Contact & data model
How this is scored
Depth and hygiene of the core records — contacts, companies, deals, custom fields, deduplication.
0 — A flat address book; no relations between people, companies and deals.
3 — The standard three objects exist but customization is cosmetic: few field types, no required fields, duplicates accumulate unchecked.
5 — Custom fields across objects, basic dedupe on create, activity history on the record; complex models still need workarounds.
8 — Rich field types with validation, merge and dedupe tooling, relationships beyond the standard model, permissioned field access.
10 — A genuinely modelable system: custom objects or equivalent, bulk hygiene tooling, field-level history — the data model bends to the business, not the reverse.
The Sales Ops Lead
The only data-model evidence I can act on is an accounts screenshot whose own capture notes no product or data-model detail, plus a promise that existing data and customisations survive a SugarCRM move and that fields can calculate values. I found no public information on field types with validation, required fields, or dedupe and merge tooling — the record hygiene a 40-seat forecast depends on is undocumented. 2 9 5