Accounting
Jortt
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Jortt B.V. · www.jortt.nl
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Jortt at a glance
- Vendor
- Jortt B.V.
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 13 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Jortt 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Jortt, from the Dutch vendor Jortt B.V., scores highest on documents and banking at 6-7: bank feeds run on the vendor's own PSD2 licence to virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and the Mollie business account, matching uses 1,243 standard rules plus 10, 25 or 250 own rules by tier, Peppol e-invoices travel both directions, and AI scan and recognition arrives with the Plus tier. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 13 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 15 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Jortt, from the Dutch vendor Jortt B.V., scores highest on documents and banking at 6-7: bank feeds run on the vendor's own PSD2 licence to virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and the Mollie business account, matching uses 1,243 standard rules plus 10, 25 or 250 own rules by tier, Peppol e-invoices travel both directions, and AI scan and recognition arrives with the Plus tier. Its lowest scores are on pricing transparency at 1-2: tier names ZZP, MKB and Plus and their rule limits are public, but we found no public information on any price figure, billing period or VAT treatment. Tax and filings holds at 4-5, with Dutch VAT returns filed to the Belastingdienst and no public information on reverse charge, intra-community supply or OSS. Bookkeeping core and GoBD compliance span 4-6, a single judge at 6 on each; judges credit a genuine change history and a 4410-structured annual statement but found no public information on manual journals, a chart of accounts or period locking. Sovereignty sits at 3-4, with no sovereignty attributes on record.
Speaks for it
- Bank feeds run on the vendor's own PSD2 licence to virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and the Mollie business account, syncing nightly and on demand every 5 minutes
- Matching runs on 1,243 standard rules plus 10, 25 or 250 of your own by tier, with Peppol e-invoices sent and received
- VAT returns are filed electronically to the Belastingdienst through the product, with bookings, returns and annual statement said to match one-to-one
- The change history records who and when created each booking, how it was made, and later edits with previous and new values
- The exit file — auditfile in XAF 4.0.3, invoice and receipt downloads, and the year-end accounts — is stated to satisfy a retention duty of at least 7 years
Held against it
- We found no public information on any price figure, billing period or VAT treatment for the ZZP, MKB or Plus tiers
- We found no public information on manual journal postings, a configurable chart of accounts or a period close that locks
- We found no public information on where the books are hosted or on subprocessors, including for the AI tools connected via MCP from the MKB tier, and the record carries no sovereignty attributes
- We found no public information on reverse-charge, intra-community supply, OSS or correction filings
- We found no public information on an adviser login or shared workspace, so the handoff is an export with corrections re-entered by the customer
Best for
- You run a Dutch business — zzp, webshop, holding or bv with staff — and want bank transactions booked and VAT returns filed to the Belastingdienst automatically
- Your accountant builds the annual statement from an XAF auditfile and enters corrections back into your books
- You send and receive Peppol e-invoices and want purchase invoices and receipts stored and renamed by booking number
Avoid if
- Your adviser needs to work inside your books or exchange via DATEV, while the documented handoff is an XAF export with corrections re-entered by you
- You need a free-posting ledger with a configurable chart of accounts, manual journals and period locking, whereas the evidenced bookings land on fixed categories with VAT
- You must compute your annual invoice from public pages before committing, and the captured pages show no price figures at all
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Bookkeeping core | 2 of 5 |
| GoBD, immutability & audit | 2 of 5 |
| Tax handling & filings | 2.5 of 5 |
| Receipts, banking & matching | 3.5 of 5 |
| Tax adviser handoff | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1 of 5 |
Bookkeeping core
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Double-entry, the chart of accounts (SKR03/SKR04), postings, journals, opening balances and period closing — the ledger underneath the pretty screens.
0 — Income-and-expense lists only; no double-entry, no chart of accounts, no journal.
3 — Simplified bookkeeping suitable for EÜR with a fixed account list; no free posting, no period close.
5 — Double-entry with SKR03/SKR04, manual postings, journals, opening balances and a month-end close.
8 — Full ledger with cost centres, recurring and reversing entries, accruals, multi-year comparatives, and a documented close checklist with locking.
10 — An accountant's ledger: configurable charts including customised accounts, period locking with audit, foreign currency with documented valuation, group or multi-entity handling, and reporting that reconciles to the trial balance.
The Bookkeeper
There is a working ledger spine: bookings with draft status and full history, per-account opening balances offset automatically against the general reserve, an annual statement in the structure of an NBA 4410 compilation report that matches the VAT returns one to one, and cost-centre and project labels on the top tier. But we found no public information on double-entry structure, a chart of accounts, free manual journal postings, or a period close that locks, so this stays in simplified territory. 1 2 4 6
The Tax Adviser
Bookings carry category and VAT with their creation history, opening balances are set per account and offset against general reserve, and the annual statement follows the NBA 4410 structure so VAT returns, bookings and accounts match one-to-one. Cost centres arrive as labels in the higher tier. I found no public information on a free chart of accounts, manual journal entries, a month-end close or period locking, which is what separates this from an accountant's ledger. 1 2 4 6
The Auditor
Bookings land on categories with VAT, opening balances are built per bank account with automatic offsets, and the year ends with an annual statement in the accountant's 4410 structure, labels for cost centres coming only from the higher tiers. We found no public information on manual journal entries, a chart of accounts the user configures, or any period closing that locks a booked period, so a full free-posting ledger underneath the screens is not evidenced. 1 2 4 6
The Founder
The XAF auditfile and an annual statement built to the structure of NBA Standaard 4410 tell me there is a real ledger under the pretty screens, with opening balance bookings per account, negative balances handled, cost centres via labels in the top tier, and a documented year-end closing guide. But I found no public information on manual journal entries, recurring or reversing postings, accruals, period locking with an audit, or anything resembling a German chart of accounts, so my SKR-based year-end would be off the map. 1 4 6
The Integrator
The captured pages show bookings on fixed categories with VAT, per-account opening balances offset against a general reserve, and an annual statement built from all bookings that the vendor says matches VAT returns and statements one-to-one — a real ledger underneath, with cost centres arriving only as labels in the Plus plan. We found no public information on manual journal postings, a configurable chart of accounts, month-end closing, or period locking. 1 2 4 6
The Skeptic
The captured pages show bookings with categories and VAT, per-account opening balances, and an annual statement built to the Dutch 4410 compilation standard, with cost-centre-style labels arriving in the Plus tier; we found no public information on a chart of accounts, free manual postings, journals or a locked period close. 1 2 4 6
GoBD, immutability & audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the record survives a tax audit: unalterable postings, complete change history, retention across the statutory period, and a Verfahrensdokumentation the vendor actually supplies.
0 — Postings can be edited or deleted without trace; no retention statement, no GoBD claim, no documentation.
3 — GoBD asserted on the marketing page with nothing behind it — no described audit trail, no documentation offered, no statement on retention.
5 — Postings become unalterable after close with corrections booked as reversals, a change log exists, and the statutory retention period is stated.
8 — Documented GoBD conformity with a supplied Verfahrensdokumentation template, complete and exportable audit trail, receipts linked to postings, and a GoBD-compliant data export (GDPdU/Z3) for the auditor.
10 — Audit-ready as a product feature: an independent GoBD certification or attestation published, Verfahrensdokumentation maintained per release, tamper-evident journals, retention executed across the full statutory period, and an export the Betriebsprüfer accepts without argument.
The Bookkeeper
The change history is genuine: who and when created a booking, which of four sources made it, a modification view showing the previous and the new value, and a monthly timeline filterable by user. The exit file of auditfile, invoices and receipts, and annual accounts is explicitly meant to satisfy a stated retention duty of at least seven years, and the auditfile follows the format the tax authority itself set. We found no public information on postings becoming unalterable after close, on locking, or on a supplier-maintained process documentation, so audit survival rests on export rather than on the system. 2 5
The Tax Adviser
The change history is real: every booking, invoice and payment shows who made it, when, through which of four channels, and later edits display the previous and the new value. An auditfile in the Belastingdienst's XAF format reconciles one-to-one with the filings, and the vendor states a seven-year retention via the exit file. I found no public information on postings becoming unalterable after close, on a Verfahrensdokumentation equivalent, or on tamper-evident journals. 2 5 6
The Auditor
The change history is the strongest part: who made a booking, how it was made, and what was later changed, with previous and new values, action sources and a monthly timeline by user, plus an audit file in the XAF format the Dutch tax authority prescribes. I found no public information on postings becoming unalterable after close, on corrections booked as reversals, or on a Verfahrensdokumentation of the kind a Betriebsprüfung asks for; retention appears only as advice to keep the exit file for a minimum of seven years. 2 5
The Founder
The change history is genuinely good — who, when and how anything was made or changed, old versus new values, a monthly timeline filterable by user, and even payslip history — and the export advice spells out a seven-year retention story built from the auditfile, the invoices and the annual accounts. I found no public information on postings becoming unalterable after close, on a Verfahrensdokumentation, or on tamper-evident journals, so I am trusting the trail rather than a lock. 2 5
The Integrator
Jortt is a Dutch product and makes no GoBD claim; what it does publish is a change history per booking, invoice, payment and payslip showing who, when, how, and previous versus new values, plus a monthly timeline filterable by user. The export page states a seven-year retention duty satisfied by downloading the auditfile, invoices and receipts, but we found no public information on postings becoming unalterable after a close, corrections booked as reversals, or a Verfahrensdokumentation. 2 5
The Skeptic
There is a genuinely described audit trail — who and when created each booking, how it was made, later changes shown with previous and new values, plus a per-month timeline in Plus — alongside a stated seven-year retention via an exit file and an auditfile in the tax authority's XAF 4.0.3 format; we found no public information on postings becoming unalterable after close, corrections booked as reversals, or any procedure documentation or attestation behind it. 2 5
Tax handling & filings
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
VAT logic and the filings that follow: UStVA, ELSTER submission, EÜR or Bilanz, OSS for cross-border sales, and reverse-charge handling.
0 — No VAT logic beyond a rate field; no filings, no ELSTER.
3 — VAT rates and a UStVA figure to copy out by hand; no electronic submission, no special cases.
5 — UStVA prepared and submitted electronically via ELSTER, EÜR or a simple balance sheet produced, and reverse-charge and intra-community supply handled.
8 — The above plus OSS handling for cross-border B2C, Zusammenfassende Meldung, small-business (§19) and Ist/Soll taxation, permanent extension (Dauerfristverlängerung), and E-Bilanz where relevant.
10 — The filing year is handled end to end: every routine German filing generated and submitted electronically with validation before sending, cross-border VAT determined from the transaction rather than by hand, and correction filings supported.
The Bookkeeper
The VAT return is filed electronically to the tax authority through jortt itself — the bot books, checks and submits — and the year-end chain is covered: a 4410-structured annual statement, the KvK deposit on the upper tiers, the income or corporate tax filing explained in a year-end guide, and payroll year-end included. We found no public information on reverse-charge, intra-community or cross-border cases, or on correction filings, which keeps this below the complete-filing level. 1 6
The Tax Adviser
The VAT return is filed electronically to the Belastingdienst from inside the product — the bookkeeping bot is described as booking, checking and filing — and the year-end guide covers annual closing, the statement, the chamber-of-commerce deposit and the annual tax return, with payroll year-end included. I found no public information on reverse-charge, intra-community supplies, OSS or correction filings, which a cross-border client cannot do without. 1 6
The Auditor
The VAT return is filed electronically through the software to the Belastingdienst, the booking bot checks and files, payroll with its year-end closing is included, and the year produces the annual statement, a KvK deposition and guidance to the income- or corporate-tax filing. We found no public information on reverse charge and intra-community supplies, on OSS, or on correction filings, which leaves the special cases unevidenced. 1 5 6
The Founder
VAT returns are filed electronically to the Belastingdienst straight from the system, and the Boekhoudbot books, checks and files on its own — that is exactly the hour saved I pay for. But this is Dutch VAT: I found no public information on ELSTER, EÜR or a balance sheet for German purposes, OSS, reverse charge or correction filings, so for my German filings the evidence tells me nothing. 1 6
The Integrator
VAT returns are filed electronically with the Belastingdienst from inside the product — the Boekhoudbot books, checks and files — and the annual statement, the KvK deposit and the year-end income or corporate tax filing are all covered by a closing guide, with VAT returns, bookings and statement said to match one-to-one. We found no public information on cross-border cases such as OSS or reverse charge, or on correction filings. 1 5 6
The Skeptic
VAT returns are filed electronically to the Belastingdienst through the product — "Je dient via jortt je btw-aangifte in" — and the Boekhoudbot produces annual statements that reconcile one-to-one with returns and bookings, with a year-end guide covering the annual return and payroll included; we found no public information on reverse-charge, intra-community supply or cross-border OSS-style handling. 1 6
Receipts, banking & matching
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How evidence and money get into the ledger: bank feeds, receipt capture, OCR, matching rules, and whether the digital receipt is legally sufficient on its own.
0 — Manual entry only; no bank connection, no receipt storage.
3 — Bank statement import by file and receipt upload as plain attachments; matching is entirely manual.
5 — Automatic bank feeds for the major German banks, receipt upload with OCR, suggested matches, and receipts linked to their postings.
8 — PSD2 feeds across many institutions, rule-based automatic matching with learning, e-invoice handling (ZUGFeRD/XRechnung) both directions, and replacement scanning (ersetzendes Scannen) documented so paper can be destroyed.
10 — The evidence chain is closed: every posting reaches its receipt in one click, e-invoicing inbound and outbound as standard, documented compliant archiving of the digital original, and matching accurate enough that exceptions rather than transactions are the work.
The Bookkeeper
Bank feeds run on the vendor's own PSD2 licence across virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and Mollie, reading nightly and on demand every five minutes, and matching is rule-based — 1,243 standard rules plus up to 250 of your own — with AI scan-and-recognise and Peppol invoicing both directions. Incoming documents are renamed and ordered by booking number and travel in the exit file, which implies the link to postings. We found no public information on a documented replacement-scanning regime or on matching that learns beyond the rules, so I credit the automation but keep exceptions on my desk. 1 3 4 5
The Tax Adviser
Bank feeds run under the vendor's own PSD2 licence to virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and Mollie, syncing nightly, at first login and on demand every five minutes, with matching on 1,243 standard rules plus up to 250 of your own per tier. Invoices and receipts download as an ordered set renamed by booking number, Peppol e-invoicing goes both directions, and AI scan-and-recognise sits in the higher tier. I found no public information on replacement scanning or documented archiving of the digital original. 1 3 4 5
The Auditor
Bank feeds run on the vendor's own PSD2 licence with nightly and on-demand synchronisation for the Dutch banks plus Revolut and a Mollie business account, a rule-based bot with 1,243 standard rules books the transactions, incoming invoices and receipts are stored and renamed by booking number, and Peppol invoices go out and come in. We found no public information on replacement scanning that would permit destroying the paper, or on whether the matching rules learn. 1 3 4 5
The Founder
This is the part I care about most, and it is the strongest: an own PSD2 licence, feeds from virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and the Mollie business account, nightly sync with a five-minute manual pull, and 1,243 standard rules plus up to 250 of my own letting the Boekhoudbot do the matching. Receipt scanning with AI recognition, purchase invoices filed by booking number, and Peppol e-invoices in and out are all evidenced too. I found no public information on replacement scanning or documented compliant archiving of the digital original, which is where I stop short. 1 3 4
The Integrator
This is where the books connect to the money: read-only bank feeds under an own PSD2 licence to virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and Mollie, synced nightly, on first login and manually every five minutes, with automatic booking by 1,243 standard rules and up to 250 of your own. Peppol invoices are sent and received, so e-invoicing runs both directions, and purchase invoices are renamed and ordered by booking number with AI scan and recognition from the Plus plan. We found no public information on replacement scanning or compliant archiving of the digital original. 1 3 4 5
The Skeptic
Bank linking runs on the vendor's own PSD2 license across virtually all Dutch banks plus Revolut and Mollie, syncing nightly and on demand every 5 minutes; matching is rule-based (1,243 standard rules plus 10, 25 or 250 own rules by tier), receipts arrive via AI Scan en Herken, Peppol e-invoices go both directions, and purchase invoices are renamed to their booking numbers. We found no public information on documented replacement scanning or compliant archiving of the digital original. 1 3 4 5
Tax adviser handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the books reach the Steuerberater — DATEV above all — and whether the adviser can work in the system rather than around it.
0 — No adviser access and no accounting export; the year-end is a pile of PDFs.
3 — Generic CSV or Excel export described as "suitable for your tax adviser", with no named format.
5 — A documented DATEV export (postings and, ideally, receipts) plus a read-only login for the adviser.
8 — DATEV export including receipt images with correct linking, or a maintained DATEV interface; the adviser gets their own scoped access with an audit of what they changed.
10 — The adviser is a first-class user: bidirectional DATEV exchange including corrections coming back, or a certified interface; period handover with locking, and a workflow where adviser queries are resolved inside the system.
The Bookkeeper
The accountant gets a named, documented exchange format — an auditfile in XAF 4.0.3 built to the tax authority's own specification, from which they prepare the annual accounts — and corrections from their review are entered back in jortt so books, auditfile and statement line up again. We found no public information on the adviser having their own access into the system or on a bidirectional exchange, so this is a well-formed export rather than a shared workspace. 5 6
The Tax Adviser
The handoff is in the accountant's own language: an XAF auditfile in the format the tax authority prescribed, invoices and receipts downloadable alongside it, an exit-file definition with the advice to leave only after the annual filing, and a documented loop where the accountant's corrections are entered back into the product. I found no public information on an adviser login or a scoped adviser role — only unspecified advanced user rights in the higher tier — so the adviser works from the export rather than in the books. 1 5 6
The Auditor
The handoff is the XAF audit file: documented, built from all bookings so that VAT returns, bookings and annual statement match one-to-one, with accountants described as building the annual statement from it and corrections to be entered in the product first. We found no public information on a separate login or scoped access for the adviser, and no DATEV exchange — decisive for a German practice. 2 5 6
The Founder
The handoff path exists and is documented: an XAF 4.0.3 auditfile in the format the Belastingdienst specified, accountants building the annual accounts from it, and corrections routed back into the books so auditfile, bookings and statement match one-to-one again. I found no public information on a DATEV export or a dedicated adviser login, and my own Steuerberater lives in DATEV, so as a workflow this serves a Dutch accountant, not mine. 5 6
The Integrator
The handoff format is the auditfile in XAF 4.0.3 as specified by the Belastingdienst, from which the vendor says an accountant builds the annual statement, with corrections to be entered back in Jortt first so books, auditfile and statement stay matched; invoices and receipts travel with it in the exit file. We found no public information on DATEV, a dedicated adviser login, or an audit of what an adviser changed. 5 6
The Skeptic
A named, documented export exists — auditfile XAF 4.0.3, the format the Belastingdienst prescribed — with a one-click download of sales invoices and an exit file combining auditfile, invoices and the year-end accounts, from which the accountant builds the annual statement; we found no public information on a login or workspace for the adviser, and corrections travel by the customer re-entering them in the product rather than by exchange. 5 6
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the books live and who could be compelled to produce them — plus, uniquely here, whether statutory retention survives leaving the vendor. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated or non-EU, subprocessors unnamed — with a ten-year retention obligation attached to data held abroad.
3 — EU hosting offered while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — OCR, AI categorisation, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or German hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and a stated export that satisfies retention if the contract ends.
10 — Sovereign and durable: German or EU hosting throughout, every subprocessor European, certification published, and a documented archive export that keeps the customer compliant for the full retention period after they leave.
The Bookkeeper
The contracting entity is the Dutch Jortt B.V., the software is built by its own team in the Netherlands, and there is a real exit story: the auditfile, the invoice and receipt download and the annual accounts together are declared sufficient for a retention duty of at least seven years after you stop. But we found no public information on where the books are hosted, on named infrastructure, or on a published subprocessor list, and nothing independent is on record, so I can confirm the way out but not the chain itself. 1 5
The Tax Adviser
The contracting party is a Dutch company building the software with its own team in the Netherlands, a processor agreement is available, and the exit-file advice explicitly answers the retention question for after you leave. The independently sourced record carries no attributes at all: I found no public information on hosting location or named infrastructure, and no subprocessor list. 1 5
The Auditor
A Dutch company builds the software with its own team in the Netherlands, a data processing agreement is offered, and the exit file — audit file, invoices and receipts, annual accounts — is documented as what the customer keeps for at least seven years after leaving, which is retention that survives the contract. We found no public information on where the books are hosted, on the infrastructure behind them, or on any subprocessor list. 1 5
The Founder
Dutch vendor, software built by their own team in the Netherlands, a processor agreement on offer, and an exit file that is explicitly said to satisfy the retention obligation for at least seven years — that durability clause I rarely see anyone write down. But there is no independently sourced sovereignty record at all, and I found no public information on where the books are hosted, on a subprocessor list, or on any certification; connecting the books to ChatGPT or Claude via MCP is offered with no stated safeguard. 1 5
The Integrator
Jortt B.V. is a Dutch contracting entity that says its software is built by its own team in the Netherlands, and the export page is unusually clear that downloading the auditfile, receipts, invoices and year-end accounts satisfies the retention obligation after leaving — with the advice to export after the annual filing. We found no public information on where the books are hosted, on subprocessors — including for the AI assistant it advertises connecting to ChatGPT and Claude — or on certifications. 1 5
The Skeptic
The sovereignty pipeline has nothing on record: the captured pages say the product is built by the vendor's own team in the Netherlands, which speaks to development rather than hosting, and we found no public information on where the books live or which subprocessors are involved; a processor agreement is offered, and the bank connection runs on the vendor's own PSD2 license rather than a third party's. 1 4
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a business can compute the real annual invoice — including the bookings, users, bank accounts and adviser access they actually need — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A headline monthly price exists, but booking or document limits, extra users or the tier where DATEV export begins are unstated.
5 — Tier prices public with billing period stated and the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (DATEV export, extra bank accounts, adviser seat) sits in an unpriced tier.
8 — Every tier and add-on priced publicly with limits, overage, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; adviser access priced or explicitly free.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given transaction volume, user count and feature set, including overage and the year-end extras.
The Bookkeeper
Tier names and their limits are public — ten own rules on ZZP, twenty-five on MKB, two hundred and fifty on Plus, unlimited bookings, bank connection free from jortt with the occasional bank charging — plus a thirty-day trial and a ninety-day refund. But the captured pages show no price figures at all: no euro amount for any tier, no billing period, no VAT treatment, so no business can compute its annual invoice from what is published here. 1
The Tax Adviser
Tiers are publicly differentiated — unlimited bookings everywhere, 10, 25 or 250 own rules depending on plan, feature lists per tier, a 30-day trial and a 90-day money-back promise — but I found no public information on any actual price figure, the billing period, VAT treatment or minimum term. A business cannot compute its annual invoice from what is published. 1 5
The Auditor
Tier names, rule limits per tier, plan-gated features, a thirty-day trial and a ninety-day refund are public, but we found no public information on the price itself: neither a monthly figure, nor a billing term, nor VAT treatment was to be found on the captured pages. The real annual invoice is therefore not computable from public pages. 1 5 6
The Founder
I got tier names, rule counts of 10, 25 and 250, unlimited bookings, a 30-day free trial, 90-day money back, and even a note that bank linking costs nothing and some banks charge — but not a single price figure anywhere in what was captured. I cannot compute an annual invoice from public pages, and that is the first thing I check before the demo call. 1 5
The Integrator
We found no public information on prices for the ZZP, MKB or Plus tiers — no monthly figure, billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment appears on the captured pages. The only cost statements are that bank linking costs nothing from Jortt, bookings are unlimited, and updates are included, which leaves a buyer unable to compute a real annual invoice from public pages alone. 1
The Skeptic
The captured pages give tier names (ZZP, MKB, Plus) with real per-tier limits — unlimited bookings, 10/25/250 own rules, and which features sit where — and state the bank connection costs nothing from the vendor's side, a few banks excepted; but we found no public information on the price of any tier, the billing period, minimum term or VAT treatment. 1 2 6
Questions about Jortt
Is Jortt European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Jortt is based.
Where does Jortt store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 13 Oct 2026.
Does Jortt have a free plan?
Yes. Jortt has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 13 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Jortt?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Papierkram (3.5/5), sevDesk (3/5) and BuchhaltungsButler (3/5) highest among the other 24 Accounting products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Papierkram (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Jortt alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 13 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 9 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (6)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.jortt.nl Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 GoBD, immutability & audit — found from sitemap www.jortt.nl Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap www.jortt.nl Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Receipts, banking & matching — found from sitemap www.jortt.nl Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Tax adviser handoff — found from sitemap www.jortt.nl Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Tax adviser handoff — found from sitemap www.jortt.nl Checked 13 Oct 2026 Details →