Learning Management (LMS)
Coassemble
Rest of world Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Coassemble Pty Ltd · coassemble.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Coassemble at a glance
- Vendor
- Coassemble Pty Ltd
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Coassemble 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Coassemble is an API-first authoring platform for staff and customer training. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 2 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Coassemble is an API-first authoring platform for staff and customer training. It scores highest on integration and portability: a documented REST API with SDKs in seven languages, signed webhooks, SCORM 1.2 and 2004 export, named connectors, a Moodle plugin and a self-hosted or dedicated option on the Partner tier. Courses and content follows at 5-6 on a visual builder, auto-graded quizzes and translation into 44 languages. The weakest area is compliance training: an immutable audit trail exportable for auditors is documented, but enrolment is marked coming soon, and the judges found no public information on rule-based assignment, due dates with reminders, escalation or recurring recertification. Sovereignty scores 4-5: EU deployments are described as region-locked on Google Cloud in Belgium, yet the contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd in Australia under New South Wales jurisdiction, with a discretionary data processing addendum. Pricing transparency scores 4-5: "Plans from $2,500/yr" is public, per-tier prices are not, and the captured pages give different figures for price display. The widest spread, 4-6, is on onboarding and academies and reporting and codetermination.
Speaks for it
- A documented REST API with SDKs in seven languages, signed webhooks, per-key rate limits and a free sandbox with the full platform and no credit card required.
- Courses open in any browser with nothing to install, identified through per-person signed links or delivered anonymously to frontline staff.
- An immutable audit trail in which every version, approval and completion is time-stamped and exportable for auditors.
- Machine translation into 44 languages delivered automatically in the learner's browser language, with authoring in 11 languages.
- Legible usage pricing: "Plans from $2,500/yr", yearly allowances of 600, 2,400 and 6,000 Identified Recipients, soft limits with no hard cut-offs, unlimited creators.
Held against it
- Enrolment is marked as coming soon, and we found no public information on rule-based assignment, due dates with reminders, escalation or recurring recertification.
- Identity is documented only as secret-key user provisioning, and we found no public information on single sign-on via SAML or OpenID Connect or SCIM provisioning.
- Only the entry price is published, while per-tier prices, the per-user overage fee and the Headless Add-on carry no stated amounts, and the captured pages give different figures for price display.
- The contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd in Australia under exclusive New South Wales jurisdiction with arbitration seated in Sydney, and the data processing addendum is offered at the vendor's discretion.
- SCORM import is stated as coming soon, and we found no public information on an offline mobile app or accessibility conformance.
Best for
- You author courses yourself and embed them in your own product, portal or intranet via API, rather than sending learners to a separate portal.
- You train frontline or external staff without company email who should open training in a browser with nothing to install and no login.
- Your developers need a documented API, signed webhooks and a free full-platform sandbox to build and prove the integration before committing.
- You deliver one course to a multilingual workforce or customer base and need machine translation into 44 languages without rebuilding.
Avoid if
- You must run mandatory compliance or recertification cycles now: enrolment and assignment are documented as coming soon, with no public information on due dates, reminders, escalation or recurring recertification.
- You rely on single sign-on via SAML or OpenID Connect or on SCIM provisioning: the pages document only secret-key user provisioning, and we found no public information on either.
- You need the full annual cost computable in advance: only "Plans from $2,500/yr" is published, and per-tier prices, the overage fee and the Headless Add-on amount are not.
- Your legal team requires a published data processing addendum or an EU contracting entity: the addendum is offered at the vendor's discretion, and we found no public information on an EU entity or representative.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Courses, learning paths & content standards | 3 of 5 |
| Compliance training, recertification & audit trail | 2 of 5 |
| Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies | 2 of 5 |
| Reporting, learner data & works council | 2.5 of 5 |
| Integrations, administration & portability | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2.5 of 5 |
Courses, learning paths & content standards
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How learning is built and delivered: a course builder with video, documents, quizzes and assignments, import of SCORM 1.2 and 2004, xAPI, cmi5 and LTI packages, learning paths with prerequisites, assessments and question pools, certificates, blended learning with classroom or virtual sessions, a mobile app with offline access, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility (WCAG), AI-assisted authoring, and an off-the-shelf content library.
0 — Not a learning management system; courses cannot be delivered or tracked with it.
3 — Courses with video, documents and quizzes and a completion record; content standards, learning paths and mobile use are basic or not described.
5 — A course builder with quizzes and certificates, SCORM import, learning paths with prerequisites, scheduled instructor-led or virtual sessions, a responsive or native mobile app, and courses and interface in several languages.
8 — SCORM, xAPI and cmi5 or LTI documented, question pools and graded assignments, adaptive or branching paths, an offline mobile app, automatic translation of courses, accessibility conformance stated against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, and AI authoring with the model and data use explained.
10 — A content platform an L&D team runs on: every major standard with a published conformance statement, a learning record store or xAPI export, skills tagged to content, multilingual versions managed as one course, and course content exportable as packages another LMS imports.
The Onboarding Lead
The visual builder with eleven screen types, quizzes with pass marks and multiple attempts, certificates on the finish screen, and collections that bundle and sequence courses into programmes cover how we would build plant training, and machine translation into 44 languages delivered automatically in the browser's language answers our German-Czech-English need directly. SCORM export is documented for versions 1.2 and 2004 with dynamic updates, though the pages state SCORM import is coming soon, and we found no public information on xAPI or cmi5, instructor-led sessions, learning-path prerequisites or an offline mobile app. AI authoring is unusually well documented, with the Google Cloud processing named and a no-train policy for content and learner data. 1 2 5 8 11 14
The Compliance Officer
A visual builder with eleven screen types, auto-graded quizzes with pass marks and multiple attempts, certificates on the finish screen and responsive delivery across laptop, tablet and mobile are documented, and the multilingual story is unusually strong: machine translation into 44 languages delivered automatically in the learner's browser language, with authoring in 11 languages. SCORM export covers 1.2 and 2004 (import is described as coming soon), and AI authoring names the Google Cloud model with a no-train policy; we found no public information on xAPI or cmi5, question pools, an offline mobile app, WCAG conformance, or scheduled instructor-led sessions. 2 5 1 14 16
The Customer Education Lead
The builder is what I'd want for partner courses: AI authoring with the model and data use actually explained, forty-four delivery languages with automatic translation, quizzes with pass marks and multiple attempts, certificates on the finish screen, and SCORM export in both 1.2 and 2004. SCORM import is marked as coming rather than available, so we could not move an existing course library in on day one, and we found no public information on question pools, instructor-led sessions, an offline mobile app, WCAG conformance, or xAPI. 1 2 5 8 11 16
The Works Council Member
The pages document a visual builder with eleven screen types, auto-graded quizzes with pass marks and multiple attempts, certificates on the finish screen, AI authoring from documents or a prompt with a stated no-train policy on learner data, machine translation into 44 languages, and SCORM export in versions 1.2 and 2004. SCORM import is stated only as "import soon", and we found no public information on learning-path prerequisites, scheduled classroom or virtual sessions, an offline mobile app, xAPI or cmi5, or accessibility conformance against WCAG, so the documented level sits above the middle without reaching the advanced tier. 2 5 1 16
The IT & HR Systems Admin
A visual builder with eleven screen types, auto-graded quizzes with pass marks and multiple attempts, certificates, AI authoring backed by a no-train policy, and automatic machine translation into 44 languages on a responsive player. SCORM import is stated as coming soon, and we found no public information on xAPI or cmi5, an offline mobile app, WCAG conformance statements or question pools. 2 5 8 10
The Skeptic
A genuine authoring engine: eleven screen types, a visual builder, auto-graded quizzes with pass marks and multiple attempts, certificates, AI narration, machine translation into 44 languages, and SCORM 1.2 and 2004 export — while the captured pages show SCORM import only as "import soon". AI authoring is unusually well documented, with a no-train policy and named AI providers, but we found no public information on instructor-led or virtual sessions, question pools, an offline mobile app, or WCAG conformance; and enrolment inside the platform is documented as coming soon, so this is stronger as an author-and-embed engine than as a managed LMS. 1 2 5 8 16
Compliance training, recertification & audit trail
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether mandatory training can be run and proven: automatic assignment by role, department, location or legal entity, due dates with reminders and escalation to the manager, recurring recertification (annual data protection, IT security, anti-money-laundering, occupational safety instruction), attestations and acknowledgements of policies, attendance records for classroom sessions, course versioning with who completed which version, expiry of certificates, and audit-ready reports and exports for regulators or auditors.
0 — No way to assign mandatory training or record completion.
3 — Courses can be assigned with a due date and completions reported; recertification, escalation and audit evidence are basic or not described.
5 — Rule-based assignment by group or attribute, due dates with automatic reminders, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, policy acknowledgements, attendance for live sessions, and completion reports exportable for an audit.
8 — Escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, e-signatures or attestations with timestamp, ready-made compliance dashboards by entity and location, and named regimes supported (occupational safety instruction, GxP or 21 CFR Part 11, FINMA or BaFin requirements).
10 — Compliance evidence that holds in an inspection: validated or certified for a named regulated use, every assignment, reminder, attempt and completion traceable to a timestamped record, retention of training records configurable per regulation, and the audit trail exportable in a documented format.
The Onboarding Lead
The compliance page positions the product for mandatory training with instant insights into compliance status, and an immutable, time-stamped audit trail of every version, approval and completion exportable for auditors is a genuinely strong evidence story. But we found no public information on automatic assignment by role, department or location, due dates with reminders and escalation, recurring recertification, attestations or certificate expiry — and the enterprise page states enrolment itself is coming soon, which matters when two hundred people a year must be enrolled on day one. 6 8 16
The Compliance Officer
The pages state an immutable audit trail in which every version, approval and completion is time-stamped and exportable for auditors — exactly the version-level proof my last audit demanded — plus quizzes with pass marks and 'instant insights into compliance status'. But enrolment is stated by the vendor as 'coming soon', delivery runs on share links and email invitations, and we found no public information on due dates, reminders that escalate to a manager, recurring recertification, attestations, certificate expiry or attendance records, so I could not run my annual AML and data-protection cycle on what is documented. 8 16 6 5
The Customer Education Lead
Completions, attempts and scores are captured against each identified recipient, and the pages describe an immutable audit trail where every version, approval and completion is time-stamped and exportable for auditors. But enrolment is explicitly marked as coming, and we found no public information on due dates with reminders, escalation to managers, recurring recertification, certificate expiry or policy attestations — the machinery partner certifications need before I could run mandatory training on it. 6 7 8 16
The Works Council Member
A compliance-training page promises training that meets audit requirements, an immutable audit trail in which every version, approval and completion is time-stamped and exportable for auditors, and instant insights into compliance status. But we found no public information on assignment by role with due dates, automatic reminders, escalation to managers or recurring recertification, and the enterprise page itself states that enrolment is "coming soon" — for mandatory training across our 2,000 staff, that assignment machinery is precisely what an auditor and our works council would demand first. 6 8 16 9
The IT & HR Systems Admin
The compliance page promises audit-ready training and an immutable, time-stamped audit trail exportable for auditors, with completions reported through dashboards and the tracking API. Enrolment and assignment are labelled coming soon, and we found no public information on rule-based assignment, due dates, reminders, escalation or recurring recertification. 6 8 16
The Skeptic
There is a documented immutable audit trail where every version, approval and completion is time-stamped and exportable for auditors, plus per-learner attempts, best-attempt scores and pass flags — that part is real. What we cannot see is the machinery that makes training mandatory: we found no public information on assignment by role or department, due dates with reminders or escalation, recurring recertification, or policy attestations, and enrolment is documented as coming soon. 6 8 9 16
Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Which audiences the product serves and how much runs without an administrator: onboarding journeys enrolled automatically from the HR system on the start date, manager and buddy tasks, frontline staff without a company email, multiple branded portals or tenants for customers, partners, franchisees or members, self-registration and SSO for external users, selling courses with checkout, subscriptions and coupons, partner certification programmes, and groups, branches and delegated administration.
0 — Serves no organisational audience; a personal course viewer only.
3 — Users can be grouped and enrolled by hand; automated onboarding and external audiences are basic or not described.
5 — Onboarding paths assigned automatically on creation of the user, groups or branches with their own administrators, a branded portal for external learners with self-registration, and either course sales with payment or several portals for different audiences.
8 — Onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks and checklists, login for frontline staff without email (username, QR code or kiosk), several branded tenants with separate content, reporting and administrators, course sales with subscriptions, bundles and invoices, and partner certification with renewal.
10 — Internal and external learning run from one platform at scale: unlimited tenants with their own domains and data separation stated, e-commerce with VAT handling and accounting integration, onboarding journeys that span HR, IT and the manager, and every audience reported on separately and together.
The Onboarding Lead
For my shift workers without a company email this is the strongest evidence on these pages: courses open in any browser with nothing to install and no login required, learners are identified through a signed link per person or an email invitation, and training is delivered to frontline teams on mobile in real time. A branded academy for customers embedded in our portal with per-tenant theming serves the external audience well. We found no public information on onboarding journeys triggered from the HR system, manager and buddy tasks, or course sales with checkout, and enrolment is stated as coming soon. 1 5 7 14 15 16
The Compliance Officer
The pages serve external audiences well: an embeddable academy for customer education themed per tenant, frontline delivery on mobile with anonymous access and optional email capture, and per-team reporting. We found no public information on onboarding journeys triggered by an HR system, branch-level administrators with delegated rights, self-registration for external users or selling courses with checkout, and enrolment is described as coming soon, which leaves my 900-staff onboarding by role and entity without a documented engine. 14 15 7 16
The Customer Education Lead
The embeddable academy suits our model: a branded hub themed per tenant, served from our own domain, delivered with signed URLs or no login at all, theming and translations set per tenant through an API. It stops short of what made me outgrow my last platform — we found no public information on course sales with checkout, subscriptions or invoices, partner certification with renewal, separate portal administrators, or onboarding triggered automatically from an HR system. 5 7 14 15 16
The Works Council Member
Branded customer academies embeddable in your own product, per-tenant theming and per-tenant isolation, a custom domain, and loginless anonymous access that covers frontline staff without a company email are all documented. We found no public information on onboarding journeys triggered from an HR system with manager tasks and checklists, self-registration portals with single sign-on, or selling courses with checkout and subscriptions, and enrolment itself is described as coming soon. 14 7 5 15
The IT & HR Systems Admin
An embeddable branded academy for customer education with per-tenant theming, a custom domain, and a loginless recipient experience that works for frontline staff without email or accounts. We found no public information on HR-triggered onboarding journeys, manager tasks, self-registration portals, course sales or delegated branch administrators. 7 14 15 16
The Skeptic
External and frontline audiences are the core: a branded customer-education academy embeddable in your own product with per-tenant theming, loginless signed links per person, anonymous learners by design, and mobile delivery to frontline staff. We found no public information on onboarding triggered from an HR system, manager or buddy tasks, selling courses with checkout, partner certification with renewal, or branches with delegated administrators. 5 7 14 15 16
Reporting, learner data & works council
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the system shows about learning and about each learner, and how far the customer can limit it: dashboards and reports for L&D, managers and auditors, custom and scheduled reports, which learner data is recorded (completions, scores, time spent, logins), role-based visibility so managers see only their team, aggregated or pseudonymised reports, the option to switch off time tracking or scoring, retention and deletion rules, learner access to their own data, and material for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG or the vendor's description of codetermination. Where the data is processed is scored under sovereignty.
0 — No reports, or individual learner activity shown to every administrator with no settings at all.
3 — Completion and progress reports exist and a privacy policy covers the product; what is recorded per learner and who sees it are basic or not described.
5 — Dashboards and custom reports with scheduled delivery, roles that restrict managers to their own team, the learner data recorded described, retention and deletion of learner records configurable, and a data processing agreement offered.
8 — Granular visibility per role and organisational unit, aggregated or pseudonymised reports for analytics, tracking of time spent or scores that can be switched off, automatic deletion after a set period, a learner data export, and a works council or codetermination guide, template works agreement or data protection impact assessment supplied.
10 — Learner data under the customer's full control and documented as such: every recorded field and every report listed with who can see it, privacy settings per country or entity, an audit log of who viewed learner data, and the codetermination position confirmed by a named works council, law firm or certification.
The Onboarding Lead
Reporting is solid for my purposes: a dashboard org-wide or per team with completions, scores and engagement, question-level quiz results, one-click CSV, and a tracking API where every attempt, score and completion is recorded per identified recipient with progress percentages and pass flags. GDPR deletion of learner records via the tracking API and a discretionary data processing addendum on request are documented, and the privacy policy describes retention limits and access rights. We found no public information on role-based visibility that restricts managers to their own team, scheduled report delivery, switching off time or score tracking, or any works council or codetermination material I could take to our Betriebsrat. 4 9 12 13 16
The Compliance Officer
What is recorded per learner is documented in real detail — attempts, best-attempt scores with pass flags, progress percent, screen-level views and sentiment — surfaced in dashboards org-wide or per team, question-level results, one-click CSV and a documented tracking API, with learner-record deletion via the tracking API on GDPR request and a discretionary data processing addendum. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery, manager visibility restricted to their own team, switching off time or score tracking, or any works-council and codetermination material I would need for a works agreement, and the access route described is a request-based privacy right rather than a self-service learner data export. 4 9 13 12 16
The Customer Education Lead
Reporting is strong: org-wide and per-team dashboards, screen-by-screen funnels, question-level quiz results, per-person tracking through the API, one-click CSV, and completions written back to our HRIS or CRM, with the recorded learner fields described openly. What a works council will ask for is less visible — we found no public information on role-based visibility rules, scheduled delivery, switching off time or score tracking, configurable retention periods, or any works agreement or impact-assessment material; deletion appears as GDPR deletes on request and secure deletion at termination. 4 9 13 16
The Works Council Member
The pages are unusually frank about what is recorded per learner: every attempt, screen-level views, quiz scores with best attempt, pass flag and completion, held against an Identified Recipient and readable per person, per course and per team through the tracking API, with CSV export, programmatic GDPR deletion of learner records, secure deletion on termination, a data processing addendum on request, and the option to run courses so learners stay anonymous with no email captured. We found no public information on restricting managers to seeing only their own team, switching off scoring or screen-level tracking for identified learners, or any works council guide, template works agreement or impact assessment — the material I would need under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG before this system logs a single colleague's score. 4 9 13 12 5
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Dashboards org-wide or per team, question-level quiz results, CSV export and a tracking API exposing attempts, scores and completions per person are documented, with programmatic GDPR deletion and a retention principle in the privacy policy. We found no public information on scheduled reports, manager-restricted visibility, configurable retention periods or works-council material, and the DPA is offered only at the vendor's discretion. 4 10 12 13
The Skeptic
What is recorded per learner is documented precisely — progress percent, best attempt score, pass flag, viewed and completed totals — surfaced in dashboards org-wide or per team, with question-level results, CSV export and programmatic deletion of learner records on request. We found no public information on scheduled reports, role-based visibility that restricts managers to their own team, switching off scoring or time tracking, or any works-council or codetermination material; the data processing addendum is offered on request at the vendor's sole discretion. 4 9 10 12 13
Integrations, administration & portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the system fits the company and what leaving would cost: single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect) and user provisioning (SCIM) from Entra ID, Google or Okta, sync with HR systems (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations, a documented REST API and webhooks, CRM and e-commerce connectors for academies, export of users, completions and certificates, export of courses as SCORM, open-source code, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition.
0 — No integrations and no export; users and records exist only inside the product.
3 — CSV import of users and an export of reports; SSO, an API and HR-system sync are basic or not described.
5 — SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, a documented REST API, a connector or documented sync for at least one named HR system, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integration, and export of users, completions and certificates.
8 — SCIM provisioning, prebuilt connectors for several named HR, CRM and identity systems, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox or test instance, courses exportable as SCORM, and a self-hosted or private-cloud edition with its own documentation.
10 — The customer can run, extend and leave the platform freely: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export of users, history, certificates and content in open formats, and the return and deletion of all data on termination documented.
The Onboarding Lead
The developer surface is the strongest I have evaluated at this size: a documented REST API with authentication, pagination and SDK examples in seven languages, multiple API keys with per-key rate limits, signed webhooks fired on course create, start and complete, a Generate API, MCP access, and a free sandbox with the full platform to build a real integration before committing. SCORM export in 1.2 and 2004, a Moodle plugin and named connectors for Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, Zoho and Intercom are documented, along with self-hosting on the top plan. We found no public information on single sign-on via SAML or OpenID Connect, SCIM provisioning, or a sync with a named HR system such as Personio or SAP SuccessFactors — the gap that would decide our rollout. 5 8 9 10 14 16
The Compliance Officer
The integration story is genuinely strong for a bank's systems team: a documented REST API with endpoints, per-key rate limits and a free sandbox, signed webhooks firing on course create, start and complete, completions written back to an HRIS or CRM, named connectors including Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, Zoho, Intercom, Slack and a Moodle plugin, and courses exportable as SCORM 1.2 and 2004 with tracking intact. We found no public information on SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on or SCIM provisioning — identity is described only as secret-key user provisioning — and no documented export of user accounts or certificates, which is a real gap for joining and leaving my 900 staff. 9 10 14 16 5
The Customer Education Lead
The API layer is genuinely documented — REST endpoints with examples in seven languages, signed webhooks that reach our CRM in under a second with retries, a free sandbox with the full platform, SCORM export, a Moodle plugin, named connectors for Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, Zoho and Intercom, and per-key rate limits. We found no public information on SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, or sync with a named HR system; identity is handled through per-person signed URLs and secret-key user provisioning. 4 5 8 9 10 14 16
The Works Council Member
A documented REST API with SDK examples in seven languages and per-key rate limits, signed webhooks, a free full-platform sandbox, SCORM export in both versions, a Slack app, video embeds, named connectors including Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier and Zoho, a Moodle plugin, and a self-hosted or dedicated option described for the Partner tier are all public. We found no public information on single sign-on via SAML or OpenID Connect, SCIM provisioning, or sync with named HR systems such as Personio or SAP SuccessFactors; write-back to an HRIS runs through generic webhooks and the tracking API. 9 10 5 14 16 8
The IT & HR Systems Admin
A documented REST API with seven language SDKs and per-key rate limits, signed webhooks, a free sandbox, Moodle plugin, Slack app, CRM connectors and SCORM 1.2 and 2004 export via the API, with a self-hosted or dedicated edition on the top tier — my exit path with courses as SCORM packages is real. Identity, though, is only secret-key user provisioning: we found no public information on SAML, OpenID Connect or SCIM, and no named HR-system connector. 5 9 10 14 16
The Skeptic
The strongest area: a documented REST API with pagination and per-key rate limits, SDK examples in seven languages, signed webhooks, a headless Generate API and MCP, named connectors (Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, Zoho, Intercom), a Slack app, SCORM export of courses, a free sandbox, and a self-hosted or dedicated option. We found no public information on SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, SCIM provisioning, or a named HR-system sync — the HRIS write-back is generic — and a documented export of users and certificates is not shown. 1 5 9 10 14 16
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where learner data (names, completions, scores, certificates) is stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, video streaming, email, AI features, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; learner records are employee data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (video, email, AI features, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every learner record on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Onboarding Lead
The contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd in Newcastle, Australia with exclusive jurisdiction of the New South Wales courts and arbitration seated in Sydney, and the data processing addendum is discretionary on request — a hard combination for a German works agreement. Credit where due: region-locked environments across the EU, US and APAC are documented, with the EU option hosted on Google Cloud in Belgium and region-pinned AWS storage, plus a published subprocessor list including OpenAI, Stripe and Intercom and SOC 2 Type 1 and 2 attested. The privacy policy states data may be stored outside Australia and the European Economic Area including in the USA, and the AI processing region is confirmed only on request. 7 11 12 13
The Compliance Officer
The contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd of Newcastle, Australia, under the exclusive jurisdiction of New South Wales courts with arbitration seated in Sydney; EU deployments are described as region-locked on Google Cloud in Belgium through Sevalla, with a named subprocessor list (AWS, OpenAI, Stripe and others), SOC 2 Type 1 and 2 attested, and a data processing addendum offered at the vendor's discretion. The privacy policy states processors may store data outside Australia and the EEA including the USA, the AI processing region is stated not always to match the storage region, and data may be relocated to another jurisdiction with written notice; we found no public information on an EU contracting entity or EU representative. 13 11 12 16 7
The Customer Education Lead
The security pages publish the chain: EU deployments region-locked on Google Cloud in Belgium managed through Sevalla, AWS pinned per region for storage and video encoding, named subprocessors with locations, SOC 2 Type 1 and 2, and a data processing addendum available on request. For an Amsterdam buyer the counterweights matter: the contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd in Newcastle, Australia with exclusive New South Wales jurisdiction and Sydney arbitration, the addendum is discretionary rather than published, the AI processing region may differ from the storage region and is confirmed only on request, and the wider chain includes OpenAI, Stripe and SendGrid. 7 11 12 13 16
The Works Council Member
Region-locked EU environments are documented on named infrastructure — Google Cloud in Belgium via Sevalla, with AWS buckets and video encoding pinned per region — alongside SOC 2 Type 1 and 2 and a subprocessor list naming AWS, Google, OpenAI, Stripe, Intercom and others. But the contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd in Newcastle, Australia, under the exclusive jurisdiction of New South Wales courts with arbitration seated in Sydney, the terms say the vendor "may agree (in its sole discretion)" to a data processing addendum, and the subprocessor list itself states providers may store data outside Australia and the European Economic Area including in the USA, with the AI processing region possibly differing from the storage region. 11 13 12 1
The IT & HR Systems Admin
EU region-locked hosting on named infrastructure in Belgium and a full subprocessor list are published, with SOC 2 Type 1 and 2 stated. The contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd in Australia under New South Wales jurisdiction, the DPA is discretionary, and the chain includes US providers such as OpenAI and Replicate, with the AI processing region confirmed only on request. 11 12 13 16
The Skeptic
EU residency is documented down to named infrastructure: region-locked environments with the EU deployment on Google Cloud in Belgium, AWS buckets pinned per region, SOC 2 Type 1 and 2, and 2024 and 2025 penetration tests published. But the contracting entity is Coassemble Pty Ltd in Australia under New South Wales jurisdiction with Sydney arbitration, the DPA is offered only at the vendor's sole discretion, and the privacy policy lists US AI providers — OpenAI, OpenRouter, Replicate — among the subprocessors, with the AI processing region confirmed only on request. 1 11 12 13
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by active or registered users, what counts as an active user, what happens above the tier, which features (SSO, API, HR connectors, extra portals, e-commerce, custom domain, content library) cost extra, the free tier or trial and its limits, implementation and support fees, the self-hosted edition and its licence, minimum term and VAT treatment.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, portals or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price per user band and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, API, extra portals, HR connector, implementation) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (active or registered users, portals), the definition of an active user and overage stated, add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's cost or licence stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of learners, portals and features, with every add-on, implementation, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Onboarding Lead
The model is refreshingly legible: plans from $2,500/yr (the pricing page shows prices in EUR), priced on plan features and usage measured by Identified Recipients with published yearly allowances per tier of 600, 2,400 and 6,000, soft limits with no hard cut-offs, unlimited creators, and a free sandbox with the full platform and no credit card required. Overage is a per-user fee with notifications immediately and after two days, add-ons are billed pro-rata on annual plans, and the terms state all fees are GST exclusive with no GST charged outside Australia. But we found no public information on the price of each named plan, the Headless add-on's per-user amount, the self-hosted edition's licence cost or a minimum term — so I could not compute our real annual cost for 1,400 people. 1 10 12 16
The Compliance Officer
A starting price is published — "Plans from $2,500/yr" — with prices shown in EUR on the pricing page, a free sandbox requiring no credit card, unlimited course creators on every plan, and a usage model measured in Identified Recipients with per-tier annual allowances that are soft with no hard cut-offs. I cannot compute my real annual cost from the public pages: per-tier prices beyond the floor, the overage fee per additional user, the Headless Add-on per-user fee and development services via statement of work are not publicly priced, and we found no public information on VAT treatment for EU customers (only GST exclusivity) or a minimum term. 1 10 12
The Customer Education Lead
The entry price is public — "Plans from $2,500/yr" — with a free sandbox needing no credit card, and the scaling rule is unusually clear: usage measured by Identified Recipients with per-tier yearly allowances, soft limits with no hard cut-offs, unlimited creators on every plan, and per-user overage fees as specified on the site. We still could not compute a full annual cost: per-tier prices beyond the entry figure are not captured, the captured pages give different figures for price display (prices shown in EUR on the pricing page), and the headless add-on, development services and the self-hosted edition available with the top tier carry no stated amounts; minimum term is not stated, and tax treatment is given only as GST, which customers outside Australia are not charged. 1 8 10 12 16
The Works Council Member
The unit and its scaling are public and unusually granular: usage-based pricing on Identified Recipients with yearly allowances of 600, 2,400 and 6,000 across the plans, anonymous-recipient and AI generation allowances per plan, soft limits with no hard stop, unlimited creators and courses on every plan, GST treatment stated, and a free sandbox with the full platform and no credit card; the captured pages give the entry price differently, with "Plans from $2,500/yr" on some pages and "Prices shown in EUR" on the pricing page. We found no public information on each plan's actual price, the per-user overage amount, the Headless Add-on fee, development services, the self-hosted edition's cost or a minimum term, so the real annual cost for a given headcount is not computable from public pages alone. 10 1 12 8
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Tier allowances in Identified Recipients and anonymous recipients, AI generation limits, a free sandbox without credit card, soft usage allowances and GST treatment are public. Only a starting price of "$2,500/yr" is published, and the overage fee, the Headless Add-on, per-tier prices, the self-hosted edition's licence and a minimum term are unpriced, so an annual cost cannot be computed. 1 10 12
The Skeptic
The structure is unusually legible: a free sandbox with the full API, three tiers with annual Identified Recipient allowances of 600, 2,400 and 6,000, soft limits with no hard stop, unlimited creators, and GST treatment and termination terms stated. But plans are published only as "Plans from $2,500/yr" — and the captured pages give different figures, with the pricing page stating prices are shown in EUR — and we found no public information on the per-tier prices, the Headless Add-on fee, overage amounts, implementation fees, or the cost of the self-hosted edition, so the real annual cost is not computable from the public pages. 1 8 10 12 16
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Coassemble
Is Coassemble European?
No. whats-best.ai classifies Coassemble as Rest of world.
Where does Coassemble store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
Does Coassemble have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Coassemble?
As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates iSpring LMS (iSpring Learn) (3/5), Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (3/5) and LearnWorlds (3/5) highest among the other 12 Learning Management (LMS) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Coassemble alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data processing agreement, Legal entity, Hosting location, Hosting options. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 6 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 compliance fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (17)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (course creation) coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (learner experience) coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Features page (reporting) coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Features page (sharing and SCORM export) coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Features page (compliance training) coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Features page (customer education) coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Integrations page coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 API documentation developers.coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Pricing page coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Security / trust page trust.coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Terms of service coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Privacy policy coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Self-hosting / on-premises installation docs — found from the homepage coassemble.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →