The meeting itself
How this is scored
Whether the call works: participant capacity, video and audio quality under load, screen sharing, breakout rooms, moderation, and what happens on a bad connection.
0 — Not a meeting tool: no multi-party video calls, only one-to-one calls or recorded video.
3 — Video meetings with screen sharing, chat and host controls such as mute-all.
5 — Meetings with a stated participant limit per plan, screen sharing, breakout rooms or a waiting room, and host moderation (mute, remove, assign co-hosts).
8 — Large meetings and webinars with published capacity limits, per-participant moderation and waiting rooms, layout control, simulcast or adaptive bitrate stated, and behaviour on constrained or mobile networks documented.
10 — Scale and control are engineering claims the vendor stands behind: capacity published per plan and per region, selective forwarding with adaptive quality documented, live streaming, hardware-room support, and diagnostics an admin can read after a bad call.
The Works Council Advocate
Multi-party HD conferencing is documented with content sharing at up to 1080p, an in-call whiteboard where participants request and the granter passes control, layouts such as Active Speaker and Continuous Presence, and adaptive SVC video stated to hold up over Internet, LTE, 3G and 4G networks. However, the pages state no participant capacity for meetings themselves (the 300 figure covers concurrent content views of recordings), and I found no public information on breakout rooms, a waiting room, or host moderation such as mute, remove or co-hosts. 2 3 7