CRM
Streak
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Streak · www.streak.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Streak at a glance
- Vendor
- Streak
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Streak 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Streak is a CRM from Rewardly, Inc. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Streak is a CRM from Rewardly, Inc. that runs inside Gmail as a browser extension, and the bench scored it highest where that shows: integrations at 5–7 and automation at 5–6. The native automation builder pairs ten triggers, including inbound webhooks and schedules, with sixteen actions and four AI steps whose outputs feed later steps. Contact management scored 4–5, with linked contacts and organizations, typed custom columns, and a self-serve importer from Google Sheets, CSV and Excel that updates existing boxes by name. The weak points are structural. Sovereignty scored 1–2: the captured pages give no public information on data residency, a data processing agreement, or a subprocessor list. Sales pipeline scored a flat 3 — seven built-in visualizations, with no public information on forecasting, quota tracking, or required fields per stage. In passing on pricing, a free plan and Pro at $49/user/month are public, while the Pro+ and Enterprise plans carrying automations and scheduled exports have no public prices. Persona-weighted verdicts ranged from 3.7 to 5.5.
Speaks for it
- Pipelines live inside Gmail as a browser extension, with sent and received emails automatically logging to the relevant box.
- The native automation builder offers ten triggers and sixteen actions, including webhooks in both directions, with AI steps that chain and feed later steps.
- Self-serve import from Google Sheets, CSV and Excel updates existing boxes by name and auto-creates missing stages and dropdowns.
- The API is documented, routinely updated, and reachable by key, alongside native Slack, Zapier, Calendly, Typeform and phone-dialer connections.
- Contact and organization pages carry the whole team's email interaction timeline, with automatic and manual linking between them.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scored 1–2, with no public information on data residency, a data processing agreement, or a subprocessor list.
- Sales pipeline scored a flat 3, with no public information on forecasting, quota tracking, win/loss capture, or required fields per stage.
- Automations and scheduled exports sit on the Pro+ and Enterprise plans only, and every AI run draws credits from a shared team pool with no published rate.
- Export destination is Google Sheets, we found no public information on exporting files or attachments, and moving data between accounts is a support request.
- Contact auto-enrichment from publicly-available data has no consent fields or lawful-basis handling evidenced.
Best for
- You run a Gmail-heavy small team or sell solo and want pipeline visibility without leaving the inbox.
- You want multi-step automation triggered by mail events, webhooks, or schedules and are ready to buy a Pro+ or Enterprise plan.
- You are importing pipeline data from spreadsheets and want updates to existing records rather than duplicates.
- Your stack connects through the API, webhooks, or Zapier and you value a documented, routinely updated interface.
Avoid if
- Your compliance review cannot close without published data residency, a data processing agreement, or a subprocessor list.
- Your revenue reviews need forecasting, quota attainment, or win/loss capture beyond built-in charts.
- You need open-format or full-fidelity export, or self-serve migration of data between accounts.
- Your team works outside Gmail and needs a CRM that meets them in another workspace.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Contact & data model | 2.5 of 5 |
| Pipeline & forecasting | 1.5 of 5 |
| Automation & workflows | 3 of 5 |
| Integrations & API | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 0.5 of 5 |
| Import, export & exit | 2.5 of 5 |
Contact & data model
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.
0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.
3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.
5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.
8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.
10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.
The Solo Seller
Contacts and organizations get their own pages carrying the team's full email timeline and auto-enrichment, and they link to each other automatically — a real relationship model, not a flat book. Custom columns come in proper types like dropdown and tag, and the importer updates existing records by box name. We found no public information on dedupe or merge tooling, required fields, or field-level permissions, so hygiene is on me. 3 4 12
The Data Protection Officer
Contacts and organizations are real, linked objects with team-wide email timelines and custom pipeline columns, which is a credible core. Hygiene is thin: the dedupe and cleanup tooling I can see lives in the import flow, and I found no public information on merge tooling, required fields, or field-level permissions. And the auto-enrichment of contact information with publicly-available data fills records with scraped personal data and no evidenced consent fields or lawful-basis handling — a hygiene problem of a different kind. 3 4 5 12
The Sales Ops Lead
Contacts and organizations get automatic pages with the team's full email timeline, auto-enrichment, and automatic plus manual linking to each other and to deals, and pipeline columns take custom types like dropdowns and tags. I found no public information on required fields, merge or ongoing dedupe tooling, field-level permissions, or field-level history, so complex models still need workarounds. 3 4 5 12
The RevOps Integrator
Records build themselves out of the inbox: contact and organization pages aggregate every team pipeline appearance with a full email timeline and auto-enrichment, contacts and companies link automatically or manually, and pipelines take custom columns of several types with importer-side duplicate-row cleanup. We found no public information on field validation, merge tooling, or permissioned field access, so demanding models still need workarounds. 3 4 6 12
The Migrator
Contacts, organizations and boxes exist with automatic and manual linking, contact pages carry the whole team's email interaction timeline, and custom pipeline columns arrive with real types like dropdowns and tags. Import updates existing boxes by name rather than blindly duplicating, which is the hygiene behavior I look for when moving in. I found no public information on field validation, merge tooling or field-level permissions, so the model is solid but not yet one that bends to the business. 3 4 6 12
The Skeptic
Contacts and organizations get automatic and manual linking, cross-pipeline pages with a full team email timeline and auto-enrichment, and pipelines accept custom columns in several types — real structure, not a flat address book. But we found no public information on merge or dedupe tooling, field validation, required fields, or field-level permissions, so the hygiene layer stays invisible, and the newest captured page about the contact model is dated June 1, 2017. 3 4 5 6 12
Pipeline & forecasting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.
0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.
3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.
5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.
8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.
10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.
The Solo Seller
Pipelines are genuinely mine — custom stages, fields, styling, ready-made templates — and seven built-in views from spreadsheet to combo charts are honest reporting for a one-person funnel. But we found no public information on stage probabilities, win/loss capture, quota or forecast views, or a custom report builder; nothing here would survive a finance review. 5 6
The Data Protection Officer
Multiple custom pipelines with custom stages, seven built-in visualizations, and triggers like a box that hasn't moved are evidenced. I found no public information on stage probabilities, required fields per stage, win/loss capture, or any forecasting, quota or snapshot capability — the reporting on show is canned charts of a single pipeline. 5 6 8
The Sales Ops Lead
Custom pipelines with custom stages, templates, and seven canned visualizations exist, but a stage change is a freeform cell edit or dropdown rather than an enforced gate. I found no public information on per-stage required fields, win/loss capture, forecast views, quota tracking, or a custom report builder — reporting ends at built-in charts and an export to Google Sheets, which my forecast committee will not accept. 5 6 11
The RevOps Integrator
Custom pipelines and stages, stage changes by cell edit or dropdown, magic columns, and seven canned visualizations are what the captured pages show; we found no public information on required fields per stage, win/loss capture, forecasting, quota tracking, or a custom report builder. Nothing here produces reporting a finance department would sign. 5 6
The Migrator
Pipelines are customizable with your own stages, fields and styling, seven built-in visualizations are provided, and stages change by editing rows or dropdowns — that is a personal pipeline tool, not a process a finance department signs. I found no public information on required fields per stage, win/loss capture, forecast views, or quota and attainment tracking. With only canned charts and no forecast layer evidenced, this serves visibility, not reporting a CFO would accept. 5 6
The Skeptic
Custom pipelines with custom stages and seven built-in visualizations are documented, but the visualizations are canned charts and stage moves are cell edits or dropdowns. We found no public information on stage requirements, win/loss capture, forecast views, quota tracking, or any custom report builder — nothing here a finance department would sign off on. 4 5 6
Automation & workflows
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.
0 — No automation beyond email templates.
3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.
5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.
8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.
10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.
The Solo Seller
The native builder is real: ten triggers and sixteen actions including webhooks in both directions, plus AI steps that chain with reusable outputs — genuine multi-step work, not if-this-then-that. But the whole tool sits on Pro+ and Enterprise plans, and every AI run consumes credits from a shared team pool; we found no public information on what those credits cost, nor on branching or per-step error handling. 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
The native automation tool evidences ten triggers and sixteen actions including outbound webhooks, chained multi-step flows, scheduled runs, and four AI action steps whose outputs feed later steps. I found no public information on branching or sequence analytics, the whole feature sits on the Pro+ and Enterprise plans, and every AI run meters a shared credit pool whose price is not published — with no retention or model-training policy evidenced for the inbox data those AI steps read. 7 8
The Sales Ops Lead
The native builder has ten triggers and sixteen actions including inbound and outbound webhooks, scheduling, and a box-hasn't-moved staleness trigger, with chainable steps and reusable outputs across the four AI actions. It is capped hard by tier and by the shared credit pool every AI run draws from, and I found no public information on branching, lead routing, sequence analytics, or error handling and per-step logs. 7 8
The RevOps Integrator
A real builder: ten triggers and sixteen actions with inbound and outbound webhooks as first-class steps, multi-step chaining whose outputs feed later steps, and a scheduled trigger, all usable without a consultant. It is gated to the Pro+ and Enterprise plans and metered by a shared AI credit pool whenever an AI step runs, and we found no public information on branching, delays, or error handling. 7 8
The Migrator
The native builder pairs ten triggers, including schedules and inbound webhooks, with sixteen actions including outbound webhooks, Slack posts and box updates, and AI steps chain with answers feeding later steps. But automations sit behind the Pro+ and Enterprise plans, and every AI run consumes credits from a shared team pool — metering whose rates we found no public information on — which turns the feature into its own upsell. No public information on branching, error handling or per-step logs either. 7 8
The Skeptic
This is the strongest page: a native engine with ten triggers including schedule and inbound webhook, sixteen actions including outbound webhook and Slack, templates, and four chainable AI steps whose outputs feed later steps. But the engine sits on the Pro+ and Enterprise plans only, and every AI run drains a shared team credit pool — we found no public information on the price or size of that pool, so the feature is its own meter. 7 8 10
Integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.
0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.
3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.
5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.
8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.
10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.
The Solo Seller
Gmail is the product: the pipeline lives inside my inbox and emails log themselves to the right box, with Zapier and native Slack, Calendly, Typeform and Google Forms around it. The API is documented and routinely updated with key access, and webhooks run both directions. We found no public information on calendar sync, API rate limits, or OAuth apps for third parties — a strong single-ecosystem story, but not an ecosystem. 6 9 10
The Data Protection Officer
Living inside Gmail gives native two-way email capture (emails auto-log to the relevant box), and there is a documented, actively maintained API plus inbound and outbound webhooks and a modest native directory — Slack, Calendly, Typeform, Google Forms, LinkedIn, Zapier. This is a single-ecosystem story: I found no public information on calendar sync beyond Google, OAuth apps, a marketplace, or API parity with the interface, and the whole architecture rests on Google Workspace processing by default. 6 9 10
The Sales Ops Lead
Gmail integration is genuinely native — emails auto-log to deals with full conversation history — backed by a documented, routinely updated API with key access and webhooks in both directions. The native directory is modest (Zapier, Slack, LinkedIn, Calendly, Typeform, Google Forms, a phone system), and I found no public information on calendar sync, OAuth apps, or API parity with the interface. 6 8 9 10
The RevOps Integrator
The email story is as deep as it gets — the CRM lives inside Gmail and logs sent and received mail automatically to the relevant box — backed by a documented, routinely updated API with key access, webhooks in both directions, and native Calendly, Slack, Typeform, Google Forms, Google Voice, and Zapier connections. We found no public information on two-way calendar sync or OAuth apps, and the API's parity with the UI stays unproven on the captured pages. 6 8 9 10
The Migrator
The Gmail integration is the whole product — the pipeline lives inside the inbox as a browser extension and sent or received emails automatically log to the relevant box — backed by a documented API their teams routinely update, inbound and outbound webhooks, and native connections including Slack, Zapier, Calendly, Typeform and phone dialers. We found no public information on calendar sync, API rate limits, or an app marketplace, so the ecosystem is strong at the email core and undocumented beyond it. 5 6 9 10
The Skeptic
It lives inside Gmail with automatic email logging and gets out through documented, routinely updated API docs with key access, inbound and outbound webhooks, Zapier, Slack, Calendly, Typeform, LinkedIn and a Google Voice dialer. We found no public information on calendar sync, API rate limits, OAuth apps, or a marketplace, and the directory leans almost entirely on one ecosystem — no evidence of an API that covers everything the interface does. 6 8 9 10
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.
0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.
3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.
5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.
8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.
10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.
The Solo Seller
The captured pages name Rewardly, Inc. and publish terms, privacy and security policies — and stop there. We found no public information on the entity's jurisdiction, where customer data is hosted, a data processing agreement, or a subprocessor list. If I'm holding other people's personal data, I can't see whose law touches it. 1 2
The Data Protection Officer
Rewardly, Inc. is the only entity named, and the captured pages give no public information on hosting location, EU residency options, a data processing agreement, subprocessors, retention or deletion — the product cannot be evaluated apart from Google Workspace, where personal data lands by default. Automatic email sharing is enabled by default for contacts on import and records are auto-enriched from publicly-available data, with no consent fields or deletion guarantees evidenced. Nothing here is signable by a European controller. 1 2 3 12
The Sales Ops Lead
The only legal entity the captured pages name is Rewardly, Inc., alongside a published security policy, and I found no public information on data residency, a DPA, a subprocessor list, or any EU hosting option. With nothing published that a DPO could review, the sovereignty question stays entirely open and the risk sits with the buyer. 1 2 4
The RevOps Integrator
The named operating entity is Rewardly, Inc. and a security policy is published, but we found no public information on data residency, a DPA, or a subprocessor list. For a CRM that lives inside Gmail, a buyer cannot establish from public pages where other people's personal data is processed or under whose law. 1 5
The Migrator
The company behind it is Rewardly, Inc., and beyond that we found no public information on data residency, a data processing agreement, a subprocessor list, or an EU hosting option. A security and privacy policy exist, but for anyone holding European personal data there is nothing here a DPO could sign. Residual exposure cannot even be named because nothing is published to name it. 1 2
The Skeptic
Only a published security policy and a status page are visible; we found no public information on the legal entity's jurisdiction, where data is hosted, a DPA, or any subprocessor list, and every captured page routes processing through Gmail. A European buyer cannot establish from public pages where personal data lands or under whose law. 1 2 6
Import, export & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.
0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.
3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.
5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.
8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.
10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.
The Solo Seller
Getting in is properly self-serve — Google Sheets, CSV or Excel with mapping, auto-created stages and dropdowns, update-or-create by box name, plus cleanup tools like find-and-replace and duplicate-row deletion. Export covers a full pipeline's column data, contacts and organizations to Google Sheets, with newsfeed, call logs and tasks optional. We found no public information on exporting files or attachments, recurring export requires Pro+ or Enterprise, and moving my data between email accounts means contacting support. 11 12
The Data Protection Officer
Self-serve import takes Google Sheets, CSV and Excel with update-or-create by box name, auto-created stages and dropdowns, and cleanup tools including duplicate-row deletion; export covers boxes, contacts and organizations with optional newsfeed, call logs, meeting notes and tasks, so activity history is not simply dropped. But the export destination is Google Sheets only, scheduled export sits on the top plans, moving data between accounts means contacting support, and I found no public information on export of attachments or files, or on any guided migration from other CRMs. 9 11 12
The Sales Ops Lead
Import is self-serve from Google Sheets, CSV, or Excel with column typing, auto-created stages and dropdowns, update-by-default matching, and cleanup tools including delete duplicate rows, and export covers pipeline data, contacts, and organizations with optional newsfeed, call logs, meeting notes, and tasks. The destination is Google Sheets rather than open-format full fidelity, I found no public information on attachments or guided migration from competitors, and moving data between accounts is a support request. 11 12
The RevOps Integrator
Self-serve import from Google Sheets, CSV, and Excel with update-or-create matching, auto-created stages and dropdowns, and duplicate-row cleanup, plus pipeline export to Google Sheets covering boxes, contacts, and organizations with optional newsfeed, call logs, meeting notes, and tasks. Account-to-account moves route through support, scheduled export sits on the top plans, and we found no public information on exporting attachments or any documented full-fidelity exit. 5 11 12
The Migrator
Getting in is genuinely good: the importer takes Google Sheets, CSV and Excel, adds new typed columns in-flow, auto-creates missing stages and dropdowns, and updates existing boxes by name instead of duplicating them. Getting out is thinner: pipelines export to Google Sheets with contacts, organizations, and optional newsfeed, call logs, meeting notes and tasks, but I found no public information on exporting files or attachments, recurring export scheduling sits behind the Pro+ and Enterprise plans, and moving data between Streak accounts means reaching out to support — exactly the friction I reject. The API exists to rebuild the database elsewhere, with effort. 9 11 12
The Skeptic
Self-serve import from Google Sheets, CSV and Excel with update-or-create, auto-created stages and duplicate-row cleanup, and export to Google Sheets covering pipeline data, contacts and organizations with optional newsfeed, call logs and tasks — decent both ways. But we found no public information on attachment or file export, recurring export is reserved for the Pro+ and Enterprise plans, and moving data from one email account to another is a support request. 5 11 12
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.
5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.
8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.
10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.
The Solo Seller
Pro is public at $49/user/month with a real free tier below it, which suits a one-person shop. But automations and integrations sit on unpriced Pro+ and Enterprise plans, every AI run meters credits from a shared pool, and we found no public information on credit pricing, VAT treatment, or annual-versus-monthly billing. I cannot compute my own renewal invoice from public pages. 6 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
Two numbers are public — the free tier and the Pro plan at $49/user/month — but the automation and scheduled-export capabilities sit on Pro+ and Enterprise plans that carry no public price at all. AI actions meter a shared team credit pool on every run, and I found no public information on what credits cost, pool sizes, VAT treatment, or billing-period differences, so a buyer cannot compute the real invoice from public pages. 6 7 8 11
The Sales Ops Lead
A free plan and a Pro plan at $49/user/month are public, but the Pro+ and Enterprise tiers where automations and scheduled exports actually live carry no public numbers, and the AI credit pool that meters every automation run has no published rate. Billing-period and VAT treatment are not stated, so a 40-seat team cannot compute its real invoice from public pages. 6 7 8 11
The RevOps Integrator
The free tier and the Pro plan at $49/user/month are public, but automations, webhooks, and scheduled exports live in the Pro+ and Enterprise plans, and we found no public information on their prices. The AI credit pool that meters each AI automation step also has no published pricing, so the invoice a revenue-operations buyer needs to compute is not computable from public pages. 6 7 8 11
The Migrator
The free plan's scope and the Pro plan at $49/user/month are public, along with a free trial and free AI previews. But the plans that carry automations and scheduled exports, Pro+ and Enterprise, are the ones I found no public prices for, and AI credits draw from a shared team pool with refill rates we found no public information on. A buyer can price the entry tier, not the invoice they will actually pay. 6 7 8
The Skeptic
The free tier and the Pro plan at $49/user/month are public, but the Pro+ and Enterprise plans — which carry all integrations, automations and scheduled exports — carry no public price at all. AI steps bill through a shared team credit pool whose price, size and overage rules we found no public information on, and billing period and VAT treatment are unstated on the captured pages. 6 7 8 11
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Streak
Is Streak European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Streak is based.
Where does Streak store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
Does Streak have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Streak?
As of 20 Oct 2026, the panel rates Pipedrive (3/5), Bitrix24 (3/5) and HubSpot Sales Hub (3/5) highest among the other 49 CRM products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Pipedrive (EU origin, foreign-owned). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Streak alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 9 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (12)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Security / trust page — found from the homepage www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →