. We found no public information on owners viewing their own horse's released records and logged services in a portal, on sending instructions the staff acknowledge, or on scoping that keeps one boarder out of another's view — and horse data can be made publicly accessible by a shareable link at the stable's discretion, which I would want tightly controlled. 2 3 6
The Riding-School Lead
A boarder arrives through a link and adds their own data, horse and arrival date, can reserve arena and paddock slots themselves, self-enrolls in lessons, and the stable messages them from the system instead of WhatsApp threads. I found no public information on an owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, or on how one boarder's data is scoped away from another's view. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
Owners are onboarded through a link with which they add themselves, their horse and the arrival date and accept the stable's terms, and they then reserve facilities themselves, sign up for lessons and receive messages from the system; horses can carry several owners with ownership percentages. We found no public information on release control over what each owner sees, push notifications for due dates and charges, or how one boarder's data is kept out of another's view. 2 3 7
The Skeptic
Customers onboard themselves by link, add their own data and horse, accept the stable's terms, self-reserve arena and paddock, and sign themselves in and out of lessons — genuine per-owner self-service, more than a yard-wide news feed. But we found no public information on owners viewing their own horse's records, logged services and invoices in a login, on instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, or on how one boarder's data is scoped away from another's; the messaging shown runs from stable to customer. 2 3
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Arena, paddock, wash area and farrier spot can be reserved with customers booking themselves, and lesson rosters with self sign-up and sign-out exist — the booking core works. We found no public information on booking rules or capacity per user group, on reservations flowing into billing or credit, on school horses, or on courses and clinics with registration and payment, and the vendor states plainly that it is not aimed at riding schools. 2 3
The Stable Manager
Arena, paddock, wash area and farrier spot can be reserved, customers book themselves and the stable sees who is where, and lessons come with self sign-up. We found no public information on capacity limits and booking rules per user group, school horses, courses with registration and payment, or equipment use flowing into the billing. 2 3
The Boarder
Arena, paddock, wash area and farrier spot are reservable with customer self-service where the stable sees who stands where, and lessons have rosters with customers enrolling and unenrolling themselves. We found no public information on time slots and booking rules, capacity or closures, use linked to billing or credit, school horses and lesson cards — the stable page itself says it is not aimed at riding schools — or clinics and events with participant management and payment. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
Arena, paddock, wash area and farrier-spot reservations with customer self-service and lesson rosters with self-enrollment are evidenced, and activities tied to a customer can be invoiced. I found no public information on booking rules, capacity or closures, on school horses and their workload, on ten-lesson cards, or on clinics with participant management and payment — and the boarding-stable page itself says the product is not for riding schools. 2 3
The Tax Adviser
Arena, paddock, wash area and farrier spot can be reserved with customers booking themselves, and lesson schedules let clients sign in and out online, which replaces the app-message round for slots. We found no public information on capacity or booking rules per user group, on linking facility or equipment use to billing or credit, on courses with registration and payment, or on school horses — the vendor states the product is not for riding schools. 2 3
The Skeptic
Riding arena, paddock, wash place and farrier spot are reservable with customer self-booking, and lesson rosters let customers enrol themselves — solid basics. We found no public information on booking rules, capacity or closures per user group, on equipment such as walker, treadmill or solarium, on school horses, or on courses and clinics with registration and payment, and the vendor states plainly that it is not aimed at riding schools. 2 3
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The privacy policy names Amazon Web Services as host with application and data in Frankfurt while flagging it as a US company, the terms name a Dutch legal entity, and payment runs through Mollie — that reads European on the surface. The independently collected sovereignty attributes nonetheless record data residency, ownership and subprocessors as unconfirmed, and we found no public information on a subprocessor list with locations for push, email and analytics, on a processing agreement offered to the stable, or on a security or certification statement. 2 6 7
The Stable Manager
The privacy policy names hosting of the application and data with Amazon Web Services in the EU in Frankfurt, and the general terms run with a Dutch contracting entity in Sint-Oedenrode. We found no public information on subprocessors beyond the host — push notifications, analytics, email, payment — nor on a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data or a published security statement. 6 7
The Boarder
The privacy page names Amazon Web Services hosting in the EU at Frankfurt, the terms name a Dutch legal entity in Sint-Oedenrode, Mollie is named for online payments, the app is stated to use only functional cookies, and the pages state data is not sold, with retention periods spelled out. The independently collected sovereignty attributes still mark hosting location and subprocessor exposure as unconfirmed, and we found no public information on a full subprocessor list with locations for analytics, push and email, a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or a published security statement. 2 6 7
The Riding-School Lead
The privacy policy states hosting of the application and data in the EU, Frankfurt on Amazon Web Services, the terms name a Dutch contracting entity, and online payment runs through Mollie. I found no public information on the processors behind push notifications, analytics and email, on a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, on ownership or a parent company, or on any security or certification statement. 2 6 7
The Tax Adviser
Hosting is stated as Amazon Web Services in Frankfurt under a Dutch contracting entity with a chamber-of-commerce number, data export and deletion after twelve months are documented, and the privacy policy sets retention periods and states that customer data is not sold. We found no public information on the ownership structure, on the processors behind the app such as push, email or analytics, on a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data, or on any security certification — and the named host is itself flagged as a US company. 2 6 7
The Skeptic
The privacy policy names Amazon Web Services hosting in EU, Frankfurt and notes it is a US company, and a Dutch contracting entity appears in the terms — yet the independently gathered sovereignty attributes still mark jurisdiction, ownership, residency and subprocessors as unconfirmed, and beyond AWS and a Mollie payment link on the invoice we found no public information on who runs push notifications, analytics or email. No data processing agreement for boarder and staff data and no security or certification statement appear in the captures, and the vendor is a named private individual with six other horse-trade websites running alongside — a stable's horse and boarder records deserve that chain in writing before season two. 2 3 6 7
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The captured pricing page describes loose modules billed monthly and switched off until you tick them on, and a trial that does not convert to a paid subscription on its own — but we found no public price per module, box, horse or user, no setup fee and no minimum term, so a yearly cost for my forty boxes is not computable from the public pages. Migration assistance is offered only at a market-conforming rate, which reads as priced on request. 5 6
The Stable Manager
The pricing page shows separate modules that can be booked monthly and ticked as they fit, and the trial does not convert into a paid subscription by itself, but no price figures, scaling rule per box or horse, setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment appear in anything we captured. A stable owner with ten boxes cannot compute an annual cost from these pages. 5 6
The Boarder
The pricing page shows a module model with monthly add-ons you tick yourself, and the data-return terms are published: export anytime, even after the subscription ends, with twelve months of grace before definitive deletion. We found no public information on any price figure at all — per box, per horse or per module — nor on setup fees, minimum term or VAT treatment, so a year's cost cannot be computed from the public pages; the offered route in is a free forty-five-minute demo call. 3 5 6
The Riding-School Lead
The pricing page shows separately bookable monthly modules described as everything set out to tick what fits, and the terms document data on cancellation — export at any time, twelve months' grace, then definitive deletion. I found no public information on actual price figures: nothing per box, horse or module, no setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment, so no stable owner can compute a real annual cost from the pages alone. 3 5 6
The Tax Adviser
The pricing page shows only that modules can be switched on individually and are billed monthly, and migration help is quoted at an unspecified market-conform rate; we found no public figures at all — no price per module, no setup fee, no minimum term, no VAT treatment — so a stable owner cannot compute an annual cost from the captured pages. The cancellation side is better published: no automatic conversion from the trial, export at any time even after termination, and definitive deletion after twelve months. 5 6
The Skeptic
The pricing page we captured shows the module structure — separate modules, billed monthly, tick what fits — and we found no public price figures on it: none per box, horse or module, none for setup, no minimum term and no VAT treatment, so every real number sits behind the free forty-five-minute video call. To the vendor's credit the cancellation side is public: export at any time including after termination, twelve months of grace, then definitive deletion, with paid migration assistance at an unnamed market-conform rate. 3 5 6
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about HorseManager
Is HorseManager European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies HorseManager as EU-Made.
Where does HorseManager store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
Does HorseManager have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to HorseManager?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: HorseManager alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 6 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (7)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage horsemanager.io Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page horsemanager.io Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Boarding-stable page horsemanager.io Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Training-stable page horsemanager.io Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Pricing page horsemanager.io Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Terms naming the legal entity horsemanager.io Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Privacy policy horsemanager.io Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →