Stable & Equestrian Management
horse+
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by KADACON GmbH · www.horseplus.app
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
horse+ at a glance
- Vendor
- KADACON GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Starting price
- “schon ab 20 € monatlich (zzgl. Mwst.)” (vendor’s words) source, captured 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates horse+ 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. horse+ is a stable and equestrian management app from KADACON GmbH of Schongau, Germany (formerly myroundpen), aimed at boarding stables, active and open stables, riding clubs, stable communities and riding schools. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
horse+ is a stable and equestrian management app from KADACON GmbH of Schongau, Germany (formerly myroundpen), aimed at boarding stables, active and open stables, riding clubs, stable communities and riding schools. It is strongest on scheduling and on the basics of billing: facilities and lessons scored 5-6 on a base-package booking calendar for the arena and solarium with advance blocking for fixed school times, and boarding and billing scored 5-6 on invoices, contracts, open items and a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeping. It is weakest on staff and operations, where the pages show communication and service documentation but we found no public information on shift plans, holiday planning or time recording, and on sovereignty, where the legal notice names KADACON GmbH (HRB 281942, Munich commercial court) but we found no public information on hosting location or subprocessors behind push, email and payment. Horse care records and pricing transparency each scored a flat 4. Judge totals span 3.8 to 4.7, no criterion spread wider than one point, and no significant disagreement between judges was flagged.
Speaks for it
- The base package includes a booking calendar for the arena and solarium with advance blocking for fixed school times, courses and farrier visits.
- Completed services pull into a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeping, alongside invoices, contracts and open items.
- Boarders book the arena or solarium from home and receive push news with read-rate tracking on the digital notice board.
- Prices are published — 'ab 30 € / Monat' with example packages of '85 € / Monat', '40 € / Monat' and '20 € / Monat', each 'zzgl. Mwst.' — and a free test is offered.
- The privacy policy states no location history or movement profiles are built, customer accounts are not publicly visible or search-indexable, and account data is deleted on termination.
Held against it
- Staff and operations scored 3-4 — we found no public information on recurring tasks assigned to people, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers.
- Horse care records scored 4, with no public information on vaccination or worming schedules, medication logs, or an exportable history per horse.
- We found no public information on hosting location or on the subprocessors behind push, email and payment.
- The offer is modular and we found no public information on per-module prices, a scaling rule per horse or box, setup fees or the minimum term, so the real annual cost is not computable from the pages.
- We found no public information on a per-owner view of their own horse's records and invoices, or on SEPA direct debit and export to a named accounting tool.
Best for
- You run a boarding stable and want boarders to book the hall and solarium themselves while you block fixed school times, clinics and farrier dates in advance.
- You bill from logged services and want every completed service in a one-click monthly report instead of additional programs or Excel lists.
- You want to reach the whole yard at once with push news and read-rate tracking rather than WhatsApp groups.
- You are a riding school and need lesson scheduling, confirmations and cancellations, occupancy plans and utilisation in the base package.
Avoid if
- You need evidenced vaccination, worming or medication records per horse — horse care records scored 4 and we found no public information on these.
- You need staff-side tooling such as named task assignment, shift and holiday planning, or time recording — staff and operations scored 3-4.
- You must review hosting location and subprocessors before signing — we found no public information on either.
- You must compute the full annual cost up front — we found no public information on module prices, scaling, setup fees or the minimum term (pricing transparency scored 4).
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 2.5 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 1.5 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Contracts, invoices and open items are handled in the app itself — “ohne zusätzliche Programme oder Excel-Listen” — and every completed service can be pulled as a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeping, which is exactly the retyping I want gone. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates per service type, credit notes, or an export to DATEV or another named accounting tool, so the money side stops at the invoice. 1 2
The Stable Manager
Invoices, contracts and open items are managed inside the system, and the service documentation promises a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeping, which is what month-end needs. But I found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates per service type, credit notes, dunning or an export to a named accounting tool, so the money side stops short of discharged. 1 2
The Boarder
The stable-owner pages show invoices, contracts and open items managed in the app, with complete service documentation pulled into a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeper, so a logged extra service visibly feeds the money side. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, per-service VAT rates, credit notes, or export to a named accounting tool. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
Invoices, contracts and open items are managed inside the app, and gapless service documentation pulls into a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeping — that is billing from logged work. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT treatment per service type, credit notes, or an export to a named accounting tool. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
Invoices, contracts and open items are managed in the system, and completed services pull into a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeping, which connects a logged service to the money side and payment status. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, credit notes, or an export to DATEV or another named accounting tool. 1 2
The Skeptic
Invoices, contracts and open items are said to be handled inside the system, and completed services pull into a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeper — that is billing from the system, not a price list. Beyond that we found no public information on SEPA mandates, VAT rates per service type, credit notes, or an export to a named accounting tool. 1 2
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Feeding, group management and the daily stable routine are front and centre, and pasture status, horse assignment and documents ship in the base package. We found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules, a medication log with dose and who administered it, passport and UELN data, or a documented export of a horse's file — the parts a vet or an inspector would demand. 1 2
The Stable Manager
Feeding, group management and paddock status are named, and horses get assigned in the base package, but I found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier dates with reminders, a medication log with dose and who administered it, or an export of the horse's file when it leaves. Feeding is mentioned without any evidence of a structured plan shown to staff per round. 1 2
The Boarder
Feeding, group management and the daily routine are named as central features, and documents, turnout status and horse assignment sit in the base package, which covers the daily round. We found no public information on vaccination or worming schedules, farrier and vet appointments with reminders, or a medication log, so I cannot tell from public pages whether the farrier's work is even recorded. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
Feeding and group management, paddock status, horse assignment and documents per horse are evidenced in the base package. We found no public information on vaccination or worming schedules with reminders, farrier and vet appointments, medication logs, or an exportable history — the things a vet, an inspector or a new stable would ask me for. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
Feeding, group management and daily stable operations are named features, with horse assignment, paddock status and documents included in the base package. We found no public information on vaccination or worming schedules with reminders, a medication log with dose and administrator, or an exportable health history per horse. 1 2
The Skeptic
Feeding and group management, a pasture status and a documents module are in the base package — more than a whiteboard. But we found no public information on vaccination or worming schedules, a medication log with dose and administrator, farrier and vet appointments, or any export of the horse's file when it leaves. 1 2
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The pages show daily stable operations, completed services and yard-wide news in the app, but apart from a lesson-planning view aimed at riding schools there is nothing on the employment side. We found no public information on recurring tasks assigned to named people with completion ticked, shift or holiday planning, time records for employees and mini-jobbers, or role permissions. 1 2
The Stable Manager
Completed services are documented and lesson scheduling is in the base package, but I found no public information on recurring tasks assigned to people with completion on the phone, a shift or holiday plan, or time recording that holds up for grooms and mini-jobbers. No audit trail of who fed or turned out which horse is shown. 1 2
The Boarder
The pages speak of the daily stable routine in general terms and show completed services documented, but we found no public information on recurring tasks assigned to specific people, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
The daily stable round is in the app and the service documentation shows every completed service, which is a record of what was done. We found no public information on tasks assigned to named people, recurring rounds ticked off on the phone, shift and holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
What the pages show for the daily running is communication and documentation: a digital notice board with push messages and read-rate tracking, and complete documentation of completed services. We found no public information on recurring tasks assigned to people, a shift plan, holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. 1 2
The Skeptic
Completed services are documented and the daily routine is mentioned, but we found no public information on task assignment and recurrence, a shift plan, holiday and absence planning, time recording for employees, or boarder duty rotas. To its credit the privacy policy states no location history or movement profiles are built, so there is at least no undocumented geofencing of staff here. 1 2 5
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
My Einsteller get real app access: they book the hall or solarium from home, receive push news with read-rate tracking, and the digital notice board reaches everyone at once — that already replaces two of my WhatsApp groups. We found no public information on owners seeing their own horse's records or their invoices and logged services, or how one boarder's data is scoped away from another's, beyond customer accounts not being indexable by search engines. 1 2 5
The Stable Manager
Boarders book the arena and solarium from home and the whole yard gets push news with read-rate tracking, so there is real owner access and communication. What I don't see is a per-owner view of their own horse's records, logged services and invoices, and no evidence of how one boarder's data is kept out of another's view. 1 2 5
The Boarder
Boarders clearly get app access: push news with read-rate tracking on the digital noticeboard, and they book the arena or solarium themselves from home. But we found no public information on an owner seeing her own horse's records or the services billed to her, or on instructions to the stable being acknowledged; the accounts are simply stated as not public and not search-indexable. 1 2 5
The Riding-School Lead
Owners register themselves from home for arena or solarium slots, the digital notice board sends push news with read-rate tracking, and the privacy policy states accounts are not publicly visible and not indexable by search engines. We found no public information on an owner's view of their own horse's records or bills, on instructions sent to the stable, or on separate scoping for co-owners and part-riders. 1 2 5
The Tax Adviser
Boarders have their own user accounts and can book the arena or solarium from home, the yard reaches everyone with push news, and accounts are stated as not public and not indexable by search engines. We found no public information on an owner view of their own horse's records or their own invoices, or on co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen being scoped separately. 1 2 5
The Skeptic
Boarders are clearly in the app — they book the arena or solarium from home and receive push news with read-rate tracking — but that is a yard-wide feed and a booking sheet. We found no public information on a per-owner view of their own horse's records, the services billed to them, or a channel for instructions to the stable. 1 2 5
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Facility booking is properly built: owners self-book the hall and solarium while I block fixed school times, Lehrgänge and farrier dates in advance, and lesson planning, confirmations/cancellations and a utilisation view are included in the base package — that is how my hall should run. We found no public information on bookings feeding into billing or prepaid credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload, or guest riders, so the calendar and the money still live apart. 1 2
The Stable Manager
The booking calendar covers hall and solarium with advance blocking for fixed school times, courses and farrier visits, and lesson scheduling, occupancy plans and utilisation are included in the base package, which is the daily arena business handled. I found no public information on course registration, capacity or booking rules per user group, lesson cards, school-horse workload, or equipment use flowing into billing. 1 2
The Boarder
The booking calendar covers hall and solarium with advance blocking for fixed lesson times, clinics and farrier closures, and occupancy plans, lesson scheduling and utilisation are included in the base package. We found no public information on booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing, or courses with registration and payment. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
The booking calendar with advance blocking for fixed riding school times, courses and farrier visits is exactly what stops double-booked arenas, and lesson scheduling, occupancy plans, utilization and confirm/decline all sit in the base package. We found no public information on lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload, or course fees landing in the same books as board. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
A booking calendar with self-service entry for the arena and solarium plus advance blocking for fixed lesson times, courses and farrier closures is exactly rules-based booking, and lesson planning and confirmations/cancellations sit in the base package. We found no public information on course registration with payment, school-horse management, or bookings linked to a charge or credit. 1 2
The Skeptic
A booking calendar for arena and solarium with advance blocking for riding school times, courses and farrier visits, plus lesson scheduling, occupancy plans and utilisation included in the base package — that is real booking with rules. We found no public information on capacity limits per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards, or payment handling for course registration. 1 2
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The contracting entity is European — KADACON GmbH, registered in Munich and based in Schongau — and the privacy policy covers the app, names the Apple and Google app-store channel, says location data forms no movement profiles, and states that account data is deleted on termination. We found no public information on where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted or on the subprocessors behind push, chat and email; the chat section names OpenAI, Anthropic and Google without a stated safeguard. 3 5
The Stable Manager
The contracting party is KADACON GmbH in Schongau under the Munich registry, and a privacy policy covers the app, its app-store distribution and states no location history or movement profiles are built. But hosting location is not stated anywhere, and the subprocessors behind push, email and payment are unnamed, so the chain stays open. 3 4 5
The Boarder
KADACON GmbH of Schongau, registered in Munich, is the vendor, and the privacy policy covers the app, promises deletion when the account is terminated and states no location history or movement profiles are built. But we found no public information on where boarder and horse data are hosted or who the subprocessors behind push, payments or email are; OpenAI, Anthropic and Google appear only in the statement that chat histories are not used to train their models. 3 5
The Riding-School Lead
The vendor is a German company (KADACON GmbH, HRB 281942, Munich commercial court) named in the legal notice and terms, and the privacy policy covers the app itself, app-store distribution and punctual location use without movement profiles. We found no public information on where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, on the subprocessors behind push, analytics, email or payment, or on a data processing agreement for the stable. 3 4 5
The Tax Adviser
The vendor presents a German legal notice, German terms and a privacy policy that covers app-store distribution, and the policy states location data is used only point-wise with no movement profiles and data deleted on account termination. We found no public information on hosting location or the subprocessors behind push, payments or email, so the chain cannot be reviewed from public pages. 3 4 5
The Skeptic
The legal notice names KADACON GmbH registered in Munich, so the contracting entity is German, and a privacy policy covers the app with deletion on termination stated. But we found no public information on where horse, boarder and staff data are hosted, and no subprocessor list beyond the generic mention of app stores — push, analytics, email and payment remain unnamed, and no data processing agreement is offered anywhere we could see. 3 4 5
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Public prices exist: “ab 30 € / Monat” with example packages of 85 € for a Boxenstall, 40 € for a Reitschule and “20 € / Monat zzgl. Mwst.” for a Stallgemeinschaft, all “zzgl. Mwst.”, plus a free test and a published list of base-package inclusions. But the product is sold modularly, and we found no public information on per-module prices, a scaling rule per box, horse or user, setup fees or minimum term — so for forty boxes I cannot compute the real annual cost, though the policy at least says data is deleted when the customer terminates. 2 5
The Stable Manager
A from price of ab 30 € / Monat is published with example packages for three stable types (85 € / Monat, 40 € / Monat, 20 € / Monat, each zzgl. Mwst.) and the base package inclusions are listed. But the modular build-your-own model means I cannot compute what billing, staff or device functions add, and I found no public information on setup fees, minimum term or data return beyond the stated deletion of account data on termination. 2 5
The Boarder
Public prices exist — "ab 30 € / Monat", with example packages of "85 € / Monat" for box stables, "40 € / Monat" for riding schools and "20 € / Monat" for stable communities, each marked "zzgl. Mwst." — and the base package contents are listed. But the product is modular, and we found no public information on individual module prices, scaling with horses or boxes, setup fees or minimum term, so a stable owner cannot compute the real annual cost from the public pages alone. 2
The Riding-School Lead
Public pages give 'ab 30 € / Monat' with example packages — riding school 'Beispielpaket 40 € / Monat zzgl. Mwst.' — and list the base package inclusions with VAT stated as excluded. We found no public information on per-module prices for the modular setup, the scaling rule per box or horse, setup fees or the minimum term, so the real annual cost for my yard is not computable from the pages alone. 2 4 5
The Tax Adviser
Public pages show "ab 30 € / Monat" with example packages of "Beispielpaket 85 € / Monat zzgl. Mwst." for box stables and "20 € / Monat zzgl. Mwst." for stable communities, VAT treatment stated and the base package's inclusions listed. Because the offer is modular and we found no public prices per module, no per-horse or per-box scaling rule, and no setup fee, minimum term or data-return terms, the real annual cost is not computable from public pages alone. 2
The Skeptic
Starting prices and priced example packages per stable type are published with VAT marked and the base inclusions listed, which is more than a bare 'from' figure. But the model is modular and we found no public information on module prices beyond the base, a scaling rule per horse or box, setup fees, or minimum term — a stable owner cannot compute the real annual cost from the public pages alone. 2 4 5
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about horse+
Is horse+ European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies horse+ as EU-Made.
Where does horse+ store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
Does horse+ have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to horse+?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: horse+ alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 11 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (5)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.horseplus.app Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (stable owners) www.horseplus.app Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Legal notice www.horseplus.app Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Terms of service www.horseplus.app Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Privacy policy www.horseplus.app Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →