Board contracts, extra services & billing
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Tax Adviser
Recurring box rent lands on the invoice automatically, extras are logged at the moment and carried into the bill, and a one-click run generates the whole month with credits and corrections; split invoices handle horses with several owners, e-invoices go out via Peppol with UBL files and VAT and intra-community overviews, and Exact, Twinfield, Snelstart and Yuki are named export targets alongside a stated seven-year fiscal retention of invoices. I found no public information on SEPA mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, per-service VAT configuration or numbering and archiving that a tax authority would certify — payment collection is evidenced only as a Mollie payment link on the invoice. 1 2 3 5 6