Learning Management (LMS)
imc Learning Suite
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by imc information multimedia communication AG · www.scheer-imc.com
Compare with Moodle Workplace → Compare with Absorb LMS → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
imc Learning Suite at a glance
- Vendor
- imc information multimedia communication AG
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates imc Learning Suite 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. imc Learning Suite, an enterprise learning management system from imc information multimedia communication AG of Saarbrücken in the Scheer group, scores best on courses and content and on onboarding and academies, where marks cluster at 6-7. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 2 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
imc Learning Suite, an enterprise learning management system from imc information multimedia communication AG of Saarbrücken in the Scheer group, scores best on courses and content and on onboarding and academies, where marks cluster at 6-7. Documented strengths include SCORM, LTI and xAPI/Tin Can import into an internal learning record store, courses exporting as SCORM, PENS or HTML, AI-assisted authoring with one-click translation into over 70 languages, automated onboarding workflows per hire, department or subsidiary, and separate learning environments per partner group with course sales through a Shopify interface. Compliance training holds at 6, with automated assignment, deadlines, escalation, certification and recertification backed by a reference covering 90,000 Audi employees. It is weakest on reporting and codetermination, which scores 3 to 4, and on sovereignty, which scores 2 to 4: the judges found no public information on which learner data is recorded, retention and deletion, or works council material, nor on hosting location, subprocessors, or a data processing agreement. On sovereignty the skeptic scored 2 and the compliance officer 4, crediting the documented on-premise option. Pricing transparency scored 0; no price appears on the captured pages.
Speaks for it
- Courses import from SCORM, LTI and xAPI/Tin Can into an internal learning record store and export as SCORM, PENS or HTML, covering the contract-end exit path
- AI-assisted authoring offers one-click translation into over 70 languages with multilingual course templates
- Compliance automation covers assignment, validation, deadlines with reminders, escalation processes, and global certification with recertification and reporting
- Separate learning environments per partner group, tailored external portals and course sales through a Shopify interface with discount codes and gift cards
- Single sign-on via SAML 2.0, Open ID or OAuth, an open web services API with flat-file exchange, and a cloud or on-premise deployment option are documented
Held against it
- We found no public information on which learner data is recorded, manager visibility restricted to the manager's own team, retention and deletion settings, or any works council and codetermination material
- We found no public information on where cloud-hosted learner data is stored, the subprocessors behind video, email and AI functions, or a published data processing agreement
- We found no public information on course versioning per learner, an unalterable audit trail, or attestations and e-signatures for audits
- We found no public information on a named HR system behind the integration claim, SCIM provisioning, webhooks, or export of users, completions and certificates
- We found no public information on prices, tiers or per-user figures; the route to buy is a demo and a consultation
Best for
- You train workforces in several languages and need authoring with one-click translation into over 70 languages
- You serve partners, customers and members in separate learning environments and want to sell courses through the Shopify interface
- You automate compliance at scale — assignment, deadlines, certification and recertification — as in the documented 90,000-employee Audi programme
- You need standards-based import of SCORM, LTI and xAPI and course export as SCORM, PENS or HTML before signing
Avoid if
- You must conclude a works agreement before launch and need documented learner-data rules, retention and pseudonymised reporting — this area scored 3 to 4
- You need a confirmed hosting location for learner data, a published data processing agreement and a visible subprocessor chain — sovereignty scored 2 to 4
- You face inspections that demand course versioning per learner, an unalterable audit trail and attestations
- You need a named HR system such as Personio, SAP SuccessFactors or Workday, plus export of users, completions and certificates, before committing
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Courses, learning paths & content standards | 3 of 5 |
| Compliance training, recertification & audit trail | 3 of 5 |
| Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies | 3.5 of 5 |
| Reporting, learner data & works council | 2 of 5 |
| Integrations, administration & portability | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5 of 5 |
Courses, learning paths & content standards
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How learning is built and delivered: a course builder with video, documents, quizzes and assignments, import of SCORM 1.2 and 2004, xAPI, cmi5 and LTI packages, learning paths with prerequisites, assessments and question pools, certificates, blended learning with classroom or virtual sessions, a mobile app with offline access, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility (WCAG), AI-assisted authoring, and an off-the-shelf content library.
0 — Not a learning management system; courses cannot be delivered or tracked with it.
3 — Courses with video, documents and quizzes and a completion record; content standards, learning paths and mobile use are basic or not described.
5 — A course builder with quizzes and certificates, SCORM import, learning paths with prerequisites, scheduled instructor-led or virtual sessions, a responsive or native mobile app, and courses and interface in several languages.
8 — SCORM, xAPI and cmi5 or LTI documented, question pools and graded assignments, adaptive or branching paths, an offline mobile app, automatic translation of courses, accessibility conformance stated against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, and AI authoring with the model and data use explained.
10 — A content platform an L&D team runs on: every major standard with a published conformance statement, a learning record store or xAPI export, skills tagged to content, multilingual versions managed as one course, and course content exportable as packages another LMS imports.
The Onboarding Lead
SCORM, LTI and xAPI import with an internal learning record store are documented, and one-click translation into 70+ languages with multilingual course management is exactly what my German, Czech and English plants need; courses also export as SCORM. But the pages say nothing on question pools, graded assignments, accessibility conformance, or which AI model the authoring tool uses and where the content goes. 3 20 12 11 6 1
The Compliance Officer
SCORM, LTI and xAPI/Tin Can import with an internal learning record store are documented, alongside classroom events with QR check-in, blended programmes, multilingual course management with one-click translation into over 70 languages, AI-assisted authoring and off-the-shelf content. We found no public information on question pools and graded assessments, WCAG accessibility conformance, cmi5, or which AI model the authoring tool uses and how our content is treated in it — for mandatory training the assessment and accessibility gaps weigh heavily. 1 3 6 11 12 20
The Customer Education Lead
SCORM and LTI support plus xAPI/Tin Can import into an internal learning record store are documented, alongside an AI-assisted authoring tool with one-click translation into over 70 languages, multilingual course templates, blended learning with QR-code attendance at live events, and off-the-shelf content such as a cybersecurity learning journey. We found no public information on question pools, graded assignments, accessibility conformance, or an offline mobile app, and the AI tool's model and data use are not explained. 3 20 12 11 6 18
The Works Council Member
SCORM and LTI support, xAPI/Tin Can import with an internal learning record store, one-click translation into more than 70 languages and AI-assisted authoring are documented, alongside blended learning, off-the-shelf content and courses exported as SCORM, PENS or HTML. We found no public information on question pools, graded assignments, WCAG accessibility conformance, or the model and data use behind the AI authoring. 3 6 11 12 20
The IT & HR Systems Admin
SCORM and LTI support, xAPI/Tin Can import into an internal learning record store, and courses that export as SCORM, PENS or HTML give me both the standards and the exit path I insist on. Authoring is well evidenced — course templates, a grid-based page editor, and AI-assisted creation with one-click translation into over 70 languages. We found no public information on question pools and graded assignments, WCAG conformance, an offline mobile app, or which AI model is used and how our content data is treated. 3 6 11 12 20
The Skeptic
SCORM, LTI and xAPI import with an internal learning record store are documented, alongside one-click translation into 70+ languages, multilingual course management and course export to SCORM, PENS or HTML. But the AI authoring claim of automating 80% of eLearning creation names no model or data-use terms, and we found no public information on question pools, WCAG accessibility conformance or an offline mobile app. 3 11 12 20 6
Compliance training, recertification & audit trail
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether mandatory training can be run and proven: automatic assignment by role, department, location or legal entity, due dates with reminders and escalation to the manager, recurring recertification (annual data protection, IT security, anti-money-laundering, occupational safety instruction), attestations and acknowledgements of policies, attendance records for classroom sessions, course versioning with who completed which version, expiry of certificates, and audit-ready reports and exports for regulators or auditors.
0 — No way to assign mandatory training or record completion.
3 — Courses can be assigned with a due date and completions reported; recertification, escalation and audit evidence are basic or not described.
5 — Rule-based assignment by group or attribute, due dates with automatic reminders, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, policy acknowledgements, attendance for live sessions, and completion reports exportable for an audit.
8 — Escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, e-signatures or attestations with timestamp, ready-made compliance dashboards by entity and location, and named regimes supported (occupational safety instruction, GxP or 21 CFR Part 11, FINMA or BaFin requirements).
10 — Compliance evidence that holds in an inspection: validated or certified for a named regulated use, every assignment, reminder, attempt and completion traceable to a timestamped record, retention of training records configurable per regulation, and the audit trail exportable in a documented format.
The Onboarding Lead
Automated assignment, automatic deadlines with reminders, escalation processes, global certification and recertification are all stated — that is the end of my completion spreadsheets. I found no public information on course versioning with who completed which version, an unalterable audit trail, or policy attestations, which my auditors ask for by name. 5 13 20 6 14
The Compliance Officer
Automated assignments, automatic deadlines, learner reminders, configurable escalation processes, global certification and recertification with reporting are documented, plus QR-code attendance at live events and a compliance programme covering 90,000 Audi employees as a reference. For a BaFin inspection we still need proof of which course version each person completed, an unalterable audit trail and ready-made dashboards by legal entity; we found no public information on any of these, nor on e-signature attestations or policy acknowledgements. 5 13 20
The Customer Education Lead
Automated assignment, deadlines, learner reminders, escalation processes, global certification and recertification with reporting are documented, backed by a named compliance deployment covering 90,000 Audi employees, QR-based attendance at events, and stated ISO 27001 certification and GDPR adherence. We found no public information on course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, attestations or e-signatures, or compliance dashboards by legal entity. 5 13 20 3
The Works Council Member
Assignment to target groups, automated due dates, learner reminders, escalation processes, global certification, recertification and reporting are documented, and learners can check in to classroom events with a personal QR code. We found no public information on course versioning, an unalterable audit trail, attestations or policy acknowledgements — exactly the evidence an auditor would ask us to produce. 5 13 20
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Automated assignment, validation and notifications, automated deadlines with learner reminders, escalation processes, global certification, recertification and reporting are stated plainly, and a QR-code check-in records attendance at live events. Off-the-shelf recertification content for FIDLEG shows a named regime in the catalogue. We found no public information on course versioning, attestations or e-signatures, an unalterable audit trail, or exports in a documented audit format. 5 13 14 20
The Skeptic
Automated assignment, validation, deadlines, escalation processes, global certification, recertification and reporting are documented, and QR check-in provides attendance for live events. We found no public information on course versioning, an unalterable audit trail, policy attestations, or compliance dashboards by legal entity and location — the evidence an inspection turns on. 5 13 20
Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Which audiences the product serves and how much runs without an administrator: onboarding journeys enrolled automatically from the HR system on the start date, manager and buddy tasks, frontline staff without a company email, multiple branded portals or tenants for customers, partners, franchisees or members, self-registration and SSO for external users, selling courses with checkout, subscriptions and coupons, partner certification programmes, and groups, branches and delegated administration.
0 — Serves no organisational audience; a personal course viewer only.
3 — Users can be grouped and enrolled by hand; automated onboarding and external audiences are basic or not described.
5 — Onboarding paths assigned automatically on creation of the user, groups or branches with their own administrators, a branded portal for external learners with self-registration, and either course sales with payment or several portals for different audiences.
8 — Onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks and checklists, login for frontline staff without email (username, QR code or kiosk), several branded tenants with separate content, reporting and administrators, course sales with subscriptions, bundles and invoices, and partner certification with renewal.
10 — Internal and external learning run from one platform at scale: unlimited tenants with their own domains and data separation stated, e-commerce with VAT handling and accounting integration, onboarding journeys that span HR, IT and the manager, and every audience reported on separately and together.
The Onboarding Lead
Automated, customisable onboarding workflows per hire, department or subsidiary with progress tracking are described, and the platform serves employees, partners, customers and members in separate learning environments with a Shopify shop. Nothing describes manager or buddy tasks, and I found no public information on a login path for the third of my workforce without a company email address. 6 1 7 20 11 3
The Compliance Officer
Automated, customisable onboarding workflows per hire, department or subsidiary, tailored external learning portals with separate environments for different partner groups, four learner audiences from employees to members, and monetisation through certifications plus an announced Shopify interface cover most of what an academy needs. We found no public information on manager tasks and onboarding checklists, self-registration for external learners, or login for frontline staff without a company email address. 1 2 6 7 11 20
The Customer Education Lead
Employees, partners, customers, members and resellers are all served, with automated onboarding workflows per hire, department or subsidiary, separate learning environments for partner groups, tailored learning portals including updates to existing external portals, single sign-on via SAML 2.0, Open ID or OAuth, and course sales through a Shopify interface with discount codes and gift cards — most of what my academy needs. We found no public information on subscriptions or invoicing for course sales, self-registration for external learners, manager tasks in onboarding, or login for frontline staff without a company email. 1 6 7 11 19 20 2
The Works Council Member
Automated, customisable onboarding workflows per hire, department or subsidiary with HR-system integration are documented, and the platform serves employees, partners, customers and members with separate learning environments and external portals for different partner groups. Courses and learning paths can be sold through a Shopify interface with discount codes, gift cards and sales analytics. We found no public information on manager tasks and checklists, self-registration, or login for frontline staff without a company email. 1 6 7 11 20
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Automated, customisable onboarding workflows per hire, department or subsidiary are documented, and the external side is real: separate learning environments per partner group, tailored learning portals, and course sales through Shopify with discount codes and gift cards. We found no public information on onboarding triggered by HR-system events, manager or buddy tasks and checklists, logins for frontline staff without email, self-registration, subscriptions and invoices, or certification renewal. 6 7 11 20
The Skeptic
Automated onboarding workflows per hire, department or subsidiary, four external audiences, separate learning environments for partner groups, tailored external portals and Shopify course sales with discount codes and gift cards are documented. We found no public information on onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks, self-registration, or login for frontline staff without a company email. 2 6 7 11 20
Reporting, learner data & works council
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the system shows about learning and about each learner, and how far the customer can limit it: dashboards and reports for L&D, managers and auditors, custom and scheduled reports, which learner data is recorded (completions, scores, time spent, logins), role-based visibility so managers see only their team, aggregated or pseudonymised reports, the option to switch off time tracking or scoring, retention and deletion rules, learner access to their own data, and material for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG or the vendor's description of codetermination. Where the data is processed is scored under sovereignty.
0 — No reports, or individual learner activity shown to every administrator with no settings at all.
3 — Completion and progress reports exist and a privacy policy covers the product; what is recorded per learner and who sees it are basic or not described.
5 — Dashboards and custom reports with scheduled delivery, roles that restrict managers to their own team, the learner data recorded described, retention and deletion of learner records configurable, and a data processing agreement offered.
8 — Granular visibility per role and organisational unit, aggregated or pseudonymised reports for analytics, tracking of time spent or scores that can be switched off, automatic deletion after a set period, a learner data export, and a works council or codetermination guide, template works agreement or data protection impact assessment supplied.
10 — Learner data under the customer's full control and documented as such: every recorded field and every report listed with who can see it, privacy settings per country or entity, an audit log of who viewed learner data, and the codetermination position confirmed by a named works council, law firm or certification.
The Onboarding Lead
Detailed learning analytics, user-activity reporting on channel content and granular access rights are stated. The pages don't describe which learner data is recorded, whether managers see only their team, retention and deletion rules, or any works-council material — and with plants in Germany and the Czech Republic, the codetermination question is the first one my Betriebsrat will ask. 1 6 18 3 17
The Compliance Officer
Learning analytics, compliance status reporting and detailed user activity reports for channel content are documented, GDPR adherence is stated, and granular access rights for administrative and regional independence exist. We found no public information on role-based visibility restricting managers to their own team, configurable retention and deletion of learner records, pseudonymised or aggregated reporting, switching off time or score tracking, or any works council material for a works agreement. 1 3 5 7 18
The Customer Education Lead
Detailed learning analytics and new user-activity reports on channel content are documented, together with granular access rights for administrative and regional independence. We found no public information on scheduled or custom report delivery, what learner data is recorded, retention and deletion rules, pseudonymised or aggregated reporting, switching off time or score tracking, or any works council and codetermination material — which matters for our Amsterdam workforce. 18 1 3 5
The Works Council Member
Detailed learning analytics and user-activity reports on channel content are documented, access rights can be assigned on a granular basis, and GDPR adherence is stated. Before anything goes live for our employees I need to know which data is recorded per learner, who sees individual results, when records are deleted, and what material exists for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG — we found no public information on any of that. 1 3 18
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Learning analytics, advanced analytics claims and detailed user-activity reports on channel content are documented, and granular access rights are stated for administrative and regional independence. We found no public information on which learner data is recorded, manager visibility limited to the manager's own team, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, retention and deletion settings, a learner data export, or any works council and codetermination material — all things I need before a works agreement. 3 6 7 18
The Skeptic
Detailed learning analytics and user activity reports exist, and granular access rights are claimed for administrative and regional independence. What the captured pages do not show: which learner data is recorded per person, manager visibility restricted to one's own team, retention and deletion rules, learner data export, or any works council or codetermination material. 1 3 18
Integrations, administration & portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the system fits the company and what leaving would cost: single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect) and user provisioning (SCIM) from Entra ID, Google or Okta, sync with HR systems (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations, a documented REST API and webhooks, CRM and e-commerce connectors for academies, export of users, completions and certificates, export of courses as SCORM, open-source code, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition.
0 — No integrations and no export; users and records exist only inside the product.
3 — CSV import of users and an export of reports; SSO, an API and HR-system sync are basic or not described.
5 — SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, a documented REST API, a connector or documented sync for at least one named HR system, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integration, and export of users, completions and certificates.
8 — SCIM provisioning, prebuilt connectors for several named HR, CRM and identity systems, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox or test instance, courses exportable as SCORM, and a self-hosted or private-cloud edition with its own documentation.
10 — The customer can run, extend and leave the platform freely: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export of users, history, certificates and content in open formats, and the return and deletion of all data on termination documented.
The Onboarding Lead
Single sign-on with SAML 2.0, OpenID or OAuth, an open web-services API, HR-system integration and a cloud or on-premise deployment are all documented, and courses export as SCORM. No HR system is named, SCIM and webhooks are not described, and I found no public information on exporting users, completions and certificates on leaving. 19 3 6 20 1 2 12
The Compliance Officer
Single sign-on via SAML 2.0, Open ID and OAuth, an open web services API with flat-file exchange, connectors including Shopify, HR-system integration, SCORM and LTI support and a cloud or on-premise deployment option are documented, and courses export as SCORM or PENS. The on-premise option matters to us, but we found no public information on SCIM provisioning, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, or an export of users, completions and certificates. 2 3 6 12 19 20
The Customer Education Lead
Single sign-on with SAML 2.0, Open ID and OAuth, an Open Web Services API with flat-file exchange, integrated and custom-built connectors, HR-system integration, a Shopify interface, on-premise or cloud deployment, and course export to SCORM are documented. HR systems and CRM connectors are never named — so I cannot confirm pushing completions into our CRM — and we found no public information on SCIM provisioning, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox, or export of users, completions and certificates. 19 3 6 20 12 1
The Works Council Member
Single sign-on via SAML 2.0, Open ID or OAuth, an Open Web Services API with flat-file exchange, integrated and plug-and-play connectors, a Shopify interface and cloud or on-premise deployment are documented. HR-system integration is stated without naming a single system, and we found no public information on SCIM provisioning, webhooks, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integrations, or export of users, completions and certificates. 1 3 6 19 20
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Single sign-on via SAML 2.0, Open ID and OAuth, an open web services API with flat-file exchange, a connector framework spanning integrated, plug-and-play and custom-built options, HR-system integration, a Shopify interface, and a choice of cloud or on-premise hosting are all stated. Courses export as SCORM packages, which covers my contract-end requirement. We found no public information on SCIM provisioning, a named HR system such as Personio, SAP SuccessFactors or Workday, Microsoft Teams integration, webhooks, a public API reference, or export of users, completions and certificates. 1 3 6 12 19 20
The Skeptic
Single sign-on with SAML 2.0, OpenID or OAuth, an Open Web Services API with flat-file exchange, integrated and plug-and-play connectors, a Shopify interface, cloud or on-premise hosting, and course export as SCORM are documented. The connector pages name no HR system behind the seamless-integration claim, and we found no public information on SCIM provisioning, webhooks, or export of users and completion records — the part that decides what leaving costs. 2 3 6 12 19
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where learner data (names, completions, scores, certificates) is stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, video streaming, email, AI features, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; learner records are employee data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (video, email, AI features, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every learner record on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Onboarding Lead
The vendor presents itself as a Saarbrücken company, imc information multimedia communication AG, and states GDPR adherence, encryption in transit and at rest, ISO 27001 certification and regular penetration tests. But we found no public information on where learner data is hosted, on the subprocessors in the chain, or on a data processing agreement. 3 1 9 10
The Compliance Officer
GDPR adherence, ISO 27001 certification, encryption at rest and in transit, regular external penetration tests and a cloud or on-premise deployment choice are documented — on-premise would let us keep learner records on our own servers. We found no public information on where the cloud service hosts learner data, the list of subprocessors, or a published data processing agreement on the captured pages. 1 2 3
The Customer Education Lead
GDPR adherence, encryption in transit and at rest, ISO 27001 certification and regular external penetration tests are stated, an on-premise deployment option is documented, and a privacy policy page is captured. Where cloud-hosted learner data is stored, which subprocessors run video, email or AI features, and whether a data processing agreement is published are all unknown from the captured pages. 3 1 2 10
The Works Council Member
GDPR adherence, ISO 27001 certification, encryption in transit and at rest, regular external penetration tests and an on-premise option are stated, and the vendor is a German Aktiengesellschaft in Saarbrücken belonging to the Scheer group. Where learner data is hosted, which subprocessors handle video, email or AI functions, and whether a data processing agreement is published are not documented on the captured pages, so the chain our works agreement would rest on stays open. 1 2 3 9
The IT & HR Systems Admin
The technical-specifications page states GDPR adherence, ISO 27001 certification, encryption at rest and in transit, regular external penetration tests and CSA CCM v3.0 / SSAE-16 compliance, and an on-premise deployment option is offered. However, we found no public information on where learner data is hosted, the subprocessor chain behind video, email and support, or a data processing agreement, and the contracting entity's jurisdiction is not confirmed on the vendor's captured pages. 1 2 3 10
The Skeptic
GDPR adherence, ISO 27001 and encryption are claimed, and an on-premise deployment option is documented. But the captured pages state nothing about where learner records are hosted, which subprocessors handle them, or a published data processing agreement — a GDPR claim without a data location is a label, not a chain of custody. 2 3
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by active or registered users, what counts as an active user, what happens above the tier, which features (SSO, API, HR connectors, extra portals, e-commerce, custom domain, content library) cost extra, the free tier or trial and its limits, implementation and support fees, the self-hosted edition and its licence, minimum term and VAT treatment.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, portals or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price per user band and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, API, extra portals, HR connector, implementation) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (active or registered users, portals), the definition of an active user and overage stated, add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's cost or licence stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of learners, portals and features, with every add-on, implementation, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Onboarding Lead
The captured pages publish no prices, tiers or user bands; the buying route is a booked demo, a brochure download and an obligation-free consultation, with a free whitepaper. I cannot compute what a year for 1,400 learners would cost from public information. 1 5 13 7
The Compliance Officer
We found no public price, tier or per-user figure on any captured page; the documented path is a demo booking, brochure download and consultation appointment. No annual cost for our 900 staff could be computed from public information. 1 5 13
The Customer Education Lead
Across the captured pages we found no prices of any kind — no tiers, no per-user figures, no free tier or trial — and the buying path everywhere is a demo request, brochure download or consultation booking. Nothing on these pages lets me compute even a starting annual cost for an academy, let alone one that scales predictably with learners and portals. 1 5 13
The Works Council Member
No price, tier, licence term or user-band figure appears on any captured page; the buying path is a demo, a brochure download and a consultation appointment, with innovation packs described as available to all customers but never costed. A buyer cannot compute an annual cost from public information. 1 5 11 13
The IT & HR Systems Admin
The captured pages offer demo bookings, brochure downloads, free whitepapers and consultation appointments, and note that a release is available to all customers, but we found no public information on prices, tiers, what counts as a user, add-on costs, implementation and support fees, or minimum terms. For a 600-learner rollout I cannot compute an annual cost from public pages; the route to buy is a sales conversation. 1 5 11 13
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about imc Learning Suite
Is imc Learning Suite European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies imc Learning Suite as EU-Made.
Where does imc Learning Suite store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
Does imc Learning Suite have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to imc Learning Suite?
As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates iSpring LMS (iSpring Learn) (3/5), Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (3/5) and LearnWorlds (3/5) highest among the other 12 Learning Management (LMS) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: imc Learning Suite alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Hosting options. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 65 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 29 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 15 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 11 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 11 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (20)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage (Learning Suite product page) www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (German product page) www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (technical specifications, standards and API) www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Integrations page www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Features page (compliance training) www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Features page (onboarding) www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Features page (partner training) www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Security / trust page (SOC 2 report announcement) www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Legal notice www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Privacy policy www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Courses, learning paths & content standards — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Compliance training, recertification & audit trail — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 18 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 19 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 20 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap www.scheer-imc.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →