horse+ vs horsemanager+

horse+

The owner pages show invoices, contracts and open items managed in the app, with service documentation ending in a one-click monthly report for the bookkeeping, and billing sold as priced modules ('Abrechnung 25 € / Monat', 'Rechnungen 5 € / Monat'). We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates per service type, credit notes or an export to a named accounting tool, so the money side is documented as invoices and open items rather than discharged in the system.

horsemanager+

Boarding contracts with services, a monthly invoice run, extras drawn from recorded bookings, SEPA direct debit with mandate management and dunning, and a DATEV file export are all documented — that is most of the way to the top tier. We found no public information on VAT rates per service type, credit notes or prepaid credit, and the terms themselves state the software is not certified specialist software for legally binding documentation duties such as GoBD-compliant bookkeeping, so we stop short of full marks.

horse+

A feeding module exists ('Fütterung 10 € / Monat') and the marketing names feeding, group management and daily stable operations, with documents and horse assignment in the base package — that is a per-horse feeding operation. We found no public information on vaccination, worming, farrier or vet entries, a medication log with dose and administrator, or an exportable horse file, so the record as documented would not yet stand up to a vet's or inspector's questions.

horsemanager+

Per-horse master data with passport and pedigree fields, rations per feeding time visible to substitutes, vaccination, worming and farrier due dates, medication and treatment documentation, an audit log of every change, and export as CSV, Excel or PDF are documented. We found no public information on blanket and turnout instructions per horse or on dosing details and who administered in the medication log, and the vendor states there is no FN interface — due dates are recorded, not tied to a federation schedule.

horse+

Task-related modules are named and priced — stable tasks, rider tasks, work services and Hofdienste — which evidences a shared task list, but the pages do not show assignment, completion ticking or a duty plan. We found no public information on time recording, holiday planning, boarder duty rotas, role permissions or an audit trail; on location, the privacy policy states only that no location history or movement profiles are built.

horsemanager+

A duty plan, a time clock by PIN, task management and per-person permissions are documented, and the privacy policy names employee shift and time-recording data as categories it processes. We found no public information on holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, or export of time records to payroll, and the vendor states offline operation is not supported — a barn section without signal will need another answer.

horse+

Riders use the app free of charge, yard news goes out by push with read-rate tracking, and boarders book the hall or solarium from home — a real owner-facing portal with news and bookings. We found no public information on owners seeing their own horse's records or the services and invoices billed to them, on instructions acknowledged by staff, or on how one boarder's data is kept out of another's view.

horsemanager+

The portal is invitation-only, the stable decides what each boarder sees, other customers' figures stay hidden, and boarders see their horse's feed and health information, marked due vaccinations, three weeks of appointments, their own invoices with status, and can leave notes to the stable; announcements go out with read receipts. We found no public information on push notifications, on status tracking for boarder requests, or on separate scoping for co-owners and part-riders, so the score sits below the strongest tier.

horse+

The booking calendar lets boarders register themselves for the hall and solarium while the stable blocks riding-school times, courses and farrier dates in advance, and lesson scheduling, an events module and utilisation sit in the packages — booking with time slots and rules. We found no public information on capacity limits, booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or school-horse workload, so the facility is booked on the system but not run on it.

horsemanager+

Booking of indoor, outdoor, walker and solarium facilities together with courses and riding lessons is documented, as are student records, ten-ride cards, school-horse deployment, and boarders' own arena bookings shown in the portal. We found no public information on capacity limits, closures and booking rules per user group, on linking equipment use to billing or credit, or on events and clinics with participant management and payment.

horse+

A German GmbH with a Munich commercial-register number, German governing law, and a privacy policy that names its providers with addresses: hosting via Google Frankfurt and Platform.sh GmbH in Köln, but also AWS in Seattle, Microsoft in Redmond, Sentry in San Francisco and Apple's app store, with third-country transfers resting on the EU standard contractual clauses. We found no public information on a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, or on where boarder and horse data specifically reside beyond these provider names.

horsemanager+

A German GmbH with a Handelsregister entry, hosting stated as Supabase in the EU and Germany, a standard data processing agreement accepted on conclusion, thirty-day post-termination export with documented deletion, and AI providers named and engaged through their Irish subsidiaries — with third-country transfers declared to concern optional features only, under standard contractual clauses. The email, CDN and map services appear as categories without locations, we found no public information on the ownership structure, and security is described as TLS 1.3, encryption at rest, daily backups and optional two-factor rather than a certification statement.

horse+

Every module carries a public monthly price — the base package at '30 € netto monatlich', Abrechnung at 25 €, Rechnungen at 5 € and the further modules each priced — with no per-user or per-horse fees, riders free, a three-month trial, no minimum term but three months' notice to the month's end, and prices quoted exclusive of VAT, plus example packages for three stable types. The captured pages give different starting figures ('ab 20 € pro Monat zzgl. MwSt.' versus a 30 € base package), and we found no public information on setup fees or support costs; deletion of account data on termination is stated in the privacy policy.

horsemanager+

The pricing page states plainly that there is no public price list — every stable receives a written individual offer — so an annual cost cannot be computed from public pages, and the free demo and consultation do not change that. The terms do publish the shape around the offer: monthly or annual billing, payment in advance within fourteen days, prices plus statutory VAT, one-month notice, yearly auto-renewal, and a thirty-day data-export window with deletion after; the prices themselves remain a sales call, which is why the score is barely above the floor.