Stable & Equestrian Management
Equionline
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by EQUIONLINE SARL · www.equionline.fr
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Equionline at a glance
- Vendor
- EQUIONLINE SARL
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Starting price
- “- dès 7.70 € €/mois” (vendor’s words) source, captured 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Equionline 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Equionline, from EQUIONLINE SARL of Marly, France, is strongest at boarding and billing — the only 7 on the board, with no spread between judges. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Equionline, from EQUIONLINE SARL of Marly, France, is strongest at boarding and billing — the only 7 on the board, with no spread between judges. Monthly board invoices go out automatically, calculated on the horses actually present, with quotes, credit notes, online payment, automated reminders, a VAT journal, a universal accounting export and stated compliance with the 2026 French e-invoicing reform. Pricing transparency is weakest at 1-2: the captured pricing page names seven modules, a free trial is the only pricing statement, and no price figure, setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment appears, so an annual cost cannot be computed. Horse care records and facilities and lessons score 4, showing a digital card per horse and a lesson-planning module while we found no public information on feeding plans, medication logging or arena booking. Staff and operations scores 3-4, judges differing on whether tasks, outings and a weekly schedule are more than a shared to-do list. Sovereignty spans 3-5 as judges weigh a French SARL and stated OVH hosting against computed attributes recording jurisdiction, ownership, residency and subprocessors as unknown.
Speaks for it
- Board invoices go out automatically each month, calculated on the horses actually present, alongside quotes, credit notes, online payment and automated payment reminders
- A VAT journal, a universal accounting export and stated compliance with the 2026 French e-invoicing reform cover the accounting side
- Each owner consults their own horse's balance and history whenever they wish, without disturbing the stable
- A digital card per horse with care history and movements is consultable by the whole team from the phone, alongside a digitalised register
- Families, consumptions and third-party payers are explicitly handled for shared horses and riding partners
Held against it
- We found no public information on any price figure, per horse, box or module, nor on setup fees, minimum term or VAT treatment, so an annual cost cannot be computed
- We found no public information on structured feeding plans, vaccination or worming schedules, or a medication log with dose and administrator
- We found no public information on task assignment with completion records, staff time recording, or holiday and absence planning
- We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, online course registration, or device integration for walkers or solariums
- Computed attributes record jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure as unknown, and we found no public information on the processors behind payment, push or email, on a data processing agreement, or on a published security statement
Best for
- You run a livery or boarding stable and want monthly board invoices generated automatically from the horses actually present, with online payment and automated reminders
- You bill families, shared horses and third-party payers and want quotes, invoices and credit notes in one system
- You want owners checking their own horse's balance and history themselves instead of phoning the stable
- Your invoices must be ready for the 2026 French e-invoicing reform, which the vendor states it complies with
Avoid if
- You need to see prices or compute an annual cost before a sales call — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You must show a vet or an inspector a horse file covering feeding, vaccination or medication — horse care records scores 4 and we found no public information on these
- You need staff time records, task completion history or holiday planning for payroll or a working-time audit — staff and operations scores 3-4
- You require confirmed residency, ownership or subprocessor information before signing — sovereignty scores 3-5 with these attributes recorded as unknown
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 3.5 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 1.5 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2.5 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Monthly board invoices go out on their own, calculated on the horses actually present, with quotes, credit notes, online payment and automated reminders, plus a VAT journal and a universal accounting export — that covers most of what I lose money on today. Families, consumptions and third-party payers are explicitly named, which suits shared horses and riding partners. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, prepaid credit, or VAT rates configurable per service type, so collection still depends on the owner paying online rather than my bank collecting on time. 1 2
The Stable Manager
Board invoices go out by themselves each month calculated on the horses actually present, with quotes, credit notes, online payment, automated payment reminders, and families plus third-party payers for shared horses — that is real billing muscle. A VAT journal and a "universal accounting export" are stated and electronic invoicing is declared ready for the French 2026 reform, but we found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, prepaid credit or an export to a named accounting tool. 1 2
The Boarder
Board invoices go out automatically each month calculated on the horses actually present, with quotes, credit notes, online payment, automated payment reminders, a VAT journal, a universal accounting export and invoices said to comply with the French 2026 e-invoicing reform — the money side largely runs inside the system. But I found no public information on services being logged at the moment they are done, on SEPA direct debit mandates, or on tracing each charge back to the staff member who logged it, which is what I would need to query three extra wraps on my bill. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
Boarding invoices go out automatically each month calculated on the horses actually present, and the invoicing module covers quotes, credit notes, online payment and automated reminders, with a VAT journal, universal accounting export and electronic invoicing for the 2026 French reform beyond that. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, prepaid credit, or an export to a named accounting tool. 2 1
The Tax Adviser
Monthly board invoices go out automatically, calculated on the horses actually present, alongside quotes, credit notes, online payment, automated payment reminders and a VAT journal with a universal accounting export; families and third-party payers are handled, and the claim of compliance with the 2026 French e-invoicing reform is exactly what I want to see. It stops short of the top band: we found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, prepaid credit, or VAT rates configurable per service type, and the accounting export is described as universal rather than to a named tool. 1 2
The Skeptic
Automatic monthly board invoices calculated on the horses actually present, quotes, invoices, credit notes, online payment, third-party payers, a VAT journal with an accounting export, automated payment reminders and stated compliance with the 2026 French e-invoicing reform — this is billing run from the system, not a price list on a website. Before trusting it with the stable's money I note we found no public information on SEPA direct-debit mandates, prepaid credit, VAT rates per service type, or an export to a named accounting tool. 1 2
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Each horse gets a digital record with care history and movements that the whole team reads from the phone, and the boarding register is digitalized — genuinely better than my whiteboard. We found no public information on structured feeding plans shown by feeding round, vaccination, worming and farrier schedules with reminders, a medication log, or a documented export when a horse leaves, which is what a vet or an inspector would ask me for. 1 2
The Stable Manager
There is a digital card per horse with care history, movements and a digitalized register that the whole team reads on the phone — the right shape for a yard. But we found no public information on structured feeding plans, vaccination or worming schedules, farrier and vet dates, or a medication log with dose and who administered it, so I could not put this file in front of a vet with confidence. 1 2
The Boarder
There is a digital record per horse with a care history, movements and a digitalised register the whole team consults from their phones — genuinely more than a whiteboard. But I found no public information on structured feeding plans, vaccination or worming schedules, farrier dates with reminders, a medication log showing dose and who administered it, or a documented export of the file to a new stable, and those are exactly the things I would rely on as an owner. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
Each horse gets a digital card with care history and movements that the whole team consults from the phone, which is more than a whiteboard. We found no public information on structured feeding plans, vaccination and worming schedules, farrier dates, a medication log, or a documented export when a horse leaves. 2 1
The Tax Adviser
There is a digital card per horse with care history, movements and a digitalised register that the whole team consults from their phones — more than a whiteboard. But we found no public information on structured feeding plans, vaccination or worming schedules, farrier and vet appointments with reminders, a medication log with dose and administrator, or a documented export of the file when the horse leaves. 1 2
The Skeptic
A digital sheet per horse with care history and movement entries, consultable by the whole team from the phone, plus a digitalised register — better than a whiteboard, but the captured pages never say what a vet, an inspector or a departing owner would actually receive. We found no public information on feeding plans, vaccination or worming schedules, medication logging with dose and administrator, passport data, or an exportable horse file when the horse leaves. 1 2
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
There are tasks, a weekly plan and a real-time shared schedule, and a trace is kept of every outing, so the working day has a home beyond three WhatsApp groups. We found no public information on tasks assigned to a named person with completion ticking, recurrence, employee time recording, or holiday and absence planning, so I could not evidence who did what or feed payroll from it. 2
The Stable Manager
The features page names outings, tasks and a weekly plan on a schedule shared in real time on the team's phones. We found no public information on tasks being assigned or ticked off with completion history, on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, on holiday and absence planning, or on any record of who did what — it reads like a shared list rather than evidenced operations. 2
The Boarder
The captured pages show tasks, outings and a real-time shared weekly planning the team consults from their phones. I found no public information on task assignment, recurrence, completion records, shift or holiday planning, time recording for staff, or any audit trail showing who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when — so my question of whether my turnout instruction was actually read stays unanswered. 2
The Riding-School Lead
The activity module covers outings, tasks and a weekly schedule on a real-time shared planning read from the phone, but that is a shared to-do list at heart. We found no public information on task assignment and completion records, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, or holiday and boarder-duty planning. 2
The Tax Adviser
Tasks, outings and a weekly plan are shared in real time and consulted by the team on their phones. We found no public information on tasks assigned to people with completion records, shift or holiday planning, or time records that would satisfy a minimum-wage or working-time audit. 2
The Skeptic
The captured features are outings, tasks and a weekly shared schedule the team consults in real time from their phones — an organised yard, but I see nothing making anyone accountable for a round. We found no public information on task assignment and completion tracking, time recording for staff, holiday and absence planning, or any location-based clock-in and how it would be consented and documented. 1 2
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Each owner can check their own horse's balance and history whenever they like without disturbing me, which is the core of what I want from a portal. We found no public information on owners sending instructions or requests to the stable, push notifications for due dates and charges, separate scoping for co-owners and riding partners, or owner data export and deletion. 2
The Stable Manager
Each owner consults the balance and the history of their own horse whenever they wish without disturbing the stable, and a rider space is listed among the modules — a self-service view scoped to the owner's own horse. We found no public information on owners sending instructions or requests to the stable, on push notifications or acknowledgements, or on owner data export and deletion. 2 3
The Boarder
Each owner can consult their horse's balance and history whenever they wish without bothering the stable, and a rider space is among the named modules — that reads as a per-owner view of one's own horse and account, the core of what I want. I found no public information on sending instructions or requests to the stable, acknowledgement by the staff member who reads them, push notifications for due dates and charges, or how a privacy policy scopes one boarder's data against another's. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
Each owner consults the balance and history of their own horse whenever they wish without disturbing the stable, and a rider space module is listed, so per-owner viewing is evidenced. We found no public information on owners sending instructions or requests to the yard, push notifications for due dates and charges, or export and deletion of owner data. 2
The Tax Adviser
Each owner can consult their horse's balance and history on demand without disturbing the stable, and a rider space module is sold. We found no public information on owners sending instructions or booking requests, push notifications for charges or due dates, or how the portal keeps one boarder's data out of another's view. 2
The Skeptic
Each owner consults their own horse's history and their balance whenever they wish, and a rider space appears in the module list — that is the core of a real portal rather than a group chat. We found no public information on owners sending instructions or requests to the stable, push notifications, separate scoping for co-owners, or how one boarder's data is kept out of another's view. 2 3
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
A lessons-and-mounts planning module exists and the riding-school segment promises courses, shared planning and family invoicing, so the teaching side has a place in the system. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with time slots and rules, online course registration with payment, lesson cards, or linking walker and solarium use to billing or credit. 1 2 3
The Stable Manager
Lessons and school-horse planning is a named module, backed by a real-time shared schedule and family billing aimed at riding schools, so the teaching side has something behind it. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with time slots and rules, course registration, capacity or any link between facility use and billing or credit, so the shared-resources half of the job is unevidenced. 1 2 3
The Boarder
A lesson and schooling planning module is named, and the riding-centre pitch ties lessons, shared plannings and family billing together, so teaching is scheduled and billed. I found no public information on arena or equipment booking with time slots and rules, courses with online registration, capacity management, guest boxes or device integration — the shared-resource side of the yard is essentially unshown. 1 3
The Riding-School Lead
A lesson and riding-out planning module plus a real-time shared weekly schedule exist, and the riding-school pitch ties courses and shared plannings to family billing, which begins to connect teaching to the books. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with slots and rules, capacity per user group, school-horse workload, or lesson cards that count themselves. 2 1
The Tax Adviser
A lessons-and-riding planning module exists, and the riding-centre offer names lessons, shared plannings and family billing. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking with time slots and rules, online course registration with payment, guest boxes, or any device integration for walkers or solariums. 1 3
The Skeptic
There is a lessons and school-horse planning module, and riding schools are sold shared schedules with family billing — but the pages say nothing about booking any shared resource. We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, course registration, capacity or booking rules, guest riders, or device integration for walkers, gates or solariums. 1 2 3
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The vendor's own homepage states that data is hosted in France and is GDPR-compliant, and the company presents as a French SARL in Marly. The independently sourced sovereignty findings mark ownership, contracting jurisdiction, hosting residency and subprocessor exposure as unconfirmed, and we found no public information on subprocessor locations, a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data, or a published security or certification statement. 1
The Stable Manager
The vendor's own page states data hosted in France and GDPR-compliant, and the independently sourced profile names a French company hosted by OVH — but that same profile lists legal-entity jurisdiction, ownership and subprocessor exposure as unknown. We found no public information on the processors behind the app (push, payment, email), on a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or on data export and deletion, so French hosting is stated while the rest of the chain is not. 1
The Boarder
The vendor's own homepage states data is hosted in France and is GDPR-compliant, and the company presents itself as a French SARL, while the independently sourced attributes record residency, ownership and subprocessor exposure as unconfirmed. I found no public information on a privacy policy for the app, on the named subprocessors behind push, analytics or the online payment, or on a data processing agreement or security statement — as a boarder I want to know precisely who else can see my mare's file. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
The captured pages state data is hosted in France under GDPR and the vendor presents as a French company out of Marly, while the independently sourced attributes leave residency, ownership and the processor chain unconfirmed — the captured information gives different pictures on hosting. We found no public information on subprocessors such as push, payment and email, a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data, or documented data export and deletion. 1
The Tax Adviser
The contracting entity is a French SARL registered at RCS Metz, hosting is on OVH in France, and the homepage states RGPD conformity — a solid European base. The rest of the chain stays dark: we found no public information on the subprocessors behind push, payment or email, a data processing agreement offered for boarder and staff data, or a published security statement. 1
The Skeptic
The homepage states data is hosted in France and is GDPR-compliant and the provenance names a French company registered in Metz, yet the independently computed attributes report jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure all unknown, with the hosting statement flagged as unconfirmed on the captured pages. We found no public information on the processors behind online payment, push or email, on a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data, or on any published security statement. 1 2
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
A pricing page and a free trial exist, but the captured pricing page names modules and nothing else — we found no public information on any price per box, horse or module, setup fees, minimum term, VAT treatment, or what happens to the data on cancellation. From the public pages I cannot begin to compute what a year for forty boxes would cost me. 1 3
The Stable Manager
The pricing page names seven modules with a phone number and email, but we found no public prices of any kind — no per-horse, per-box or per-module figure, no setup fee, no minimum term, no VAT treatment, and nothing on what happens to the data on cancellation. A free trial is the only pricing statement I can find anywhere, so every yard is a sales call and I give it a single point above nothing. 1 3
The Boarder
A public pricing page was captured, but what it contributes is the module names — billing, client management, horses, e-invoicing, lesson planning, rider space, breeding register — plus contact details, with a free trial on the homepage. I found no public price figures at all, not even a starting "from" price, no setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment, so a stable owner could not compute a real annual cost from these pages. 1 3
The Riding-School Lead
The captured pricing page lists the module names and a free trial is offered, but we found no public information on any price figure, scaling per horse or module, setup fees, minimum term or VAT treatment. I cannot compute the annual cost of my yard from the public pages as captured. 3 1
The Tax Adviser
A pricing page exists that names the modules, and a free trial is offered, but we found no price figure on the captured pages — nothing per horse, box or module, and no setup fee, minimum term, VAT treatment or data-return terms on cancellation. An annual cost simply cannot be computed from what is public, so every stable is in effect a sales call. 1 3
The Skeptic
A pricing page was captured, but the facts it contributes are a module list and usage statistics — no price figure, scaling rule per horse or box, setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment appears, and only a free trial is named. A stable owner cannot compute an annual cost from the captured pages, and we found no public information on what happens to the data on cancellation. 1 3
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Equionline
Is Equionline European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Equionline as EU-Made.
Where does Equionline store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
Does Equionline have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Equionline?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Equionline alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 product fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (3)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.equionline.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (livery stables) www.equionline.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Pricing page www.equionline.fr Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →