whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

Streak

Provenance unknown Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Streak · www.streak.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Streak: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Streak: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Streak at a glance

Vendor
Streak
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
Data hosting
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Streak 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Streak is a CRM from Rewardly, Inc. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources

Streak alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

Weighted verdict

Knows a CRM is a database of other people's personal data before it is a sales tool. Optimizes for GDPR posture: EU hosting, DPA, subprocessor hygiene, consent fields, retention and deletion that actually delete. Rejects US-default hosting and enrichment features that scrape contacts from the open web.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Protection Officer

Panel median The Data Protection Officer This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Data Protection Officer
Contact & data model 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
Pipeline & forecasting 1.5 of 5 1.5 of 5
Automation & workflows 3 of 5 3 of 5
Integrations & API 3 of 5 3 of 5
European sovereignty 0.5 of 5 0.5 of 5
Import, export & exit 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Contacts and organizations are real, linked objects with team-wide email timelines and custom pipeline columns, which is a credible core. Hygiene is thin: the dedupe and cleanup tooling I can see lives in the import flow, and I found no public information on merge tooling, required fields, or field-level permissions. And the auto-enrichment of contact information with publicly-available data fills records with scraped personal data and no evidenced consent fields or lawful-basis handling — a hygiene problem of a different kind. 3 4 5 12

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Multiple custom pipelines with custom stages, seven built-in visualizations, and triggers like a box that hasn't moved are evidenced. I found no public information on stage probabilities, required fields per stage, win/loss capture, or any forecasting, quota or snapshot capability — the reporting on show is canned charts of a single pipeline. 5 6 8

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The native automation tool evidences ten triggers and sixteen actions including outbound webhooks, chained multi-step flows, scheduled runs, and four AI action steps whose outputs feed later steps. I found no public information on branching or sequence analytics, the whole feature sits on the Pro+ and Enterprise plans, and every AI run meters a shared credit pool whose price is not published — with no retention or model-training policy evidenced for the inbox data those AI steps read. 7 8

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Living inside Gmail gives native two-way email capture (emails auto-log to the relevant box), and there is a documented, actively maintained API plus inbound and outbound webhooks and a modest native directory — Slack, Calendly, Typeform, Google Forms, LinkedIn, Zapier. This is a single-ecosystem story: I found no public information on calendar sync beyond Google, OAuth apps, a marketplace, or API parity with the interface, and the whole architecture rests on Google Workspace processing by default. 6 9 10

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Rewardly, Inc. is the only entity named, and the captured pages give no public information on hosting location, EU residency options, a data processing agreement, subprocessors, retention or deletion — the product cannot be evaluated apart from Google Workspace, where personal data lands by default. Automatic email sharing is enabled by default for contacts on import and records are auto-enriched from publicly-available data, with no consent fields or deletion guarantees evidenced. Nothing here is signable by a European controller. 1 2 3 12

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Self-serve import takes Google Sheets, CSV and Excel with update-or-create by box name, auto-created stages and dropdowns, and cleanup tools including duplicate-row deletion; export covers boxes, contacts and organizations with optional newsfeed, call logs, meeting notes and tasks, so activity history is not simply dropped. But the export destination is Google Sheets only, scheduled export sits on the top plans, moving data between accounts means contacting support, and I found no public information on export of attachments or files, or on any guided migration from other CRMs. 9 11 12

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Two numbers are public — the free tier and the Pro plan at $49/user/month — but the automation and scheduled-export capabilities sit on Pro+ and Enterprise plans that carry no public price at all. AI actions meter a shared team credit pool on every run, and I found no public information on what credits cost, pool sizes, VAT treatment, or billing-period differences, so a buyer cannot compute the real invoice from public pages. 6 7 8 11

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error

Questions about Streak

Is Streak European?

Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where Streak is based.

Where does Streak store data?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.

Does Streak have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Streak?

As of 20 Oct 2026, the panel rates Pipedrive (3/5), Bitrix24 (3/5) and HubSpot Sales Hub (3/5) highest among the other 49 CRM products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Pipedrive (EU origin, foreign-owned). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Streak alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Sources (12)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor page www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Security / trust page — found from the homepage www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Contact & data model — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap www.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Integrations & API — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  11. 11 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
  12. 12 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap support.streak.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →