whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Transactional Email

MailerSend

Rest of world Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by MailerSend, Inc. · www.mailersend.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

MailerSend: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai MailerSend: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

MailerSend at a glance

Vendor
MailerSend, Inc.
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Default not stated; pages mention Belgium source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Free plan
Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Starting price
“upgrade for as little as $7 when you need more emails and features.” (vendor’s words) source, captured 1 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates MailerSend 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. MailerSend's evidence is strongest for developers: sending API and observability scores cluster at 7, on seven official SDKs, a published OpenAPI spec, a CLI, an SMTP relay with documented limits, a searchable per-message log with HTML, plain-text and raw views, and signed webhooks retried twice on a published schedule. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 1 Nov 2026. all sources

MailerSend alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Agency Lead

Weighted verdict

Technical lead at a web agency in Cologne that builds and runs thirty client applications, from a booking portal to a membership site, each sending its own mail from the client's domain. Wants one account with a sub-account, keys and limits per client, domains verified by API, roles so a client can see their own logs and nothing else, and a price per client that can be written into a maintenance contract.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Agency Lead

Panel median The Agency Lead This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Agency Lead
Sending API, SMTP & developer experience 3.5 of 5 0 of 5
Deliverability & sender reputation 3 of 5 0 of 5
Message logs, events & webhooks 3.5 of 5 0 of 5
Message data, retention & security 3 of 5 0 of 5
Reliability, accounts & support 3 of 5 0 of 5
European sovereignty 2.5 of 5 0 of 5
Pricing transparency 3.5 of 5 0 of 5

Sending API, SMTP & developer experience

How this is scored

How an application sends mail: a REST API and an SMTP relay with their limits stated, official SDKs and drivers for named languages and frameworks (PHP and Laravel, Node, Python, Ruby and Rails, Java, Go, .NET), stored templates with variables and versions, batch sending, attachments, idempotency keys, scheduled sending, a test or sandbox mode that does not deliver, inbound email parsed into a webhook, and the quality of the API reference and guides.

0 — Not a sending service; an application cannot send email through it by API or SMTP.

3 — An API or SMTP credentials to send a message; SDKs, templates, limits and a test mode are basic or not described.

5 — A documented REST API and SMTP relay, official SDKs for several named languages, stored templates with variables, attachments and batch sending, rate limits stated, a sandbox or test mode, and quick-start guides for named frameworks.

8 — An API reference with every endpoint and error code, idempotency keys, scheduled sending, template versions and a template language documented, inbound email parsed to a webhook, an OpenAPI specification or official CLI, framework drivers maintained by the vendor, and a migration guide from named competitors.

10 — An API a team builds its product on: versioning and deprecation policy published, backward compatibility stated, full parity between API and SMTP features, local or staging test tooling that mirrors production, and every limit, timeout and retry behaviour documented.

Report an error

The Agency Lead

Seven official SDKs covering PHP, Laravel, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Java and Go, an OpenAPI collection on SwaggerHub, a CI-friendly CLI and a documented SMTP relay with its limits (5 messages per connection, TLS on port 587, rate limits per IP) cover exactly how my thirty client apps would send. Templates with personalisation variables, a bulk-email endpoint, scheduled sending, a sandbox trial domain and inbound routing with custom headers are all documented. We found no public information on idempotency keys, template versioning or a.NET SDK, and the SMTP relay explicitly drops custom headers and advanced personalisation that the API supports. 6 14 2 13 7

Report an error

Deliverability & sender reputation

How this is scored

What the vendor does so the mail reaches the inbox: guided SPF, DKIM and DMARC set-up with a custom return path and tracking domain, shared IP pools and how senders on them are vetted and policed, dedicated IPs with automatic warm-up, transactional and bulk mail kept on separate streams or IP pools, bounces, complaints and unsubscribes turned into suppressions automatically, feedback loops with mailbox providers, blocklist and DMARC monitoring, compliance with the Gmail and Yahoo bulk-sender rules, and published delivery times or inbox placement with their method.

0 — No sender authentication and no bounce handling; mail goes out from shared addresses with no reputation management at all.

3 — SPF and DKIM can be set up and bounces are recorded; IP policy, stream separation and suppressions are basic or not described.

5 — Guided SPF, DKIM and DMARC set-up with a custom return path, shared IPs with a stated sender vetting policy, dedicated IPs available, automatic suppression of hard bounces and complaints, transactional and marketing mail separated by stream or IP pool, and deliverability guidance in the documentation.

8 — Dedicated IPs with automatic warm-up and pool management, a stated acceptable-use and vetting process for shared pools, feedback loops and blocklist monitoring, DMARC reports, BIMI or custom tracking domains, compliance with the Gmail and Yahoo sender requirements stated, delivery times published, and access to deliverability experts.

10 — Deliverability that can be verified: delivery time and bounce rates per mailbox provider published continuously with their method, inbox placement testing included, pool reputation shown to the customer, and a documented escalation path with mailbox providers.

Report an error

The Agency Lead

Auto DNS configures SPF, DKIM and DMARC, bounces, unsubscribes and spam complaints land on the suppressions list automatically, and DMARC plus blocklist monitoring are built in, with per-domain reputation from the Starter plan that limits or pauses sending domain by domain. Deliverability consultation and a team with 13 years of experience are on record, but dedicated IPs exist only for Enterprise accounts over 100K emails/week and are priced on request. We found no public information on IP warm-up, shared-pool vetting, feedback loops, Gmail and Yahoo bulk-sender compliance or published delivery times, which the SLA explicitly excludes from its commitment. 2 4 7 16 12 15

Report an error

Message logs, events & webhooks

How this is scored

What the team can see about each message once the application has handed it over: a message log searchable by recipient, subject, tag or message ID, the full event history (processed, delivered, deferred, bounced with the remote server's answer, opened, clicked, complained), how long logs and message content are kept, event webhooks with retries and a signature, an events API, dashboards and statistics per stream, tag or domain, alerts on bounce or complaint spikes, and access for a support team without developer rights.

0 — Nothing can be seen after sending; no logs, no events and no webhooks.

3 — Totals of sent and bounced messages; per-message logs, webhooks and retention are basic or not described.

5 — A searchable message log with per-message event history and the bounce reason, log retention stated, event webhooks for delivery, bounce, open, click and complaint, statistics per tag or domain, and an API to fetch events.

8 — Webhooks signed and retried with their schedule documented, the raw SMTP response and the rendered message viewable per send, log retention configurable or extended by plan, alerts on bounce, complaint or delivery-time thresholds, export or streaming of events to a named log or data tool, and read-only roles for support staff.

10 — Full traceability: every message traceable from API call to the receiving server's final answer, events streamed in real time with ordering and delivery guarantees stated, long retention with search across the whole history, and observability features documented with their limits.

Report an error

The Agency Lead

The Emails page logs every send with search by recipient, subject, tag or message ID, statuses from queued to delivered plus opens, clicks and complaints, and HTML, plain-text and raw views per message with a downloadable JSON. Webhooks are signed with a unique secret key, retried on a documented schedule (10 and 100 seconds), testable, and viewable with seven days of attempts, covering delivery, bounces, opens, clicks, complaints and reputation changes. Retention is stated per plan and extendable to 365 days as a paid add-on, and custom user roles can be limited to activity and analytics; we found no public information on automatic bounce or complaint alerts or on streaming events to a named log tool. 18 17 5 7 21

Report an error

Message data, retention & security

How this is scored

What is stored about each message and what the customer controls: whether message bodies are stored or only metadata, retention periods and the setting to shorten them, deletion of a recipient's data on request, open and click tracking that can be switched off per stream or message, TLS for delivery with an option to require it, encryption at rest, API keys with scopes and per-domain restrictions, IP allow-listing, two-factor authentication and SSO for the dashboard, an audit log, a vulnerability disclosure programme, and security certifications or audits with their scope. Where the data is processed and by whom is scored under sovereignty.

0 — Stores every message indefinitely with no controls, and the vendor states it uses message content for its own purposes.

3 — A privacy policy and a statement that data is encrypted; what is stored, retention and access controls are basic or not described.

5 — What is stored per message documented, retention periods stated, open and click tracking switchable, TLS used for delivery, API keys with restricted permissions, two-factor authentication for the dashboard, and a data processing agreement offered.

8 — Message content retention configurable down to none or metadata only, enforced TLS per domain or message, encryption at rest stated, scoped API keys and IP allow-listing, SSO (SAML) and roles, an audit log, deletion of recipient data by API, and ISO 27001 or SOC 2 stated with its scope.

10 — Data minimisation that can be verified: every stored field and its retention listed, content never stored unless the customer opts in, customer-managed encryption keys or equivalent, independent audits published with their scope, and every security control the customer has listed with its effect.

Report an error

The Agency Lead

Two-factor authentication with recovery codes, IP allow-listing, AES-256 encryption at rest, TLS and an automatic DPA are documented, recipients can be deleted from the activity view, and personal data is deleted within 30 days of a request. What is kept is listed — templates, activity records, suppressions, recipient addresses and message content — with retention stated per plan, and open tracking is switched in the domain settings. We found no public information on scoped API tokens, an audit log or a vulnerability disclosure programme, the ISO 27001 certificate is stated for the Google storage center rather than the vendor itself, and the vendor reserves the right to monitor email content for terms compliance. 9 18 19 20 10 11 1

Report an error

Reliability, accounts & support

How this is scored

Whether the platform can be relied on and run by a team: a public status page with incident history, uptime SLA and service credits published, redundancy or failover across data centres described, queueing and retry of mail during outages, sub-accounts or servers per application, client or tenant, team members with roles, separate environments, support channels and response times per plan, named migration help, and integrations with platforms that send mail on the customer's behalf (WordPress, Shopify, Shopware, Supabase, Vercel and similar).

0 — No status page, no support channel and no way to separate users or applications.

3 — A support contact and a single account; status page, SLA, sub-accounts and roles are basic or not described.

5 — A public status page with incident history, an uptime SLA on at least one plan, sub-accounts or separate servers per application, team members with roles, support by email or chat with stated hours, and plugins or guides for several named platforms.

8 — An SLA with service credits published, redundancy across data centres or regions described, mail queued and retried during incidents, sub-accounts with their own keys, domains and limits manageable by API, granular roles, support response times per plan, and migration assistance offered.

10 — Reliability that can be verified: uptime history published for years, post-mortems for incidents, multi-region failover documented, an SLA covering delivery latency as well as API availability, and white-label or reseller tooling for agencies and platforms.

Report an error

The Agency Lead

A 99.5% uptime SLA with 5-15% service credits, 24/7 support, five user types with custom granular permissions and connectors for WordPress, Laravel, Symfony and Supabase give me a workable base, and the Professional plan positions itself for agencies with unlimited seats and domains plus per-domain reputation. Data is mirrored in two locations, but we found no public information on mail queueing during incidents, published incident history, response-time commitments per plan or migration help. Beyond a captured help page about creating sub-accounts, we found no public information on sub-accounts with their own keys, domains and limits manageable by API — the documented model is multiple clients via domains and sender identities in a single account, with up to 5 SMTP users per domain. 12 21 7 5 3 1 19 9 22

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where messages, logs and recipient data are processed and stored, whether an EU region can be chosen and what it covers, and who the subprocessors are (cloud hosting, sending infrastructure, logging, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; every message carries personal data, so the whole sending chain counts, not only the dashboard.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — An EU region available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (sending infrastructure, logs, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard, or the EU region does not cover logs and account data.

8 — EU processing of messages, logs and account data on named infrastructure, an EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting, sending infrastructure and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Agency Lead

The contracting entity is MailerSend, Inc. of New York under Delaware law, with MailerLite Limited in Dublin as EU GDPR representative, and storage runs on Google Cloud EMEA in Belgium with data mirrored in two locations. A published DPA applies automatically with Standard Contractual Clauses, a UK Addendum and Data Privacy Framework certification, and subprocessors are named — Google, Stripe, PayPal, Braintree, Bandwidth, Meta, PostHog and others — in Annex 4 of the DPA. The DPA nevertheless permits transfer and processing of customer data in the United States and anywhere in the world, and we found no public information on where the sending infrastructure itself runs. 10 11 19 9

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by monthly message volume, the price per additional thousand messages, the free tier and its limits, what dedicated IPs, extra log retention, sub-accounts, SSO and support plans cost, minimum term, and whether unused volume carries over.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with volume or which features cost extra is unclear.

5 — Tiers are public with their monthly volume and price, but at least one commonly needed piece (overage rate, dedicated IP, longer log retention, SSO, support plan) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with its volume and overage rate per thousand messages, dedicated IPs and add-ons priced, log retention per tier stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given monthly volume, number of domains and sub-accounts and feature set, with every add-on, support and overage fee and the cancellation terms published.

Report an error

The Agency Lead

Every tier is public with its volume and price — Free with 500 emails/month, Hobby at $6.30 per month for 5,000, Starter and Professional at 50,000 emails for $31.50 and $99.00 monthly with 10% off yearly billing — and overage rates are quoted for Hobby ($1.50 per 1,000 emails) and Professional ($1.30 per 1,000 emails). Add-ons carry numbers: DMARC monitors at $2.00 per domain, domain spaces at $4.00, activity retention extension from $5.00, and VAT treatment, billing periods, refunds and cancellation terms are all stated, so I can compute a per-client maintenance price. Dedicated IPs are 'Contact our support team', and we found no public information on Starter overage, SSO pricing or whether unused volume carries over. 7 8 1

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about MailerSend

Is MailerSend European?

No. whats-best.ai classifies MailerSend as Rest of world.

Where does MailerSend store data?

The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Belgium as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.

Does MailerSend have a free plan?

Yes. MailerSend has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to MailerSend?

As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates Lettermint (3.5/5), Bird Email API (formerly SparkPost) (3/5) and Postmark (3/5) highest among the other 15 Transactional Email products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Lettermint (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: MailerSend alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about MailerSend? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (23)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page (email API) www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Features page (SMTP relay) www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Features page (deliverability) www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Features page (webhooks) www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  6. 6 API documentation developers.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Pricing page www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Terms of service www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Privacy policy www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Data processing agreement (dpa) www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Security / trust page (GDPR) www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Service level agreement www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Sending API, SMTP & developer experience — found from sitemap developers.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Sending API, SMTP & developer experience — found from sitemap developers.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Deliverability & sender reputation — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  16. 16 Deliverability & sender reputation — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  17. 17 Message logs, events & webhooks — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  18. 18 Message logs, events & webhooks — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  19. 19 Message data, retention & security — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  20. 20 Message data, retention & security — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  21. 21 Reliability, accounts & support — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  22. 22 Reliability, accounts & support — found from sitemap www.mailersend.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
  23. 23 Code repository (open-source licence) — found from the homepage github.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →