ERP
Scopevisio
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Scopevisio AG · www.scopevisio.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Scopevisio at a glance
- Vendor
- Scopevisio AG
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention Germany source, captured 26 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Scopevisio 3/5, the mean of 6 judges. Scopevisio is the cloud ERP of Scopevisio AG (Bonn, HRB 15257), hosted in a Frankfurt data centre. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 26 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 28 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Scopevisio is the cloud ERP of Scopevisio AG (Bonn, HRB 15257), hosted in a Frankfurt data centre. It is strongest on finance and compliance, where scores run 8 to 9: a complete creditor process into GoBD archiving, XRechnung and ZUGFeRD in and out, DATEV exports, an IDW PS 880 certificate and a PwC audit. Pricing transparency is weakest (5 to 6): prices are public from 'ab 3,00 € netto pro Nutzer und Tag (jährlich abgerechnet)', but implementation and training costs are individual and module prices are not itemised, so the first-year total is not computable. Orders and inventory (7 to 8) documents shortage-based purchasing, batch and expiry tracking and multi-warehouse stock; judges split a point on production and projects (6 to 7) over how far time billing and resource planning carry service firms, and manufacturing stops at multi-level bills of materials. Integration and portability tops out at 6; sovereignty sits at 7. The sharpest split is fit: the online retailer scored 0 throughout against 7.5 for the finance lead, citing no public information on shop or marketplace connectors or returns processing.
Speaks for it
- Creditor process documented end to end from incoming invoice through approval and posting to GoBD-conform archiving with procedure documentation.
- IDW PS 880 certificate, PwC audit, ISO 27001 and BSI C5 Typ 2 attestation published with a downloadable certificate.
- Shortage-based order proposals across open customer orders convert into purchase orders emailed to suppliers, with goods receipts matched to incoming invoices.
- Implementation is plannable from public pages: four to twelve weeks standard, three onboarding packages with 80 hours of expert consulting, and a 98 per cent per year availability figure with a fee-reduction remedy.
- Licence prices are public — 'ab 3,00 € netto pro Nutzer und Tag (jährlich abgerechnet)' with worked monthly examples such as 'Monatspreis Netto: 665,00 €' — and updates are included.
Held against it
- Implementation costs are individual, training is charged separately and module prices are not itemised, so the first-year total is not computable.
- We found no public information on shop or marketplace connectors, carrier and label handling, or returns processing.
- Manufacturing depth stops at multi-level bills of materials; we found no public information on production orders, routings or capacity planning.
- The documented exit export covers financial accounting data in GDPdU/IDEA format; we found no public information on a full export of documents or on webhooks.
- We found no public information on a subprocessor list with locations, the ownership chain above the AG, or a status page with uptime history.
Best for
- You run a mid-sized project or service business — consulting, IT, engineering, an agency — that bills time and needs GoBD-conform invoicing.
- You need books your auditor and tax adviser can work from, with DATEV exchange in both directions, XRechnung and ZUGFeRD handling and GoBD archiving.
- You buy stock against open customer orders and need shortage-driven purchasing, batch and expiry traceability, and multi-warehouse valuation posted into finance.
- You want a stated rollout schedule with published availability terms and automatic updates included in the subscription.
Avoid if
- You sell mainly through online shops or marketplaces such as Shopware, Amazon or eBay and need connectors, carrier labels and returns handling wired in.
- You run manufacturing that needs production orders, routings and capacity planning rather than multi-level bills of materials alone.
- You must compute your complete first-year cost, including implementation and modules, from public prices before signing.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Finance, tax & compliance | 4.5 of 5 |
| Purchasing, inventory & order processing | 4 of 5 |
| Manufacturing, services & projects | 3.5 of 5 |
| Integration, API & data portability | 3 of 5 |
| Rollout, roles & operations | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Finance, tax & compliance
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ERP keeps books a tax adviser and an auditor accept: general and subledgers, VAT per country, GoBD-compliant posting and archiving, e-invoices sent and received (XRechnung, ZUGFeRD), payments and dunning, and a DATEV export or a documented hand-over to the accountant.
0 — No accounting at all; invoices leave as PDFs and the books are kept somewhere else by hand.
3 — Invoices and credit notes are created in the system, but there is no ledger, no stated GoBD compliance and no export the accountant can import.
5 — Invoices, open items and payments in the system with a DATEV or accounting export, VAT rates per item, dunning, and e-invoices in XRechnung or ZUGFeRD format sent to customers.
8 — Full financial accounting or a live-synchronised one: general, receivables and payables ledgers, incoming e-invoices read and matched to purchase orders, bank feeds with payment matching, OSS and reverse-charge VAT, GoBD compliance stated with a procedure documentation, and several companies in one tenant.
10 — The money side closes inside the system: an auditor's GoBD or IDW PS 880 attestation published, consolidation and intercompany postings across entities, fixed assets and cost accounting, every posting traceable to the order, goods movement and user behind it, and period close with locked periods documented.
The Managing Director
Books I could hand to my tax adviser and auditor: the whole creditor process from incoming invoice through approval and posting to GoBD-conform archiving with procedure documentation, outgoing e-invoices in XRechnung and ZUGFeRD, automated dunning with escalation levels, and DATEV bookings and balances exports, with ELSTER and DATEV export included as standard and several companies run in one instance. The trust centre publishes an IDW PS 880 certificate, a PwC audit, ISO 27001 and BSI C5 Typ 2, which is more attestation than most mid-market vendors show. We found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT or on locked periods at close, so the evidence stops short of the very top. 1 7 9 15 8
The Head of Finance
DATEV bookings and balances export for the tax adviser, GoBD conformity with procedure documentation and complete logging, an IDW PS 880 certificate and a PwC audit published, outgoing XRechnung and ZUGFeRD plus incoming e-invoices automatically read and matched to goods receipts in the invoice receipt ledger — with dunning, open-item monitoring, fixed assets and several companies in one client. That is a book I could close. I found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT, intercompany postings or locked periods. 1 3 7 8 9 10 15
The Operations Lead
The money side is well documented: a complete creditors process from invoice intake to GoBD archiving, e-invoices in XRechnung and ZUGFeRD both created and read automatically, dunning with escalation levels, payment monitoring, and DATEV exchange in both directions. GoBD is stated with procedure documentation and an IDW PS 880 certificate plus a PwC audit are published, with fixed assets and multi-company tenants; we found no public information on consolidation, intercompany postings or period locking. 1 7 8 9 15
The Online Retailer
The pages document a complete creditor process from invoice receipt through release to posting and GoBD-conform archiving, automated dunning with escalation levels, real-time open-item payment monitoring, XRechnung and ZUGFeRD created and read automatically, DATEV bookings and balances exports, a multi-client setup, an IDW PS 880 attestation and a PwC audit — more than my tax adviser will ask to see. For my own business the one gap is that we found no public information on OSS VAT for cross-border marketplace sales. 1 7 9 15 8 3
The IT Integrator
The money side looks closeable: GoBD support with procedure documentation, an IDW PS 880 certificate and a PwC audit are published, DATEV bookings and balances exports are documented, and e-invoices go out in XRechnung and ZUGFeRD while incoming XRechnung, ZUGFeRD and PDF documents are read automatically and archived eight years in original format. Automated dunning with escalation levels, real-time open-item monitoring, fixed assets as an add-on and several companies in one tenant are stated. We found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT, consolidation, intercompany postings or locked periods. 1 3 5 7 8 9
The Skeptic
This is full accounting, not invoicing with a stock column: ledger and person accounts with bookings through to P&L and balance sheet, XRechnung and ZUGFeRD created and read automatically, automated dunning with escalation levels, open-item monitoring, a DATEV export of bookings and balances for the tax adviser, a GDPdU-conform IDEA audit export, GoBD support through procedure documentation, an IDW PS 880 certificate alongside a PwC audit, and several companies in one instance. We found no public information on OSS or reverse-charge VAT, bank feeds with payment matching, or consolidation and locked periods, so the close itself is not shown end to end. 1 3 5 7 8 9 15
Purchasing, inventory & order processing
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The goods chain from supplier to customer: quotes, orders and order confirmations, purchasing and goods receipt, stock per warehouse and bin, batch and serial numbers, picking and shipping, returns — and whether each step posts through to the next document and to the ledger instead of being retyped.
0 — No order or stock handling; the product is a contact list or an invoicing tool.
3 — Items with a stock count and an order list, but purchasing, goods receipt and delivery are not connected and stock is corrected by hand.
5 — Quote, order, delivery note and invoice as one document chain, purchase orders with goods receipt booking stock, and stock levels with reorder points per item.
8 — Several warehouses and storage bins, batch and serial number tracking, mobile picking and scanning, carrier and shop or marketplace connections, returns with restocking and credit note, drop shipping, and stock valuation that flows into the books.
10 — The goods chain runs and is evidenced in the system: demand-driven purchasing proposals, EDI with suppliers and customers, fulfilment and multi-channel stock allocation, best-before and recall traceability per batch from supplier to customer, and every movement attributed and dated.
The Managing Director
The purchasing chain is properly evidenced: order proposal, enquiry, purchase order and goods receipt convert into one another, proposals calculate the true shortage across open customer orders, goods receipts are matched to supplier invoices, and batch and lot traceability, best-before dates, multi-warehouse stock valued by moving average, FIFO or LIFO and periodic inventory counts all run on a shared data basis. For a wholesaler of my size the open questions are serial numbers, mobile scanning, carrier and shop connections, returns processing and drop shipping, on which we found no public information. 10 11 1
The Head of Finance
The purchase chain runs end to end: order proposals with true shortage calculation across open customer orders, converted into a purchase order emailed to the supplier, goods receipt matched to the incoming supplier invoice, plus reservations, executability status and planned dates per order — and batch and lot traceability, expiry dates, inventory counts and FIFO/LIFO or moving-average valuation across several locations, warehouses and storage bins. I found no public information on serial numbers, mobile scanning, carrier or shop connections, returns or EDI. 10 11
The Operations Lead
The procurement chain is documented end to end — order proposal, inquiry, purchase order, goods receipt — with shortage-based proposals summed across open customer orders, per-supplier totals, automatic stock reservation and colour-coded executability per order. Stock runs per location, warehouse and bin with batch and expiry management, FIFO/LIFO valuation flowing into finance and goods receipts matched against scanned supplier invoices; we found no public information on serial numbers, mobile picking and scanning, carrier or shop connections, returns handling or EDI. 10 11
The Online Retailer
The purchasing documentation is genuinely deep: demand-driven order proposals summing real shortages across all open customer orders, automatic stock reservation per order with a colour-coded executability status, multiple locations with several warehouses and bins, batch and expiry tracking, partial picking, and FIFO, LIFO or moving-average valuation that posts into financial accounting. But we found no public information on connectors to shops or marketplaces like Shopware, Amazon and eBay, on carrier and label handling, or on returns processing — exactly the pieces that decide whether I oversell a bestseller again this Christmas. 10 11 2 3
The IT Integrator
The purchasing chain is genuinely connected: order proposals compute the real shortage across open customer orders and convert directly into a purchase order emailed to the supplier, goods receipts are matched with incoming supplier invoices, and invoices are auto-preposted into financial accounting. Multiple locations with several warehouses, batch lots with expiry dates, FIFO/LIFO/moving-average valuation and automatic stock reservation per order are documented. We found no public information on serial numbers, mobile scanning, carrier or shop connections, returns with restocking, drop shipping or supplier EDI. 1 10 11
The Skeptic
The chain is evidenced link by link: order proposals from a real shortage calculation summed across open customer orders, converted into the purchase order and e-mailed to the supplier, goods receipt then matched with the incoming invoice, stock valued by moving average, FIFO or LIFO and posted into financial accounting, with automatic reservations, a colour-coded executability status per order, batch and expiry-date management, inventory counts and several locations each holding several warehouses. The captured pages state that routing between locations is not supported, and we found no public information on serial numbers, mobile picking, carrier or shop connections, returns or EDI. 1 10 11
Manufacturing, services & projects
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The depth for the buyer's own business model: bills of materials, work orders and capacity planning for manufacturers; projects, time, resources and milestone billing for service firms; contracts, subscriptions and field service. A product is judged on the models it says it serves.
0 — Nothing beyond trading goods; no bills of materials, projects or service billing.
3 — A simple kit or set of items, or a project tag on invoices, but no production orders, no time recording and no planning.
5 — For at least one model a working core: bills of materials with production orders consuming stock, or projects with time recording and billing from logged hours, with the supported models named on the vendor's pages.
8 — Multi-level bills of materials with routings, work centres and capacity planning, or projects with budgets, resource planning, milestone and recurring billing, and service or maintenance contracts — with costs flowing to cost accounting.
10 — Industry depth documented for the models served: MRP runs with material and capacity planning, shop-floor data capture and quality checks, variant configuration, or full professional-services automation with utilisation, contracts and revenue recognition — each described with its limits in public documentation.
The Managing Director
Scopevisio names project businesses as its market and that core is real: time recording by stopwatch, calendar or app with permission control, flat-rate or time-based billing from logged hours with automatic service slips, a resource-planning add-on and time budgets visible per order position, flowing to cost centres. Manufacturing depth stops at multi-level bills of materials — we found no public information on production orders, routings or capacity planning — and none on milestone, recurring or contract billing. 12 13 3 1
The Head of Finance
For the project firms it names as its market: time capture by stopwatch, calendar or app with net durations handed to billing, billability and release flags per entry, time budgets per order position, automatic service slips, GoBD-conform flat-rate or time-based invoicing and real-time project profitability, with resource planning, billing and expense add-ons listed and multi-level bills of materials present. I found no public information on project budgets with milestone or recurring billing, utilisation, contracts, or production orders with capacity planning. 1 3 10 12 13
The Operations Lead
For project businesses the core is there and the target market is named: time recording by stopwatch, calendar or app, net durations handed to time billing, flat-rate or time-based GoBD invoices with automatic service slips, and resource planning as an add-on. Manufacturing depth stops at multi-level bills of materials for costing; we found no public information on production orders, routings, capacity planning, or on budgets, milestone and recurring billing. 3 10 12 13
The Online Retailer
The vendor names the model it serves — mid-sized project businesses in consulting, IT, engineering and agencies — and documents a working core: project management with time recording by stopwatch, calendar or app, billing from logged hours in flat-rate or time-based modes, resource planning as an add-on and real-time project profitability. We found no public information on production orders, routings or capacity planning behind the multi-level bills of materials that are documented. 12 13 3 10 1
The IT Integrator
For project businesses the core is evidenced: time tracking by stopwatch, calendar or app with time budgets per order position, flat-rate or time-based billing, expense management, a digital project file and a resource planning add-on, plus multi-level bills of materials for manufacturing. We found no public information on production orders, routings, work centres or capacity planning, nor on milestone, recurring or contract billing. 3 10 12 13
The Skeptic
For the models the vendor names — project-driven service firms in consulting, IT, engineering and agencies — the core works: time capture by stopwatch, calendar and app with net durations passed to billing, automatic service slips, flat-rate or time-based GoBD-conform project invoices, real-time project profitability, resource planning as an add-on, expense approval and a digital project file. We found no public information on project budgets, milestone or recurring billing, service contracts or utilisation, and manufacturing shows only multi-level bills of materials with nothing documented on production orders, routings or capacity. 1 3 10 12 13
Integration, API & data portability
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the ERP connects and how the data gets in and out: a public API reference, webhooks, standard connectors for shops, marketplaces, banks, payroll, DATEV and BI, data import from the previous system, and a documented full export when the company leaves.
0 — No API, no import and no export beyond printing.
3 — CSV import and export of some lists, a few named integrations, but no public API documentation and no full export.
5 — A documented REST or OData API, CSV or Excel import for master data and open items, and standard connectors to common shops, banks and DATEV.
8 — A public, versioned API reference covering all main objects with webhooks, a connector marketplace, a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and a full data export of master data, documents and postings available to the customer.
10 — Open by design and evidenced: complete API coverage with sandbox tenants and rate limits stated, open data formats or open-source code, a contractual exit with export format and timeline, and self-hosting or on-premise as a documented alternative to the vendor's cloud.
The Managing Director
The OpenScope REST API is public, documented and included without add-on cost, backed by a broad import and export catalogue: DATEV bookings and balances in both directions, CSV imports for accounts, bookings and the tax matrix, an audit export in GDPdU/IDEA format, and an Orbis connector via the Connectivity Center. We found no public information on webhooks, a connector marketplace or a documented migration path from named predecessor systems, and the published exit export covers financial accounting data rather than documents. 1 3 15 5 7
The Head of Finance
A documented REST API called OpenScope ships in the standard scope, and the help centre documents DATEV imports and exports, the Connectivity Center and an Orbis connector, with CSV imports covering accounts, bookings, cash movements, the tax matrix, contacts, products and fixed assets. Master data import on switching from a third-party system, GDPdU/IDEA export of financials for audit, and deletion 30 days after contract end are stated. I found no public information on webhooks, API versioning or a complete export of documents. 3 5 7 10 14 15
The Operations Lead
A documented REST API with a public reference, DATEV import and export in both directions, an Orbis connector and a Connectivity Center with CSV imports for accounts, bookings, products and contacts are published. The exit side is thinner for a buyer: exports listed cover financials in GDPdU/IDEA format plus account ledger and contacts, and we found no public information on webhooks, a connector marketplace or a full export of documents and postings. 3 5 7 14 15
The Online Retailer
The OpenScope REST API is public with a reference and included in the standard scope, and the import and export documentation is thorough — DATEV in and out, CSV imports for accounts, bookings, products and contacts, an Orbis connection, and audit exports in GDPdU-conform IDEA format. For my channels, we found no public information on Shopware or marketplace connectors, on webhooks, or on a full export of documents and postings when leaving. 7 3 15 5 10 14
The IT Integrator
There is a documented REST API called OpenScope with a public reference, included in the standard licence, plus a Connectivity Center with DATEV import and export, CSV imports for accounts and bookings, and an Orbis connector; on exit, financial accounting data can be exported as GDPdU-conform IDEA files before deletion 30 days after the contract ends. We found no public information on webhooks, API versioning, sandbox tenants, rate limits or a full export of documents and master data, which is what I would need before wiring the shop floor, bank and BI to it. 1 3 5 7 10 15
The Skeptic
The OpenScope REST API has a public reference and is included in the standard, and the import-export catalogue is broad for a mid-market product: DATEV bookings and balances in both directions with the import path in the DATEV software, CSV imports of accounts and bookings, product, contact, fixed-asset and time-entry imports, a GDPdU/IDEA export for audits, Fairmas and doo.net and an Orbis connection. We found no public information on webhooks, API versioning, a connector marketplace, a migration path from named predecessor systems, or a documented full export of documents and postings on exit — only financial-accounting data in GDPdU format is shown. 3 5 7 8 10 15
Rollout, roles & operations
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What it takes to go live and run the system: implementation path (self-service, vendor, partner network), onboarding and training, roles and permissions, audit log, updates and customisation that survive them, support channels and service levels, and availability.
0 — No information on implementation, roles, support or availability.
3 — A contact form and a help page, but no stated implementation path, no role model and no support terms.
5 — A described onboarding or implementation offer, user roles with permissions, a help centre with current documentation, and support channels with hours.
8 — Implementation methods with typical duration stated, a certified partner network or vendor services listed, fine-grained permissions with a change log, customisation without code that survives updates, and published service levels for support and availability.
10 — Operations are evidenced: a status page with uptime history, release notes and an update policy, a field-level audit trail, sandbox or test tenants, and support, training and implementation terms public enough to plan a go-live without a sales call.
The Managing Director
This is what I want to see before signing: standard implementations in four to twelve weeks (two to four months with customisations or third-party connections), 80 hours of specialist consulting inside the standard onboarding packages, three onboarding packages, automatic updates roughly every four weeks and a published availability figure of 98 per cent per year with a right to reduce fees when it is missed. Phone, email and callback support plus an e-learning platform are public, though training is chargeable. We found no public information on a status page with uptime history, sandbox tenants or published response times. 1 3 5 17
The Head of Finance
Implementation durations are stated — four to twelve weeks standard, two to four months complex — with three onboarding packages, 80 hours of consulting in the standard ones and a Customer Lifetime Service in three levels per platform tier; updates arrive automatically about every four weeks and are included, and a 98% per year availability figure carries a fee-reduction remedy. Permissions are documented and every step is logged audit-proof. I found no public information on a status page with uptime history, sandbox tenants or concrete support response times. 1 3 5 13 16
The Operations Lead
Implementation is concrete enough to plan against: four to twelve weeks standard, two to four months for complex rollouts, three onboarding packages with 80 hours of consulting in the standard ones, an e-learning platform, and automatic updates roughly every four weeks at no extra charge. A published availability rule of 98 per cent per year with fee reduction, support by phone and email, and two-factor authentication are stated; we found no public information on a status page with uptime history or quantified support reaction times, and permissions are visible only through help pages and permission-controlled notes. 1 3 5 16 17
The Online Retailer
Implementation duration is stated (four to twelve weeks standard, two to four months for complex projects) with eighty hours of expert consulting in the standard packages, three onboarding packages, tiered Customer Lifetime Service levels, e-learning on Scopeunity, phone and email support, automatic updates roughly every four weeks, and a 98 percent per year availability figure in the public terms with a fee-reduction remedy if it is missed. We found no public information on a status page with uptime history or on sandbox test tenants. 1 3 5 13 17
The IT Integrator
Go-live is plannable: three onboarding packages with 80 consulting hours in the standards, typical durations of four to twelve weeks or two to four months for complex projects, a three-level Customer Lifetime Service, automatic updates roughly every four weeks and an availability figure of 98% per year with a fee-reduction remedy. Permissions are documented in the help centre, two-factor authentication is supported and approval steps are logged audit-proof. We found no public information on a status page with uptime history, sandbox tenants, a field-level change log or numeric support response times. 1 2 3 5 13
The Skeptic
A go-live can be planned from public pages: 80 hours of consulting in the standard onboarding, four to twelve weeks for standard projects and two to four months for complex ones, three onboarding packages, a tiered Customer Lifetime Service with e-learning, support by free phone number and e-mail, updates included on an automatic cycle of roughly four weeks, daily backups and two-factor authentication, plus a 98% per-year availability figure with a right to reduce fees when it is missed — while the terms also state that availability at all times is expressly not owed. We found no public information on a documented role model with a change log, code-free customisation surviving updates, or quantified support response times. 1 2 3 5 13 17
European sovereignty
panel opinion
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where the ERP data — customers, suppliers, prices, postings, employees — is hosted, and who the subprocessors are (cloud infrastructure, email, support tooling, AI features). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; an ERP holds a company's entire commercial record, so the ownership chain counts, not only the server location.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the service are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (US hyperscaler, AI features, support or email tooling) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered, and an on-premise or EU-only hosting option stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a certification such as ISO 27001 or BSI C5 published rather than implied.
The Managing Director
The contracting entity is Scopevisio AG registered in Bonn, data sits in a Frankfurt data centre marketed as "100% made & hosted in Germany", an Article 28 GDPR data processing agreement is offered, deletion 30 days after contract end and a GDPdU/IDEA export are documented, and ISO 27001 and BSI C5 Typ 2 certificates are published. We found no public information on the ownership chain above the AG or on a subprocessor list with locations, which keeps this below the very top despite the strong German hosting story. 4 5 7 2 6
The Head of Finance
Contracting entity is Scopevisio AG, Bonn (HRB 15257), hosting is stated as a Frankfurt data centre and "100% made & hosted in Germany", ISO 27001 and BSI C5 certificates are published with download, an Article 28 data processing agreement is offered, third-country transfers are safeguarded by standard contractual clauses plus the Data Privacy Framework, and Google Fonts is embedded locally so no data reaches Google. I found no public information on the ownership chain behind the AG, the infrastructure provider or a complete subprocessor list with locations. 1 2 4 5 6 7
The Operations Lead
The contracting entity is Scopevisio AG in Bonn with hosting in a Frankfurt data centre, a data processing agreement under Article 28 GDPR is offered, deletion 30 days after contract end and a GDPdU export are documented, and ISO 27001 plus BSI C5 Type 2 certificates are published. We found no public information on the ownership chain or a subprocessor list with locations, which leaves the chain short of fully evidenced end to end. 2 4 5 6 7
The Online Retailer
The contracting entity is Scopevisio AG in Bonn with commercial register entry HRB 15257, hosting is stated as a data centre in Frankfurt, ISO 27001 and BSI C5 Type 2 certifications are published with a downloadable certificate, an Article 28 GDPR data processing agreement is offered, and data export plus deletion thirty days after contract end are in the public terms. We found no public information on a subprocessor list with locations, on the ownership chain, or on an on-premise alternative. 4 5 7 2 1 6
The IT Integrator
The contracting entity is Scopevisio AG in Bonn (HRB 15257), data is stated to sit in German data centres in Frankfurt, and ISO 27001 certified by TÜV plus a BSI C5 Type 2 testation are published in a trust centre with a downloadable certificate; a data processing agreement under Art. 28 GDPR is recommended and third-country transfers are secured with standard contractual clauses and the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework. We found no public information on the ownership chain, a subprocessor list with locations, or an on-premise hosting option. 1 2 4 5 6 7
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is Scopevisio AG in Bonn with a commercial register number, data is stored in a named Frankfurt data centre with redundant power, an Art. 28 GDPR data processing agreement is offered, ISO 27001 with a downloadable certificate and a BSI C5 Type 2 attestation are published, deletion after contract end and an audit-format export are in the terms, and the privacy policy names standard contractual clauses and the Data Privacy Framework for third-country transfers. We found no public information on the ownership chain, a subprocessor list with locations, or an on-premise or EU-only hosting option. 1 2 4 5 6 7
Pricing transparency
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a company can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user, module, company or transaction volume, which modules (accounting, warehouse, production, POS) cost extra, implementation and onboarding fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call or a partner proposal.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with users, modules or companies is unclear.
5 — Prices per edition or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (implementation, extra companies, warehouse or production module, API use) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every edition and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per user, company or volume), onboarding and implementation packages priced, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given company size and module set, with every add-on, implementation, support and hosting cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Managing Director
Licence costs are public enough to budget: a start price of 3,00 € net per user per day billed annually, a default configuration with Organisation, Finanzen and DMS/ECM at 67,20 € net per user per month, and worked examples per platform tier such as 665,00 € net monthly for 10 named users and 3.215,00 € net monthly for 50. The twelve-month term with auto-renewal, net prices plus statutory VAT, cancellation four weeks to month end, data deletion after 30 days and small surcharges like 2,35 € for a paper invoice are all published. Implementation is described as individual depending on functions, training and migration, and training is chargeable, so I cannot compute my true first-year cost without a conversation. 1 2 3 5
The Head of Finance
Public prices exist: a start of 3,00 € netto pro Nutzer und Tag, typically ca. 3,00-5,00 Euro pro Benutzer und Tag, a default configuration at 67,20 € Netto pro Benutzer/Monat including Organisation, Finanzen, DMS/ECM and service basis, and worked net monthly examples of 665,00 €, 3.215,00 € and 25.110,00 € for ten, fifty and five hundred named users. Term, notice, net-plus-VAT treatment and surcharges are published, but module prices, the three onboarding packages and implementation are individual and unpriced, so the full annual cost is not computable. 1 2 3 5 9
The Operations Lead
Prices are public and unusually concrete: from 3,00 € net per user and day billed annually, a default configuration at 67,20 € net per user per month covering Organisation, Finanzen and DMS/ECM, and worked monthly examples for Essential, Professional and Enterprise at named user counts, plus term, VAT treatment, renewal and cancellation terms. Implementation and training costs are stated as individual and per-module prices depend on functionality, user count and term, so the full annual cost is not computable from public pages alone. 1 3 5 9
The Online Retailer
Pricing is public and scales per named user rather than per order — "ab 3,00 € netto pro Nutzer und Tag (jährlich abgerechnet)", a default configuration at "67,20 € Netto pro Benutzer/Monat (jährlich abgerechnet)", and worked monthly examples such as "Monatspreis Netto: 665,00 €" and "Monatspreis Netto: 25.110,00 €" — with the twelve-month term, net-plus-VAT treatment, included updates and a special termination right when a rise exceeds ten percent all stated. Implementation costs are described as individual, and we found no public information on per-module prices for modules such as purchasing, so my full first-year cost is not computable from the public pages alone. 1 2 3 5
The IT Integrator
There is real scale information: a start price of ab 3,00 € netto pro Nutzer und Tag (jährlich abgerechnet), a default configuration of 67,20 € Netto pro Benutzer/Monat (jährlich abgerechnet) covering Organisation, Finanzen and DMS/ECM, and worked monthly examples for the Essential, Professional and Enterprise tiers at 10, 50 and 500 named users, with contract term, auto-renewal and VAT treatment public. Implementation costs are stated to be individual, training is charged separately, and we found no public information on per-module prices for the listed add-ons, so the first-year total is not computable from the captured pages alone. 1 2 3 5 9
The Skeptic
The subscription is estimable: 3,00 € net per user and day as the entry figure, a default configuration at 67,20 € net per user per month including Organisation, Finanzen, DMS/ECM and the base service level, worked monthly examples for a 10-user, 50-user and 500-user service firm, plus minimum term, auto-renewal, VAT treatment and even the 2,35 € surcharges all public. But implementation costs are stated to be individual depending on scope, training and migration, module prices are not itemised beyond the worked examples, and training is against separate payment — so the real first-year cost stays a sales conversation. 1 2 3 5 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Scopevisio
Is Scopevisio European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Scopevisio as EU-Made.
Where does Scopevisio store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Germany as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 26 Oct 2026.
Does Scopevisio have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 26 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Scopevisio?
As of 29 Oct 2026, the panel rates Odoo (4/5), weclapp (3.5/5) and Haufe X360 (3.5/5) highest among the other 13 ERP products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Odoo (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Scopevisio alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 26 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency, Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 9 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (17)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (cloud ERP) www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Pricing page www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Legal notice www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Terms of service www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Privacy policy www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Trust centre www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap help.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Finance, tax & compliance — found from sitemap www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap help.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Purchasing, inventory & order processing — found from sitemap help.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Manufacturing, services & projects — found from sitemap help.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 14 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap help.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 15 Integration, API & data portability — found from sitemap help.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 16 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap help.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →
- 17 Rollout, roles & operations — found from sitemap www.scopevisio.com Checked 26 Oct 2026 Details →