whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Efficy CRM

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Efficy NV · www.efficy.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Sales Ops Lead

Weighted verdict

Owns the forecast a 40-seat team lives by. Optimizes for pipeline discipline: stage hygiene, required fields, routing, quota and forecast reporting the CFO will accept. Rejects freeform pipelines that cannot enforce a process and reporting that stops at a dashboard screenshot.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Sales Ops Lead

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Sales Ops Lead

Leads, opportunities, quotes and contracts are named as objects, the vendor points to data entry assistance for database quality and unlimited customisation for complex projects — but the captured pages do not detail field types, required fields, dedupe or merge tooling. As the person who has to keep a 40-seat database clean, I see object names and adjectives, not hygiene mechanics. We found no public information on activity history per record or permissioned field access. 1 4

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Sales Ops Lead

Forecasts are listed alongside quotes and contracts in the sales module, and the vendor promises sales-metric reports at the touch of a button — which reads to me as canned reporting, not a builder. The eight pipeline stages and four forecasting methods on the content pages are generic CRM education, not evidence of stage gates, quota tracking or team-and-period forecasting in the product. We found no public information on required fields per stage, win/loss capture mechanics, or a custom report builder. 1 4 5 6

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Sales Ops Lead

Automation is claimed where I would want it: opportunity creation can be automated, follow-up runs en masse, event-triggered email and SMS journeys are described, and automated workflows appear as a named AI feature. Nothing captured shows a workflow builder with delays, branching or lead routing, and no limits or analytics per workflow are published. We found no public information on routing rules, sequence analytics, or where automation caps sit by package. 1 6 7

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Sales Ops Lead

The vendor calls itself an open platform, fully integratable, and describes real-time registration of lead interactions from marketing solutions — but those are adjectives, not connections. We found no public information on a documented API, two-way email and calendar sync, webhooks, or any named native integration. From what was captured I cannot connect a single tool in the revenue stack to this CRM. 1 4

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Sales Ops Lead

The homepage claims hosting in Europe with no extraterritorial dependency, and the hosting menu goes further than most — SecNumCloud, HDS, on-premise and private cloud, with local European teams. But the residency claim lives only in marketing copy: we found no public information on a data processing agreement, a subprocessor list, or the verified jurisdiction and server location behind the entity. Strong hosting story, unproven paperwork. 1

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Sales Ops Lead

Nothing captured addresses getting data in or out: we found no public information on import tooling, export formats, migration support, or contractual data-return terms. For an anti-lock-in read the silence is the finding — the only adjacent signal is an open platform slogan, which documents nothing about exit. I cannot verify any portability capability from the published pages. 1 2

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Sales Ops Lead

Four packages carry real per-user monthly figures — 69 €, 69 €, 89 € and 119 € — with a stated no-à-la-carte packaging model, which is more than most vendors publish. But the pricing page does not state billing period or VAT treatment, seat minimums go unmentioned, and the top package is literally named Custom & Intelligent with a personalized-estimate consultation as the path in. I can see sticker prices; I cannot compute the invoice at renewal. 2

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

1 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency EU only ⚠ unverified 3/3 pts 1 Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about Efficy CRM? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (7)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage www.efficy.com Checked 21 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Vendor pricing page www.efficy.com Checked 21 Sep 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.efficy.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.efficy.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.efficy.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.efficy.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.efficy.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →