As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates 1Password 3/5 and Bitwarden 3.5/5 in Password Management. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick 1Password and 4 pick Bitwarden. 1Password scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (Sharing, roles & recovery, Encryption model & independent audits and European sovereignty). Bitwarden scores higher on 3 of 6 criteria (Hosting choice, offline access & export, Audit logs, policies & reporting and SSO, directory sync & provisioning). Provenance — 1Password: Rest of world; Bitwarden: Rest of world, United States. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.
1Password leads on security architecture (7.0 vs 6.8; one lean to 1Password, five ties), sharing and access control (7.0 vs 6.7; two leans to 1Password, four ties) and sovereignty (3.8 vs 3.7; two leans to 1Password, one to Bitwarden, three ties). Bitwarden leads on deployment and portability (7.0 vs 6.0; six leans to Bitwarden, no ties), audit and policy (7.7 vs 7.2; four leans to Bitwarden), identity integration (7.3 vs 7.2; two leans to Bitwarden, one to 1Password, three ties) and pricing transparency (5.5 vs 1.0; six leans to Bitwarden) — pricing is not weighted in 1Password's verdicts; the vendor publishes no prices. Weighted totals split: Bitwarden for the CISO (6.6 vs 6.5), identity engineer (7.1 vs 6.6) and DevOps engineer (6.6 vs 6.1); 1Password for the compliance auditor (6.2 vs 5.8) and skeptic (6.5 vs 6.2); no SME owner total is shown. The benches split; no overall winner.
Choose 1Password if
You need data residency in the EU as a selectable option — 1Password's data residency attribute is EU optional, Bitwarden's is US default.
Your purchase is reviewed by a compliance auditor or a skeptic — 1Password's weighted totals are ahead on both benches (6.2 vs 5.8 and 6.5 vs 6.2).
Your team's priority is sharing and access control — 1Password's mean is 7.0 vs 6.7, with two judges leaning 1Password and no judge leaning Bitwarden.
You prefer contracting with a legal entity in Canada — 1Password's legal entity jurisdiction is CA; Bitwarden's is US.
Choose Bitwarden if
You need self-hosting — deployment and portability is 7.0 vs 6.0 with six judges leaning Bitwarden; the verdict cites self-hosting for Windows, Linux, Docker and Kubernetes.
You must see pricing before talking to sales — pricing transparency is 5.5 vs 1.0 with six judges leaning Bitwarden; Teams is "$4 per month / per user billed annually" and Enterprise is "$6 per month / per user billed annually" (seat minimums, add-on prices and self-hosted licensing are not shown).
Audit and reporting drives your choice — audit and policy is 7.7 vs 7.2 with four judges leaning Bitwarden; the verdict cites over 60 event types, indefinite retention with a 367-day viewable window, and named SIEM integrations.
You weigh the identity and DevOps benches — Bitwarden's weighted totals are 7.1 vs 6.6 for the identity engineer and 6.6 vs 6.1 for the DevOps engineer.
Read this comparison as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The DevOps Engineer
Would rather run the vault in the company's own data centre than trust another SaaS with root credentials. Wants a documented self-hosted deployment with backup and high availability, open-source code to read, a CLI and API for pipelines, and an export that loses nothing.
1Password
Bitwarden
This judge's pick
Criterion by criterion
Encryption model & independent audits
1Password
The security page names AES-GCM-256, PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA256, a 128-bit Secret Key and the SRP protocol, links a Security Design White Paper, and states the vendor has no way of decrypting secure data; ISO 27001/27017/27018/27701, SOC 2 type 2, a public HackerOne bug bounty and published unaltered audit reports (ISE 2020, Onica) are all on the record. Before going higher I'd want the field-by-field encryption scope including URLs and metadata, incident history, and client source code I can read myself.
Bitwarden
The security whitepaper names the design end to end — AES-CBC 256 with HMAC-SHA256, PBKDF2 at 600,000 iterations or Argon2id, RSA-OAEP for sharing — and states servers only ever store encrypted data, with third-party reviews at least yearly and SOC 2 Type 2 results published annually, a HackerOne vulnerability disclosure program, and open source to read. What I could not find on the captured pages is a field-by-field statement of what is and is not encrypted including metadata, or any published incident history, so I stop short of the top band.
Sharing, roles & recovery
1Password
Vaults shared with team members, groups and single-vault guests, five item-level permissions on Business plus a separate Manage Vault permission, client settings that can switch off password viewing, export, printing and sharing outside 1Password, and recovery documented in real depth — new Secret Key and account password, 2FA reset, bulk recovery through the CLI, self-recovery codes and per-domain notification routing. I found no public information on time-limited or one-time sharing with external parties or an emergency-access waiting period.
Bitwarden
Sharing runs through organizations with collections, groups and member roles, and Enterprise account recovery is documented down to the key model: the member's encryption key is wrapped with the organization's public key, the old master password is never visible to anyone, and enrollment, resets and withdrawals are logged, with the owner-versus-admin recovery hierarchy spelled out. Emergency access via trusted contacts exists on paid plans. I found no public information on hiding a password while still allowing autofill, an emergency-access waiting period, or approval workflows for sensitive items, which holds this below the top.
SSO, directory sync & provisioning
1Password
Unlock with SSO runs over OpenID Connect with PKCE against a long list of identity providers and describes the device-key model for the unlock, while automated provisioning from named providers creates users and groups, syncs access, and suspends people on deprovisioning — with provisioning deliberately excluded from groups holding account-wide cryptographic permissions. I found no public information on FIDO2 or hardware-key MFA in the captured pages, which holds this below the top band.
Bitwarden
SSO over SAML 2.0 and OIDC is documented with three decryption paths — master password, device-stored keys through trusted devices, and a self-hosted Key Connector server — and the pages state plainly that the identity provider never holds the decryption key. SCIM and a Directory Connector handle user and group provisioning, just-in-time provisioning is documented, and a PRF-capable passkey can both log in and decrypt the vault. Group sync driving vault permissions is implied by the organization model, but immediate revocation on deprovisioning with a log entry and conditional access are not spelled out in the captured pages.
Audit logs, policies & reporting
1Password
Events reporting pushes sign-in attempts, item usage and audit events to named SIEM targets including Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel and Elastic, with a documented Events API for building your own client, configurable token expiry and revocation, and data retention control — that is pipeable into my stack. Breach, device, usage and developer-secrets reports exist, but the pages say most of them sit in the Business plan only, and I found no public information on enforceable master-password or MFA policies or browser-extension policy controls.
Bitwarden
Over sixty event types are logged for Teams and Enterprise, retained indefinitely with a 367-day view window, and reachable through the web app, CSV export and a public events API, with native integrations to Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Elastic, Panther, Rapid7 and Sumo Logic. The policy catalogue is long — master password minimums, mandatory two-step login, removal of export, Send control, session timeout, autofill behaviour — plus Have I Been Pwned checks and weak and reused password reporting. The vendor itself notes the logs may not suffice for legal forensics for all organizations, and I found no public information on tamper-evident storage or an auditor role without secret access.
Hosting choice, offline access & export
1Password
Client coverage is complete for my purposes — macOS, Windows, Linux, iOS, Android, browsers and a CLI — the vault region is customer-selectable between EU, US and Canada, and export and import are documented down to the field, including migration from named competitors. But the export is stated to be stored in plaintext, CSV drops security questions, linked items and custom fields, passkeys export only from iOS and Android, and an SSO unlock blocks export until an admin turns it off; I found no public information on a self-hosted vault, high-availability deployment, or vault access continuing during a vendor outage.
Bitwarden
Self-hosting is documented properly: Docker or Kubernetes with a Bitwarden-developed Helm chart in standard or lite deployments, installable on Windows or Linux, compatible with every client including Linux desktops, with the source open to audit — this is the deployment story I want for my own data centre. Export covers plaintext and encrypted JSON plus CSV, the encrypted export is password-protectable or account-restricted, the CLI can drive it for pipelines, and a zip export includes attachments. But that zip is individual-vault only, no format carries trash items or Sends, individual exports exclude organization data, and the captured pages give nothing on offline access during a vendor outage, a status page, or a documented high-availability configuration for self-hosting — so a lossless exit is not proven.
European sovereignty
1Password
The contracting entity is AgileBits Inc. of Toronto under Ontario governing law, customer support and email services run in the United States and Canada, and AWS appears in a third-party audit description of the infrastructure. An EU vault region is selectable, a DPA is published, and standard contractual clauses, adequacy decisions and binding corporate rules are cited for transfers — but no EU contracting entity and no subprocessor list with locations appear in the captured pages.
Bitwarden
The contracting party is 8bit Solutions LLC under California law, wholly owned by Delaware-incorporated Bitwarden Inc., subject to FTC enforcement and leaning on the Data Privacy Framework — the contracting chain is US throughout. The privacy policy names storage primarily in the European Economic Area and the United States, and a documented self-hosting option can remove the vendor from the data path, which keeps this off the bottom. Ownership and subprocessor exposure are marked unknown here; a subprocessor list is referenced but its locations are not shown on the captured pages.
Pricing transparency
1Password
The pricing page itself states that pricing is tailored to the organization's needs and requires a sales quote, and I found no published price figure anywhere in the captures. The terms document the mechanics — per-user fees in US dollars, monthly or yearly billing, 30-day payment terms, taxes separately invoiced and fees non-refundable — but nothing on these pages lets me compute an annual invoice.
Bitwarden
The business tiers are priced plainly — Teams at $4 per month per user and Enterprise at $6 per month per user, billed annually in USD with taxes not included — with a 30-day refund on paid services and 30 days' notice of price changes in the terms. What I cannot compute from the captured pages: seat minimums, self-hosted licensing, the Secrets Manager add-on, and the Families plan price, so a complete annual invoice is not derivable from public pages alone.
Sovereignty, side by side
Dimension
1Password
Bitwarden
Legal entity
Not determined
Incorporated in US
Ownership
Not determined
Not determined
Data residency
Not determined
Not determined
Subprocessors
US CLOUD Act reach
Not determined
Facts, side by side
Only facts both products carry under the same definition — anything else would not be a fair row.
As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Bitwarden higher: 3.5/5 against 3/5. Weighted by what each judge cares about, 2 of the 6 judges pick 1Password and 4 pick Bitwarden. Which one fits depends on the criteria that matter to you; the table on this page shows both side by side, and each judge’s reading has its own page. Both were scored by the same AI bench under the same rubric, from public evidence only, as the methodology describes.
Is 1Password or Bitwarden European?
1Password is not European by provenance (Rest of world). Bitwarden is not European by provenance (Rest of world, United States). Provenance is read from each company’s own legal pages: who builds it and who owns it.