CRM
OnePageCRM
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by OnePageCRM Ltd · www.onepagecrm.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
OnePageCRM is a Galway, Ireland vendor's CRM that the bench scores highest on pricing transparency and contact management (flat 4), and lowest on automation and data portability. The evidenced core is real: unlimited Contacts, Deals, Fields and Tags on all plans, a $9.95 per user/month starting price with 4 months free on annual plans, a free trial, a 1,000-email/day allowance, and bundled tools — Sales Dialer, Web Forms, Lead Clipper, Business Card Scanner, AI Sales Route Planner. Judges split on sovereignty, which spans 2-4: high scores credit the Irish entity, low scores point to the evidence's 'no sovereignty attributes on record' — no DPA, subprocessor list, hosting location or deletion controls — with the Claude/ChatGPT integrations flagged as implying undocumented US processors. Pricing's 4-6 spread mirrors that gap: the high scores call the invoice simple and computable, the low ones note 'starts from' leaves the tier ladder and VAT treatment unpriced. Where the product is thin there is no spread: pipeline & forecasting scores sit at 2, and automation and data portability cluster at 1-2 because no workflow, export or API capability appears anywhere in the evidence.
Speaks for it
- Contact management scores sit at 4 on unlimited Contacts, Deals, Fields and Tags on all plans, which judges read as real custom fields rather than cosmetic ones
- Pricing transparency reaches 6: $9.95 per user/month, 4 months free with annual plans, and a free trial with cancel-anytime terms make the small-team invoice computable
- Bundled tools — Sales Dialer, Web Forms, Lead Clipper, Business Card Scanner, AI Sales Route Planner — plus a mobile AI card scanner evidence fast data capture
- Claude & ChatGPT integrations and 'dozens of integrations' come bundled, per the pricing page's 'so you don't need to pay for anything extra'
- Setup is advertised at 'Set up in 4 minutes', a genuine low-friction entry point for small teams
Held against it
- Automation scores cluster at 1-2 because no triggers, sequences, branching, routing or workflow builder appears anywhere in the evidence
- Data portability scores cluster at 1-2 because every data-flow fact points inward, with no export, migration path or documented API evidenced
- Sales pipeline scores sit at 2: a Deals object is confirmed, but stages, stage gates, forecasts and reporting are entirely unevidenced
- Sovereignty scores span 2-4 over a sheet that records 'no sovereignty attributes on record' — no DPA, subprocessor list, hosting location or deletion controls — with the Claude/ChatGPT hooks flagged as implying undocumented US processors
- Pricing stops at 'starts from': per-tier numbers, VAT treatment and renewal rules are absent, so a 30- or 40-seat invoice cannot be computed from the evidence
Best for
- You need a low-friction contact manager for a small team and want the invoice computable from a single $9.95 per user/month starting price
- Your selling method is personal GTD-style follow-up driven by a daily next-action agenda rather than a stage-gated process
- You value bundled capture tools — Lead Clipper, Business Card Scanner, Web Forms, Sales Dialer — at no extra cost over a deep integration directory
Avoid if
- You need to get your data out — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You need pipeline reporting a finance department would accept — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You must sign a DPA or review a subprocessor list before adopting — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- You rely on workflow automation — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
Contact & data model
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.
0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.
3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.
5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.
8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.
10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.
The Solo Seller
Unlimited Contacts, Deals, Fields and Tags on all plans is real customization, not cosmetic — but the evidence never mentions companies, dedupe, merge, or field validation, so the hygiene half of this criterion is unevidenced. I can't credit what the vendor didn't put on the page. 2
The Data Protection Officer
Unlimited contacts, deals, fields and tags gives the standard objects plus custom fields, but nothing on dedupe, validation or permissioned access. Worse, the bundled Lead Clipper is exactly the open-web scraping tool that fills a personal-data database with unvetted records and no hygiene tooling on record. 1 2
The Sales Ops Lead
Unlimited Contacts, Deals, Fields and Tags on all plans gives real custom fields at the record level, but nothing on required fields, validation, dedupe or merge — the hygiene a shared 40-seat database collapses without. Card scanner and Lead Clipper are capture tools, not data governance. 1 2
The RevOps Integrator
Unlimited contacts, deals, fields and tags exist on all plans, but there is zero evidence of dedupe, merge, validation, or relations beyond the standard objects — and 'set up in 4 minutes' is a vendor confession that the model is deliberately thin. A one-page contact manager, not a system the data model bends around. 1 2
The Migrator
"Unlimited Contacts, Deals, Fields, and Tags on all plans" confirms the core objects and real custom fields, but there is not one word about a companies object, merge, or dedupe tooling — and dedupe is the difference between a migration and a six-month cleanup project. The AI card scanner is a data-in path, not hygiene. Customization looks more than cosmetic; hygiene is entirely unevidenced. 1 2
The Skeptic
Unlimited contacts, deals, fields and tags on all plans gets you the standard objects plus custom fields, and the morning agenda implies actions live on the record. But the evidence says nothing about company relationships, dedupe, merges or validation — and silence on hygiene is exactly how duplicates breed unchecked. 2 1
Pipeline & forecasting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.
0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.
3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.
5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.
8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.
10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.
The Solo Seller
Deals exist (unlimited, per E2) and the morning agenda enforces a next-action habit, which suits a one-person shop — but there is zero evidence of stages, probabilities, win/loss capture, or any report or forecast. Nothing here rolls up into a number I'd show my accountant. 1 2
The Data Protection Officer
Deals exist as an object and the morning follow-up agenda enforces a habit, but there is no evidence of pipelines, stage requirements, forecasts or reporting of any kind. Nothing a finance department would accept, and nothing I can verify beyond a deals counter. 1 2
The Sales Ops Lead
All I can confirm is that a Deals object exists; the product's stated center of gravity is a personal morning follow-up agenda — GTD methodology, not process. No stage gates, per-stage required fields, probabilities, quota tracking or forecast views appear anywhere in the evidence, so nothing here produces reporting a CFO would accept. 1 2
The RevOps Integrator
Deals are confirmed as a record type and the morning Next Action agenda imposes personal follow-up discipline, but the evidence is silent on stages, stage gates, win/loss capture, forecasts and reporting entirely. Nothing here a finance department would accept as pipeline reporting. 1 2
The Migrator
All I can confirm is that Deals exist as an object; the evidence is silent on stages, stage requirements, win/loss capture, forecasts, quotas, or any reporting at all. I've seen deal lists that called themselves pipelines — silence where process enforcement should be means I score what's evidenced: a deal record with nothing around it. 2
The Skeptic
Deals exist and are unlimited, and that is all the evidence proves — no pipelines, no stage requirements, no forecast, no report builder anywhere in the record. 'Set up in 4 minutes' tells you this is a task list with amounts attached, not a process a finance department can interrogate. 2 1
Automation & workflows
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.
0 — No automation beyond email templates.
3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.
5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.
8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.
10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.
The Solo Seller
The daily agenda surfaces work automatically and a 1,000 email/day sending limit implies bulk email, but no trigger, sequence, or workflow builder appears anywhere on record. I see nothing I could configure to chase a lead while I'm on a call. 1 2
The Data Protection Officer
A morning agenda is a prompt, not automation: no triggers, sequences, branching or routing appear anywhere in evidence. The 1,000-email/day cap suggests bulk sending with no documented workflow engine behind it. 1 2
The Sales Ops Lead
No trigger, sequence, routing or workflow capability appears anywhere in the evidence. The closest facts are a 1,000 email/day sending cap and Claude/ChatGPT connectors — bulk sending and an AI chat hook, not automation infrastructure. 2
The RevOps Integrator
Web forms, a dialer and a daily agenda automate capture and reminders, and a 1,000-email/day sending allowance exists — but no multi-step workflows, sequences, branching, routing or webhooks appear anywhere in the record. This is GTD prompting, not automation infrastructure. 1 2
The Migrator
The morning agenda is a generated digest, not automation; web forms and a 1,000 email/day cap hint at triggered capture and bulk send, but no sequences, branching, routing, or workflow builder appears anywhere in the evidence. Slightly above nothing, and nothing I'd build a sales process on. 1 2
The Skeptic
The auto-built daily agenda is genuine automatic follow-up prompting, but there is no evidence of triggers, multi-step workflows, branching or routing anywhere on the evidence. '1,000 emails/day (100% Deliverability)' is a sending allowance with a footnote-free marketing claim, not a sequence engine. 1 2
Integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.
0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.
3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.
5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.
8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.
10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.
The Solo Seller
"Dozens of integrations" bundled free beats a handful of Zapier triggers, and Claude/ChatGPT hooks are a genuine novelty — but the evidence is silent on API, webhooks, and two-way email/calendar sync, which is what separates a directory from first-class connectivity. For a solo buyer the bundled-no-extra-cost part is the honest bit; the missing API is the deal-limiter. 2
The Data Protection Officer
'Dozens of integrations' names no providers, and no API is evidenced, so I cannot confirm even two-way email or calendar sync. The Claude & ChatGPT hooks are the part I reject outright: contact data flowing to US model providers with no DPA or subprocessor facts anywhere on record. 2
The Sales Ops Lead
'Dozens of integrations' plus named Claude/ChatGPT connectors claims a modest native directory, but there is no documented API, no webhooks, and no evidence of two-way email or calendar sync. Marketing copy, not an integration architecture. 2
The RevOps Integrator
'Dozens of integrations' names not one tool, and the only specific connections are Claude/ChatGPT and bundled lead capture — no API documentation, no webhooks, no two-way email or calendar sync claim survives scrutiny. An unverified integration count with no native revenue-stack connection named is exactly the closed-ecosystem pattern I reject. 2 1
The Migrator
"Dozens of integrations with your favorite tools" is a directory claim with zero specifics — no two-way email/calendar sync, no API documentation, no webhooks, no rate limits. My exits have always run through the API, and a the evidence that never says the word API is brochure language I don't underwrite. 2
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.
0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.
3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.
5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.
8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.
10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.
The Solo Seller
Provenance is Galway, Ireland, so the entity is European — but the registry explicitly has no sovereignty attributes: no DPA, no subprocessor list, no hosting location. I can't verify where my leads' personal data actually sits, and for EU customers that silence is information. 1
The Data Protection Officer
The Galway, Ireland entity is the one real asset — an EU vendor is where I want a CRM to start — but this sheet records no DPA, no subprocessor list, no hosting location and no retention or deletion controls, while the AI integrations imply undocumented US processors. An Irish company with an empty sovereignty file is still a file I cannot sign. 1 2
The Sales Ops Lead
The vendor is an Irish company, so it is not the US-entity anchor-0 case, but the evidence records 'no sovereignty attributes': the captured pages are silent on DPA, subprocessor list, hosting location and deletion controls. Nothing here a DPO could sign; the missing DPA alone keeps it under the 3 anchor. 1 2
The RevOps Integrator
The one signal is provenance: an Irish entity in Galway on a European-made product. But the sovereignty record is empty — no DPA, no hosting location, no subprocessor list, no deletion controls — so a DPO has nothing to sign off on, which is information in itself. 1
The Migrator
A Galway, Ireland vendor is a genuine European-entity start, but "no sovereignty attributes on record" means no DPA, no subprocessor list, no hosting location, and no deletion controls are evidenced anywhere. I've read too many exit contracts to sign off on a jurisdiction alone — the silence on subprocessors is exactly what a DPO cannot approve. 1
The Skeptic
A Galway, Ireland entity is the right postcode, but the evidence records zero sovereignty attributes: no DPA, no subprocessor list, no hosting facts. Worse, Claude & ChatGPT integrations hint at undocumented US AI subprocessors sitting in the data path. 2
Import, export & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.
0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.
3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.
5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.
8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.
10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.
The Solo Seller
The Lead Clipper and AI card scanner get fresh contacts in, but the evidence says nothing about CSV import with history, export, or API access. There is not one fact suggesting I could leave this CRM with my data — the anti-lock-in question is entirely unanswered. 1
The Data Protection Officer
Every data-flow fact on record points inward — web forms, card scanner, Lead Clipper — and not one word about export, migration tooling or an API. A CRM that evidences only entry and never exit is a lock-in risk, and where deletion and export are undocumented I assume they are unimplemented. 1 2
The Sales Ops Lead
The only ingress evidenced is point capture — Lead Clipper, Business Card Scanner, Web Forms — with no import/migration path, no export format, no documented API and no exit terms anywhere in the evidence. Getting a team's deal history out is entirely unevidenced. 1 2
The RevOps Integrator
Getting data in is frictionless — web forms, Lead Clipper, business card scanner — but the evidence is a complete blank on the exit side: no export, no migration tooling, no API extraction, nothing. Capture tools are not portability, and silence on exit is the lock-in tell. 1
The Migrator
"Set up in 4 minutes" plus card scanner and lead clipper describe getting data IN fast; the evidence says nothing about import mapping, dedupe on import, export coverage of notes and activity history, or any API to pull the database out. Data-in marketing with zero data-out evidence is chapter one of every lock-in story I've lived through, so I score the silence, not the benefit of the doubt. 1 2
The Skeptic
Data gets in easily enough — web forms, lead clipper, business card scanner — but the evidence is completely silent on export, migration or API-based exit. Vendors with good export brag about it; one that doesn't mention it gets scored as if exit is a support ticket. 1
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.
5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.
8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.
10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.
The Solo Seller
$9.95 per user/month, 4 months free on annual, unlimited records and integrations on all plans, free trial, no seat minimums in sight — the 1-5 seat invoice is honest two-minute math, which is exactly what I pay with my own card for. It loses points because "starts from" implies higher tiers whose numbers aren't on record, and VAT treatment is unstated. 2 1
The Data Protection Officer
$9.95 per user/month, four months free annually, a free trial and unlimited records on all plans is refreshingly honest fine print. But 'starts from' implies a tier ladder the evidence never prices, and VAT treatment and renewal rules are absent, so the real invoice at 30 seats is not computable from public pages alone. 2
The Sales Ops Lead
A real per-seat starting price ($9.95/user/month), a quantified annual discount (4 months free), free trial, and stated limits and bundling (unlimited records on all plans, 1,000 emails/day) are genuinely computable — but only a 'from' price is confirmed, with no per-tier numbers, seat minimums or VAT treatment, so the invoice at 40 seats cannot be computed from the evidence alone. 2
The RevOps Integrator
$9.95 per user/month, 4 months free on annual, a free trial, unlimited records and bundled tools 'so you don't need to pay for anything extra' — the invoice looks simple and mostly computable. But 'starts from' means the upper tier ladder and VAT treatment are unevidenced, so the real renewal price isn't fully public. 2 1
The Migrator
$9.95 per user/month with 4 months free on annual and a cancel-anytime trial makes the small-team invoice computable, and unlimited records on all plans means no per-record metering that would price an exit out of reach. But "starts from" is one number for an unknown number of tiers, and VAT treatment is nowhere stated — I cannot compute the renewal invoice for 30 seats from these pages. 2
The Skeptic
$9.95 per user/month, four months free annually, unlimited records 'on all plans' and a free trial is refreshingly unmetered. But 'starting from' plus a plural 'all plans' means sibling tiers and the renewal invoice aren't computable from this sheet, and VAT treatment goes unspoken — the $9.95 is the nicest thing this page will ever tell you. 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 4 Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. AWS is US-headquartered even though servers also run in Dublin, and the full sub-processor list referenced in the privacy policy and terms is not among the excerpts, so further US providers (including the AI providers for Claude/ChatGPT features) cannot be verified here.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 17 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 16 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 15 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (14)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.onepagecrm.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Vendor pricing page www.onepagecrm.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Terms of service www.onepagecrm.com Checked 21 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Security / trust page www.onepagecrm.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
- 5 Privacy policy www.onepagecrm.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
- 6 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Contact & data model — found from sitemap developer.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap developer.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap www.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Integrations & API — found from sitemap www.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Integrations & API — found from sitemap developer.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap developer.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap developer.onepagecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →