AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers
Jamie
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by wespond UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · www.meetjamie.ai
Compare with Otter.ai → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Jamie at a glance
- Vendor
- wespond UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention the EU, Switzerland and United Kingdom source, captured 5 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 5 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Jamie 3.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Jamie is a botless AI meeting assistant from wespond UG (haftungsbeschränkt) of Rösrath, Germany, capturing online and in-person meetings from a Mac, Windows or iPhone app. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 5 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 6 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Jamie is a botless AI meeting assistant from wespond UG (haftungsbeschränkt) of Rösrath, Germany, capturing online and in-person meetings from a Mac, Windows or iPhone app. Its strongest criterion is sovereignty, which scores 8 across the bench: a German contracting entity, EU-region storage of transcripts and summaries, a published data processing agreement, and a subprocessor list placing speech recognition (Soniox) and AI inference (Modal) in the EU — while the judges also note the chain is not European end to end, as both operators are US companies and identity, marketing and paywall subprocessors sit in the United States. Integrations and workflow also scores 7 across the bench on native CRM links — HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics 365, Attio, Affinity, DealCloud — plus a documented REST API, webhooks and an MCP server. The weakest are consent and codetermination (5 to 6), where judges found no public information on a participant opt-out and informing participants rests on the customer, and pricing transparency (5 to 7): four tiers are public, but Enterprise is Custom billed annually and what counts as a seat is not stated.
Speaks for it
- Botless capture runs on your own device across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and any other platform, plus in-person meetings from laptop or phone
- Audio is streamed for transcription and never stored, and no model training on customer data is stated on every plan
- A published data processing agreement and a subprocessor list name Soniox for speech recognition and Modal for AI inference, both processing in the EU
- Native integrations cover HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics 365, Attio, Affinity and DealCloud, alongside a documented REST API with webhooks and an MCP server
- The Enterprise plan adds SAML SSO, SCIM, custom retention policies, an IP allowlist and immutable audit logs with CSV export
Held against it
- Informing participants remains your responsibility, and the meeting chat notice is in beta and off by default
- We found no public information on a participant opt-out or a way for participants to stop a recording
- SAML SSO, SCIM, audit logs, custom retention and the IP allowlist are Enterprise-only, and Enterprise is Custom billed annually
- We found no public information on what counts as a seat, on storage limits or on overage handling
- The speech recognition and AI inference providers are US companies, and WorkOS, Loops and Superwall are listed with United States processing locations
Best for
- You take meetings across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and in person and do not want a bot joining the call
- You need meeting content stored and processed within the EEA, Switzerland and the UK, as the captured pages state, with audio deleted after transcription
- Your team works in HubSpot, Salesforce or Dynamics 365 and wants summaries and action items synced automatically
- You can negotiate Enterprise terms, where SAML SSO, SCIM, audit logs and custom retention are listed
Avoid if
- You must budget governance in advance — audit logs, custom retention, SAML SSO and SCIM exist only on the Enterprise plan, which is Custom billed annually
- You are accountable for participant consent — the pages place informing participants and the legal basis on you as controller, and Speaker Memory, when enabled, stores biometric voiceprints
- You require European operators throughout the chain — the speech and AI providers are US companies, and WorkOS, Loops and Superwall are listed with United States locations
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Recording, transcription & languages | 3.5 of 5 |
| Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge | 3.5 of 5 |
| Integrations, API & workflow | 3.5 of 5 |
| Consent, participant rights & works council | 3 of 5 |
| Retention, AI training & administration | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 4 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Recording, transcription & languages
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the conversation gets in and how faithfully it is written down: a bot that joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex, botless capture from a desktop or mobile app, in-person meetings and phone calls, file upload, live transcription, speaker identification and names, the languages supported with German stated, meetings that switch language, custom vocabulary for names and jargon, timestamps linked to the recording, and editing of the transcript.
0 — Does not record or transcribe meetings; a note template or agenda tool without capture.
3 — A bot that joins one or two conferencing tools and produces a transcript; languages, speaker names, in-person capture and accuracy are basic or not described.
5 — A bot for Zoom, Teams and Google Meet, a desktop or mobile app for in-person meetings, file upload, speaker identification, German among the supported languages, timestamps linked to the recording, and an editable transcript.
8 — Botless capture documented next to the bot, Webex and phone or dialer calls, live transcription, mixed-language meetings handled, custom vocabulary, speaker names learned across meetings, and the transcription engine or its accuracy per language stated.
10 — Capture a regulated team relies on: every channel above with accuracy published per language and method, dialects and specialist vocabulary documented, on-device or customer-hosted transcription as an option, and how errors are corrected and fed back stated.
The Management Consultant
Botless capture from a desktop or phone app that works across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and any other platform, including in-person meetings, is exactly the workshop capture I need, with speaker names learned across meetings, custom vocabulary of 50 to 250 terms and a fully editable word-for-word transcript, and the speech recognition provider named as a subprocessor. I found no public information on live transcription, timestamps linked to the recording, accuracy per language, or German named specifically among the 99+ languages. 1 13 14 15 5 12
The Sales Team Lead
Botless capture on Mac, Windows and iPhone covers Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and any other platform, plus in-person meetings, with a word-for-word transcript organized by speaker, speaker names remembered across meetings and custom vocabulary up to 250 terms. Transcription runs through a named speech-recognition provider with customer data kept in the EU. We found no public information on timestamps tied to the recording, live transcription, phone or Webex capture, file upload or accuracy per language, and German is not named individually beyond the 99+ languages claim. 1 5 12 13 14 15
The Works Council Chair
Capture is botless from a Mac, Windows or iPhone app across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and any other online platform, plus in-person meetings, with notes and transcripts in 99+ languages, custom vocabulary, speaker names remembered across meetings via optional Speaker Memory, and an editable word-for-word transcript; the speech-recognition provider (Soniox) appears in the subprocessor list as processing in the EU. We found no public information on live transcription during the meeting, phone or dialer calls, mixed-language meetings, timestamps linked to the recording, or accuracy figures per language, and German is not named separately among the 99+ languages. 1 2 5 12 13 14 15
The Data Protection Officer
Botless capture on the customer's own device across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and any other platform, in person from laptop or phone, with speaker identification, optional speaker memory across meetings and custom vocabulary per plan is the capture model I prefer to a bot. We found no public information on timestamps tied to the recording, a live transcript during the meeting, mixed-language handling or accuracy per language, and German is not separately named among the 99+ languages. 1 5 13 14 15
The IT Lead
Botless capture running on the device covers Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and any other online platform, plus in-person meetings from laptop or phone, with custom vocabulary limits per plan and speaker names learned across meetings once Speaker Memory is on. I found no public information on file upload, live transcription during the meeting, mixed-language meetings, or accuracy per language; German is not named, only a claim of 99+ languages. The transcript is word-for-word and organized by speaker, and content is editable. 1 13 14 15 5
The Skeptic
Capture is botless on the user's own device across Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and any other platform, with in-person recording from laptop and phone, speaker identification, optional speaker memory that names speakers in later meetings, and custom vocabulary by plan; the pages also state that audio is streamed for transcription and never stored. What holds it back is that accuracy per language is undocumented, German is never named among the "99+ languages", and we found no public information on live transcription, timestamps, phone or dialer calls, or file upload. 1 13 14 5 15
Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the tool makes of the transcript: summaries and minutes by meeting type with editable templates, decisions and action items with owners and due dates, summaries in the meeting's language or a chosen one, follow-up emails, clips and highlights, search across all meetings, questions answered over the archive with citations back to the transcript passage, shared team folders or channels, and the minutes exported to Word, PDF or a wiki.
0 — No summaries of any kind; only the raw transcript or recording.
3 — One generic summary per meeting; templates, action items, search across meetings and citations are basic or not described.
5 — Summaries with templates per meeting type, action items and decisions extracted, the summary language selectable with German available, search across meetings, questions answered over one or several meetings, and sharing or export of the minutes.
8 — Custom templates per team, action items with owners pushed to task tools, answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, topic or keyword tracking across meetings, team libraries with permissions, and the AI models used for summaries named.
10 — Meeting knowledge a company can audit: every generated statement traceable to its source passage, hallucination handling and human review documented, summary quality by language stated, and the archive queryable through an API or MCP server with the same permissions as in the app.
The Management Consultant
Minutes by meeting type are genuinely there: custom templates that auto-apply based on meeting content and calendar titles, action items with assignees that can be pushed to Asana, an executive summary plus topic structure, search across meetings, a chat over the archive and export to Notion, OneNote and Google Docs. I found no public information on answers citing the transcript passage they rest on, a selectable summary language with German, decisions and due dates as distinct fields, or the AI models used for summaries being named. 15 16 18 4 5
The Sales Team Lead
Summaries come as an executive summary plus a topic-structured full summary, templates can be built per meeting type and auto-applied by classification, and action items carry assignees and sync to Asana automatically — while workflows extend this to updating the CRM and drafting follow-ups, which is exactly the loop I want closed after every discovery call. Search across all meetings and asking questions over them are documented. We found no public information on answers citing the transcript passage they rest on, on the summary models being named, on choosing the summary language, or on decisions being extracted separately from tasks. 1 4 5 15 16 18
The Works Council Chair
Every meeting yields an executive and full summary by topic, templates with user-defined sections that auto-apply by meeting type and can be shared workspace-wide, action items with assignees pushed to Asana, search across meetings, an Ask Jamie chat plus ChatGPT, Claude and MCP connectors over the archive, and export to Notion, Google Docs and OneNote. We found no public information on answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, choosing the summary language, decisions extraction, or hallucination handling and review. 2 4 7 15 16 18
The Data Protection Officer
Structured summaries with an executive and a full-by-topic section, custom templates that auto-apply by meeting type and can be shared workspace-wide, action items with assignees pushed to Asana, and search across the archive with an ask-Jamie chat plus ChatGPT, Claude and MCP access. Answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on are not documented, the summary language is not documented as selectable, and the language model behind the summaries is not named — only the EU inference platform that runs it. 4 15 16 18
The IT Lead
Summaries come as an executive summary plus a topic-structured full summary, templates auto-apply by meeting type and can be shared across the workspace on Team and Enterprise, tasks carry assignees and push to Asana, and Ask Jamie plus ChatGPT and Claude connectors answer questions over a searchable archive. We found no public information on answers citing the transcript passage they rest on, the AI models behind the summaries, or Word and PDF export; export paths shown are Notion, OneNote and Google Docs. 15 16 4 18 2
The Skeptic
Summaries come structured with an executive and full-by-topic breakdown, editable templates that auto-apply to the meeting type, tasks with assignees that can be pushed to Asana, search across meetings, and an "Ask Jamie" chat over the archive. My standing question is unanswered: the model that writes the summary is never named, nothing documents that a generated statement links back to the transcript passage it rests on, and choosing the summary's output language is not described. 15 16 18 4
Integrations, API & workflow
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the notes reach the place where work happens: calendar connection with rules for which meetings are recorded, CRM fields filled from the call (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Microsoft Dynamics), project and task tools, Slack and Microsoft Teams channels, Notion, Confluence and SharePoint, Zapier, Make or n8n, a documented REST API and webhooks, an MCP server for AI assistants, and browser extensions and native apps.
0 — No integrations and no export; the notes stay in the app.
3 — A calendar connection and an email or Slack summary; CRM, API and task tools are basic or not described.
5 — Google and Microsoft calendars, a native CRM integration (HubSpot or Salesforce), Slack or Teams, a task or wiki tool, Zapier or Make, and a documented API or webhooks.
8 — CRM field mapping per meeting type, several CRMs including Microsoft Dynamics or Pipedrive, a full REST API with webhooks and reference documentation, an MCP server, SharePoint or Confluence export, and recording rules per calendar or meeting type.
10 — An integration layer a company builds on: every object reachable by API with rate limits and versioning stated, granular OAuth scopes, data residency kept across integrations, and the integrations administered centrally with logs.
The Management Consultant
An unusually modern integration layer: HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics 365, Attio, Affinity and DealCloud as CRMs, Asana and Notion for tasks and knowledge, a documented REST API with rate limits and a request builder, webhooks, and an MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor, with per-calendar recording settings. I found no public information on Slack or Microsoft Teams channel posting, Zapier, Make or n8n, or SharePoint and Confluence export. 17 18 5 1 22
The Sales Team Lead
HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics 365, Attio, Affinity and DealCloud are native CRM destinations, Asana takes the tasks, Notion, OneNote and Google Docs take the minutes, and auto-sync sends every new meeting without anyone remembering to. A documented REST API with webhooks, rate limits, a request builder and an MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Cursor is available from the Pro plan. We found no public information on Slack or Teams channel delivery, Zapier, Make or n8n, SharePoint or Confluence export, or per-meeting-type CRM field mapping. 5 17 18
The Works Council Chair
Google and Microsoft calendars drive detection, six CRMs are integrated including HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics 365, Attio, Affinity and DealCloud, and there is a documented REST API (meetings, tasks, tags) with rate limits, webhooks, an MCP server, a ChatGPT plugin and content-type choices per integration, with calendar recording settings auditable. We found no public information on Slack, Zapier, Make or n8n, SharePoint or Confluence export, or browser extensions. 1 4 5 10 17 18 22
The Data Protection Officer
Native CRM integrations across HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics 365, Attio, Affinity and DealCloud, export to Notion, OneNote and Google Docs, a documented REST API with rate limits and workspace and personal keys, webhooks, and an MCP server from the Pro plan. We found no public information on Slack or Teams channels, Zapier, Make or n8n, or CRM field mapping per meeting type. 4 5 17 18
The IT Lead
Google and Microsoft calendars drive meeting detection and per-calendar recording settings, native integrations include HubSpot, Salesforce and Dynamics 365, and there is a documented REST API with webhooks and rate limits plus an MCP server and a Copilot Studio connection. For my Microsoft shop I found no public information on SharePoint, Confluence, Slack or Teams channel delivery, or on Zapier and Make; CRM field mapping per meeting type is also not described. 18 17 10 22 5
The Skeptic
A documented REST API with reference material, stated rate limits, two key types, webhooks and a request builder, an MCP server, post-meeting workflows that update the CRM, and native integrations spanning HubSpot, Salesforce, Dynamics 365, Attio, Affinity, DealCloud, Notion, OneNote, Google Docs and Asana. We found no public information on Slack or Teams channel delivery, Zapier, Make or n8n, or SharePoint and Confluence export, and authentication is a static API key rather than scoped OAuth — with an API base URL that still says beta. 17 18 1 5 22
Consent, participant rights & works council
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether every person in the meeting knows and can decide, and whether the tool can be introduced under German co-determination: a recording notice to all participants including external guests, consent or opt-out before the recording starts, a visible bot or a stated notice for botless capture, rules for when the assistant joins automatically, stopping and deleting a recording on request, per-person analytics (talk time, sentiment, engagement scores) off by default or switchable per organisation, material or a template for a works agreement (Betriebsvereinbarung, § 87 (1) no. 6 BetrVG), and support for a data protection impact assessment.
0 — Built to record people without their knowledge, or sells covert recording or individual performance scoring as a feature.
3 — A general privacy statement and a bot that appears in the participant list; notices to guests, opt-out, per-person analytics and works councils are basic or not described.
5 — A recording notice to participants by chat message, email or the bot's name, a way for a participant to stop the recording or opt out, admin rules for when the assistant joins, recordings deletable on request, and per-person analytics described with how to switch them off.
8 — Consent collected before recording starts for external participants, per-person analytics off by default or switchable per organisation, botless capture with its notice method documented, a works-council information pack or works-agreement template published, DPIA support, and the EU AI Act classification stated.
10 — Co-determination built into the product: every analytic and its granularity documented for the works council, consent and opt-out logged per participant, configuration changes logged, minimum group sizes for any team statistics, and references of works-council-approved rollouts published.
The Management Consultant
Both notice methods are documented — an automatic pre-meeting email to attendees with timing windows and an in-meeting chat notice, each enforceable workspace-wide by an Enterprise admin — which is what a works council will ask about first. The pages place informing participants and the legal basis on me as controller, and I found no public information on a participant opt-out, consent logged per person, works-agreement material, DPIA support or an EU AI Act classification. Per-person analytics appear only as an Enterprise feature with no public description of what they measure or how to switch them off. 19 20 5
The Sales Team Lead
The pre-meeting email notice with timing windows, attendee and domain exclusions, and a meeting-chat notice that Jamie posts itself once per recording are exactly how prospects should be told, and on the Enterprise plan an admin can enforce both for everyone. The chat notice ships off by default and in beta, and the vendor places responsibility for informing participants on the customer. We found no public information on a participant opt-out or a guest's way to stop a recording, on switching off the Enterprise user analytics, or on works-council material, DPIA support or an AI Act classification. 4 5 19 20
The Works Council Chair
Two notice channels are well documented — an automatic pre-meeting email to external attendees with domain exclusions and Enterprise-wide enforcement, and a chat notice with a default message that an Enterprise admin can set on for everyone — and recording starts only when the user clicks Start Jamie, with biometric voiceprints stored only if optional Speaker Memory is enabled, which helps a works agreement. As council chair I still miss the rest: we found no public information on a participant opt-out or stop mechanism, the Enterprise user analytics feature is listed without describing what it measures, in what granularity, or how to switch it off, and there is no published works-agreement template, DPIA support, or EU AI Act classification. 4 5 11 13 19 20 22
The Data Protection Officer
The notice machinery is well documented: a pre-meeting email with selectable timing and domain exclusions, a meeting-chat notice with a default message and enterprise-wide enforcement, and the vendor states plainly that the legal basis and informing participants remain the customer's responsibility as controller. I found no public information on a participant opt-out or a way for a participant to stop the recording; per-person analytics are Enterprise-only and not described with an off-switch, and there is no works-agreement material, no DPIA support beyond a legal whitepaper on request, and no EU AI Act classification. 4 13 19 20
The IT Lead
Pre-meeting notice emails go to attendees with configurable lead time, domain exclusions and Enterprise enforcement, and a meeting-chat notice stating "Jamie (meetjamie.ai) is transcribing this meeting." can be forced on for everyone by an admin. Informing participants "remains your responsibility", and I found no public information on a participant opt-out or stopping a recording on request, per-person analytics detail, a works-agreement template, DPIA support or an EU AI Act classification. Speaker Memory stores voiceprints that the data processing agreement itself flags as biometric data, which is a conversation I would have to lead with our works council unaided. 19 20 5 11
The Skeptic
Two notice mechanisms are documented — a pre-meeting email to attendees with timing windows, domain exclusions and Enterprise enforcement, plus a chat notice posted once per recording — and the pages state plainly that informing participants remains the user's responsibility. The chat notice is beta and off by default, we found no public information on a way for participants to stop or opt out of a recording themselves, works-council material, DPIA support and the EU AI Act classification are not documented, and the optional speaker memory processes biometric voiceprints that a works council would want in writing. 19 20 5 13 11
Retention, AI training & administration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the employer can govern: retention periods and automatic deletion of recordings, transcripts and summaries, whether audio and video can be discarded after transcription, sharing defaults and link permissions, customer content excluded from model training by contract, the AI and transcription providers named with their region and their own retention, encryption, single sign-on (SAML), SCIM, roles and workspaces, admin policies on auto-recording and sharing, audit logs, export of the whole archive, and security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2.
0 — No administration and no deletion; every user decides alone and recordings are kept indefinitely.
3 — Users can delete their own recordings and a security page exists; retention policies, model training, SSO and audit logs are basic or not described.
5 — Retention settings per workspace, customer content excluded from model training, team workspaces with roles, single sign-on, admin control over sharing and auto-recording, encryption at rest and in transit, and ISO 27001 or SOC 2 stated.
8 — Automatic deletion by policy with audio discardable after transcription, the AI and transcription subprocessors named with region and zero retention, SAML with SCIM, granular roles, audit logs, legal hold or export of the full archive, and certifications with their scope published.
10 — Governance an auditor accepts: every retention, sharing and recording policy enforceable centrally and logged, models run on the vendor's own or the customer's infrastructure as an option, audit logs exportable to a SIEM, and the deletion of every copy, including at subprocessors, documented.
The Management Consultant
The promise in writing I want is there: audio is streamed for transcription and deleted immediately with only transcript and summary retained, and the data processing agreement and every plan state no training of any model on customer content. Enterprise adds custom retention policies, SAML with SCIM, IP allowlists and immutable audit logs covering meetings, members, integrations and sharing with CSV export; ISO 27001 is stated certified and SOC 2 Type II pending. I found no public information on legal hold or the published scope of the certifications. 21 11 5 22 6
The Sales Team Lead
Meeting audio is streamed for transcription and never stored, no plan trains models on customer content, and the immutable audit log reaches down to API keys, share links and sign-ins with a CSV export of the whole workspace. Workspaces with roles, verified domains, admin permission control, encryption in transit and at rest, and ISO 27001 on every plan give me most of what I need to govern. Custom retention policies, SCIM, SAML and the audit log itself are Enterprise-only, and we found no public information on legal hold or the published scope of the certifications. 2 5 6 11 21 22
The Works Council Chair
Audio is streamed for transcription and never stored, customer content is excluded from model training on every plan, transcripts sit in an EU-region database, and the Enterprise plan adds SAML SSO with SCIM, custom retention policies, an IP allowlist and an immutable audit log covering roles, sharing, calendar recording changes and API keys with a CSV export of the full workspace history; ISO 27001 is stated with SOC 2 Type II pending. Certification scope, legal hold and default retention periods for transcripts are things we found no public information on, and several governance items sit only on the Enterprise plan. 2 5 6 10 11 21 22
The Data Protection Officer
The chain lines up the way an impact assessment needs: audio is deleted immediately after transcription and never stored, the data processing agreement contractually excludes model training and explains that voiceprints are created only if the optional speaker memory is activated, and SAML with SCIM, immutable audit logs with CSV export and ISO 27001 are documented. The gaps for my file: custom retention policies are Enterprise-only, zero retention at the transcription and inference providers is not stated, the language model itself remains unnamed, SOC 2 is pending, and certification scope is not published. 5 6 10 11 21 22
The IT Lead
SAML SSO, SCIM, verified domains, custom retention policies, IP allowlist and immutable audit logs with CSV export are all documented on the Enterprise tier, covering SSO, SCIM, sharing, integration and API key events; no model training applies on every plan and audio is deleted immediately after transcription. Soniox for transcription and Modal for AI inference are named with EU processing, connections use HTTPS and TLS 1.2 with AES 256 at rest, and ISO 27001 is stated certified with SOC 2 Type II pending. We found no public information on zero-retention terms at the subprocessors or the certification scope, and central retention control sits only in the top tier. 5 21 22 11 12 6
The Skeptic
Audio is streamed and deleted immediately after transcription, no model training on customer data is stated on every plan, ISO 27001 is described as independently audited and certified, SAML and SCIM arrive on Enterprise, and audit logs are immutable, granular to individual actions and CSV-exportable. Custom retention, the IP allowlist and the audit log itself are Enterprise-gated, SOC 2 is listed as pending, certification scope and legal hold are not documented, and the archive leaves as a member's CSV export or return-and-delete at contract end. 5 21 22 11 6
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where recordings, transcripts, summaries, voice profiles and account data are stored and processed, which language model and transcription providers read them and where, and who the other subprocessors are (hosting, email, support, analytics and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. A conferencing platform outside Europe that the customer already uses is part of the meeting, not counted against the notetaker; where the notetaker stores and processes the conversation is.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (language models, transcription, email, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors including the AI providers listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, with transcription and language models run in Europe by European operators, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Management Consultant
The contracting entity is a German company registered at the District Court of Cologne, storage and processing stay in the EEA, Switzerland and the UK on named EU infrastructure including Google Cloud and PlanetScale, the published subprocessor list shows speech recognition and AI inference processing in the EU, and the data processing agreement is public with ISO 27001 stated. Subprocessors for identity, email marketing and mobile paywalls are US-based or US-headquartered, and the transcription and AI providers are US companies processing in the EU, so not every operator in the chain is European. 8 11 12 6 10
The Sales Team Lead
Everything is documented on the vendor's own legal pages: a German contracting entity registered at the Cologne district court, transcripts stored in an EU-region PlanetScale database on Google Cloud EU infrastructure, and a published data processing agreement plus subprocessor list that places speech recognition and AI inference in the EU. Meeting content stays in the EEA, Switzerland and the UK, and the US-based subprocessors on the list are identity, marketing and paywall services rather than meeting-content processors. The models run in Europe but for American operators, and certifications are stated without published scope, so this stops short of sovereign end to end. 1 6 8 11 12
The Works Council Chair
The contracting entity is a German company in Rösrath with German governing law, meeting content is stored and processed in the EU on named infrastructure (PlanetScale database, Google Cloud EMEA, Soniox for transcription, Modal for AI inference), and a data processing agreement plus a subprocessor list with locations and ISO 27001 are published. The chain is not European end to end: email marketing, paywall, identity and data-enrichment providers are listed with United States processing locations, and some entries carry standard contractual clauses only where third-country access is possible. 5 6 8 9 10 11 12
The Data Protection Officer
I read the subprocessor list first and it holds: a German contracting entity (HRB 100335, District Court Cologne), EU hosting on named infrastructure (PlanetScale and Google Cloud, EU regions), and a subprocessor list the vendor states is identical to Annex 2 of the published data processing agreement, with transcription (Soniox) and AI inference (Modal) processing in the EU. It stops short of the top level: WorkOS, Loops, Superwall and Clay Labs process in the United States, and the models run on US-owned platforms in Europe rather than with European operators. 8 9 10 11 12
The IT Lead
The contracting entity is wespond UG (haftungsbeschränkt) in Rösrath with a Cologne trade register number, the data processing agreement commits to EU/EEA processing, and the subprocessor list matches its Annex 2 and names Soniox for speech recognition and Modal for AI inference, both processing in the EU. Some subprocessors run in the United States, notably WorkOS for authentication and SCIM, plus support-adjacent, paywall and marketing tools under standard contractual clauses where applicable, and the AI and speech operators are themselves US companies, so this is not European end to end. ISO 27001 is stated as certified. 8 11 12 6 10
The Skeptic
A German contracting entity registered at the Cologne court under German law, production data in EU data centres with transcripts and summaries in an EU-region database, a published data processing agreement with TOMs and a German DPO, a subprocessor list naming the speech recognition and AI inference providers with their regions, and ISO 27001. It stops short of the top rung: the transcription and inference operators are US companies running in the EU, the language model that reads the transcript is never named, and the authentication, email marketing and paywall subprocessors sit in the United States. 8 11 12 10 6
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per seat and tier, what counts as a seat (every invited user, only recording users), transcription minutes or credits included, storage limits, which features (CRM integrations, API access, SSO, custom retention, EU hosting, AI credits) cost extra, the free tier and its limits, monthly versus annual billing, minimum seats and VAT.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with seats, minutes or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their seat price and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, CRM integration, API, custom retention, EU hosting, minute or credit limits) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (seats, minutes, credits, storage), add-ons priced, what counts as a seat stated, overage handling stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size and meeting volume, with every add-on, overage and support fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Management Consultant
I can sketch a real annual cost: a free tier at €0/mo with 10 AI notes per month and a 30-minute meeting limit, a paid tier at €39/mo billed annually, Team at €33/seat/mo billed annually, a 17% yearly discount, gross prices inclusive of statutory VAT, and a one-year minimum term with two weeks' renewal notice for yearly billing. What counts as a seat and storage limits are not documented, and Enterprise items such as audit logs and custom retention are custom-priced. 5 9
The Sales Team Lead
Tiers are public with their inclusions — a free plan at €0 /mo with 10 AI notes per month and a 30-minute cap, a paid plan at €39 /mo billed annually with unlimited AI notes, Team at €33 /seat/mo billed annually, and Enterprise priced on request — plus gross VAT-inclusive prices, a one-year minimum on annual billing and a 17% yearly discount. What counts as a seat, storage limits and overage handling are not stated, and SSO, SCIM, audit logs and custom retention all sit in the unpriced Enterprise tier, so the real annual cost for my nine-person setup is not computable from the public pages. 5 9 17 22
The Works Council Chair
Prices are public with their inclusions — Free at €0 with 10 AI notes per month and a 30-minute meeting limit, a tier at €39/mo billed annually, Team at €33 /seat/mo billed annually with a yearly discount of -17%, and Enterprise custom billed annually — and the terms state gross EUR prices including VAT with a one-year minimum term for yearly contracts. SAML SSO, SCIM, audit logs and custom retention exist only on the unpriced Enterprise plan, and we found no public information on what counts as a seat or the monthly prices per tier. 5 9
The Data Protection Officer
Four tiers are public with their limits — notes per month, meeting duration, templates and vocabulary terms per plan — plus a 17% annual discount, gross prices including statutory VAT, and minimum terms of one month or one year. Enterprise is priced on request, what counts as a seat is not stated, and no overage or storage pricing is documented. 5 9
The IT Lead
Free is public at €0 /mo with 10 AI notes per month and a 30min duration limit, the power-user plan at €39 /mo billed annually, Team at €33 /seat/mo billed annually with a stated -17% yearly discount, gross prices including VAT, a one-year minimum on yearly billing and two-week renewal notice. Everything I actually need for a 400-seat rollout — SSO, SCIM, custom retention, audit logs — sits in Enterprise, which is custom priced on request, and I found no public information on what counts as a seat on the lower plans or on storage limits. 5 9
The Skeptic
Public numbers exist for most tiers — a free plan at "€0 /mo" with ten AI notes a month and a thirty-minute meeting cap, a "€39 /mo. billed annually" plan, Team at "€33 /seat/mo. billed annually", "Custom billed annually" for Enterprise and a "Yearly -17%" toggle — while the terms state VAT-inclusive gross prices, monthly or yearly billing, minimum terms and notice periods. A buyer still cannot compute the full annual cost: what counts as a seat is never defined, monthly list prices for the paid tiers are not shown on the captured pricing page, and overage handling and storage limits are not documented. 5 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Jamie
Is Jamie European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Jamie as EU-Made.
Where does Jamie store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026. The vendor’s pages mention the EU, Switzerland and United Kingdom as hosting locations, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.
Does Jamie have a free plan?
Yes. Jamie has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Jamie?
As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates MeetGeek (3.5/5), Noota (3.5/5) and Fellow (3.5/5) highest among the other 14 AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is MeetGeek (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Jamie alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 5 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data processing agreement, Hosting location, Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 12 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (22)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (privacy-first, botless notes) www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (enterprise) www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 API documentation docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Pricing page www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Security / trust page www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 About page www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Legal notice www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Terms of service www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Privacy policy www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Data processing agreement (dpa) www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Subprocessor list www.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 17 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 18 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 19 Consent, participant rights & works council — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 20 Consent, participant rights & works council — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 21 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 22 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap docs.meetjamie.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →