ERP
myfactory
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Forterro Deutschland GmbH · www.myfactory.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
myfactory at a glance
- Vendor
- Forterro Deutschland GmbH
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention Germany source, captured 26 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates myfactory 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. myfactory is a cloud ERP from Forterro Deutschland GmbH in Munich, positioned for small and mid-sized companies in trade, production and services. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 28 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
myfactory is a cloud ERP from Forterro Deutschland GmbH in Munich, positioned for small and mid-sized companies in trade, production and services. The bench scores it highest on finance and compliance at 8-9: double-entry accounting on SKR03 and SKR04, VAT pre-registration via ELSTER, XRechnung and ZUGFeRD e-invoices, a DATEV hand-over, and financial software stated as audited to IDW PS 880. Orders and inventory land at 8-9 on bin-managed stock, barcode picking, serial and batch traceability and marketplace connections, and production and projects holds at 8 for multi-level bills of materials and plan-versus-actual costing. The genuine split is pricing transparency, 2-5: the higher scores credit published monthly-fee terms and exactly priced partner add-ons, the lower ones hold that no per-user or per-module price for the ERP itself appears on public pages, so an annual cost is not computable. Integration and portability, rollout and operations and sovereignty all sit at 5-6, with hosting stated in German data centres, EU standard contractual clauses named, and read access by group staff in India, the United States and Morocco disclosed.
Speaks for it
- Finance and compliance scored 8-9 on double-entry accounting with SKR03/SKR04 charts, VAT pre-registration via ELSTER, XRechnung and ZUGFeRD e-invoices, a DATEV hand-over and financial software stated as audited to IDW PS 880.
- Orders and inventory scored 8-9 for bin-managed storage with FiFo bin suggestions, barcode picking, serial and batch traceability, and marketplace and webshop connections.
- Production and projects scored 8 for multi-level bills of materials, forward and backward scheduling with date simulation, and plan-versus-actual costing.
- Contract terms are public — monthly fees plus statutory VAT, a volume programme from 10 users, annual billing in advance, and a free trial of all functions without a credit card.
- The contracting entity is Forterro Deutschland GmbH in Munich under German law, with hosting stated in German data centres and EU standard contractual clauses named.
Held against it
- Pricing transparency scores span 2-5, with no per-user or per-module price for the ERP itself on the public pages — the only euro figures there belong to partner add-on licences (1500 € plus 15 € / Monat, and 3750 € plus 57 € / Monat).
- Integration and portability scored 5-6, the documented REST interfaces being separately priced partner add-ons covering customers, sales documents and products, and we found no public information on webhooks or a full export on exit.
- Rollout and operations scored 5-6, and we found no public information on user roles and permissions, a change log, or service levels and availability figures.
- Sovereignty scored 5-6: Google Tag Manager and read access for group staff in India, the United States and Morocco are disclosed, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or an ISO 27001 or BSI C5 certification.
- We found no public information on projects, time recording or milestone billing for the services side, or on shop-floor data capture and quality checks in production.
Best for
- You run a German trading or manufacturing SME and want double-entry books on SKR03/SKR04 with a DATEV hand-over for your tax adviser.
- Your warehouse depends on barcode picking, serial and batch traceability, and marketplace or webshop connections in one system.
- You plan production with multi-level bills of materials and want plan-versus-actual costing feeding integrated cost accounting.
- You want a stated implementation path — go-live within a few weeks rather than months — with project leads covering configuration and data migration.
Avoid if
- You need to budget a known per-user cost before signing — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your integrations go beyond a short object list — the documented REST interfaces are separately priced partner add-ons covering customers, sales documents and products, and we found no public information on webhooks.
- You want multi-year price stability — the terms state a minimum term to the year-end of the following year, automatic renewal and year-end fee adjustments, with an extraordinary termination right if fees rise.
- You need support outside weekday business hours — published support hours run Monday to Friday, with the hotline taking error reports weekdays 9:00–16:00.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Finance, tax & compliance | 4.5 of 5 |
| Purchasing, inventory & order processing | 4 of 5 |
| Manufacturing, services & projects | 4 of 5 |
| Integration, API & data portability | 3 of 5 |
| Rollout, roles & operations | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.5 of 5 |
Finance, tax & compliance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ERP keeps books a tax adviser and an auditor accept: general and subledgers, VAT per country, GoBD-compliant posting and archiving, e-invoices sent and received (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD), payments and dunning, and a DATEV export or a documented hand-over to the accountant.
0 — No accounting at all; invoices leave as PDFs and the books are kept somewhere else by hand.
3 — Invoices and credit notes are created in the system, but there is no ledger, no stated GoBD compliance and no export the accountant can import.
5 — Invoices, open items and payments in the system with a DATEV or accounting export, VAT rates per item, dunning, and e-invoices in XRechnung or ZUGFeRD format sent to customers.
8 — Full financial accounting or a live-synchronised one: general, receivables and payables ledgers, incoming e-invoices read and matched to purchase orders, bank feeds with payment matching, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, GoBD compliance stated with a procedure documentation, and several companies in one tenant.
10 — The money side closes inside the system: an auditor's GoBD or IDW PS 880 attestation published, consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, fixed assets and cost accounting, every posting traceable to the order, goods movement and user behind it, and period close with locked periods documented.
The Managing Director
This is real bookkeeping, not invoice printing: double-entry financial accounting with SKR03 and SKR04, VAT returns via ELSTER and the EU summary statement, a DATEV handover for my Steuerberater, configurable multi-level dunning, SEPA payments, fixed assets with automatic depreciation, cost accounting, budgeting and period and annual closing — and the accounting is stated as audited to IDW PS 880, with XRechnung and ZUGFeRD e-invoices sent and received in the ERP. I found no public information on bank feed matching, OSS or reverse-charge handling, several companies in one tenant, or consolidation and intercompany postings, so I stop short of the top level. 1 2 9 11 12
The Head of Finance
The accounting side is properly German: double-entry bookkeeping on SKR03 and SKR04 charts, VAT pre-registration via ELSTER, the EU summary statement via XML, multi-level dunning with fees, SEPA file creation and a DATEV hand-over for the tax adviser — and the financial software is stated as audited to IDW PS 880, which an auditor accepts. E-invoices go out and come in as XRechnung and ZUGFeRD directly in the ERP, period and annual closings run with automatic balance carryforwards across up to 999 periods, and fixed assets with AfA preview plus cost accounting and budgeting are included. We found no public information on GoBD procedure documentation, bank feeds with automatic payment matching, intercompany postings across several companies in one tenant, or locked periods. 1 2 9 11 12
The Operations Lead
The integrated financial accounting is stated as audited per IDW PS 880 and covers double-entry books on SKR03/SKR04 charts, cost accounting, budgeting, fixed-asset depreciation with asset register, VAT pre-registration via ELSTER, the EU summary statement by XML, dunning, SEPA payments, a DATEV hand-over and e-invoices sent and received in XRechnung and ZUGFeRD. I stop just short of full marks because the captured pages give no information on consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, several companies in one tenant, or posting-level traceability and locked periods. 9 11 12 2 1
The Online Retailer
The captured pages show real double-entry books: SKR03/SKR04 charts, VAT pre-registration via ELSTER, DATEV hand-over, SEPA payments, multi-level dunning with fees, fixed assets with automatic depreciation, period and annual closing routines, e-invoices in XRechnung and ZUGFeRD sent and received, and the accounting software is published as audited to IDW PS 880 — that is a level my tax adviser and auditor should accept. For my cross-border sales the EU summary statement via XML is documented, but we found no public information naming OSS one-stop-shop handling, bank feeds with payment matching or several companies in one tenant. 9 11 1 2
The IT Integrator
The books close inside this ERP: double-entry accounting on SKR03 and SKR04 with VAT pre-registration via ELSTER and the EU summary statement by XML, e-invoices in XRechnung and ZUGFeRD sent and received, SEPA payment files, configurable multi-level dunning and a DATEV hand-over for the accountant, plus fixed assets with automatic depreciation, cost accounting, budgeting and period and annual closings across up to 999 periods. The finance software is stated as audited to IDW PS 880, which is what my auditor will ask about. We found no public information on bank feed matching, intercompany consolidation or locked periods. 9 11 12 1 2
The Skeptic
Double-entry financial accounting on SKR03/SKR04 with VAT pre-registration via ELSTER, the EU summary statement as XML, multi-level dunning and SEPA payment files is documented, the accounting module is stated as audited to IDW PS 880 with cost accounting, fixed assets and closing routines, and XRechnung and ZUGFeRD are included for sending and receiving in the ERP with a DATEV hand-over. We found no public information on bank feeds with payment matching, several companies in one tenant, or consolidation with locked periods. 1 2 9 11 12
Purchasing, inventory & order processing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The goods chain from supplier to customer: quotes, orders and order confirmations, purchasing and goods receipt, stock per warehouse and bin, batch and serial numbers, picking and shipping, returns — and whether each step posts through to the next document and to the ledger instead of being retyped.
0 — No order or stock handling; the product is a contact list or an invoicing tool.
3 — Items with a stock count and an order list, but purchasing, goods receipt and delivery are not connected and stock is corrected by hand.
5 — Quote, order, delivery note and invoice as one document chain, purchase orders with goods receipt booking stock, and stock levels with reorder points per item.
8 — Several warehouses and storage bins, batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, carrier and shop or marketplace connections, returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, and stock valuation that flows into the books.
10 — The goods chain runs and is evidenced in the system: demand-driven purchasing proposals, EDI with suppliers and customers, fulfilment and multi-channel stock allocation, best-before and recall traceability per batch from supplier to customer, and every movement attributed and dated.
The Managing Director
The goods chain is joined up on one database shared with the accounting: quotes, orders, delivery notes and invoices, purchasing with delivery-delay visibility and automated order disposition, goods receipt booked on tablets against purchase orders, bin-managed storage with FiFo bin suggestions, barcode picking on industrial terminals with a real-time control station, batch and serial traceability, plus webshop and marketplace connections. I found no public information on returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, or stock valuation flowing into the books, and operation of several warehouses is not separately shown beyond bin locations. 2 3 10 11 17
The Head of Finance
The document chain runs from quote to order, delivery note and invoice, purchasing works from demand planning and automated order disposition, and goods receipt is captured on the purchase order by tablet — the retyping in between is what I want gone. Bin-level warehouse management with FiFo location suggestions, end-to-end traceability of serial numbers and batches, barcode and best-before labelling, paperless multi-stage mobile picking and connections to marketplaces and webshops give real warehouse depth. We found no public information on returns with restocking and credit note, EDI with suppliers and customers, drop shipping, or an explicit multi-warehouse setup. 2 3 10 11 12
The Operations Lead
Goods receipt is booked on a tablet or app directly against the purchase order, stock sits in bins with a FiFo bin suggestion and quarantine storage, and serial numbers and batches are captured by barcode through paperless, multi-person picking into automatically generated shipping papers — exactly the chain I have to run daily. Purchase proposals come from demand planning and automated disposition, with supplier comparisons and delivery-delay views. The captured pages give no information on returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping or an explicit multi-warehouse statement. 10 11 12 2 3
The Online Retailer
Quotes, orders, delivery notes and invoices form one document chain, goods receipt is booked on tablets against purchase orders into storage bins, picking runs on a mobile app with EAN/barcode and serial and batch tracking, shipping labels and papers generate automatically on completion, and connections to marketplaces and webshops are listed — that is most of what I need to stop overselling my bestseller. Automated order disposition and order proposals are documented; we found no public information on returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping or multi-warehouse allocation across my channels. 3 10 11 17
The IT Integrator
Quotes, orders, delivery notes and invoices run as one chain, purchasing includes demand planning and automated order disposition, and goods receipt is captured on purchase orders via tablet app into bin-managed stock with serial and batch barcode tracking, FiFo picking suggestions, paperless multi-person picking and shipping labels carrying customs tariff numbers. Automated purchasing proposals and end-to-end batch traceability with best-before labelling push toward the top of the range, and marketplace and webshop connections exist. We found no public information on supplier EDI, returns with restocking and credit note, or drop shipping. 10 11 3 2 17
The Skeptic
Quote, order, delivery note and invoice run in one system, purchasing has automated order disposition and goods receipt is booked per tablet onto purchase orders, with bin-managed storage, FiFo picking suggestions, paperless multi-stage picking, serial and batch traceability via barcode, shipping papers generated at picking completion and marketplace, webshop and B2B portal connections. We found no public information on returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, or a documented stock valuation flowing into the books. 2 3 10 11 12
Manufacturing, services & projects
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The depth for the buyer's own business model: bills of materials, work orders and capacity planning for manufacturers; projects, time, resources and milestone billing for service firms; contracts, subscriptions and field service. A product is judged on the models it says it serves.
0 — Nothing beyond trading goods; no bills of materials, projects or service billing.
3 — A simple kit or set of items, or a project tag on invoices, but no production orders, no time recording and no planning.
5 — For at least one model a working core: bills of materials with production orders consuming stock, or projects with time recording and billing from logged hours, with the supported models named on the vendor's pages.
8 — Multi-level bills of materials with routings, work centres and capacity planning, or projects with budgets, resource planning, milestone and recurring billing, and service or maintenance contracts — with costs flowing to cost accounting.
10 — Industry depth documented for the models served: MRP runs with material and capacity planning, shop-floor data capture and quality checks, variant configuration, or full professional-services automation with utilisation, contracts and revenue recognition — each described with its limits in public documentation.
The Managing Director
For the trading and manufacturing models the vendor names, the production core is there: multi-level bills of materials with an update assistant, work centres and resource pools, a planning board with percentage utilisation, forward and backward scheduling with date simulation, subcontracting with automatic purchase orders, pre- and post-costing that ties into cost accounting, and multidimensional variants. I found no public information on shop-floor data capture, quality checks, or time recording and milestone billing for service firms. 2 12 13
The Head of Finance
For the manufacturing model it explicitly serves, the depth is real: multi-level bills of materials with an update assistant, production orders from disposition or sales documents, forward and backward scheduling with date simulation, a planning board showing percentage resource utilisation, resource groups and pools carrying costs and times, and pre/post costing with plan-versus-actual comparison. Subcontracting via the extended workbench, multidimensional variants with inheritance across all steps, and batch traceability round it out, with costs flowing into the integrated cost accounting. We found no public information on shop-floor data capture, quality checks, or time recording and project billing for service firms. 2 12 13
The Operations Lead
Multi-level bills of materials with forward and backward scheduling, work centres and resource pools with percentage utilisation on a planning board, pre- and post-costing with plan-actual comparison, subcontracting with automatic purchase orders and multidimensional variants — enough to plan next week's production instead of running a whiteboard. Production orders can be generated from the disposition run, from sales documents or manually. We found no public information on shop-floor data capture and quality checks, nor on projects, time recording or service billing for the services model the vendor names among its industries. 12 13 2 3
The Online Retailer
The vendor names trade, production and services as the industries served, and for production the pages document multi-level bills of materials, resource groups and pools, a planning board with percentage capacity utilisation, forward and backward scheduling, date simulation, subcontracting via the extended workbench, plan/actual costing and batch and serial traceability. That is genuine manufacturing depth; we found no public information on shop-floor data capture or quality checks, and on the services side only contract management with a forecast tool appears. 12 2 13
The IT Integrator
For the production model the depth is real: multi-level bills of materials with an update assistant, production orders from disposition or sales documents with forward and backward scheduling, resource planning with groups and pools, a planning board showing percentage resource utilisation, pre and post costing with plan/actual comparison, extended workbench subcontracting with automatic purchase orders, and multidimensional variants with inheritance. We found no public information on shop-floor data capture per operation, quality checks, or a projects and time-recording model for service billing. 12 13 2
The Skeptic
Production depth is specific and public: multi-level bills of materials, production orders from disposition or sales documents, forward and backward scheduling with date simulation, a planning board showing resource utilisation in percent, subcontracting via an extended workbench, plan versus actual cost comparison and multidimensional variants with inheritance. For the service side the pages name CRM, service and portals, but we found no public information on projects with time recording, budgets or milestone billing. 2 12 13 17
Integration, API & data portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the ERP connects and how the data gets in and out: a public API reference, webhooks, standard connectors for shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll, DATEV and BI, data import from the previous system, and a documented full export when the company leaves.
0 — No API, no import and no export beyond printing.
3 — CSV import and export of some lists, a few named integrations, but no public API documentation and no full export.
5 — A documented REST or OData API, CSV or Excel import for master data and open items, and standard connectors to common shops, banks and DATEV.
8 — A public, versioned API reference covering all main objects with webhooks, a connector marketplace, a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and a full data export of master data, documents and postings available to the customer.
10 — Open by design and evidenced: complete API coverage with sandbox tenants and rate limits stated, open data formats or open-source code, a contractual exit with export format and timeline, and self-hosting or on-premise as a documented alternative to the vendor's cloud.
The Managing Director
REST access with Swagger/OpenAPI documentation, JSON over HTTPS and read as well as write endpoints exists — but it comes as partner solutions carrying their own licences (1500 € or 3750 €) and covering only a handful of objects such as customers, sales documents and products, extendable on request; master data and bill-of-materials import are documented, as are connections to marketplaces, webshops and the DATEV handover. I found no public information on webhooks, bank connectors, a migration path from named predecessor systems, or a full data export when a company leaves. 12 14 15 17
The Head of Finance
Two partner REST interfaces are documented on the vendor's own site with Swagger/OpenAPI documentation, JSON over HTTPS and read as well as write endpoints for master data, customers, sales documents and products — but each is a separately priced add-on (Lizenzpreis 1500 € with 15 € / Monat maintenance, and 3750 € with 57 € / Monat). Master data and bill-of-materials import, connections to marketplaces, webshops and services, the docuvita DMS and the DATEV hand-over are stated. We found no public information on webhooks, API versioning, coverage of postings, or a documented full export when the company leaves. 12 14 15 17
The Operations Lead
Two documented REST interfaces using JSON over HTTPS with Swagger/OpenAPI documentation read and write customers, products, master data and sales documents, and there are connections to marketplaces, webshops and services plus DATEV hand-over and import for master data, bills of materials and prices. The documented APIs are separately priced partner solutions rather than a native, versioned reference for all main objects. We found no public information on webhooks, a full export of master data, documents and postings on exit, or a migration path from named predecessor systems. 14 15 17 12
The Online Retailer
Master-data, price and bill-of-materials imports plus marketplace and webshop connections are documented, and two partner REST interfaces with public Swagger/OpenAPI documentation read and write customers, sales documents and products over HTTPS in JSON — but those interfaces are paid partner add-ons (1500 € license plus 15 €/month, or 3750 € plus 57 €/month) covering a short object list. We found no public information on webhooks, a first-party vendor API, a migration path from a predecessor system or a documented full export when I leave, so my channel sync rests on third-party middleware. 14 15 17 12
The IT Integrator
A REST interface over HTTPS using JSON with GET, POST and PUT is documented with Swagger/OpenAPI documentation, read and write access to customers, sales documents and products, and restrictable data access — offered as partner solutions, one from ipt solution GmbH at a 3750 € Lizenzpreis plus 57 € / Monat Wartungsgebühr and one from ambarics at 1500 € plus 15 € / Monat, with a datasheet available; marketplace and webshop connections, a DATEV hand-over and imports of master data, prices and bills of materials are also documented. As the one who has to hang the shop, the bank and the supplier EDI off this, we found no public information on webhooks, a sandbox, versioned API coverage of all main objects, or a documented full export when the company leaves. 14 15 17 12
The Skeptic
A REST interface over HTTPS with JSON and Swagger/OpenAPI documentation offers read plus limited write access to master data, customers, sales documents and products, and marketplaces, webshops and a DATEV hand-over are named alongside master data and bill-of-materials import. We found no public information on webhooks, a connector marketplace, a migration path from a named predecessor system, or a full export of documents and postings when a company leaves — and the data gets out is exactly the question an operator must answer. 12 14 15 17
Rollout, roles & operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What it takes to go live and run the system: implementation path (self-service, vendor, partner network), onboarding and training, roles and permissions, audit log, updates and customisation that survive them, support channels and service levels, and availability.
0 — No information on implementation, roles, support or availability.
3 — A contact form and a help page, but no stated implementation path, no role model and no support terms.
5 — A described onboarding or implementation offer, user roles with permissions, a help centre with current documentation, and support channels with hours.
8 — Implementation methods with typical duration stated, a certified partner network or vendor services listed, fine-grained permissions with a change log, customisation without code that survives updates, and published service levels for support and availability.
10 — Operations are evidenced: a status page with uptime history, release notes and an update policy, a field-level audit trail, sandbox or test tenants, and support, training and implementation terms public enough to plan a go-live without a sales call.
The Managing Director
The path to go-live is described: project managers accompany planning, configuration, data migration and third-party interfaces, there is a Quickstep setup wizard, workshops and courses, a practice guide, and go-live "innerhalb weniger Wochen statt Monate"; support hours are published (Monday to Friday 08:00–17:00, hotline 9:00–16:00) with manuals in a documentation database and the latest program version included. I found no public information on user roles and permissions, a change or audit log, service levels or availability — which is what I would need before betting a quarter of my business on the switch. 6 9 11 16 17
The Head of Finance
Go-live is described with a stated duration — commissioning within a few weeks instead of months — backed by project leaders for implementation and configuration, data migration and third-party interfaces, a Quickstep setup wizard, workshops and a free trial of all functions without a credit card. A documentation database with manuals, an error hotline on weekdays, published support hours, the latest program version and legal updates included, and TeamViewer remote maintenance are all stated. We found no public information on user roles and permissions, a change or audit log, published service levels, or a status page with availability history. 4 6 9 11 16
The Operations Lead
Go-live is stated as within a few weeks, with project leaders for planning, configuration, implementation, data take-over and third-party interfaces, plus a setup wizard, workshops and courses, a documentation database, a free webinar and hotline hours on weekdays — an implementation path I could actually plan against. We found no public information on user roles and permissions, a change log, service levels for support or availability figures, which I need in writing before running two warehouses and an assembly line on the system. 16 9 11 6 17
The Online Retailer
Go-live within weeks instead of months, a Quickstep setup wizard, a personal project lead covering configuration, data migration and interfaces, workshops and courses, manuals in a documentation database, hotline hours on weekdays 9:00–16:00 (the Swiss team 08:00–17:00 with holiday closures), TeamViewer remote maintenance and cloud updates included are all documented. We found no public information on user roles and permissions, a change or audit log, service levels or availability, which matters with eight staff sharing one login-sensitive warehouse. 16 6 9 1
The IT Integrator
Implementation is described with a project lead covering planning, configuration, data migration and third-party interfaces, go-live "innerhalb weniger Wochen", a Quickstep setup wizard, workshops, a documentation database with module manuals and a Swiss support team Monday to Friday 08:00–17:00, with hotline terms, remote maintenance via TeamViewer and delivery of the latest program version in the general terms. For running this day to day, we found no public information on a role and permission model, an audit or change log, service levels or an availability commitment, or a status page. 16 9 6
The Skeptic
An implementation offer running from planning through configuration and data migration to third-party interfaces, project-manager accompaniment, a setup wizard, workshops, a documentation database with manuals and support hours on weekdays are public, with go-live stated as within weeks rather than months and updates included in the cloud. We found no public information on user roles and permissions, a change log, customisation that survives updates, or service levels and availability figures. 6 9 16
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where the ERP data — customers, suppliers, prices, postings, employees — is hosted, and who the subprocessors are (cloud infrastructure, email, support tooling, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; an ERP holds a company's entire commercial record, so the ownership chain counts, not only the server location.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (US hyperscaler, AI features, support or email tooling) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered, and an on-premise or EU-only hosting option stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5 published rather than implied.
The Managing Director
Contracting runs through Forterro Deutschland GmbH in Munich under German law with Munich as the venue, hosting is stated to be in German data centres, and the privacy policy names EU standard contractual clauses and discloses support read access from subsidiaries in India, the United States and Morocco plus Google Tag Manager. The data centre is described only generically as a German high-security facility or a certified partner, and I found no public information on a data processing agreement, an on-premise or EU-only hosting option, or a security certification. 2 4 5 6 7 11
The Head of Finance
The contracting entity is Forterro Deutschland GmbH in Munich, registered at the Amtsgericht München, with German law and Munich venue, and hosting is stated in German data centres or with a certified partner. The chain is European — the group's ultimate controller for data processing is named as Jeeves Information Systems AB — but the privacy policy discloses Google's tag manager and read access to personal data for group staff in India, the United States and Morocco, with EU standard contractual clauses stated for transfers and processing generally within the UK or EU/EEA. We found no public information on a named hosting operator, a data processing agreement offered, an ISO 27001 or BSI C5 certification, or an on-premise alternative to the cloud. 2 4 5 6 7
The Operations Lead
The contracting entity is Forterro Deutschland GmbH in Munich with myfactory part of the Forterro group, and hosting is stated to run in German high-security data centres or with a certified partner, with EU standard contractual clauses as the transfer mechanism. The privacy policy names Google Tag Manager on the website and read access for group subsidiaries in India, the United States and Morocco for support and professional services. We found no public information on a named data-centre provider, a data processing agreement, or a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5. 2 4 5 7
The Online Retailer
Hosting is stated to run in German data centres with a German contracting entity (Forterro Deutschland GmbH, Munich, HRB 183190 at the Munich court), and EU standard contractual clauses are named for transfers. The privacy policy states processing generally within the UK or EU/EEA, names Jeeves Information Systems AB as top controller, lists Google LLC tag management, and grants read access to personal data for support to subsidiaries in India, the USA and Morocco; we found no public information on a data processing agreement, named hosting infrastructure or a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5. 2 6 7 5
The IT Integrator
The contracting entity is Forterro Deutschland GmbH in Munich and hosting is stated in German data centres on several captured pages, with the Forterro group above it, Jeeves Information Systems AB named as ultimate controller, Forterro UK Ltd as legal head, and EU standard contractual clauses stated, with processing described as generally within the UK or EU/EEA. Named processors include Google LLC for tag management and group subsidiaries in India, the United States and Morocco with read access to personal data for support tickets. We found no public information naming the data-centre operator, a data processing agreement, or an on-premise option. 2 4 6 7 11
The Skeptic
A German contracting entity and controller in Munich and hosting in German data centres are stated on several pages, EU standard contractual clauses are named for transfers and processing is stated for the UK or EU/EEA, with the group's legal head in London and the ultimate controller for processing a Swedish company. Subsidiary staff in India, the United States and Morocco are named with read access to personal data, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement, a named data-centre operator, or a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5. 2 4 7 11
Pricing transparency
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user, module, company or transaction volume, which modules (accounting, warehouse, production, POS) cost extra, implementation and onboarding fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call or a partner proposal.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with users, modules or companies is unclear.
5 — Prices per edition or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (implementation, extra companies, warehouse or production module, API use) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per user, company or volume), onboarding and implementation packages priced, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given company size and module set, with every add-on, implementation, support and hosting cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Managing Director
The captured pages state monthly fees plus statutory VAT, a volume programme from ten users, a free trial without credit card, and terms that publish annual advance billing, a 6-month warranty, auto-renewal with three months' notice to year end and fee adjustments with an extraordinary termination right — but the only euro figures anywhere are partner interface licences (1500 € with 15 € / month, and 3750 € with 57 € / month). I found no public per-user or per-module price for the ERP itself, so the annual cost for sixty people is not computable from these pages. 4 6 14 15
The Head of Finance
Prices are presented as monthly fees plus statutory VAT with a volume programme and price advantages from 10 users, every module bookable and adjustable monthly, and the contract terms are public: annual billing in advance, a minimum term to the year-end of the following year with 3-month notice, and a 6-week extraordinary termination right if fees rise — terms I can plan against. The partner interface licences are quoted exactly (Lizenzpreis 1500 € plus 15 € / Monat, and 3750 € plus 57 € / Monat) and on-site consultation is free of charge. We found no public information on per-user or per-module price figures for the ERP itself, priced implementation packages, or what happens to the data on cancellation. 4 6 14 15
The Operations Lead
The pricing page states monthly fees plus statutory VAT and a volume programme from ten users, and the terms publish payment within 14 days, annual advance billing, a minimum term to year-end with three months' notice and fee-adjustment rights — but no per-user or per-edition price for the ERP itself appears on the captured pages. The only concrete figures we found are for two separately sold partner API solutions: a licence of 1500 € with a maintenance fee of 15 € / month, and a licence of 3750 € with a maintenance fee of 57 € / month. I could not compute an annual cost for a given company size from what is public. 4 6 14 15
The Online Retailer
A pricing page exists promising transparent monthly fees plus statutory VAT, a volume programme from 10 users, a free trial with all functions and no credit card, and the terms state annual pre-payment, a minimum term to year-end with three months' notice, automatic one-year renewal and possible fee adjustments at year-end. We found no public price figure for the ERP itself per user or module — the only figures captured are the partner API licenses — so I cannot compute my annual cost, and the year-end fee adjustment is exactly the kind of price movement I wanted to avoid. 4 6 14 15
The IT Integrator
Monthly module prices plus statutory VAT are published with flexible monthly module booking, a volume program from 10 users, and general terms stating net billing annually in advance, payment within 14 days, a minimum term to 31 December of the following year with three months' notice and auto-renewal, plus a free trial without credit card; partner REST add-ons are priced exactly (3750 € plus 57 € / Monat, 1500 € plus 15 € / Monat). We found no public information on implementation package prices, on what happens to the data on cancellation, or on per-user subscription figures for the ERP itself, so the real annual cost is not computable from the captured pages. 4 6 1 14 15 16
The Skeptic
The pricing page shows a free trial without credit card, monthly prices plus statutory VAT, a volume programme from ten users and free on-site consultation, and the general terms add annual billing in advance, net prices, year-end fee adjustments and a term running to year-end with three months' notice. We found no price per user or module for the ERP itself on the pages we read — the published figures, 1500 € licence with 15 € / Monat maintenance and 3750 € licence with 57 € / Monat maintenance, belong to partner connector add-ons — so the real annual cost is not computable from public pages. 4 6 14 15
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about myfactory
Is myfactory European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies myfactory as EU-Made.
Where does myfactory store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Germany as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 26 Oct 2026.
Does myfactory have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to myfactory?
As of 29 Oct 2026, the panel rates Odoo (4/5), weclapp (3.5/5) and Haufe X360 (3.5/5) highest among the other 13 ERP products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Odoo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: myfactory alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 26 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 69 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 12 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (17)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (cloud ERP) www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (inventory) www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Pricing page www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Legal notice www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Terms of service www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Privacy policy www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 16 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 17 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap www.myfactory.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →