Time Tracking & Attendance
TimeLog
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by TimeLog Systems A/S · www.timelog.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
TimeLog at a glance
- Vendor
- TimeLog Systems A/S
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates TimeLog 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. TimeLog, from TimeLog Systems A/S, scored highest on project and billing at 8–9: rates applied by client, project, person and role, one-click invoicing with approval flows, budgets that update automatically with real-time early warnings, and finance connections to e-conomic, Visma and Fortnox. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
TimeLog, from TimeLog Systems A/S, scored highest on project and billing at 8–9: rates applied by client, project, person and role, one-click invoicing with approval flows, budgets that update automatically with real-time early warnings, and finance connections to e-conomic, Visma and Fortnox. Payroll export follows at 6–8 on an automatically generated DATEV Lohn und Gehalt file carrying project time, absence, flex, expenses and mileage, plus single-entry payroll connections including Lessor Payroll. The weakest scores are pricing transparency at 0–1 — a Growth plan's features are public, but no price, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment is — and working time law at 1–2, with no public information on break rules, daily-hour limits, rest periods or retention. Time capture scored 3–4, a desk-and-road toolset. Judges spread on absence and planning, 2 to 4: higher scores credited holiday, sickness and flex recording that reaches payroll; lower scores weighed duty rostering, entitlement and carry-over, on which the judges found no public information. Sovereignty scored 1–3; no sovereignty attributes are on record.
Speaks for it
- Project and billing scored 8–9, the bench's highest, on rates by client, project, person and role, automatic budget updates with real-time early warnings, and one-click invoicing with approval flows.
- Payroll export scored 6–8 on an automatically generated DATEV Lohn und Gehalt file carrying project time, absence, flex, expenses and mileage.
- Named single-entry payroll connections include Lessor Payroll for Microsoft Dynamics NAV, Hogia Lön+, Zenegy, Crona, DataLøn, Danløn and Fortnox Lön.
- Finance connections to e-conomic, Visma and Fortnox are published, alongside custom integrations and APIs.
- Capture suits desk and road staff: mobile and desktop apps, a task stopwatch, Outlook calendar conversion, minute-level tracking, camera receipts and mileage via Google or Apple Maps.
Held against it
- Pricing transparency scored 0–1: a Growth plan's features are listed, but the bench found no public information on any price, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment.
- Working time law scored 1–2, with no public information on break rules, daily-hour limits, rest periods, retention or guidance tying the product to the German recording duty.
- Sovereignty scored 1–3 and no sovereignty attributes are on record; the judges found no public information on hosting region, data-centre provider or a subprocessor list.
- Time capture scored 3–4, with no public information on offline capture, shared terminals or badge check-in for shift crews, or a correction-and-approval workflow for time entries.
- Absence and planning scored 2–4, and the planning on show is project capacity, with no public information on duty rosters, automatic entitlement, carry-over or absence approval.
Best for
- You run a project-driven agency or consultancy billing at rates set per client, project, person and role.
- You close the month by turning time, expense and mileage registrations into invoices in one step, with approval flows and revenue recognition.
- You hand payroll to a tax adviser through DATEV Lohn und Gehalt, or run Lessor Payroll, and want single entry with no re-typing.
- Your staff are desk-based or travelling consultants who can register time on mobile, desktop, a task stopwatch or Outlook.
Avoid if
- You must evidence compliance with the German working-time recording duty — the judges found no public information on break rules, daily-hour limits, rest periods or retention.
- You run shift or field crews needing shared terminals, badge check-in, offline capture or duty rosters with rest checks.
- You need to cost the product before talking to sales — every figure sits behind a sales conversation.
- Your works council or data-protection officer requires documented hosting region, contracting entity and subprocessors before approving an attendance tool.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Capture in the real workplace | 1.5 of 5 |
| Working-time law & audit record | 1 of 5 |
| Absence & shift planning | 2 of 5 |
| Project, cost-centre & billing | 4.5 of 5 |
| Payroll handoff | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 0 of 5 |
Capture in the real workplace
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.
0 — One browser timer and nothing else; anyone away from a desk records nothing.
3 — Web plus a mobile app, but no offline capture, no shared terminal, and corrections are an admin task rather than a workflow.
5 — Web, mobile and at least one shared capture point (kiosk, terminal or badge), with offline capture that syncs, and a correction workflow with approval.
8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.
10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.
The Operations Lead
Mobile and desktop apps, a task stopwatch and Outlook conversion give desk staff several ways to record, but every path shown is a personal device or browser — I found no public information on shared terminals, badge or kiosk capture for workshop and shift crews, offline capture, or a correction-and-approval workflow for time entries. For a 200-person operation with field staff, this reads as a consultant's timesheet, not attendance capture. 2 3 6
The Payroll Officer
Mobile and desktop apps, a task stopwatch, Outlook conversion and minute-level tracking serve the desk and the travelling consultant, with mileage calculated through Google or Apple Maps. We found no public information on offline capture, shared terminals or badge check-in for shift crews, nor on a correction workflow with approval and an audit trail — the promise is simply that every employee registers time as they prefer. 2 3 6
The Works Council Advocate
Desktop and mobile apps with a task stopwatch, Outlook conversion and swipe-to-close give desk staff genuine choice in how they register, which is what a works council wants to see. But we found no public information on offline capture, shared terminals for deskless or shift crews, or a correction workflow with approval; and the mileage feature routes journeys through Google or Apple Maps with no statement of what location data is stored, for how long, or who can read it. 2 3
The Agency Owner
Minute-level tracking across mobile and desktop apps, a task stopwatch, Outlook calendar conversion, camera receipts and mileage tied to Google or Apple Maps covers my desk staff and the client-visit road time that pays my margin. But I found no public information on offline capture, a shared kiosk or badge terminal for site crews, or a correction-and-approval workflow with a change history, so this reads as a desk-and-road product rather than a whole-workforce one. 2 3 6
The Field Supervisor
Mobile and desktop apps, minute-level tracking, a task stopwatch, Outlook-to-time conversion and a swipe to close the timesheet are all on the record, with expenses and mileage riding along via camera and Maps. But we found no public information on offline capture, on any shared terminal or kiosk for a site hut, or on a correction workflow a foreman could run without a ticket — in my world that is a timer that gets reconstructed from memory at the end of the week. 2 3 6
The Skeptic
The capture paths on show are the mobile app, desktop apps, a task stopwatch and converting Outlook calendar events, minute-level and plainly built for consultants rather than shift crews. We found no public information on offline capture, shared terminals or badge readers, and the only approval flows shown are for invoices — a correction workflow for time entries is nowhere described. 2 3
Working-time law & audit record
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.
0 — Hours are summed and nothing else; no break handling, no limits, no retention statement.
3 — Break deduction exists but is a flat rule; no daily maximum or rest-period checks, and no stated retention period.
5 — Configurable break rules, warnings on the 8/10-hour daily maximum and the 11-hour rest period, and per-employee reports covering the recording duty.
8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, and an export built for an inspection.
10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.
The Operations Lead
This is a Danish project-timesheet product and I found no public information on break handling, the 8/10-hour daily maximum, the 11-hour rest period, retention or anything mapping to the German recording duty after the BAG ruling. The only adjacent facts are flex-time and absence reporting and a work-time export built for payroll, which is more than a bare hour sum but none of the ArbZG apparatus. 2 6
The Payroll Officer
Minute-level capture and a flex account that exports alongside work and absence times give me reconcilable data, but I found no public information on break rules, daily maximum hours, rest periods, retention, or any framing against the German recording duty. Nothing captured shows this record being built to survive an inspection. 2 6
The Works Council Advocate
Time is captured to the minute and flex is reported, but we found no public information on break rules, daily maxima, rest periods, retention, or tamper-evident change history — the only audit trail on show is described for internal billing across legal entities, not for the working-time record itself. A record built for invoices will not satisfy the recording duty on its own, and I found no guidance mapping features to the working-time statutes they serve. 2 5 6
The Agency Owner
Flex, holiday and sickness get recorded and flow toward payroll, and there are GDPR and privacy pages, but I found no public information on break rules, daily-hour limits, rest-period checks or a retention statement — nothing captured shows the record standing up to a German inspection. For me compliance is the floor, and the captured pages do not evidence the floor. 2 6
The Field Supervisor
Minute-level capture and a flex-time account are the only pieces of a working-time record I can see, and flex even reaches the DATEV export alongside project time. We found no public information on break rules, daily maximums, rest periods, retention, or any guidance tying the product to the German recording duty, so I would not hand this to an inspector as it stands. 2 6
The Skeptic
No captured page mentions the German recording duty, break rules, the daily maximum, rest periods or a retention period — there is not even a conformity claim I could pin to a feature. All that touches the criterion is minute-level tracking and flex accounts flowing to payroll, which is arithmetic, not compliance. 2 7
Absence & shift planning
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.
0 — No absence handling; vacation lives in a separate calendar or spreadsheet.
3 — Vacation requests with approval, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no rostering.
5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic shift planning with availability.
8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.
10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.
The Operations Lead
Holiday, flex and sickness recording exist and travel through to payroll, and there is resource planning with live workload transparency — but that reads as project capacity planning, and I found no public information on automatic entitlement, carry-over, vacation approval workflows or a shift roster with rest checks. My field crews' duty roster would still live somewhere else. 2 3 7
The Payroll Officer
Holiday, sickness and flex are real categories that flow into both DATEV and Lessor Payroll as activated salary types, and resource planning offers live workload transparency. We found no public information on automatic entitlement or carry-over, location-based holiday calendars, or shift rosters with rest-period checks — the planning on display is project capacity, not a duty roster. 2 3 7
The Works Council Advocate
Holiday, sickness and flex can be reported from home and flow into payroll, and a resource-planning module with real-time workload transparency exists. But we found no public information on entitlement calculation, carry-over, approval workflows for absence, or shift rostering with rest checks; the planning on show is project capacity for consultants, not a duty roster for shift crews. 2 3 7
The Agency Owner
Holiday, sickness and flex absence are recorded and reach payroll, and a resource-planning module gives real-time workload transparency. I found no public information on automatic entitlement or carry-over, an absence calendar, or shift rostering with coverage checks — the planning on show is project capacity, not duty rosters, which suits my agency but caps the score. 1 2 3 7
The Field Supervisor
Holiday, flex and absence reporting from home in a minute is evidenced, sickness and holiday flow through to the payroll integrations, and resource planning is named as a module with real-time workload transparency. But we found no public information on automatic entitlement, carry-over, absence approval, or shift and duty rosters with rest-period checks — the half that makes the time data mean anything on a crew. 2 3 7
The Skeptic
Holiday, sickness and flex absence are recorded and travel into payroll as salary types, and resource planning exists — but as project capacity with real-time workload transparency, not a duty roster. We found no public information on automatic entitlement, carry-over, absence approval, substitution and swap workflows, or public-holiday calendars per location. 2 3 7
Project, cost-centre & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.
0 — Attendance only; no project, task or cost-centre dimension at all.
3 — A free-text note or a single project field, with no rates, no billable flag and no per-project reporting.
5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag and per-project reports, plus a rate per person or per project.
8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.
10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.
The Operations Lead
This is the vendor's home ground: hourly rates by client, project, person and role, budgets updated automatically, invoice approval flows, one-click month-end invoicing and maintained handoffs into named finance systems make time-to-revenue without re-entry largely evidenced. I found no public information on a cost-centre dimension or how rates behave when changed mid-project, which is what keeps it just short of the top. 1 2 4 5
The Payroll Officer
Time, expense and mileage registrations become invoices in one automated step, with approval flows, templates per customer and project, rates applied by client, project, person and role, multi-currency and multi-entity billing, budget warnings, live revenue recognition and named finance connections to e-conomic, Visma and Fortnox. That is time becoming revenue without re-entry; we found no public information on cost-centre structure or client-facing reporting. 1 4 5
The Works Council Advocate
This is the vendor's home ground: rates by client, project, person and role, multi-currency billing, budgets that update automatically, one-click invoicing from time, expense and mileage registrations, invoice templates with approval flows, and maintained connections to e-conomic, Visma and Fortnox via API. We found no public information on cost-centre structure or how rate rules behave when a rate changes mid-project, which keeps it short of the top. 1 4 5
The Agency Owner
This is where I live: rates applied automatically by client, project, person and role, project budgeting and forecasting with automatic budget updates and real-time early warnings before an overrun, invoice approval flows, one-click invoicing, revenue recognition, and a maintained handoff into named finance systems like e-conomic, Visma and Fortnox. I found no public information on how a rate change lands mid-project, on cost-centre structure, or on client-facing reports, which is all that keeps it from the top mark. 1 2 3 4 5
The Field Supervisor
Recorded minutes become invoices with almost nothing retyped: rates by client, project, person and role, budgets that update automatically, one-click invoicing with approval flows and templates, revenue recognition, and maintained finance handoffs to e-conomic, Visma and Fortnox. The distance to the top mark is cost centres and rate-change handling mid-project — we found no public information on either. 1 4 5
The Skeptic
This is the vendor's home ground: hourly rates applied by client, project, person and role, budgets updated automatically with real-time early warnings, time, expense and mileage registrations turned into invoices in one step, invoice templates with approval flows, and a maintained connection into named finance systems. The captured pages are silent on rate-change handling mid-project and on an explicit cost-centre dimension. 1 3 4 5
Payroll handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.
0 — No payroll path stated; the month leaves as a spreadsheet someone retypes.
3 — Generic CSV said to be usable for payroll, with no named system, no defined format and no handling of surcharges.
5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system, covering hours, absences and overtime.
8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.
10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.
The Operations Lead
The DATEV Lohn und Gehalt file integration is documented with automatic file generation covering work times, absence, flex, expenses and mileage, and further named payroll systems (Lessor, Hogia, Danløn and others) run on single entry with no retyping. I found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharge handling or a lock step before transmission, which is what separates a clean handoff from a great one. 6 7
The Payroll Officer
The DATEV Lohn und Gehalt file integration automatically generates the file with work and absence times, flex, expenses and mileage, the same single entry reaches Lessor Payroll with salary types pre-mapped, and Hogia Lön+, Zenegy, Crona, DataLøn, Danløn and Fortnox Lön are named as payroll systems. What keeps it short of the best case: we found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, a lock step before transmission, or retro handling for corrections after the close — the month gets sent, but no one closes it. 2 6 7
The Works Council Advocate
DATEV Lohn und Gehalt receives an automatically generated file carrying work time, absence, flex, expenses and mileage, Lessor Payroll for Microsoft Dynamics NAV runs with no manual re-entry from a single point of registration, and six further Nordic payroll systems are named. We found no public information on surcharge handling for night, Sunday and holiday work, on a lock step before transmission, or on corrections after the month has closed. 6 7
The Agency Owner
The DATEV Lohn und Gehalt file is generated automatically with work, absence, flex, expense and mileage data for the tax adviser, and Lessor Payroll for Dynamics NAV plus Hogia, Zenegy, Crona, DataLøn, Danløn and Fortnox Lön are named payroll targets enabled in system administration with single entry. I found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, a lock step before transmission, or retro corrections after the close. 1 6 7
The Field Supervisor
The DATEV Lohn und Gehalt integration is documented down to an automatically generated file carrying work, absence, flex, expenses, mileage and project time, with an install guide in the help center and a stated time saving for the tax adviser; Lessor Payroll runs single-entry, and Hogia Lön+, Zenegy, Crona, DataLøn, Danløn and Fortnox Lön are named too. We found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, on a lock step before transmission, or on retro corrections after the close. 2 6 7
The Skeptic
A documented DATEV Lohn und Gehalt file integration generates the export file automatically with project time, absence, flex, expenses and mileage, plus further named payroll systems (Lessor for Dynamics NAV, Hogia Lön+, Zenegy, Crona, DataLøn, Danløn, Fortnox Lön) with single entry and no manual re-typing. We found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, a lock step before transmission, or retro handling after the close. 2 6 7
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting region unstated or non-EU, subprocessors not named.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option, but the contracting entity is non-EU or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.
The Operations Lead
The captured pages show a Danish vendor with security and GDPR links, but no sovereignty attributes are on record — I found no public information on hosting region, a named data-centre provider or a published subprocessor list. That is exactly the documentation my works council would ask for before we commit attendance data of 200 people. 3 5 6
The Payroll Officer
Only Security & GDPR and privacy-policy links are on record; the vendor presents as Danish, but we found no public information on hosting region, contracting-entity terms or any subprocessor list. For data that ends up in a payroll run, that silence is not something I can underwrite. 3 5
The Works Council Advocate
We found no public information on hosting region, contracting entity or subprocessors — only links to a security and privacy policy whose contents were not captured in the pages we hold. For a system that holds every employee's working day, silence on where the data lives and who processes it is itself the finding; the Danish support address and Danish bank-holiday calendar are hints, not documented assurance. 3 5
The Agency Owner
The contracting signals look European — TimeLog Systems A/S, a timelog.dk contact, Danish bank holidays, and published GDPR and privacy pages. But I found no public information on hosting region, data-centre provider or the subprocessor chain, so where my clients' time data physically sits is a question the public record leaves open. 3 5 6
The Field Supervisor
The vendor presents as Danish — Danish bank holidays in the support hours and a.dk contact — and GDPR, terms and privacy pages are linked. We found no public information on hosting region, data-centre provider, contracting entity or any subprocessor list, and for me that is an open question rather than an answer. 3 5 6
The Skeptic
The Danish parent suggests an EU contracting party, but no sovereignty attributes are on record and the captured pages show only security and privacy policy links. We found no public information on hosting region, data-centre provider or the subprocessor list, so nothing here can be verified rather than assumed. 3 5
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-user headline exists, but hardware, modules or a minimum seat count are unpriced or unmentioned.
5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.
The Operations Lead
No public prices at all in the captured pages: a "Growth" plan's feature list is shown but every figure sits behind a sales conversation. A buyer cannot even estimate the annual invoice for their headcount, let alone compute it with modules or minimums. 1
The Payroll Officer
No figure of any kind appears — plan names such as Growth and an implementation package with a customised workshop are described, but we found no public information on per-user prices, module pricing, billing period or minimums. Every cost here begins with a sales conversation. 1 4
The Works Council Advocate
A plan named Growth is listed with its features but no figure beside it, and the route in is a customised workshop with an implementation package and a Growth specialist — every price is a sales conversation. We found no public per-user price, billing period or minimum term in the captured pages. 1 4
The Agency Owner
The captured pages name a Growth plan and list its features, but I found no public information on any price — no per-user figure, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment — and the buying path runs through a customised workshop and a Growth specialist, so I cannot compute the annual invoice for forty people from public pages alone. 1 2 4
The Field Supervisor
A Growth plan's feature list is public, but that is where the numbers stop: we found no public information on per-user pricing, billing periods, contract terms or VAT treatment. Computing the annual invoice for a given headcount from these pages is not possible — the price is a sales conversation. 1
The Skeptic
A Growth plan is named together with its feature list and an implementation package is mentioned, but we found no public information on any price, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment. A buyer cannot compute the annual invoice from these pages; every figure sits behind the sales conversation. 1 4
Questions about TimeLog
Is TimeLog European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where TimeLog is based.
Where does TimeLog store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does TimeLog have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to TimeLog?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates TimeTac (3.5/5), clockodo (3/5) and ZEP (3/5) highest among the other 25 Time Tracking & Attendance products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is TimeTac (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: TimeLog alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 22 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 21 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (7)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.timelog.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap timelog.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap timelog.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap timelog.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap timelog.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap timelog.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap timelog.com Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →