whats-best.ai

Event Registration & Ticketing

Tito

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: not determined

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Team Tito Limited · ti.to

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Link to this page

Tito: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai Tito: AI-assisted analysis on whats-best.ai (dark)

Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds. The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.

Tito at a glance

Vendor
Team Tito Limited
Headquarters
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Data hosting
Default not stated; pages mention Ireland and the EU source, captured 29 Oct 2026
Free plan
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
Panel verdict
The AI panel rates Tito 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Tito, an event management and ticketing platform from Team Tito Limited of Dublin, lands mid-field; persona-weighted totals span 4.3 to 5.6. how scores are made
As of
Vendor pages captured 29 Oct 2026 to 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 30 Oct 2026. all sources

Tito alternatives, European ones first →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Course Provider

Weighted verdict

Runs a small adult education business: evening courses over eight weeks, weekend workshops for coaches, and a few seminars that employers pay for. Wants registrations with the questions each course needs, a waiting list that fills a cancelled seat by itself, VAT that is right for exempt teaching and taxable workshops in one shop, invoices to employers in her own name, and cancellation rules her terms can point to.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Course Provider

Panel median The Course Provider This judge’s scores over the panel median. Each label opens its reasoning below.
Scores per criterion, in stars out of 5
Criterion Panel median The Course Provider
Ticket shop, checkout & registration 2.5 of 5 2 of 5
Payments, payouts, fees & refunds 2.5 of 5 2.5 of 5
VAT, invoices & accounting handoff 2 of 5 2 of 5
Check-in, badges & on-site sales 2.5 of 5 2 of 5
Attendee data & the customer relationship 3 of 5 2 of 5
European sovereignty 3 of 5 2.5 of 5

Ticket shop, checkout & registration

How this is scored

How a ticket or a registration is sold: ticket types and categories, member and early-bird prices, discount codes, bundles and add-ons, a shop embeddable on the organiser's own website or under its own domain, custom questions per ticket and per attendee, group and company bookings, capacity limits and waiting lists, reserved seating with a seating plan, recurring dates and course series, several languages, and an accessible mobile checkout.

0 — Not a ticketing or registration tool; tickets cannot be sold and registrations cannot be taken in the product.

3 — An event page on the platform with a few ticket types and a fixed sign-up form; embedding, custom questions, capacity rules or seating are basic or not described.

5 — Several ticket types with prices, quotas and sale periods, discount codes, custom questions per attendee, a shop embeddable on the organiser's website as a widget or link, capacity limits with a waiting list, and a checkout that works on a phone.

8 — A white-label shop under the organiser's own domain and design, reserved seating with a seating-plan editor, add-ons and bundles, group and company bookings with several attendees per order, conditional questions, member prices by code or login, recurring dates and course series, several languages, and the checkout's accessibility stated.

10 — A shop that fits any event: multi-event and season tickets, timed entry and seat holds, a checkout that the organiser can extend (API, custom fields synced to a CRM), an accessibility conformance statement (WCAG level named), and the conversion and drop-off of the checkout reported to the organiser.

Report an error

The Course Provider

The embeddable widget is well documented — two lines of code put my course checkout on my own site, styleable with my own CSS, with guides for WordPress and Squarespace — and the examples show several ticket types at different prices, a discounted student ticket with an ID question, and discount codes via the API. For my eight-week courses I need waiting lists that refill a cancelled seat, quotas and recurring dates, and I found no public information on any of those, nor on checkout languages or accessibility. 1 2 5

Report an error

Payments, payouts, fees & refunds

How this is scored

How the money moves: payment methods offered to buyers (cards, PayPal, SEPA direct debit, invoice, local methods), whether the organiser connects its own payment account or the platform collects as merchant of record, when the revenue is paid out (continuously, before the event, or after it), the per-ticket and payment fees and whether they can be passed on to the buyer, refunds of single tickets and of a cancelled event, ticket transfer and resale, and chargebacks.

0 — No payment of any kind; the product only collects free registrations.

3 — Online card payment through the platform; payout timing, fee model, refunds or buyer-paid fees are basic or not described.

5 — Several payment methods including cards and PayPal or SEPA, the fee per ticket stated with the option to pass it to the buyer, the payout schedule stated, and refunds of single orders and of a cancelled event issued from the product.

8 — A choice between the organiser's own payment account (Stripe, PayPal, Mollie or similar) and platform collection, payouts before the event stated with their conditions, invoice and bank transfer for business buyers, partial refunds and refund policies set per event, ticket transfer or resale by buyers, and chargeback handling explained.

10 — Full control of the money: the merchant of record named for each set-up, payout timing and any reserve held published, every fee itemised per order, refunds, transfers and resale with the organiser's rules enforced, and the cancellation process for an event documented end to end.

Report an error

The Course Provider

The money model is unusually clear: I connect my own Stripe or PayPal gateway, the fee is 3% per ticket capped at €25, and the gateway sends funds directly to my bank so the platform never holds my course fees. I found no public information on how refunds of a single booking or a cancelled course are issued, whether the fee can be passed to the buyer, or how chargebacks are handled. 6 7

Report an error

VAT, invoices & accounting handoff

How this is scored

How ticket revenue reaches the books correctly: the VAT rate set per ticket or product (reduced rates for concerts and culture, exemptions for education and seminars), gross and net prices shown, invoices to buyers in the organiser's name with consecutive numbers, business buyers with company name and VAT ID, reverse charge for cross-border events, cancellation invoices and credit notes, the platform's own fee invoice, e-invoicing, and exports to DATEV or named accounting systems.

0 — No receipts or invoices; the organiser has to produce every invoice outside the product.

3 — An order confirmation or simple receipt per booking; VAT rates, invoices in the organiser's name, business buyers or accounting exports are basic or not described.

5 — VAT rate configurable per ticket, invoices generated in the organiser's name with its tax details and consecutive numbers, company name and address captured for business buyers, cancellation invoices on refund, and a sales export as CSV or to at least one named accounting system.

8 — Several VAT rates in one order, net prices for business buyers, VAT IDs validated and reverse charge applied, e-invoices (XRechnung or ZUGFeRD) for public and business buyers, a DATEV export with booking data, the platform's fee invoice separated from ticket revenue, and whether the platform sells as agent or in its own name stated.

10 — Tax handled per country: VAT rules for events in several EU countries documented with the place of supply, invoices and credit notes stated as compliant with national invoice law, a reconciliation of payouts, fees and ticket revenue per event, and a GoBD-compliant archive or audit export.

Report an error

The Course Provider

The EU VAT guidance is genuinely useful for my mix of exempt teaching and taxable workshops, covering place-of-supply for event admissions, the exemption note and reverse charge for exhibitor services, and example tickets carry an inclusive rate such as Inc. VAT @23%. I found no public information on invoices in my own name with consecutive numbers, business buyers' VAT IDs, credit notes, or an export to a named accounting system such as DATEV. 3 5 6

Report an error

Check-in, badges & on-site sales

How this is scored

What happens at the door: a check-in app that scans tickets on phones or scanners, offline scanning and several devices at once, entrances and time slots, check-in lists by name, badge printing with attendee data and QR code, box office and on-site sales with card terminals, walk-in registration, session and room check-in at conferences, attendance certificates, and live attendance figures.

0 — No check-in; tickets cannot be validated at the event.

3 — Tickets with a QR code and a guest list to tick off by hand or in a simple app; offline use, several devices, badges or on-site sales are basic or not described.

5 — A free check-in app for iOS and Android that scans tickets on several devices at once, works offline and syncs, a searchable guest list, and live check-in numbers in the dashboard.

8 — Badge printing with attendee data and QR codes, access rules per entrance, session or day, box office sales on site with a named card terminal, walk-in registration, dedicated scanner hardware supported or rented, and attendance certificates for courses.

10 — On-site operations at scale: self-service kiosks or turnstile integration, session check-in feeding continuing-education credits, cashless or on-site payments reconciled with online sales, and the hardware, offline limits and failover documented.

Report an error

The Course Provider

Check-in is well documented: iOS and Android apps, search by name or QR scan from ticket email, PDF or Apple Wallet, several devices syncing to my admin panel, Bluetooth scanner support, duplicate warnings, and timed exports of who checked in when. The documented sync only works while a data connection is available, and I found no public information on offline scanning, live attendance figures, badge printing, box office sales or attendance certificates for my courses. 4

Report an error

Attendee data & the customer relationship

How this is scored

Who the ticket buyer belongs to: whether the organiser is the controller of attendee data and the platform its processor, or the platform a controller in its own right; whether buyers must create an account on the platform; whether the platform markets other events to the organiser's buyers or lists the event on its own marketplace; consent for the organiser's newsletter collected in the checkout; messages to attendees; attendee data exportable at any time; and deletion and anonymisation after the event.

0 — The organiser receives no attendee data at all; the platform keeps the buyer relationship entirely.

3 — A guest list visible to the organiser; who is controller, the platform's own marketing to buyers, export or deletion are basic or not described.

5 — Attendee data exportable by the organiser at any time, the organiser named as controller with a data processing agreement offered, buyers able to book without a platform account, newsletter consent for the organiser collectable in the checkout, and messages to attendees from the product.

8 — A white-label set-up in which buyers see only the organiser, the platform stated not to market other events to the organiser's buyers (or the opt-out explained), the platform's marketplace listing optional, deletion and anonymisation of attendee data after the event configurable, and attendee data synced to a named CRM or via API and webhooks.

10 — The organiser owns the relationship and can prove it: the controller and processor roles documented for every data flow, no platform account or platform marketing by default, retention set per event and enforced, and a complete export of orders, attendees and answers that a successor tool can import.

Report an error

The Course Provider

The roles are stated outright — I am the data controller for my attendees and the platform is the processor — and attendee data is exportable as spreadsheets, by webhook and by API, with mail blasts to attendees from inside the product. I found no public information on whether students can book without a platform account, on collecting my newsletter consent in the checkout, or on an explicit data processing agreement being offered, though a GDPR compliance page and third-party list are published. 1 5 7 8

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where attendee, order and payment data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, payment providers, email delivery, analytics, support). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; attendee lists show who goes where and when, and a conference list holds names, employers and dietary or accessibility answers, so the whole chain counts, not only the database.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.

3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.

5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (payments, email, analytics, support) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.

8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, a self-hosted or on-premises option or data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.

Report an error

The Course Provider

The contracting entity is Team Tito Limited, registered in Ireland with a Dublin address, company number and VAT number published, and all data-hosting services run on Amazon Web Services in Ireland within the EEA. The chain runs partly through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard — Intercom, a US-headquartered provider, handles support and messaging and Google Analytics cookies measure visitors — and the third-party list I read appears cut off, with no ISO 27001 or SOC 2 certification stated. 6 7 8

Report an error

Pricing transparency not rated — the vendor publishes no price

How this is scored

Whether an organiser can compute the real cost of an event from public pages alone: the fee per ticket or per registration (fixed, percentage or both), payment processing fees, whether fees are charged to the organiser or added to the buyer's price, free events, subscriptions or credit packs, payout and refund fees, add-ons (seating, white label, badges, box office), hardware rental, minimums and term, and VAT on the fees.

0 — No public prices at all; every organiser is a sales call.

3 — A starting price or "free for free events" exists, but the fee for paid tickets, payment fees or who pays them is unclear.

5 — The fee per ticket and the payment processing fees are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (refund fees, white label, seating, box office, hardware) is unpriced or "on request".

8 — Every fee published with its rule (per ticket, percentage, cap), the share paid by buyer and organiser stated, add-ons and hardware priced, payout and refund fees listed, and VAT treatment of the fees stated.

10 — Complete price computability: the cost of an event derivable for a given ticket price, ticket count and payment mix, with every add-on, hardware, support and payout fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.

Report an error

The Course Provider

The pricing page is honest and mostly computable: 3% per ticket with the cap set at €25 above €833.33, a 2.5% rate for charities, free events free, gateway fees shown by example at 2.9% + 30¢ for US Stripe, fees quoted excluding VAT, and even a fee calculator with a net profit estimate. What I could not find is whether the fee falls on me or my students, and prices for refund handling, white label or any hardware. 6

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

0 of 6 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Hosting location Not determined ⚠ unverified — uncited Report an error
Hosting options Not determined — uncited Report an error
Open source Not determined — uncited Report an error
Data processing agreement Not determined — uncited Report an error
Transfer impact assessment Not determined — uncited Report an error

Questions about Tito

Is Tito European?

Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Tito as EU-Made.

Where does Tito store data?

The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Ireland and the EU as hosting locations, per the vendor’s page captured 29 Oct 2026.

Does Tito have a free plan?

Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.

What are the best alternatives to Tito?

As of 3 Nov 2026, the panel rates pretix (3/5), Converia (3/5) and doo (3/5) highest among the other 13 Event Registration & Ticketing products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is pretix (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Tito alternatives.

Where this could be wrong

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

Sources (9)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

  1. 1 Vendor homepage ti.to Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  2. 2 Help article (embeddable widget) help.tito.io Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  3. 3 Help article (VAT in the EU) help.tito.io Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  4. 4 Help article (check-in) help.tito.io Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  5. 5 Developer documentation ti.to Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  6. 6 Pricing page ti.to Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  7. 7 Privacy policy ti.to Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  8. 8 Data protection / gdpr page help.tito.io Checked 29 Oct 2026 Details →
  9. 9 Terms of service — found from the homepage ti.to Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →