Stable & Equestrian Management
EasyKeeper
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by EasyKeeper Software · www.easykeeper.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
EasyKeeper at a glance
- Vendor
- EasyKeeper Software
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates EasyKeeper 0.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. EasyKeeper is herd management software for goat breeders — its own pages say so — and the bench scored it accordingly within a stable-management category. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
EasyKeeper is herd management software for goat breeders — its own pages say so — and the bench scored it accordingly within a stable-management category. Its strongest criterion is horse care records, where scores cluster at 3-4: judges found genuine structure in automated health and management schedules with reminders, batch entry for health events, duplicate-event checking and performance reporting, though the feature pages speak of kidding, estrus and mastitis rather than horses. Staff and operations scores also cluster at 3-4 on the strength of task and event lists, with no public information on assigning work to named people, shift planning or time records. Everything specific to a boarding yard sits at the bottom: boarding and billing, facilities and lessons and sovereignty each score 0, and boarder portal spans 0-2, the single higher mark crediting designated-agent access rather than a per-owner view. The contracting entity is EasyKeeper Herd Manager, Inc. of Reno, Nevada under United States governing law; we found no public information on hosting location, ownership or subprocessors, the terms were last updated in December 2017, and no price figures appear anywhere.
Speaks for it
- Animal-level health records with automated schedules, reminders, batch entry for health events and duplicate-event checking
- Pedigree and progeny tracking with keep/cull and breeding decision insights
- Task and event lists with health management reminders for planning daily activities
- A 30-day full-feature trial without a credit card, no commitment, and self-service cancellation from the My Account section
- Web-based access on any internet-connected device with no download required
Held against it
- Boarding and billing scores 0, and we found no public information on board contracts, invoices to owners, payment collection or VAT handling
- Boarder portal scores 0 to 2, and we found no public information on an owner login showing a horse owner their animal's records or bills
- Facilities and lessons scores 0, and we found no public information on arena booking, lessons, school horses or courses with registration
- Sovereignty scores 0: the contracting entity sits in Reno, Nevada under United States governing law, with hosting location, ownership and subprocessors unstated
- The feature pages are written for goat breeding, and we found no public information on feeding plans per horse, farrier or vet appointments, or medication logs naming who administered a dose
Best for
- You run a small breeding operation and mainly need automated health and management schedules with reminders for each animal
- Your team is you plus a few designated agents, and task and event lists cover your planning without shift schedules or payroll time records
- You keep animals for your own operation rather than boarding other people's horses, so owner logins and boarding invoices never come into play
Avoid if
- You board other people's horses and need board contracts, invoices and payment collection — the captured pages present one farming operation's own herd records
- You want horse owners to log in and see their own animal's records, logged services or bills
- You teach or rent facilities and need lesson, course or arena booking
- Your boarder, staff and animal data requires an examined legal and hosting chain — the pages name a Reno, Nevada entity under United States governing law, and we found no public information on hosting or subprocessors
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 0 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 1.5 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 0 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 0 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Everything public on the money side is about the vendor's own subscription — credit card required after trial, monthly or annual billing interval, cancel anytime — and I found no public information on invoicing boarders: no board contracts per box, no way a logged extra service flows onto an invoice, nothing on SEPA direct debit, VAT or an export to an accountant. The pages present herd software for goat breeders, and a boarding-stable billing capability is simply not shown. 1 2
The Stable Manager
The product on show is herd-record software for goat breeders, and the only money that changes hands is the subscription itself, charged to a credit card once the trial ends. I found no public information on board contracts, invoices generated from logged services, prepaid credit, direct debit, VAT handling or an export to an accounting tool. 1 2
The Boarder
We found no public information on board contracts, extra services logged at the moment they are done, invoices to boarders or payment collection; the only billing terms published are for the vendor's own subscription, with a credit card required after a 30-day trial and e-check accepted. As a boarder there is nothing visible that would ever connect the farrier's extra wraps to a charge on my bill. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
The only billing evidenced is the software's own subscription charged to a credit card after the trial — this is herd-record software aimed at goat breeders. We found no public information on board contracts per box, extra services flowing into invoices, recurring billing, SEPA direct debit, VAT handling, or an export to an accountant. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
The only billing on the captured pages is the vendor charging the stable's own card for the subscription. We found no public information on board contracts, invoices to boarders, VAT per service, SEPA collection or any export to an accounting tool, so nothing connects a logged service to a charge. 1 2
The Skeptic
The only money that changes hands in the captured pages is the buyer's own software subscription — credit card after the trial, monthly or annual intervals. I found no public information on board contracts, invoices to horse owners, prepaid credit, SEPA, VAT treatment or an export to an accountant, and nothing connects a recorded event to a charge. 1 2
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
There is genuine structure — automated health and management schedules, health-event reminders, batch entry for health events, duplicate-event checking, even tracked jaw and eye fields — but it is built around goat herds (kidding, mastitis tests, estrus cycles). I found no public information on feeding plans per horse, vaccination or farrier appointments, a medication log with who administered what, or a documented export when a horse leaves my yard. 1 3
The Stable Manager
Health scheduling with reminders is real, and their own update pages describe batch entry for health events and duplicate-event checking per animal. But everything is aimed at goats — estrus, kidding, mastitis — and I found no public information on feeding plans a night shift can read by feeding round, a medication log showing who gave what dose, or a documented export of the full file when an animal leaves. 1 3
The Boarder
There is real structured record-keeping per animal — automated health and management schedules, reminders, batch entry for health events with duplicate checking — which is more than free-text notes. But we found no public information on feeding plans per horse, farrier or vet appointments, a medication log naming who administered what, or a documented export of the horse's file, and the feature pages are written for goat breeders (kidding, estrus, jaw structure) rather than a horse yard. 1 3
The Riding-School Lead
Animal-level health records with automated schedules and reminders are evidenced, including batch entry and duplicate-event checking, which goes beyond free-text notes. But the captured features are framed for goats (kidding, mastitis, estrus); we found no public information on feeding plans by feeding round, farrier or vet appointments, medication logs with dose and administrator, or an exportable per-horse file. 1 3
The Tax Adviser
Health records go beyond free-text: automated health and management schedules with reminders, batch entry with duplicate checking, plus pedigrees, weights and body condition scoring. We found no public information on feeding plans per animal, medication logs naming who administered a dose, or an exportable file when an animal leaves — and the marketing speaks of kidding, mastitis and estrus, goat breeding rather than horse care. 1 3
The Skeptic
There is a genuine record here — automated health and management schedules with reminders, batch entry for health events, duplicate-event checking, and performance reporting — so it clears free-text notes. But every page points at goat breeding (kidding plans, weaning weights, mastitis scheduling), and I found no public information on feeding plans by round, farrier or vet appointments, a medication log naming who administered, or a documented export when an animal leaves. 1 3
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Task and event lists with automated schedules and health management reminders are advertised, which is more than a shared note, but I found no public information on assigning a round to a named groom, ticking completion on the phone, a shift or holiday plan, or any time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. The terms mention only the member's own Designated Agents, so proper yard staffing features are not shown. 1 2
The Stable Manager
The homepage promises automated schedules, task and event lists and health reminders, which covers planning the day at least in outline. I found no public information on assigning rounds to named people, ticking completion on a phone, shift or holiday planning, or time records that would hold up for payroll with grooms and mini-jobbers. 1
The Boarder
Task planning exists — automated schedules, task and events lists, health management reminders — but we found no public information on assigning work to people, ticking completion on a phone, shift and holiday planning, or any time recording for employees. Nothing published shows a record of who fed, medicated or turned out which horse, which is exactly the audit I would want as an owner. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
Task and event lists with automated schedules and health-management reminders are evidenced, plus account access for the member's designated agents. We found no public information on rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on a phone, shift or holiday planning, time recording for employees, or any record of who did what. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
Daily activities are planned with automated schedules, task and event lists and health reminders, and designated agents can access the account. We found no public information on assigning tasks to named people, shift or holiday planning, or time records that would survive a minimum-wage check. 1 2
The Skeptic
The vendor promises automated schedules, task and event lists, and health reminders — a to-do layer with recurrence, at best. I found no public information on assignment to named people, completion history, shift or holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, or any location-based clock-in; the terms allow Designated Agents access but describe no role model. 1 2
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
I found no public information on any owner access — no login for the horse owner, no view of their horse's records or their charges, no way to send blanket or turnout instructions and have staff acknowledge them. As far as the captured pages go, my boarders would stay on WhatsApp and three phone calls a day. 2
The Stable Manager
The terms grant access to the account holder and its designated agents, and community sharing explicitly keeps health and wellness records private — that is a single-operator setup, not a per-owner portal. I found no public information on an owner login showing their own animal's released records, logged services or invoices. 1 2
The Boarder
We found no public information on a login for horse owners; the published account model is one farming operation per account with designated agents, aimed at the breeder, not a yard of boarders each seeing their own horse. The terms do promise that private records such as health data will not be shared in the Community Data feature, which is a comfort on data sharing, but it is not a portal where I could see my mare's file, my bill or whether my instruction was read. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
The terms grant access to the member's own designated agents for one farming operation's records, which is not a per-owner view. We found no public information on owners logging in to see their own horse's records or bills, sending instructions to the stable, or any scoping that keeps one boarder's data out of another's view. 2
The Tax Adviser
We found no public information on a login for horse owners showing their own animal's records, logged services or invoices. The terms describe one member account per farming operation with designated agents, and the community data feature governs which breeding records are shared publicly; we found no public information on per-owner scoping of records or bills. 1 2
The Skeptic
No owner-facing portal appears in the captured pages: the terms speak only of a member and Designated Agents, and the Community Data clause about private records concerns what the vendor shares, not scoping one boarder's view of another's animal. I found no public information on owner login, per-owner records, invoices, or bookings and requests. 1 2
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
I found no public information on arena or indoor-school booking, horse walker, treadmill or solarium use, lessons, school horses, or clinics with registration and payment. The captured pages describe goat-breeding features such as pedigree and progeny tracking, and nothing on shared yard facilities or a teaching business. 1
The Stable Manager
I found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons and school horses, courses with registration, or guest boxes. For a yard that rents its indoor school and teaches, that whole side of the business would stay on paper. 1
The Boarder
We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons and school horses, courses with registration, or guest boxes. The product pages describe herd record-keeping and breeding analytics for goat operations, with no calendar or booking capability shown. 1
The Riding-School Lead
The captured feature pages are entirely about herd records, breeding decisions and performance reporting. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons with riders and school horses, ten-lesson cards, or courses and clinics with registration and payment. 1
The Tax Adviser
We found no public information on arena or equipment bookings, lessons, school horses, or courses and events with registration. The captured pages describe herd records, breeding analytics and task planning only. 1
The Skeptic
Arena and school bookings, horse walker or solarium use, lessons, courses, guest boxes — I found no public information on any of it. The product presents itself as herd record-keeping for goat breeders, with no booking or teaching features described. 1
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The contracting entity is EasyKeeper Herd Manager, Inc. of Reno, Nevada, and the terms are governed by United States law; I found no public information on hosting location, on any subprocessor behind hosting, push, analytics or payment, or on a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data. Nothing in the chain I can see is European. 1 2
The Stable Manager
The contracting entity is EasyKeeper Herd Manager, Inc. of Reno, Nevada, with terms governed by United States law and last updated in 2017. I found no public information on where data is hosted, which subprocessors sit behind the app, a data processing agreement, or a privacy policy covering the web application — for a European stable's boarder, staff and horse data, that is not a chain I can accept. 2
The Boarder
The contracting entity is EasyKeeper Herd Manager, Inc. of Reno, Nevada, governed by United States law, and we found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, or a privacy policy covering the application. For me that means my mare's health file and my payment details would sit with a US company under US law, with no visible European data-residency commitment. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
The contracting entity is EasyKeeper Herd Manager, Inc. of Reno, Nevada, under United States governing law. We found no public information on hosting location, ownership, or any subprocessor, and no privacy policy among the captured pages — the terms themselves were last updated in December 2017. 2
The Tax Adviser
The contracting entity is EasyKeeper Herd Manager, Inc. of Reno, Nevada, under United States governing law, and the captured pages leave hosting location and every subprocessor unstated. For a European stable's boarder, staff and horse data the entire chain sits with a US vendor with nothing evidenced in between. 2
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is EasyKeeper Herd Manager, Inc. of Reno, Nevada, under United States governing law. Hosting location, ownership, and every subprocessor are unknown, and no privacy policy covering the app appears in the captures — a European stable's boarder, staff and animal data would sit in an entirely unexamined chain, with terms last updated December 2017. 2
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The pages advertise affordable monthly and annual plans with no commitment, a free 30-day full-feature trial without a credit card, and named cancellation channels plus 30 days' notice on fee changes — but no price figure of any kind is public. I cannot even begin to compute what a year for forty boxes would cost without contacting sales. 1 2
The Stable Manager
The pages promise 'Affordable monthly and annual pricing plans. No commitment, cancel anytime.' and I found no public information on what any plan actually costs, per animal, per user or otherwise — I cannot begin to compute a year's spend. The mechanics are at least public and fair: a 30-day full-feature trial without a credit card, cancellation from the My Account section, and 30 days' notice before fees change. 1 2
The Boarder
The captured pages describe the billing mechanics — a 30-day full-feature trial with no credit card, monthly or annual plans, no commitment with cancel anytime, and 30 days' notice of fee changes — but publish no price figures at all. A stable owner cannot compute any annual cost from what is public, and we found no public information on what a plan includes per animal or module. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
No price figures appear anywhere on the captured pages — only "Affordable monthly and annual pricing plans" with a 30-day full-feature trial and cancel-anytime terms. Per-horse or per-module prices, setup fees, VAT treatment, and what happens to the data on cancellation are not shown, so a real annual cost for a yard of my size cannot be computed from public pages. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
The subscription terms are public: monthly or annual plans, no commitment with cancel-anytime, a 30-day full-feature trial without a card, credit card required afterwards and 30 days' notice of fee changes. But we found no public price figures at all, so an annual cost cannot be computed, and we found no public information on per-animal or module scaling, setup fees or VAT treatment. 1 2
The Skeptic
The shape of the deal is public and unusually candid: a 30-day full-feature trial without a credit card, monthly or annual billing, no commitment, self-service cancellation from the account page, email or contact form, and at least 30 days' notice of fee changes. But not one price figure appears on the captured pages, so a stable owner cannot compute any cost, and I found no public information on what happens to the records when the subscription ends. 1 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about EasyKeeper
Is EasyKeeper European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where EasyKeeper is based.
Where does EasyKeeper store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
Does EasyKeeper have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to EasyKeeper?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 16 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: EasyKeeper alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (easykeeper.com, easykeeper.com/terms-conditions, easykeeper.com/product-update-enhanced-duplicate-event-checking-per-animal-health-activities-new-fields-added). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (3)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.easykeeper.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Terms of service — found from the homepage www.easykeeper.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Horse records, feeding & health — found from sitemap www.easykeeper.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →