whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

CRM

SuiteCRM

UK / wider Europe Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by SalesAgility Ltd · suitecrm.com

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Data Protection Officer

Weighted verdict

Knows a CRM is a database of other people's personal data before it is a sales tool. Optimizes for GDPR posture: EU hosting, DPA, subprocessor hygiene, consent fields, retention and deletion that actually delete. Rejects US-default hosting and enrichment features that scrape contacts from the open web.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Data Protection Officer

Contact & data model

How this is scored

Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.

0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.

3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.

5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.

8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.

10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The captured pages show an accounts object, a unified record view and a calculated-fields capability that sets values from multiple other fields, but I found no public information on field types, required fields, deduplication or field-level permissions. The accounts screenshot page carries no data-model detail in its captured text, so the depth and hygiene of the core record — which for a CRM is a database of other people's personal data — rests on very thin evidence. 2 4 5

Report an error

Pipeline & forecasting

How this is scored

Whether the pipeline enforces a process and produces reporting a finance department accepts.

0 — A kanban of deals with amounts; nothing is enforced, nothing rolls up.

3 — Multiple pipelines and stage probabilities exist, but no required fields per stage and only canned reports.

5 — Stage requirements, win/loss capture and standard forecast views; custom reporting is limited or an add-on.

8 — Enforceable process (required fields, stage gates, routing), custom report builder, forecast by team and period with quota tracking.

10 — Forecasting a CFO signs: weighted and commit-based views, historical snapshots, attainment tracking, and reporting composable enough to answer questions the vendor never anticipated.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

What the pages evidence is visualisation: a Kanban view and charting in list views. I found no public information on stage requirements, win/loss capture, forecast views, quota tracking or any reporting roll-up, so this sits just above a board of deals with amounts. 4

Report an error

Automation & workflows

How this is scored

Triggers, sequences and routing that remove manual work without a consultant.

0 — No automation beyond email templates.

3 — Simple if-this-then-that on records; no multi-step sequences, no branching.

5 — Multi-step workflows with delays and branching, email sequences, basic lead routing — capped by tier or count.

8 — Full workflow builder across objects with webhooks as steps, round-robin routing, sequence analytics.

10 — Automation as infrastructure: versioned workflows, error handling, per-step logs, and limits generous enough that the feature is not its own upsell.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Workflow Calculated Fields let records compute and set values from other fields — genuine record-level automation, but single-step in what is evidenced. I found no public information on multi-step sequences, delays, branching, routing or webhooks, and the workflows page captures nothing beyond the entity footer. 5 6

Report an error

Integrations & API

How this is scored

Two-way email/calendar sync, native connections, and an API that treats external systems as first-class.

0 — No API, no sync; data enters by CSV and leaves never.

3 — One-way email logging (BCC), a handful of Zapier triggers, a read-mostly API.

5 — Two-way email and calendar sync for the major providers, a documented REST API with sane limits, a modest native directory.

8 — Deep native integrations for the revenue stack, webhooks, OAuth apps, API parity with the UI for core objects.

10 — An ecosystem: public API covering everything the UI does, event streams, a marketplace, and sync so reliable the CRM can be the system of record without being the only system.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The Outlook add-in is evidenced across email history synchronisation, bi-directional calendar sync and manual/automatic contact sync, backed by an open REST API described as enabling integration with core business systems plus an extensive plugin range. That is two-way sync for a major provider with a documented API; I found no public information on webhooks, OAuth applications or API limits. 1 7 8

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where other people's personal data actually lives and under whose law — entity, hosting, subprocessors, DPA.

0 — US entity, US-default hosting, no public DPA or subprocessor list.

3 — A DPA exists and an EU region is available on request or on top tiers; subprocessor exposure to US CLOUD Act reach is broad and undocumented.

5 — EU hosting selectable at signup, published DPA and subprocessor list; core processing still touches US entities.

8 — EU entity or EU-default hosting with published subprocessors, consent-friendly fields, retention and deletion controls; residual US exposure named and narrow.

10 — European entity, EU-only processing including subprocessors, deletion that provably deletes — sovereignty a DPO can sign off without a caveat file.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The vendor is European (SuiteCRM Ltd, SalesAgility in Stirling, UK) and the free open-source download lets a controller self-host, taking the vendor out of the processing chain for what the pages call ultimate control over your data. But for the vendor's own SuiteCRM Hosted and SuiteASSURED services I found no public information on data residency, a DPA or a subprocessor list — the hosted path is undocumented where it matters most, so this lands between the anchors rather than at either. 5 9 10

Report an error

Import, export & exit

How this is scored

Getting in with history intact, and out with everything — the anti-lock-in criterion.

0 — Import is a support ticket; export is contacts-only CSV missing notes, activities and files.

3 — Self-serve CSV import with mapping; export covers main objects but drops activity history, attachments or relations.

5 — Guided migration from major competitors, full-object CSV export, API access sufficient to rebuild the database elsewhere with effort.

8 — Complete export (all objects, history, files) self-serve in open formats, import with dedupe and dry-run, no API metering that prices exit out of reach.

10 — Exit as a feature: documented full-fidelity export, migration tooling both directions, and contractual data-return terms — leaving is a weekend, which is exactly why you can stay.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

Entry is well evidenced: guided migration from HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics and SugarCRM with precision data mapping and a stated commitment that once migration is complete you own the platform and the data, with the open REST API and downloadable code placing the database in the customer's hands. I found no public information on self-serve, full-object export of history and attachments or tooling for the outbound journey — exit is implied by ownership, not documented as a feature. 1 5 9

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real invoice — per seat, per month, at renewal — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — An entry price exists, but the tiers most buyers need are unpriced, or per-seat maths is obscured by bundles, minimums or mandatory onboarding fees.

5 — Most tiers carry real numbers with billing period and VAT treatment stated, but at least one commonly needed capability hides in an unpriced tier or usage-metered add-on.

8 — Every tier priced publicly including annual/monthly split; limits, seat minimums and overage rules stated; only genuine enterprise contracts are custom.

10 — Complete price computability: every tier, add-on, usage meter and renewal rule public, with a calculator or table that makes the invoice at 3 and 30 seats a two-minute exercise.

Report an error

The Data Protection Officer

The only figure the captured pages carry is the download, available free of charge under the open-source licence. The commercial services a buyer would actually need — SuiteCRM Hosted, SuiteASSURED, Hosted Migration, Implementation — carry no published prices, and I found no public information on their per-seat, per-month or VAT treatment, so the real invoice is a sales conversation. 5 9 10

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Ownership Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data residency Not determined — uncited Report an error
Subprocessors Not determined — uncited Report an error

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Do you know more about SuiteCRM? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage suitecrm.com Checked 15 Sep 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Contact & data model — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Contact & data model — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Pipeline & forecasting — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Automation & workflows — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Integrations & API — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Integrations & API — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
  10. 10 Import, export & exit — found from sitemap suitecrm.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →