Mailjet

The Integrator

The visual builder is documented with event, timer, action and condition blocks that branch on customer behaviour, workflow templates are ready-made, A/B testing covers subject lines and content, and automation can enter on contact-property updates the API can write — so journeys react to data from other systems. We found no public information on send-time optimisation, on testing that reports significance, or on holdout groups, which is what separates this from the top band. 2 5 6 13

Report an error

The Integrator

SPF and DKIM setup is documented for custom sending domains, dedicated IPs on Premium and Custom come with a vendor-run warm-up plan, automatic spam-list removal is stated, and support teams plus technical account managers are documented as monitoring reputation and resolving blocklist issues on the sender's behalf. We found no public information on DMARC guidance, an explicit hard-bounce suppression policy, or engagement-based sunsetting, so the evidence lands mid-range. 2 7 8 13

Report an error

The Integrator

Double opt-in is documented in the signup forms, GDPR consents are stored alongside contact properties, and the tracking-consent feature is genuinely granular — recipients grant, deny or withdraw consent to open and click tracking individually, held in the contact profile and available on every plan including free. We found no public information on whether double opt-in is the default, on a consent record carrying source and consented wording, or on unsubscribe honoured across lists, which is what proof-of-consent would rest on. 2 9 10 12

Report an error

The Integrator

Import is fine for my purposes: CSV, TXT and XLS with properties and consents stored natively, error screening, duplicate filtering, property updates via API, and bulk delete of contacts is documented. We found no public information on subscriber export including custom attributes, subscription and unsubscribe state, on engagement-history or template export, or on export throttling — so exit stays unevidenced even though deletion is. 5 11 12

Report an error

The Integrator

This is a real connection surface: a documented send API and SMTP relay covering marketing and transactional mail on one platform, real-time event webhooks configurable per event type through both interface and API, push into external queuing systems, inbound parse, sandbox mode and SDKs in six languages. But we found no public information on rate limits, webhook retry behaviour, API versioning or a deprecation policy, and the captured pages give an integration count of over one hundred while we found no named shop or CRM systems among them — so I would be building against undocumented operational limits. 1 2 13 14

Report an error

The Integrator

The server region is customer-selected between the United States and Europe rather than EU-standard, the captured pages give different figures on whether data stays exclusively in the EU, and the contracting entity's jurisdiction is not confirmed on the vendor's own pages while the notice names US-headquartered hosts, US payment providers and a US-based Sinch company in the chain. Credit where due: the subprocessor list is published in detail, transfer mechanisms are stated, and a group data protection officer is reachable — but the chain rests on standard contractual clauses and the Data Privacy Framework rather than staying inside the EU. 3 4

Report an error

The Integrator

The billing model is stated — price by emails sent per month, with unlimited contacts on Essential and Premium — and dedicated IPs are placed in Premium and Custom. But we found no public information on tier prices, send limits, overage rates or VAT treatment in the captured pages, so no invoice for any list size and send volume can be computed from public pages alone. 1 2 8 13

Report an error