Stable & Equestrian Management
Paddock Pro
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by High Park Software · www.paddockpro.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Paddock Pro at a glance
- Vendor
- High Park Software
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Paddock Pro 0/5, the mean of 6 judges. Paddock Pro, stable and equestrian management software from High Park Software, was judged from one captured vendor page, and the bench found very little to score. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Paddock Pro, stable and equestrian management software from High Park Software, was judged from one captured vendor page, and the bench found very little to score. Five criteria — boarding and billing, horse care records, staff and operations, boarder portal, facilities and lessons — returned 0 from every judge: we found no public information on board contracts, invoices, horse records, staff rotas, owner logins, or arena and lesson booking. What the page shows is three edition names (Small Farm, Business, Enterprise), a demo video, and the Arabian Horse Association naming Paddock Pro its official horse farm software — the page's only third-party endorsement. The only non-zero marks are single points on sovereignty and pricing transparency, the latter crediting the visible tier ladder; no judge disagreements were flagged, and score differences never exceeded one point. We found no published prices, and judges noted a stable owner cannot compute an annual cost from the page. The vendor record names High Park Software while the page copyright names Alua Software, with no location stated for either.
Speaks for it
- Publishes a three-edition ladder — Small Farm, Business and Enterprise — on the vendor page.
- Offers a demo video buyers can watch before enquiring.
- Carries the Arabian Horse Association's official horse farm software endorsement.
Held against it
- Scored 0 on all five stable-management criteria — boarding and billing, horse care records, staff and operations, boarder portal, and facilities and lessons.
- We found no public information on structured horse records — feeding plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier or medication logs — that a vet or inspector could rely on.
- We found no public information on any owner or boarder login, per-owner views of records and charges, or instruction channels.
- No sovereignty attributes are on record; judges found no public information on hosting location, contracting-entity country or subprocessors, and the vendor record and page copyright name different companies.
- We found no published prices, setup fees, minimum terms or data-return terms alongside the three edition names.
Best for
- You run an Arabian horse operation and give weight to the breed association's official-software endorsement.
- You are comfortable evaluating through a demo video and a vendor conversation rather than published documentation.
- You only need a tier ladder to prompt an enquiry, with scope and cost settled in conversation.
Avoid if
- You need a clear contracting entity and data location before signing — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You must budget without a sales call — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You require documented evidence of core yard functions before shortlisting — the bench scored 0 on all five stable-management criteria.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 0 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 0 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 0 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 0 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 0 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Not a word on the money side: I found no public information on board contracts, extra services logged where they happen, recurring invoices or SEPA direct debit, which is exactly what a forty-box yard needs. On this evidence every blanket change and leg wrap would still be typed into an invoice by hand in another tool. 1
The Stable Manager
The captured page names three editions, a demo video and an Arabian Horse Association endorsement, and stops there; we found no public information on board contracts, per-horse extra services, invoices, payment collection or any export to an accountant, so I cannot see how a yard would get paid from this system. 1
The Boarder
The public page names three editions and offers a demo video, and that is all; we found no public information on board contracts, extra-service logging, invoices, payment methods or VAT treatment. As a boarder who wants to know why there are three extra wraps on my bill, I found no public information that would let me verify a single charge. 1
The Riding-School Lead
We found no public information on board contracts, extra services, invoices, direct debit, VAT treatment or accounting exports — the captured page names the product's three editions and nothing about the money side. For a stable that bills per box and per horse, that is the same position as invoicing by hand in another tool. 1
The Tax Adviser
We found no public information on board contracts, per-horse or per-service billing, VAT treatment or an export to an accounting tool — the captured page says nothing about how a stable gets paid. Without even a feature list on the money side, nothing distinguishes this from invoicing by hand elsewhere. 1
The Skeptic
The captured page names Small Farm, Business and Enterprise editions and offers a demo video, and we found no public information on board contracts, invoices, payment methods or an export to accounting. Not one element of the money side of a yard is visible on these pages. 1
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
I found no public information on feeding plans, vaccination or worming schedules, farrier and vet appointments, medication logs or a per-horse history. Nothing I can see would let a vet, an inspector or an owner rely on records kept in this system. 1
The Stable Manager
We found no public information on any structured record per horse — no feeding plans, vaccination, worming or farrier schedules, no medication log with who gave what, and no history or export — so I cannot tell whether the night shift would see more than a name on a screen. 1
The Boarder
We found no public information on horse profiles, feeding plans, vaccination or farrier records, or export of a horse's file; the only horse-related statement is that the product is the Arabian Horse Association's official horse farm software, which says nothing about records. Nothing here shows a vet, an inspector or I could rely on any documentation. 1
The Riding-School Lead
We found no public information on horse profiles, feeding plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier or vet history anywhere in the captured material. I keep twelve school horses and there is nothing here a vet, an inspector or an owner could rely on. 1
The Tax Adviser
No public information on horse master data, feeding plans, vaccination schedules or medication logs appears in the captured material; the page names the product and its editions and nothing more. A vet, inspector or owner would have nothing documented to rely on here. 1
The Skeptic
The product is presented as horse farm software and as official software of the Arabian Horse Association, but we found no public information on feeding plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier or vet records. Nothing captured evidences a record per horse that an inspector or vet could rely on. 1
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
We found no public information on tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording or boarder duty rotas. The captured page points to a demo video but describes nothing about how the daily running of a yard is organised. 1
The Stable Manager
We found no public information on task assignment or feeding-round checklists, rotas and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, role permissions or offline use in a barn without signal — nothing published shows the morning round could be run or evidenced in this system. 1
The Boarder
We found no public information on tasks, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, time recording, or boarder duty rotas. The public page shows editions and a demo only, so I cannot see who would be recorded as having fed or turned out my mare. 1
The Riding-School Lead
We found no public information on task lists, feeding rounds, shift plans, time recording or boarder help. The daily running of the yard is simply not addressed on the captured page. 1
The Tax Adviser
We found no public information on tasks, feeding rounds, shift or holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers. There is nothing here that would evidence working-time documentation for a wage or customs check. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public information on tasks, feeding rounds, shift planning, time recording for mini-jobbers or any location-based clock-in and its consent. The captured page speaks of editions and a demo and nothing about the daily running of a yard. 1
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
I found no public information on an owner login, per-horse views of records and bills, or how one boarder's data is kept out of another's view. On this evidence communication would stay with WhatsApp and the notice board. 1
The Stable Manager
We found no public information on an owner login of any kind, so I cannot see how boarders would view their own horse's records or their bills, send instructions to the stable, or how one owner's data would be kept from another's view. 1
The Boarder
We found no public information on an owner login, per-owner scoping of horse data, invoices shown to owners, or an instruction channel to the stable. This is my top concern — I want my mare's file visible to me, acknowledged by the groom, and out of other boarders' view — and none of it is evidenced. 1
The Riding-School Lead
We found no public information on any owner login, a per-owner view of their horse's records or charges, or a channel for instructions to the stable. On this evidence an owner's window into the yard stays outside the product. 1
The Tax Adviser
No public information on owner access was captured — nothing on per-owner views of a horse's records, logged services or invoices, and nothing on how one boarder's data is scoped from another's. The page does not evidence any portal at all. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public information on owner or boarder access — no login, no per-owner view of records or charges, no channel for instructions. Whether an owner ever sees their own horse's data inside the system is not answerable from the captured page. 1
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
I found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons and school horses, courses with registration, or guest boxes. The teaching and shared-facilities side is simply not described in the captured material. 1
The Stable Manager
We found no public information on arena or equipment bookings with time slots and rules, lessons with riders and school horses, or courses and events with registration and payment. 1
The Boarder
We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons and school horses, or courses and clinics with registration. The captured page contains nothing on shared facilities. 1
The Riding-School Lead
This is the heart of my operation and the captured page offers a demo video and three edition names with no description of arena booking, lesson scheduling, school horses, ten-lesson cards, courses or clinics. We found no public information on any booking or teaching feature, so I cannot hand it a single point. 1
The Tax Adviser
We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons, school horses, courses or guest boxes. The captured page evidences no facility or teaching-business feature. 1
The Skeptic
We found no public information on arena or equipment booking, lessons, school horses, courses with registration or guest boxes. The captured page gives edition names and an association endorsement and nothing on shared resources or the teaching business. 1
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
No sovereignty attributes are on record: I found no statement of hosting location, contracting-entity jurisdiction, subprocessors or a privacy policy covering the app. The copyright notice names Alua Software for 2011 while the vendor record lists High Park Software, and the captured page places neither entity in any country. 1
The Stable Manager
No hosting location, contracting-entity country or subprocessor is on record, and we found no published privacy policy covering the app. The vendor entry names High Park Software while the page's copyright names Alua Software, and no location is stated for either company — for a European yard, boarder, staff and horse data residency is entirely unknown. 1
The Boarder
No sovereignty attributes are on record: we found no public information on hosting location, subprocessors, a privacy policy covering the app, or a data processing agreement, and the captured pages give different names for the company behind the product (High Park Software in the header, Alua Software in the copyright). The Arabian Horse Association endorsement points to the American market, and we found no public information showing an EU contracting entity or EU hosting. 1
The Riding-School Lead
The only corporate traces are a vendor named High Park Software, a 2011 copyright line to Alua Software, and marketing aimed at the Arabian Horse Association; no sovereignty attributes are on record. We found no public information on hosting location, contracting entity in Europe, subprocessors behind the app, a data processing agreement, or a privacy policy covering the app. 1
The Tax Adviser
No sovereignty attributes are on record: the captured material states no hosting location, names no subprocessors for hosting, push, payment or email, and shows only a 2011 copyright line for Alua Software with no EU entity in evidence. I found no public information on a privacy policy, data processing agreement or data-return terms. 1
The Skeptic
The captured material gives two different company names — High Park Software as the vendor and Alua Software in the 2011 copyright — and we found no public information on where either is based, where data is hosted, or which subprocessors stand behind the app, push or payments. For a European stable, who the contracting entity even is, and where boarder and horse data sit, is left unanswered on the public pages. 1
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The captured page names Small Farm, Business and Enterprise editions, but we found no figures for any of them — no price per box, horse or module, no setup fee, no minimum term, nothing on data return. A stable owner cannot work out an annual cost from public pages; only the existence of a tier ladder is visible. 1
The Stable Manager
The page publishes three edition names — Small Farm, Business and Enterprise — but we found no public prices, inclusions, scaling rule per box or horse, setup fee, minimum term, or cancellation and data-return terms, so I cannot begin to work out a year's cost for my yard from it. 1
The Boarder
Three edition names (Small Farm, Business, Enterprise) are published, but we found no public prices at all — no per-box, per-horse or per-module figures, no setup fees, no minimum term, no VAT treatment and no data-return terms. A stable owner cannot compute any annual cost from the public page alone. 1
The Riding-School Lead
The captured page names Small Farm, Business and Enterprise editions but publishes no price for any of them, and we found no public information on per-horse or per-box scaling, setup fees, minimum term or what happens to the data on cancellation. A stable owner can compute nothing from this; every enquiry would be a sales call. 1
The Tax Adviser
The page names three editions — Small Farm, Business, Enterprise — but we found no public price for any of them, no per-box, per-horse or per-module scaling, and no setup fee, minimum term or cancellation terms. A stable owner cannot compute any annual cost from this capture; it reads as a sales conversation waiting to happen. 1
The Skeptic
The captured page names three editions — Small Farm, Business, Enterprise — and we found no public prices at all: nothing per box, per horse or per module, nothing on setup, term, VAT or data return on cancellation. No stable owner can compute even a rough annual cost from this page. 1
Questions about Paddock Pro
Is Paddock Pro European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Paddock Pro is based.
Where does Paddock Pro store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
Does Paddock Pro have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Paddock Pro?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 16 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Paddock Pro alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (paddockpro.com). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (paddockpro.com). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 2 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (1)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.paddockpro.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →