Learning Management (LMS)
Learnster
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Learnster AB · www.learnster.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Learnster at a glance
- Vendor
- Learnster AB
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Learnster 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Learnster, an LMS from Learnster AB of Stockholm, is strongest on integration and portability, where scores cluster at 6-7, and on sovereignty, where scores sit at 7: SAML and OpenID Connect sign-on, SCIM provisioning via Entra ID and Okta, and named HR connectors including Personio and Teamtailor are documented, as are data stored within the EU under AES-256 encryption with keys exclusively controlled by Learnster, a subprocessor list naming AWS, Flowmailer and ProtonMail in the EU/EEA plus Trembit in Ukraine under EU Standard Contractual Clauses, and ISO 27001:2022. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 2 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Learnster, an LMS from Learnster AB of Stockholm, is strongest on integration and portability, where scores cluster at 6-7, and on sovereignty, where scores sit at 7: SAML and OpenID Connect sign-on, SCIM provisioning via Entra ID and Okta, and named HR connectors including Personio and Teamtailor are documented, as are data stored within the EU under AES-256 encryption with keys exclusively controlled by Learnster, a subprocessor list naming AWS, Flowmailer and ProtonMail in the EU/EEA plus Trembit in Ukraine under EU Standard Contractual Clauses, and ISO 27001:2022. The floor is pricing transparency at 3: the only public figure is an example of €8 per user/month based on 100 users/month, add-ons are listed without prices, and buying runs through a 30-minute intro and a tailored proposal. Compliance training scores cluster at 4-5 and reporting and codetermination at 3-4, where we found no public information on recurring recertification, course versioning or record retention. Onboarding and academies scores span 4 to 6, split between documented HR-triggered onboarding from Personio or Teamtailor and undescribed academy features: branded tenants, external self-registration and course sales.
Speaks for it
- Integration and portability scores cluster at 6-7 on documented SAML and OpenID Connect single sign-on, SCIM provisioning via Microsoft Entra ID and Okta, and a long list of named HR connectors including Personio and Teamtailor
- Sovereignty scores sit at 7, on data stored within the EU under AES-256 encryption with keys exclusively controlled by Learnster, a published subprocessor list, ISO 27001:2022 and stated penetration testing
- HR-triggered onboarding is documented end to end: Personio and Teamtailor create the account instantly, send login details and start personalized training, with preboarding from contract signing
- Courses and content scores cluster at 6-7 on SCORM delivery from external authoring tools, structured learning paths, AI course drafting from PDFs and slides, a mobile app and stated WCAG 2.2 AA conformance
- Off-the-shelf content libraries from GoodHabitz, iHasco, LinkedIn Learning and Udemy are listed as integration partners
Held against it
- Pricing transparency scores sit at 3, with one public example of €8 per user/month based on 100 users/month, add-ons listed without prices, and a 30-minute intro before a tailored proposal
- Compliance training scores cluster at 4-5, with no public information on recurring recertification with certificate expiry, manager escalation, course versioning or policy attestations
- Reporting and codetermination scores cluster at 3-4, with no public information on scheduled or custom reports, retention and deletion of learner records, or works council material
- We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI support, question pools, offline mobile access, or the AI model and its data use
- We found no published data processing agreement on the captured pages, and no public information on exporting courses as SCORM or a self-hosted edition, so the cost of leaving is not visible
Best for
- You need onboarding that runs itself off HR events, with Personio or Teamtailor creating accounts, sending login details and starting role-based training automatically.
- You require EU data storage with vendor-controlled encryption keys and a published subprocessor list for European operations.
- Your IT stack depends on SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on and SCIM provisioning alongside many HR systems.
- You deliver SCORM courses built in external authoring tools and want AI help turning PDFs and slides into draft courses.
Avoid if
- You must show an auditor recurring recertification with certificate expiry or course versioning — we found no public information on either.
- You need a computable total cost before talking to sales, since only one example price is public and buying runs through a 30-minute intro and a tailored proposal.
- You run customer or partner academies that need separate branded tenants, external self-registration or course sales — we found no public information on these.
- You operate under German codetermination and need learner-data, retention and reporting detail ready for a works agreement before rollout.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Courses, learning paths & content standards | 3 of 5 |
| Compliance training, recertification & audit trail | 2 of 5 |
| Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies | 2.5 of 5 |
| Reporting, learner data & works council | 2 of 5 |
| Integrations, administration & portability | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 3.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.5 of 5 |
Courses, learning paths & content standards
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How learning is built and delivered: a course builder with video, documents, quizzes and assignments, import of SCORM 1.2 and 2004, xAPI, cmi5 and LTI packages, learning paths with prerequisites, assessments and question pools, certificates, blended learning with classroom or virtual sessions, a mobile app with offline access, multilingual courses and interface, accessibility (WCAG), AI-assisted authoring, and an off-the-shelf content library.
0 — Not a learning management system; courses cannot be delivered or tracked with it.
3 — Courses with video, documents and quizzes and a completion record; content standards, learning paths and mobile use are basic or not described.
5 — A course builder with quizzes and certificates, SCORM import, learning paths with prerequisites, scheduled instructor-led or virtual sessions, a responsive or native mobile app, and courses and interface in several languages.
8 — SCORM, xAPI and cmi5 or LTI documented, question pools and graded assignments, adaptive or branching paths, an offline mobile app, automatic translation of courses, accessibility conformance stated against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, and AI authoring with the model and data use explained.
10 — A content platform an L&D team runs on: every major standard with a published conformance statement, a learning record store or xAPI export, skills tagged to content, multilingual versions managed as one course, and course content exportable as packages another LMS imports.
The Onboarding Lead
The captured pages show structured learning paths and multi-step programs, AI quizzes, SCORM delivery, in-person session management, a Learnster U mobile app, authoring that turns PDFs and slides into draft courses, automatic course translation, and a stated WCAG 2.2 AA conformance. We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI support, question pools, offline mobile use, or which SCORM versions are supported, so the standards depth my e-learning team would ask about stays open. 1 2 6 7 8
The Compliance Officer
Delivery of SCORM content from external authoring tools, structured learning paths with AI-powered quizzes, recurring and in-person session management, a mobile app and stated WCAG 2.2 AA conformance are documented, alongside an AI course translator and a wizard that drafts courses from PDFs and slides. We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI support, question pools, offline mobile access, or the AI model and its data use. Good enough for delivering our annual training, but the standards question would need answering before we rely on it for external content. 1 2 6 7 8 10
The Customer Education Lead
Learning paths and multi-step programs, recurring and in-person sessions, SCORM delivery, a mobile app and AI-generated quizzes are all documented, with WCAG 2.2 AA conformance, an AI wizard that turns PDFs and slides into draft courses and an AI course translator on top. The off-the-shelf libraries from GoodHabitz, iHasco, LinkedIn Learning and Udemy are a real plus. We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI packages, question pools, an offline mobile app, or the model and data use behind the AI authoring tools. 1 2 6 7 8 10
The Works Council Member
Structured learning paths, recurring sessions, AI quizzes and multi-step programs are documented, SCORM content from external authoring tools is supported, and the Learnster U mobile app covers training on the go with notifications. WCAG 2.2 AA conformance and an AI course translator are stated, but we found no public information on xAPI or cmi5 support, offline mobile access, question pools, or which model and data use the AI authoring wizard rests on. That is a solid core platform with parts of the advanced standard set documented and the rest undescribed. 1 2 6 7 8 10
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Microlearning and multi-step learning programs, structured learning paths, AI quizzes and an AI wizard that turns PDFs and slides into draft courses, plus SCORM delivery of externally authored content, recurring and physical sessions, a Learnster U mobile app, automatic course translation, WCAG 2.2 AA and content-library partners cover most of what my L&D team needs. We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI support, offline mobile access, question pools, or exporting our own courses as SCORM packages, which keeps it below the highest level. 1 2 6 7 8 10
The Skeptic
Courses are built with an AI content wizard that turns PDFs and slides into drafts, AI-powered quizzes, structured learning paths, recurring and in-person session management, SCORM delivery of external authoring-tool content, and a native mobile app, with WCAG 2.2 AA conformance and AI course translation stated. We found no public information on xAPI, cmi5 or LTI support, question pools, offline mobile access, or the AI model and its data use, which keeps this below the top level. 1 2 6 7 8
Compliance training, recertification & audit trail
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether mandatory training can be run and proven: automatic assignment by role, department, location or legal entity, due dates with reminders and escalation to the manager, recurring recertification (annual data protection, IT security, anti-money-laundering, occupational safety instruction), attestations and acknowledgements of policies, attendance records for classroom sessions, course versioning with who completed which version, expiry of certificates, and audit-ready reports and exports for regulators or auditors.
0 — No way to assign mandatory training or record completion.
3 — Courses can be assigned with a due date and completions reported; recertification, escalation and audit evidence are basic or not described.
5 — Rule-based assignment by group or attribute, due dates with automatic reminders, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, policy acknowledgements, attendance for live sessions, and completion reports exportable for an audit.
8 — Escalation to managers, course versioning with the completed version stored per learner, an unalterable audit trail, e-signatures or attestations with timestamp, ready-made compliance dashboards by entity and location, and named regimes supported (occupational safety instruction, GxP or 21 CFR Part 11, FINMA or BaFin requirements).
10 — Compliance evidence that holds in an inspection: validated or certified for a named regulated use, every assignment, reminder, attempt and completion traceable to a timestamped record, retention of training records configurable per regulation, and the audit trail exportable in a documented format.
The Onboarding Lead
Distribution of compliance training by role, team, location or responsibility is documented, alongside reminders, recurring sessions, in-person training management and "certification tracking with audit-ready history". We found no public information on recurring recertification with certificate expiry, escalation to managers, policy attestations, course versioning, or named regimes such as occupational safety instruction — exactly the mechanics I must show an auditor for our plants. 1 2 4 7
The Compliance Officer
Compliance training can be distributed by role, team, location or responsibility, reminders and notifications are documented, and certification tracking is described with an audit-ready history. We found no public information on escalation to managers, recurring recertification with certificate expiry, course versioning that records who completed which version, policy attestations with timestamps, or support for named regimes such as BaFin requirements — the versioning gap is exactly what made our last audit take a week. 2 4 7
The Customer Education Lead
Distributing compliance training by role, team, location or responsibility is documented, together with certification tracking described as audit-ready, notifications and reminders, and structured registration for in-person training, and CSV/XLSX export of user data gives me something to hand an auditor. We found no public information on recurring recertification with certificate expiry — the piece our partner programme cannot work without — nor on policy attestations, manager escalation, course versioning or named regulated regimes. 1 2 4 6 7
The Works Council Member
Training can be distributed by role, team, location or responsibility with messages, notifications and reminders, certification tracking with an audit-ready history is stated, and in-person course management with structured registration exists. We found no public information on recurring recertification with certificate expiry, escalation to managers, course versioning, attestations, or the format of the audit export — precisely what an occupational safety inspection or a works agreement would demand from us. 1 2 4 7 12
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Compliance training can be distributed by role, team, location or responsibility, with notifications and reminders, certification tracking with audit-ready history, and structured registration for in-person sessions. We found no public information on recurring recertification with certificate expiry, escalation to managers, course versioning, policy attestations, or support for named regulated regimes, so I cannot vouch for it in an inspection on the captured pages alone. 1 2 4 7 10
The Skeptic
Compliance training is distributed by role, team, location or responsibility, with notifications and reminders, certification tracking described as audit-ready history, structured registration for in-person training, and CSV/XLSX export of user data and learning records. We found no public information on recurring recertification with certificate expiry, escalation to managers, policy attestations, course versioning, or support for named regimes such as occupational safety instruction. 1 2 4 6 7
Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Which audiences the product serves and how much runs without an administrator: onboarding journeys enrolled automatically from the HR system on the start date, manager and buddy tasks, frontline staff without a company email, multiple branded portals or tenants for customers, partners, franchisees or members, self-registration and SSO for external users, selling courses with checkout, subscriptions and coupons, partner certification programmes, and groups, branches and delegated administration.
0 — Serves no organisational audience; a personal course viewer only.
3 — Users can be grouped and enrolled by hand; automated onboarding and external audiences are basic or not described.
5 — Onboarding paths assigned automatically on creation of the user, groups or branches with their own administrators, a branded portal for external learners with self-registration, and either course sales with payment or several portals for different audiences.
8 — Onboarding triggered by HR-system events with manager tasks and checklists, login for frontline staff without email (username, QR code or kiosk), several branded tenants with separate content, reporting and administrators, course sales with subscriptions, bundles and invoices, and partner certification with renewal.
10 — Internal and external learning run from one platform at scale: unlimited tenants with their own domains and data separation stated, e-commerce with VAT handling and accounting integration, onboarding journeys that span HR, IT and the manager, and every audience reported on separately and together.
The Onboarding Lead
HR-triggered onboarding is the strongest evidence here: with Personio and Teamtailor, a Learnster account is created instantly, login details are sent and personalized training begins right away, preboarding can roll out after contract signing, and managers get visibility into onboarding progress; customer and partner training is described as supported. We found no public information on manager or buddy task checklists, login for shift workers without a company email address, several branded tenants with separate administration, or selling courses — and the no-email question decides adoption at my sites. 2 3 5 12 13
The Compliance Officer
Onboarding is documented as running on its own: the Personio and Teamtailor integrations create accounts instantly, send login details and start training, with preboarding triggered at contract signing and manager visibility into progress, and customer and partner education is supported through structured journeys. We found no public information on separate branded portals or tenants, self-registration for external learners, manager tasks and checklists, or selling courses with payment. 3 5 12 13
The Customer Education Lead
Automated onboarding is the strongest story: a Personio or Teamtailor event creates the account, sends login details and starts role-based training, managers see onboarding progress, and branding follows our logo and colours. Customer education and partner training are named as supported use cases with progress insights for customer training managers, and flexible roles allow delegated administration. We found no public information on several branded portals per audience, self-registration for external learners, selling courses with checkout or invoicing, or partner certification with renewal — exactly the ground I need covered. 2 3 5 7 12 13
The Works Council Member
Onboarding runs automatically off HR events — the Teamtailor integration sends knowledge tests at the job offer stage, starts preboarding at contract signing, creates the account instantly and begins personalized training — and customer and partner education is supported with progress insights for training managers. Custom branding and flexible delegated roles are documented. We found no public information on self-registration or separate branded tenants for external audiences, frontline login without a company email, or selling courses with payment. 2 3 5 7 12 13
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Onboarding runs hands-off from the HR side: Personio and Teamtailor create the account instantly, send login details and start role-based training, with preboarding triggered from recruitment stages and manager visibility into progress, and delegated administration through flexible roles. Customer and partner education is supported with custom branding, but we found no public information on separate branded tenants, external self-registration, course sales, or login for frontline staff without a company email. 2 3 5 7 12 13
The Skeptic
Onboarding is genuinely automated from HR events: the Personio and Teamtailor connectors create the account instantly, send login details and start personalized training, with preboarding from the contract-signing stage, plus delegated administration through flexible and custom roles, and customer and partner education is documented with progress insights. We found no public information on multiple branded tenants with separate content and reporting, self-registration for external learners, frontline login without email, or selling courses with payment. 2 3 5 7 12 13
Reporting, learner data & works council
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the system shows about learning and about each learner, and how far the customer can limit it: dashboards and reports for L&D, managers and auditors, custom and scheduled reports, which learner data is recorded (completions, scores, time spent, logins), role-based visibility so managers see only their team, aggregated or pseudonymised reports, the option to switch off time tracking or scoring, retention and deletion rules, learner access to their own data, and material for a works agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG or the vendor's description of codetermination. Where the data is processed is scored under sovereignty.
0 — No reports, or individual learner activity shown to every administrator with no settings at all.
3 — Completion and progress reports exist and a privacy policy covers the product; what is recorded per learner and who sees it are basic or not described.
5 — Dashboards and custom reports with scheduled delivery, roles that restrict managers to their own team, the learner data recorded described, retention and deletion of learner records configurable, and a data processing agreement offered.
8 — Granular visibility per role and organisational unit, aggregated or pseudonymised reports for analytics, tracking of time spent or scores that can be switched off, automatic deletion after a set period, a learner data export, and a works council or codetermination guide, template works agreement or data protection impact assessment supplied.
10 — Learner data under the customer's full control and documented as such: every recorded field and every report listed with who can see it, privacy settings per country or entity, an audit log of who viewed learner data, and the codetermination position confirmed by a named works council, law firm or certification.
The Onboarding Lead
Tracking across individuals, teams and departments, insights for learning leaders, manager visibility, customer-training progress views, custom permission roles and support for subject access requests are described. We found no public information on scheduled or custom report delivery, which learner data fields are recorded, configurable retention and deletion, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, or material for a works agreement under German codetermination — without that I cannot take this to my works council. 2 3 5 7 8 12
The Compliance Officer
Progress, engagement and completion tracking across individuals, teams and departments, tailored permission roles, visibility for team managers into learning results, and CSV/XLSX export are documented, and support for subject access requests is stated. We found no public information on scheduled report delivery, configurable retention and deletion of learner records, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, or any works council material — for a bank under German codetermination, that gap would need closing with a works agreement before rollout. 3 5 6 7 8
The Customer Education Lead
Insights across individuals, teams and departments, manager visibility into onboarding progress and results, and custom roles with tailored permission structures are documented, and the GDPR and security page describes GDPR processing, logical data segregation and subject access requests. We found no public information on scheduled or custom reports, configurable retention and deletion, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, a published data processing agreement, or any works council and codetermination material a Dutch or German buyer would ask for. 2 3 5 6 7 8 12
The Works Council Member
The pages document tracking and reporting across individuals, teams and departments, manager visibility into onboarding progress and learning results, and follow-up on course completion and scores — a system that logs individual results is performance monitoring and would need our agreement under §87(1) no. 6 BetrVG before it goes live here. Custom roles with tailored permission structures exist and subject access requests are supported. We found no public information on which learner data fields are recorded, whether scoring or time tracking can be switched off, retention and deletion of learner records, or any works council or codetermination material — a works agreement would have to start from a questionnaire to the vendor. 2 3 5 7 8 12
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Tracking across individuals, teams and departments, manager visibility into onboarding and results, tailored permission roles, GDPR processing and support for subject access requests are all stated. We found no public information on custom or scheduled reports, configurable retention and deletion of learner records, aggregated or pseudonymised reporting, or any works council or codetermination material, which is exactly what I would need before signing a works agreement. 2 3 5 7 8 12
The Skeptic
Tracking across individuals, teams and departments, manager visibility into onboarding progress and results, tailored permission roles, CSV/XLSX export of learning records, a privacy policy and support for data access requests are documented. We found no public information on custom or scheduled reports, which learner fields are recorded and who can see each, retention and deletion rules, or any works council or codetermination material. 2 3 5 6 7 8 9
Integrations, administration & portability
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the system fits the company and what leaving would cost: single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect) and user provisioning (SCIM) from Entra ID, Google or Okta, sync with HR systems (Personio, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday), Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations, a documented REST API and webhooks, CRM and e-commerce connectors for academies, export of users, completions and certificates, export of courses as SCORM, open-source code, and a self-hosted or on-premise edition.
0 — No integrations and no export; users and records exist only inside the product.
3 — CSV import of users and an export of reports; SSO, an API and HR-system sync are basic or not described.
5 — SAML or OpenID Connect single sign-on, a documented REST API, a connector or documented sync for at least one named HR system, Microsoft Teams or video conferencing integration, and export of users, completions and certificates.
8 — SCIM provisioning, prebuilt connectors for several named HR, CRM and identity systems, webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox or test instance, courses exportable as SCORM, and a self-hosted or private-cloud edition with its own documentation.
10 — The customer can run, extend and leave the platform freely: open-source code under a named licence that runs fully self-hosted with feature parity stated, a complete export of users, history, certificates and content in open formats, and the return and deletion of all data on termination documented.
The Onboarding Lead
The breadth fits my landscape: SAML and OpenID Connect single sign-on, SCIM provisioning through Entra ID and Okta, around twenty named HR systems including Personio with documented automated provisioning, Teams, Slack, Meet and Zoom, open APIs, file-based exchange and CSV/XLSX user import-export. We found no public information on webhooks, a public API reference, a sandbox, export of completions and certificates, SCORM export of courses, or a self-hosted edition — so what leaving would cost stays unclear. 6 12 13
The Compliance Officer
SAML and OpenID Connect single sign-on, provisioning via Microsoft Entra ID, Okta and SCIM, a long list of named HR connectors including Personio, Teamtailor, BambooHR and HiBob, open APIs, and Microsoft Teams, Slack and video conferencing integrations are documented. We found no public information on webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, export of courses as SCORM, or a self-hosted or private-cloud edition, so what leaving the platform would cost cannot be judged from public pages. 2 6 12 13
The Customer Education Lead
Single sign-on via SAML, OpenID Connect, Entra ID and Okta with automated provisioning including SCIM, connectors for a long list of named HR systems such as Personio, Teamtailor and BambooHR, Teams, Slack and video integrations, open APIs, and CSV/XLSX user import and export are all documented — that covers most of our internal plumbing. We found no public information on webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox, exporting courses as SCORM, a self-hosted edition, or a CRM connector so completions reach the sales system. 6 7 12 13
The Works Council Member
SAML, OpenID Connect and provisioning via Microsoft Entra ID and Okta are documented, alongside a long list of named HR connectors including Personio and Teamtailor, Teams, Meet, Zoom and Slack integrations, open APIs, and CSV/XLSX import and export of user data. We found no public information on webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox, export of completions and certificates, course export as SCORM, or any self-hosted edition — the exit question a council must ask before signing stays open. 6 7 12 13
The IT & HR Systems Admin
This is close to my ideal stack: SAML and OpenID Connect single sign-on, Microsoft Entra ID SSO and provisioning with SCIM among the user-management connectors, a Personio connector that syncs employee data and automates provisioning and distribution of learning, Teams and Slack connectors, open APIs, and CSV/XLSX import and export. We found no public information on webhooks, a public API reference with rate limits, a sandbox, exporting completions and certificates, exporting courses as SCORM on exit, or a self-hosted edition, which is what holds it back. 2 6 7 12 13
The Skeptic
Single sign-on via SAML and OpenID Connect, provisioning through Microsoft Entra ID, Okta and SCIM, a long list of named HR connectors, Microsoft Teams and Slack connectors, open APIs and file-based CSV/PAXML exchange are documented. We found no public information on a public API reference with rate limits, webhooks, a sandbox, exporting courses as SCORM, or a self-hosted edition — so what leaving would cost is not yet visible. 6 12 13
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where learner data (names, completions, scores, certificates) is stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, video streaming, email, AI features, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; learner records are employee data, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. A self-hosted or open-source edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (video, email, AI features, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated — or a self-hosted edition documented that keeps every learner record on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, or a self-hosted open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Onboarding Lead
The vendor's own pages state data is stored within the EU with encryption keys exclusively controlled by Learnster, the contracting entity is Learnster AB in Stockholm, a subprocessor list names AWS, Flowmailer and ProtonMail in the EU/EEA and Trembit in Ukraine under standard contractual clauses, and ISO 27001:2022 certification is stated. We found no public information on a published data processing agreement, the certification's scope, or the ownership chain, which keeps this a step short of fully evidenced end to end. 7 8 11 12
The Compliance Officer
Learnster AB in Stockholm is the contracting entity, data is stated to be stored in the EU on Amazon Web Services with AES-256 encryption and keys controlled by Learnster, and the published subprocessor list names locations and transfer mechanisms — all EU/EEA except a Ukrainian development firm engaged under EU standard contractual clauses. ISO 27001:2022, GDPR-aligned processing, logical data segregation and penetration testing are stated; we found no public information on a published data processing agreement, which we would require before any go-live. 7 8 11 12 13
The Customer Education Lead
Learnster AB is the contracting entity in Stockholm, data is stored within the EU with encryption keys controlled by the vendor, and a published subprocessor list names AWS in the EU/EEA for hosting, Flowmailer and ProtonMail in the EU/EEA, and Trembit in Ukraine under EU Standard Contractual Clauses. ISO 27001:2022 accreditation and penetration testing are stated, and the vendor states it does not rely on non-European sub-processors under the Privacy Shield framework. We found no public information on a published data processing agreement or a self-hosted edition. 7 8 11 12 13
The Works Council Member
The contracting entity is Learnster AB of Stockholm, the security pages state that data is stored within the EU under AES-256 encryption with keys controlled by Learnster, and a published subprocessor list names AWS in the EU/EEA for hosting, Flowmailer and ProtonMail in the EU/EEA, and Trembit in Ukraine for development under EU Standard Contractual Clauses. ISO 27001:2022 certification is stated. We found no published data processing agreement on the captured pages, which keeps this just short of the full standard. 7 8 11 12 13
The IT & HR Systems Admin
Learnster AB at Malmskillnadsgatan in Stockholm is the contracting entity, data is stored within the EU with AES-256 encryption and keys controlled by the vendor, and a published subprocessor list names AWS in the EU/EEA for hosting, Flowmailer and ProtonMail in the EU/EEA for email, and a Ukrainian development firm under EU Standard Contractual Clauses, with ISO 27001:2022 accredited and successful penetration testing stated. We found no public information on a published data processing agreement or on the subprocessors behind the AI features, so I stop just short of the top. 8 9 11 12 13
The Skeptic
The vendor states EU storage with AES-256 encryption and keys held exclusively by Learnster, the contracting entity is Learnster AB in Stockholm, and the published subprocessor list names AWS, Flowmailer and ProtonMail in the EU/EEA plus a Ukrainian development firm under EU standard contractual clauses, alongside ISO 27001:2022 and penetration testing. We found no public information on a published data processing agreement or the scope of the certification, which stands between this and the top level. 8 11 12 13
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per tier by active or registered users, what counts as an active user, what happens above the tier, which features (SSO, API, HR connectors, extra portals, e-commerce, custom domain, content library) cost extra, the free tier or trial and its limits, implementation and support fees, the self-hosted edition and its licence, minimum term and VAT treatment.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with users, portals or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price per user band and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, API, extra portals, HR connector, implementation) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (active or registered users, portals), the definition of an active user and overage stated, add-ons priced, the self-hosted edition's cost or licence stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given number of learners, portals and features, with every add-on, implementation, support and overage fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Onboarding Lead
The pricing page shows one example price of €8 per user/month based on 100 users/month, lists always-included modules and names add-ons such as the AI Content Creation Wizard and the Teams and Slack connectors, but we found no public information on tiers, the scaling rule with user counts, add-on prices, or term and VAT treatment. The stated route to a real figure is a 30-minute intro yielding a tailored proposal, so I cannot compute our annual cost for 1,400 people from the captured pages. 7
The Compliance Officer
A single example figure is published — €8 per user/month (based on 100 users/month) — with add-ons such as the AI content wizard, AI course translator, custom roles and the Teams and Slack connectors listed but carrying no prices, and purchasing routed through a 30-minute intro and a tailored proposal. We found no public information on tiered pricing, what counts as an active user, minimum term, VAT treatment or implementation fees, so the real annual cost for 900 staff is not computable from public pages. 7
The Customer Education Lead
The pricing page gives one example — €8 per user/month (based on 100 users/month) — names what is always included, and lists add-ons such as the AI Content Creation Wizard, AI Course Translator, Custom Roles, the Teams and Slack connectors and Physical Course Management, with a 30-minute intro producing a tailored proposal. We found no public information on tier prices, how cost scales with users or portals, what counts as an active user, add-on prices, implementation and support fees, minimum term or VAT treatment, so I cannot estimate what an academy for 3,000 customers and 120 partners would cost. 7
The Works Council Member
One example price is public — €8 per user/month based on 100 users/month — next to add-ons listed without prices and a tailored proposal after a 30-minute intro. With no published tiers, scaling rule, definition of what counts as a user, or priced add-ons, we could not compute an annual cost for 2,000 employees from the public pages alone. 7
The IT & HR Systems Admin
The only public figure is a price example of €8 per user/month (based on 100 users/month), alongside named add-ons such as the Teams and Slack connectors and the AI tools whose prices are not shown. Tiers, the scaling rule, what counts as an active user, implementation and support fees all arrive as a tailored proposal after a 30-minute intro, so I cannot compute a 600-seat annual cost from public pages. 7
The Skeptic
The only public figure is a price example of €8 per user/month based on 100 users/month, with named add-ons such as the AI content creation wizard, AI course translator, custom roles and the Teams and Slack connectors left unpriced, and buying routed through a 30-minute intro that yields a tailored proposal. We found no public information on tiers, how cost scales beyond the example, what counts as an active user, minimum terms or VAT treatment. 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Learnster
Is Learnster European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Learnster as EU-Made.
Where does Learnster store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
Does Learnster have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Learnster?
As of 2 Nov 2026, the panel rates iSpring LMS (iSpring Learn) (3/5), Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (3/5) and LearnWorlds (3/5) highest among the other 12 Learning Management (LMS) products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Zensai Learn365 (formerly LMS365) (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Learnster alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity, Hosting location. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 31 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 7 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (13)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (onboarding) www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Features page (compliance training) www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Features page (customer education) www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Integrations page www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Pricing page www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Security / trust page (GDPR and security) www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Privacy policy www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Onboarding, extended enterprise & academies — found from sitemap www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Reporting, learner data & works council — found from sitemap www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Integrations, administration & portability — found from sitemap www.learnster.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →