whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

AI Agents & Assistants

Claude for Work

Rest of world Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Anthropic PBC · claude.com

Compare with Langdock → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Claude for Work: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Claude for Work: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Claude for Work at a glance

Vendor
Anthropic PBC
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
Free plan
Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 26 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Claude for Work 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Claude for Work — Anthropic's Team and Enterprise plans — earns its highest marks on data use and training and admin and access: the commercial terms state Anthropic may not train models on Customer Content, accepting those terms also accepts the data processing agreement, and Enterprise plans carry single sign-on with domain capture, SCIM provisioning, custom roles with per-connector permission levels, and retention controls with every change tracked in audit logs. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 28 Oct 2026. all sources

Claude for Work alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Automation Lead

Weighted verdict

Builds the agents that file tickets, draft offers and chase approvals across the ERP, CRM and wiki. Wants tools and actions with scoped permissions, MCP and an API, approval steps before anything is sent, run logs, and a way to test an agent before the whole company uses it.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Automation Lead

Panel median The Automation Lead This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Automation Lead
Data use, training & retention 4 of 5 4 of 5
Models & processing location 2 of 5 2 of 5
Admin, identity & access controls 4 of 5 4 of 5
Integrations, connectors & knowledge 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
Agent capabilities & guardrails 3.5 of 5 3.5 of 5
European sovereignty 2 of 5 2 of 5
Pricing transparency 3 of 5 3 of 5

Data use, training & retention

How this is scored

What happens to prompts, uploaded files, connected data and outputs: whether any of it trains a model (the vendor's or a model provider's), how long it is kept and where logs live, whether zero-retention is available, and whether a data processing agreement covers it.

0 — No statement on training or retention; the privacy policy is a website policy that does not cover the product.

3 — A general statement that business data is "not used for training", with no word on retention, on the model providers behind the product or on logs.

5 — Business data excluded from training by contract, retention periods stated for chats and files, and a DPA offered to business customers.

8 — No-training commitments stated for the vendor and every model provider it routes to, retention configurable by the admin (including deletion of chat history), zero-data-retention terms with the model providers named, and abuse-monitoring retention described.

10 — Data use fully accounted for: training, retention, logging and abuse monitoring stated per model provider, customer-controlled retention and deletion with an audit trail, outputs and connected data treated as customer data in the DPA, and an independent audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001 or ISO 42001) covering the product.

Report an error

The Automation Lead

The commercial terms state plainly that Anthropic may not train models on Customer Content, Enterprise admins can set retention for conversations, projects and artifacts with every change tracked in audit logs, and the abuse-monitoring carve-outs are disclosed rather than buried. I hold it below the top because data is retained indefinitely unless an owner acts, and the retention controls explicitly do not reach Claude Managed Agents or cloud-run Claude Code — the agent features I would deploy first. 4 7 6 2 5

Report an error

Models & processing location

How this is scored

Which models sit behind the product and who runs them, where inference and storage happen, whether the customer can pin processing to the EU, choose or exclude model providers, bring its own model or key, or run the product in its own cloud or on premises.

0 — The models behind the product and the processing location are not stated.

3 — The model family is named, but where inference runs and through which provider (the model maker, a hyperscaler, the vendor) is unstated.

5 — Models and their providers named, with an EU processing option stated for storage and at least the default model.

8 — Each available model listed with provider and inference region, EU-only processing selectable by the admin and enforced across models, model providers excludable, and bring-your-own-key or own-cloud deployment documented.

10 — Processing fully under the customer's control and documented: EU-only or on-premises inference for every feature including agents and connectors, open-weight or self-hosted models supported, data flows per feature published, and a residency commitment in the contract rather than on a marketing page.

Report an error

The Automation Lead

The model families are named — Mythos including Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku — with per-role control over which models members may use, and the privacy policy states personal data is transferred to servers in the US or other countries outside the EEA and the UK. We found no public information on pinning this product's inference or storage to the EU; the regions page captured simply hands off to Amazon Bedrock's own documentation. 1 3 5 8

Report an error

Admin, identity & access controls

How this is scored

What the IT department controls: SSO and SCIM provisioning, roles and groups, which models, agents and connectors each group may use, retrieval that respects the permissions of the source system, audit logs, usage reporting, and policies such as data-loss prevention — and whether reporting on staff use is scoped and documented.

0 — No admin features documented; accounts are individual sign-ups.

3 — A team workspace with an owner and member invitations, but no SSO, no roles and no audit log.

5 — SSO, admin and member roles, user management, and an admin view of usage.

8 — SAML/OIDC SSO with SCIM provisioning, group-based permissions for models, agents and connectors, retrieval that inherits source-system permissions, exportable audit logs, and usage analytics with documented scope.

10 — Governance a regulated company can operate: fine-grained policies (DLP, content filters, prompt and output logging rules), audit logs streamed to a SIEM, per-agent ownership and approval, usage reporting that can be aggregated or pseudonymised for works-council agreements, and every admin action logged.

Report an error

The Automation Lead

This is what I want before wiring an agent into company systems: SSO with SAML and domain capture, SCIM provisioning, custom roles with per-connector permission levels — every tool 'Always allow', 'Needs approval', 'Blocked' or per-tool 'Custom' — plus model access per role and per-group monthly spend limits. The gaps sit at the regulated end: we found no public information on data-loss prevention rules, streaming audit logs to a SIEM, or per-agent ownership, and the scope of the usage analytics is not described. 2 10 11 12

Report an error

Integrations, connectors & knowledge

How this is scored

How the product reaches company knowledge and systems: connectors to file stores, wikis, mail, CRM, ticketing and ERP, how fast and how completely they sync, the API, support for open protocols such as MCP, and how the assistant cites the sources it answers from.

0 — No integrations; users paste text or upload files one at a time.

3 — File upload and one or two connectors (for example a drive), with no API and no statement on sync or citations.

5 — A connector library covering the common file stores, wikis and collaboration tools, answers citing sources, and a documented API.

8 — Connectors to file stores, wikis, mail, CRM and ticketing with incremental sync, custom connectors or MCP support, an API and webhooks for embedding assistants and agents in other tools, and source citations on every grounded answer.

10 — The product sits in the company's systems: read and write connectors with documented scopes, MCP servers and clients, contact-centre or telephony integration where relevant, a knowledge layer that can be audited and corrected, and the data, agents and configuration exportable when the customer leaves.

Report an error

The Automation Lead

Remote MCP connectors, a documented API, webhooks and a marketplace with an official Pipedrive connector carrying seventy-nine read-and-write tools that respect existing CRM permissions — that is real plumbing, not slideware. The library as documented leans on mail, drives and collaboration tools; we found no public information on ticketing connectors, sync frequency or completeness, or how grounded answers cite their sources. 1 2 5 12 13

Report an error

Agent capabilities & guardrails

How this is scored

What an agent can actually do and where it stops: multi-step tasks, tool use and actions in other systems, scheduling and triggers, human approval before consequential actions, run logs, evaluation and testing before release, and the limits the vendor states rather than hides.

0 — No agents; the product is a chat window, whatever the marketing says.

3 — Saved prompts or custom assistants with instructions and files, but no actions in other systems and no run history.

5 — Agents that call tools or APIs and run multi-step tasks, built without code, with a log of each run.

8 — Agents that act in connected systems with scoped permissions, human approval configurable per action, triggers and schedules, test and evaluation tooling before release, and documented limits and failure handling.

10 — Agents a business can put in production and account for: versioning and staged rollout, evaluation against test sets, monitoring of quality and cost per agent, handover to a human with full context, every action attributable to the agent and the person who deployed it, and the vendor's own statement of what agents must not be trusted with.

Report an error

The Automation Lead

Agents run multi-step sessions that act on your behalf in connected systems, run events stream on the session so you can follow each step, and the documentation is unusually honest about limits — a thousand agents per run, sixty-four concurrent threads, a twenty-four-hour run lifetime, a failed agent usually retried once on a new thread. What stops me signing off: the docs state there is no approval step before a managed-agent run starts, though connector tools can be gated so members confirm each call, and we found no public information on test or evaluation tooling to rehearse an agent before the whole company uses it. 5 15 11 12 3

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where customer data is hosted, and who the subprocessors are — model providers above all, then hosting, search, telephony and email. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; for an AI product the model provider is a subprocessor, so a European interface over a non-European model counts as such.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors (including model providers) unnamed.

3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the model providers behind the product are not named as subprocessors.

5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but prompts reach non-EU model providers or other subprocessors without a stated safeguard or EU region.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, every subprocessor listed with its location including model providers, EU inference available, and a DPA offered.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and model processing, every subprocessor European or optional, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.

Report an error

The Automation Lead

EEA, Swiss and UK customers contract with Anthropic Ireland Limited, with Dublin arbitration and standard contractual clauses covering transfers, but the privacy policy states personal data is processed on US servers, so hosting is not European. A subprocessor list is published as a reference, though the pages captured name only two Korean processors, and we found no public information on EU inference or an EU hosting option for this product. 5 2 4 6

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per seat, per agent, per conversation or per usage unit, what is included in each tier, usage limits and overage, which models, connectors or agents cost extra, minimum seats and term.

0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but usage limits, included models and what scales the cost are unclear.

5 — Prices per tier are public with the main inclusions, but usage limits, overage, agent runs or enterprise features (SSO, audit logs, EU processing) are unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every tier priced publicly with seat or usage units, usage limits and overage rates, add-ons listed, minimum seats and term stated.

10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of seats, agents or conversations, with every usage rate, model surcharge, add-on and support tier and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Automation Lead

The headline numbers are public: the free plan at $0, Pro at $17 per month with annual subscription discount ($200 billed up front) or $20 if billed monthly, Max 'From $100 Per month', and Enterprise at $20 per seat per month plus usage billed at API rates with a minimum of 20 seats and an annual commitment. A buyer still cannot total a year from these pages alone: usage limits are flagged but not quantified, the per-token rates live on a separate pricing page, and we found no public information on a Team plan price, overage rates or add-ons. 3 2 4 15

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about Claude for Work

Is Claude for Work European?

No. whats-best.ai classifies Claude for Work as Rest of world.

Where does Claude for Work store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.

Does Claude for Work have a free plan?

Yes. Claude for Work has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 26 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Claude for Work?

As of 28 Oct 2026, the panel rates Langdock (4/5), Dust (3.5/5) and Unique AI (3.5/5) highest among the other 15 AI Agents & Assistants products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Langdock (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Claude for Work alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Claude for Work? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (15)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Features page (Enterprise plan) claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Pricing page claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Terms of service www.anthropic.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Privacy policy www.anthropic.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Data use, training & retention — found from sitemap support.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Data use, training & retention — found from sitemap support.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Models & processing location — found from sitemap support.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Models & processing location — found from sitemap platform.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Admin, identity & access controls — found from sitemap support.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Admin, identity & access controls — found from sitemap support.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Integrations, connectors & knowledge — found from sitemap claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  13. 13 Integrations, connectors & knowledge — found from sitemap claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  14. 14 Agent capabilities & guardrails — found from sitemap platform.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
  15. 15 Agent capabilities & guardrails — found from sitemap platform.claude.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →