The meeting itself
How this is scored
Whether the call works: participant capacity, video and audio quality under load, screen sharing, breakout rooms, moderation, and what happens on a bad connection.
0 — Not a meeting tool: no multi-party video calls, only one-to-one calls or recorded video.
3 — Video meetings with screen sharing, chat and host controls such as mute-all.
5 — Meetings with a stated participant limit per plan, screen sharing, breakout rooms or a waiting room, and host moderation (mute, remove, assign co-hosts).
8 — Large meetings and webinars with published capacity limits, per-participant moderation and waiting rooms, layout control, simulcast or adaptive bitrate stated, and behaviour on constrained or mobile networks documented.
10 — Scale and control are engineering claims the vendor stands behind: capacity published per plan and per region, selective forwarding with adaptive quality documented, live streaming, hardware-room support, and diagnostics an admin can read after a bad call.
The Accessibility Advocate
Multi-party HD meetings, content sharing, an in-call whiteboard and Active Speaker and Continuous Presence layouts are documented, and adaptive layering over LTE, 3G and 4G with resiliency on unmanaged networks is genuinely strong. But the captured pages give no participant limit per plan, no waiting room or breakout rooms and no host moderation controls, so this sits between levels. 2 3 7 1