ERP
microtech ERP
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by microtech GmbH · www.microtech.de
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
microtech ERP at a glance
- Vendor
- microtech GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates microtech ERP 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. microtech ERP (microtech GmbH, Hargesheim, Germany) is a modular ERP for retail, wholesale and production, with Basic, Core and Enterprise editions at 199,- €, 299,- € and 399,- € per month net plus VAT. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 28 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
microtech ERP (microtech GmbH, Hargesheim, Germany) is a modular ERP for retail, wholesale and production, with Basic, Core and Enterprise editions at 199,- €, 299,- € and 399,- € per month net plus VAT. Finance and compliance is strongest, clustering at 7-8 on ZUGFeRD and XRechnung e-invoicing, DATEV export and bank and PayPal matching; orders and inventory clusters at 6-8 on quote-to-invoice, demand-driven purchasing and bin-level warehousing. Sovereignty is weakest at 4-5: a German contracting entity, published Article 28 data processing agreement and on-premise option are on the pages, but we found no public information on where the cloud edition hosts ERP data or on the ERP's own processors. The judges split: integration and portability runs 6-7 — the 6 from the IT integrator, citing the Enterprise-only GraphQL API and COM printing licences — and pricing transparency runs 6-7 the other way, its 7 from the same judge; only the head of finance scored sovereignty 5, crediting on-premise residency. Production, projects and rollout land at 6-7. One judge's column reads 0 on every criterion; the remaining weighted totals run 6.2-6.7.
Speaks for it
- Finance and compliance scored 7-8 on documented ZUGFeRD and XRechnung e-invoicing, DATEV export and a homepage IDW PS 880 attestation
- The order chain runs from quote to invoice with real-time delivery capability and algorithm-driven demand triggering purchase orders automatically
- The warehouse add-on manages storage slots with weight and quantity limits, nesting and hazardous-goods separation rules
- Interfaces span a read-and-write GraphQL API on the Enterprise tier, a publicly documented COM interface, DATEV, shops, marketplaces, logistics and n8n, Make or Zapier automation
- All three editions carry public monthly prices with two users and one company included, plus a free trial
Held against it
- Sovereignty scores cluster at 4-5; we found no public information on where the cloud edition hosts ERP data or on the processors behind the ERP itself
- We found no public information on batch or serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, or stock valuation
- We found no public information on multi-level bills of materials with routings and work centres, project budgets or milestone billing
- We found no public price for the production add-on, the onboarding packages or the Aktualitäts-Service behind support
- The captured pages give different statements on contract terms — individually negotiable on the pricing page, a 24-month annual minimum in the terms
Best for
- You need German financial accounting with ZUGFeRD and XRechnung e-invoicing and DATEV hand-over to your tax adviser
- You run quote-to-invoice trading with bin-level warehousing and hazardous-goods separation rules
- You want the ERP on-premises under a German contracting entity with a published Article 28 data processing agreement
- You want a partner-supported rollout, with over 150 certified partners and support tiers publishing reaction times of 24, 16 and 8 hours
Avoid if
- You need batch or serial number tracking or mobile scanning at goods receipt
- Your manufacturing planning depends on multi-level bills of materials with routings and work centres
- You require published information on cloud hosting location and the processors behind the ERP before signing
- You must budget your full first-year cost from published prices alone, including the production add-on and implementation
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Finance, tax & compliance | 3.5 of 5 |
| Purchasing, inventory & order processing | 3.5 of 5 |
| Manufacturing, services & projects | 3 of 5 |
| Integration, API & data portability | 3.5 of 5 |
| Rollout, roles & operations | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Finance, tax & compliance
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ERP keeps books a tax adviser and an auditor accept: general and subledgers, VAT per country, GoBD-compliant posting and archiving, e-invoices sent and received (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD), payments and dunning, and a DATEV export or a documented hand-over to the accountant.
0 — No accounting at all; invoices leave as PDFs and the books are kept somewhere else by hand.
3 — Invoices and credit notes are created in the system, but there is no ledger, no stated GoBD compliance and no export the accountant can import.
5 — Invoices, open items and payments in the system with a DATEV or accounting export, VAT rates per item, dunning, and e-invoices in XRechnung or ZUGFeRD format sent to customers.
8 — Full financial accounting or a live-synchronised one: general, receivables and payables ledgers, incoming e-invoices read and matched to purchase orders, bank feeds with payment matching, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, GoBD compliance stated with a procedure documentation, and several companies in one tenant.
10 — The money side closes inside the system: an auditor's GoBD or IDW PS 880 attestation published, consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, fixed assets and cost accounting, every posting traceable to the order, goods movement and user behind it, and period close with locked periods documented.
The Managing Director
For my books this stacks up: invoices go out in ZUGFeRD and XRechnung and incoming e-invoices are received and processed, dunning and open items run with automatic bank and PayPal matching, a DATEV export hands over to my accountant, and an IDW PS 880 attestation is published. I found no public information on general-ledger detail, GoBD procedure documentation or OSS VAT treatment. 1 2 4 9
The Head of Finance
There is a financial accounting module with its own documentation chapter, DATEV exports for the tax adviser, e-invoices created and processed in both ZUGFeRD and XRechnung, bank and PayPal statements fetched with automatic open-item matching, dunning and open-item management, and an IDW PS 880 attestation published on the homepage. I found no public information on GoBD with a procedure documentation, OSS or reverse-charge VAT, or intercompany postings across entities, so I stay below the top band. 1 2 4 8 9 13
The Operations Lead
A financial accounting module is documented in the help centre, DATEV exports are offered for the hand-over to the accountant, and dunning and open-item management sit in the base edition with online banking that assigns and clears open items automatically. E-invoices run both ways — XRechnung and ZUGFeRD with an XML dataset the vendor states can be sent, received and processed, included in every Gen. 24 edition — and the homepage carries an IDW PS 880 attestation claim. I found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge handling, fixed assets, consolidation or locked periods. 8 9 2 4 1 13
The Online Retailer
Financial accounting is a documented module, and the captured pages show dunning and open-item management, payment transactions that pull bank statements and PayPal and match open items automatically, DATEV exports for the accountant, e-invoices in ZUGFeRD and XRechnung that can be sent, received and processed, and a published IDW PS 880 testation on the homepage. What decides it against a higher mark for me as a cross-border seller: we found no public information on OSS or per-country VAT handling, no procedure documentation for GoBD, and no statement that incoming e-invoices are matched to purchase orders. 1 2 4 8 9
The IT Integrator
A financial accounting and payroll module is documented in the help centre, ZUGFeRD and XRechnung invoices are both created and processed with a machine-readable XML dataset, bank and PayPal statements are retrieved with automatic open-item matching, dunning and payment traffic are built in, DATEV exports exist, and the homepage carries an IDW PS 880 testate. We found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT, fixed assets or locked period close, so it sits just below the top level. 1 2 4 8 9
The Skeptic
ZUGFeRD and XRechnung are documented for creating, sending, receiving and processing, a DATEV export is named for the accountant, bank and PayPal statements are fetched and matched to open items automatically, dunning and payments ship in the base package, and the homepage carries an 'IDW PS 880-Testiert' claim. I stop short of more because we found no published attestation or procedure documentation behind that badge, no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT, and the general ledger appears only as a module name with a help-centre section. 1 2 4 8 9 13
Purchasing, inventory & order processing
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The goods chain from supplier to customer: quotes, orders and order confirmations, purchasing and goods receipt, stock per warehouse and bin, batch and serial numbers, picking and shipping, returns — and whether each step posts through to the next document and to the ledger instead of being retyped.
0 — No order or stock handling; the product is a contact list or an invoicing tool.
3 — Items with a stock count and an order list, but purchasing, goods receipt and delivery are not connected and stock is corrected by hand.
5 — Quote, order, delivery note and invoice as one document chain, purchase orders with goods receipt booking stock, and stock levels with reorder points per item.
8 — Several warehouses and storage bins, batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, carrier and shop or marketplace connections, returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, and stock valuation that flows into the books.
10 — The goods chain runs and is evidenced in the system: demand-driven purchasing proposals, EDI with suppliers and customers, fulfilment and multi-channel stock allocation, best-before and recall traceability per batch from supplier to customer, and every movement attributed and dated.
The Managing Director
This is the core of what I buy an ERP for: offers to invoices in one chain with real-time delivery capability, purchasing that triggers orders from demand algorithms with supplier requests for quotation and ratings, warehouse slots down to shelf column and level with weight limits and hazardous-goods rules, returns with automated refunds, and shop, marketplace and logistics connections. I found no public information on batch or serial numbers, mobile scanning or multiple warehouses. 2 4 10 11
The Head of Finance
The document chain from quote to invoice runs in one central overview with real-time delivery-availability calculation, purchasing calculates demand by algorithm and triggers purchase orders automatically, and the bin-management add-on covers shelf columns and levels, nested slot groups, capacity limits, a goods-receipt assistant and stocktaking. Returns with automated refunds plus shop, marketplace and shipping connections are documented; I found no public information on batch or serial number tracking, mobile scanning, or stock valuation flowing into the books. 2 10 11
The Operations Lead
Quote to invoice in one document chain with real-time delivery capability, automatic demand detection that triggers purchase orders, and a goods-receipt assistant feeding a bin-location module with shelf columns and levels, nesting slot groups, weight and quantity limits, hazardous-goods separation and stocktaking — that is genuinely my world. Returns plus e-commerce, marketplace and logistics interfaces are listed. I found no public information on batch or serial number tracking, mobile scanning or best-before recall, which is what I need at the receiving dock. 2 10 11 4
The Online Retailer
The chain runs from quote to invoice with real-time delivery capability calculation, automatic demand determination triggering purchase orders, RFQs to several suppliers with ratings, and returns management with automated refunds — plus a documented storage-slot module with bins, capacity limits and a goods-receipt assistant, and interfaces to online shops, marketplaces, logistics and shipping. I found no public information on batch or serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, drop shipping or stock valuation, and nothing stating that stock synchronises across channels in real time — the exact thing that burned me twice last Christmas. 1 2 10 11
The IT Integrator
Quote through invoice runs in one document chain with real-time delivery capability, algorithms calculate demand from stock and archive data and trigger purchase orders automatically, and the warehouse add-on manages shelf columns, nested slot groups, per-slot weight and quantity limits and hazardous-goods separation rules. Returns are handled with automated refunds or replacements, and shop, marketplace, POS and carrier connections are listed; we found no public information on batch or serial number tracking, mobile scanning or supplier EDI. 2 4 10 11
The Skeptic
Quote-to-invoice sits in one document overview with real-time availability, demand is computed from stock and archive data and can trigger purchase orders automatically, returns run with automated refunds, and the warehouse add-on goes down to storage slots with weight and quantity limits, nesting and hazardous-goods separation rules. Batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, and stock valuation flowing into the books — the parts a stock-heavy buyer cannot do without — are things we found no public information on. 1 2 10 11
Manufacturing, services & projects
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The depth for the buyer's own business model: bills of materials, work orders and capacity planning for manufacturers; projects, time, resources and milestone billing for service firms; contracts, subscriptions and field service. A product is judged on the models it says it serves.
0 — Nothing beyond trading goods; no bills of materials, projects or service billing.
3 — A simple kit or set of items, or a project tag on invoices, but no production orders, no time recording and no planning.
5 — For at least one model a working core: bills of materials with production orders consuming stock, or projects with time recording and billing from logged hours, with the supported models named on the vendor's pages.
8 — Multi-level bills of materials with routings, work centres and capacity planning, or projects with budgets, resource planning, milestone and recurring billing, and service or maintenance contracts — with costs flowing to cost accounting.
10 — Industry depth documented for the models served: MRP runs with material and capacity planning, shop-floor data capture and quality checks, variant configuration, or full professional-services automation with utilisation, contracts and revenue recognition — each described with its limits in public documentation.
The Managing Director
Both business models are named with a working core: a production add-on running the manufacturing flow off bills of materials with resource planning, and projects with time recording billed from logged hours, capacity planning and contract management with automatic SLA billing. I found no public information on multi-level bills of materials, routings or milestone billing. 4 12 13
The Head of Finance
Both models are named and served: a production add-on maps the manufacturing flow through standard processes with resource needs defined in the bill of materials, and the service side has project management, time recording that imports straight into billing, capacity planning for staff, material and time, and contract administration including SLAs with automated billings. The captured pages give no depth beyond that — I found no public information on multi-level bills of materials with routings and work centres, project budgets, or milestone billing. 1 4 12 13
The Operations Lead
Both models are served on named pages: the production and manufacturing add-on maps the manufacturing flow through standard processes with resource needs defined in the bill of materials, and the services page documents project management, time recording that imports straight into billing, capacity planning for staff, material and time, and contract management with automatic billings. I found no public information on multi-level bills of materials, routings and work centres, or MRP runs with shop-floor capture, so I cannot see next week's production being planned to that depth. 12 13 1 4
The Online Retailer
Two models are named and documented: a production and manufacturing add-on maps the manufacturing flow through standard processes with resource needs defined in the bill of materials, while project management with time recording, billing from logged hours and capacity planning is included from Core upward, alongside contract management with SLAs, reminders and automated billing. The pages stop short of multi-level bills of materials with routings and work centres, project budgets or milestone billing, so I place it just above the working core. 4 12 13
The IT Integrator
For a maker like us the production add-on models the manufacturing flow through standard processes with resource needs defined in the bill of materials and working times and group assignment per resource, while the services side covers projects, time recording that flows into invoicing, capacity planning, and SLA contracts with automatic reminders and billing. We found no public information on multi-level bills of materials with routings and work centres, shop-floor data capture, or costs flowing into cost accounting. 1 4 12 13
The Skeptic
The production add-on defines resource needs in the bill of materials and maps the manufacturing flow through standard processes, and the service side gets projects with time recording billed from logged hours, capacity planning for staff, material and time, and contracts with SLAs and automated invoicing. We found no public information on multi-level bills of materials with routings and work centres, budgets and milestone billing, or costs flowing into cost accounting — a working core for the named models, not depth. 4 12 13
Integration, API & data portability
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the ERP connects and how the data gets in and out: a public API reference, webhooks, standard connectors for shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll, DATEV and BI, data import from the previous system, and a documented full export when the company leaves.
0 — No API, no import and no export beyond printing.
3 — CSV import and export of some lists, a few named integrations, but no public API documentation and no full export.
5 — A documented REST or OData API, CSV or Excel import for master data and open items, and standard connectors to common shops, banks and DATEV.
8 — A public, versioned API reference covering all main objects with webhooks, a connector marketplace, a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and a full data export of master data, documents and postings available to the customer.
10 — Open by design and evidenced: complete API coverage with sandbox tenants and rate limits stated, open data formats or open-source code, a contractual exit with export format and timeline, and self-hosting or on-premise as a documented alternative to the vendor's cloud.
The Managing Director
The pages show a public GraphQL API that both reads and writes, legacy COM documentation with code examples and dozens of export formats, connectors to DATEV, shops, marketplaces and logistics, no-code automation via n8n, Make or Zapier, and an on-premise alternative to the cloud. GraphQL and SQL read access sit in the Enterprise package only, and I found no public information on webhooks or a documented full export on cancellation. 1 2 4 14 15
The Head of Finance
The connection story is broad: a read-and-write GraphQL API plus SQL replication, BI tools such as Power BI and Metabase, automation via n8n, Make or Zapier, several hundred stated interfaces including DATEV, shops and marketplaces, and a publicly documented COM interface with layout-based import/export and a long list of export formats. I found no public information on webhooks, sandbox tenants, or a documented full export of master data, documents and postings when a customer leaves. 1 2 14 15
The Operations Lead
The COM interface is publicly documented with code examples, layout files and a long list of export formats, and a GraphQL API both reads and writes — creating articles, posting transactions, triggering processes — with several hundred interfaces plus DATEV, online banking, shops, marketplaces and logistics named, and n8n, Make or Zapier for automation without code. I found no public information on webhooks, sandbox tenants, or a documented full export when a company leaves. 15 14 1 2 4
The Online Retailer
A GraphQL API for reading and writing articles, postings and processes, read-only SQL access and SQL replication are named, the COM interface is documented publicly down to code examples, encodings and export formats, and there are connectors for DATEV, e-commerce and marketplaces, shipping and logistics, automation via n8n, Make or Zapier, and BI tools like Power BI and Metabase. We found no public information on webhooks, sandbox tenants or a documented full export when a customer leaves — though the on-premise alternative to the cloud is a real plus. 1 2 12 14 15
The IT Integrator
The GraphQL API reads and writes articles, postings and processes and can feed Power BI or Metabase, and the COM interface is publicly documented down to code examples, encodings and print formats — but the GraphQL API only arrives in the Enterprise package, and automated COM printing needs a developer contract with microtech plus a combit List & Label license and per-job RDU licenses. Several hundred interfaces plus DATEV, shop, logistics and n8n/Make/Zapier connectors are real; we found no public information on webhooks, a sandbox, API versioning or a documented full export on exit, though the on-premises foundation keeps the database on our own servers. 1 2 3 4 14 15
The Skeptic
The COM interface has a genuine reference with code examples, layout-based import and export per module and a long list of export formats, and the modern side offers a read-and-write GraphQL API (Enterprise tier only), SQL replication, BI tools, automation platforms and partner apps — so the data does get out. We found no public information on webhooks or a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and the interface documentation itself states COM printing requires a microtech developer contract plus a combit List & Label licence. 1 4 14 15
Rollout, roles & operations
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What it takes to go live and run the system: implementation path (self-service, vendor, partner network), onboarding and training, roles and permissions, audit log, updates and customisation that survive them, support channels and service levels, and availability.
0 — No information on implementation, roles, support or availability.
3 — A contact form and a help page, but no stated implementation path, no role model and no support terms.
5 — A described onboarding or implementation offer, user roles with permissions, a help centre with current documentation, and support channels with hours.
8 — Implementation methods with typical duration stated, a certified partner network or vendor services listed, fine-grained permissions with a change log, customisation without code that survives updates, and published service levels for support and availability.
10 — Operations are evidenced: a status page with uptime history, release notes and an update policy, a field-level audit trail, sandbox or test tenants, and support, training and implementation terms public enough to plan a go-live without a sales call.
The Managing Director
I can plan a go-live from these pages: three onboarding paths from self-setup with trainings and online help to full service including implementation, on-site workshop or Teams and Zoom delivery, over 150 certified partners, and support tiers with published hours and reaction times from 24 hours down to 8. I found no public information on implementation duration, availability commitments or an audit trail beyond documented permission structures. 1 6 11 16 17
The Head of Finance
Implementation is offered three ways — full service with configuration, implementation and team trainings; supported; or self-setup with trainings, online help and support — online via Teams or Zoom or as an on-site workshop, backed by more than 150 certified partners and tiered support with published hours, reaction times of 24, 16 and 8 hours and unlimited tickets. Permission structures are documented in the help centre; I found no public information on typical implementation duration, an availability service level or status page, or a field-level change log. 1 4 11 16 17
The Operations Lead
Three onboarding paths (set it up yourself with training and online help, supported, or full service covering configuration, implementation and team training), online or on-site workshops, more than 150 certified partners, and a support page with hours and reaction times per tier of 24h, 16h and 8h, unlimited tickets, a ticket portal, callbacks and free webinars. Permission structures are documented for the warehouse module. I found no public information on typical implementation duration, a published availability commitment or a status page. 16 17 1 11 4
The Online Retailer
Three onboarding paths — full service with trainings, supported setup, or self-setup with the help portal and training resources — are described and can be switched anytime, with permissions structures documented in the warehouse help, webinars and a training portal, and tiered support with published hours and reaction times of 24h, 16h and 8h, unlimited tickets and over 150 certified partners. We found no public information on typical implementation duration, published availability or uptime, or a change log of user actions, which keeps this from going higher. 1 4 11 16 17
The IT Integrator
Three onboarding paths from self-setup with trainings, online help and support to full-service implementation with on-site or Teams-and-Zoom workshops are described, and support tiers publish hours, reaction times from 24h down to 8h, unlimited tickets and remote maintenance via TeamViewer, backed by over 150 certified partners. Permission structures are documented in the warehouse module and updates arrive via the Aktualitäts-Service; we found no public information on an audit log, published availability commitments or typical implementation duration. 1 4 6 11 16 17
The Skeptic
Three onboarding paths with the option to switch between them, over 150 certified partners plus vendor implementation, and a support page that actually publishes per-tier reaction times (24h, 16h, 8h), support hours, unlimited tickets, remote maintenance via TeamViewer and free webinars. We found no public information on typical implementation duration, an availability commitment or status page, or any change log behind the permission structures. 1 6 8 16 17
European sovereignty
panel opinion
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where the ERP data — customers, suppliers, prices, postings, employees — is hosted, and who the subprocessors are (cloud infrastructure, email, support tooling, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; an ERP holds a company's entire commercial record, so the ownership chain counts, not only the server location.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (US hyperscaler, AI features, support or email tooling) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered, and an on-premise or EU-only hosting option stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5 published rather than implied.
The Managing Director
The contracting entity is a German GmbH under German law with a published data processing agreement and software developed in Germany, and I can run on-premise so my commercial record stays in my own server room. I found no public information on where cloud-hosted ERP data sits, on ownership above the GmbH, or on a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5, and the subprocessor list I found covers website tools like Google and Microsoft Ireland rather than the ERP platform. 1 3 5 6 7
The Head of Finance
The contracting entity is a German GmbH with register court Bad Kreuznach, German governing law and an Article 28 data processing agreement published at its own URL, and the ERP can run on-premises with the cloud acting only as an encrypted access layer — which settles residency by leaving the commercial record in my own server room. The privacy policy names web-service processors with locations, some flagged with possible US transfer; we found no public information on the ownership chain behind the company or on where the private-cloud edition hosts ERP data. 1 3 5 6 7
The Operations Lead
The captured legal pages show microtech GmbH in Hargesheim under German law with a German register court, the ERP runs on premises at the customer with the cloud as a read-only access layer, and a data processing agreement under Article 28 is offered. I found no public information on where the cloud edition's data is hosted, on the ownership chain, or on the subprocessors behind the ERP service itself — the named processors (Google, Microsoft Ireland, OpenAI Ireland, Usercentrics) serve the vendor's website. 5 6 3 7 1
The Online Retailer
The contracting entity is microtech GmbH in Hargesheim, Germany, registered at Bad Kreuznach, the software is developed in Germany, a data processing agreement is publicly linked, an on-premise deployment is offered as an alternative to the cloud, and an external German data protection officer is named. We found no public information on where the cloud edition hosts its ERP data, on the ownership chain, or on the processors behind the ERP service itself — the named subprocessors in the privacy policy cover website tooling, some with possible US transfers. 1 5 6 7
The IT Integrator
microtech GmbH in Hargesheim, registered at Bad Kreuznach and contracted under German law, is the entity, a GDPR Article 28 data processing agreement is offered, an external German data protection officer is named, and on-premises or private cloud deployment keeps the ERP data on our own infrastructure. We found no public information on where the cloud edition hosts data, the ownership chain, or the subprocessors behind the ERP itself — the providers named with locations (Microsoft Ireland, OpenAI Ireland, Google, Usercentrics in Munich) serve the website, not the product. 1 3 5 6 7
The Skeptic
A German contracting entity with register court and VAT ID, German governing law, a linked data processing agreement, an on-premise or private-cloud deployment option and an external data protection officer are on the pages, and the privacy policy names the website's processors (Microsoft Bookings in Ireland with possible US transfer, OpenAI Ireland, DoubleClick, Usercentrics in Munich). Where the ERP cloud keeps company data and who the subprocessors behind the ERP service itself are — plus any ISO 27001 or BSI C5 certification — we found no public information. 1 5 6 7
Pricing transparency
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user, module, company or transaction volume, which modules (accounting, warehouse, production, POS) cost extra, implementation and onboarding fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call or a partner proposal.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with users, modules or companies is unclear.
5 — Prices per edition or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (implementation, extra companies, warehouse or production module, API use) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per user, company or volume), onboarding and implementation packages priced, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given company size and module set, with every add-on, implementation, support and hosting cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Managing Director
The price page lets me compute most of the subscription: Basic at 199,- € / Monat, Core at 299,- € and Enterprise at 399,- €, each with two users and one company included, per-user (39 € / 49 € / 59 €) and per-company (19 € / 99 € / 99 €) add-ons, all net plus VAT; the terms of service state a 24-month annual minimum or monthly cancellation with four weeks' notice while the pricing page calls contract terms individually negotiable. The production and storage-slot add-ons, the onboarding packages and the Aktualitäts-Service behind support carry no public price, so my full first-year cost still needs a sales conversation. 4 6 12 16 17
The Head of Finance
Monthly edition prices are public — Basic at 199,- € / Monat, Core at 299,- € / Monat, Enterprise at 399,- € / Monat — together with per-user add-on prices of 39 €, 49 € and 59 €, per-company add-on prices, package limits, the monthly and annual contract terms including the 24-month minimum, and net prices plus VAT. The production add-on is described as bookable in Core and Enterprise and three onboarding routes are offered, but neither carries a price, and I found no public information on what happens to the data when the contract ends. 4 6 12 16
The Operations Lead
Three editions are priced monthly at 199,- €, 299,- € and 399,- € net plus VAT, each with two users and one company included, with public per-user (39 €, 49 €, 59 €) and per-company (19 €, 99 €, 99 €) add-on prices, tier limits, a 24-month minimum on annual contracts, four-week notice on monthly ones and six weeks' notice before price changes. The production add-on, implementation packages and the Aktualitäts-Service behind support are not priced publicly, and I found no public information on data return at cancellation. 4 6 12 17
The Online Retailer
All three editions are priced publicly at "199,- € / Monat", "299,- € / Monat" and "399,- € / Monat", with additional users at 39 €, 49 € and 59 €, additional companies at 19 €, 99 € and 99 €, tier limits, net prices plus VAT, monthly contracts cancellable at four weeks or annual contracts with a 24-month minimum term, and a free trial. But the production add-on is only named as bookable in Core and Enterprise without a price, we found no public information on the price of the e-commerce module I would need, and the onboarding packages carry no figures — so I cannot yet compute my true annual cost as a fixed figure that does not jump with volume. 2 4 6 12 16
The IT Integrator
The price table is unusually concrete: 199 €, 299 € and 399 € per month for Basic, Core and Enterprise, with 39 €, 49 € or 59 € per additional user and 19 € or 99 € per additional company, stated user and company limits, a monthly option with no minimum term and four weeks' notice or a 24-month annual term, all net plus VAT. We found no public price for implementation or the production add-on module and no public information on data return on cancellation, so the real first-year total is not fully computable from the pages alone. 4 6 12 17
The Skeptic
Three editions at '199,- € / Monat', '299,- € / Monat' and '399,- € / Monat' net with two users and one company included, extra users at '39 €', '49 €', '59 €', extra companies at '19 €' or '99 €', and the terms page states the monthly option (no minimum, four weeks' notice) against the annual one (24 months minimum, three months' notice). The production module is bookable in Core and Enterprise but carries no figure, onboarding and implementation packages are unpriced, the Aktualitäts-Service behind support has no stated price, and on data return at cancellation we found no public information. 4 6 12 17
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about microtech ERP
Is microtech ERP European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies microtech ERP as EU-Made.
Where does microtech ERP store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
Does microtech ERP have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to microtech ERP?
As of 29 Oct 2026, the panel rates Odoo (4/5), weclapp (3.5/5) and Haufe X360 (3.5/5) highest among the other 13 ERP products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Odoo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: microtech ERP alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 26 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 15 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 8 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (17)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (inventory) www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (cloud edition) www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Pricing page www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Legal notice www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Terms of service www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Privacy policy www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap hilfe.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap hilfe.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap hilfe.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap hilfe.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap hilfe.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 16 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 17 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap www.microtech.de Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →