AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers
Notta
Rest of world Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Notta Pte. Ltd. · www.notta.ai
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Notta at a glance
- Vendor
- Notta Pte. Ltd.
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 5 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Notta 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Notta is an AI notetaker that records and transcribes online, in-person and uploaded meetings in 58 languages including German. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 5 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 6 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Notta is an AI notetaker that records and transcribes online, in-person and uploaded meetings in 58 languages including German. The strongest scores are 6 to 7 for capture and transcription and for integrations and workflow: a bot joins Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex, calendar auto-join is documented, and notes flow to seven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, plus Slack, Notion and Zapier with an MCP server and CLI. The weakest is sovereignty at 1 to 2: users registered outside Japan contract with Notta Pte. Ltd. in Singapore under Singapore law, hosting is on AWS with no region stated, subprocessors appear only as categories with Stripe named, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement. Consent and codetermination scores 3, with the terms putting the duty to inform recorded participants on the customer. Pricing transparency spans 4 to 6: the free tier is precise to the minute, but the captured pages never show a per-seat price for Pro or Business. The widest spread is two points, and the flagged splits flag none.
Speaks for it
- A bot auto-joins Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex meetings, with desktop, mobile and Chrome apps plus file upload covering in-person and imported recordings.
- Notes and automatically tagged action items sync to seven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, alongside Slack, Notion, Zapier, an MCP server and a CLI.
- Transcripts export to TXT, DOCX, PDF, XLSX and SRT.
- Encryption is stated as TLS 1.2 in transit and AES-256 at rest, with ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 reports carrying their dates.
- The free tier is specified to the minute — one seat, 120 transcription minutes a month, up to 3 minutes per conversation, 50 file uploads, 10 AI summaries — and signup needs no credit card.
Held against it
- The terms put informing participants that a discussion is being recorded on the customer, and we found no public information on participant opt-out, per-person analytics or works-council material.
- Users registered outside Japan contract with Notta Pte. Ltd. in Singapore under Singapore law, hosting is on AWS with no region stated, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or EU hosting.
- The captured pricing pages never show a per-seat price for the Pro or Business tiers, so a team's annual cost is not computable from them.
- We found no public information on retention settings or automatic deletion, and the only training statement found covers Google Workspace API data.
- The captured pages give different figures for transcription accuracy — 98.86%, 98%+ and 98% under stated room conditions — and we found no public information on accuracy per language.
Best for
- You run sales calls on Zoom, Google Meet, Teams or Webex and want notes and action items synced to a Salesforce, HubSpot or Pipedrive customer profile.
- You want to evaluate before paying: the free tier carries precise limits, signup needs no credit card, and a 7-day Business trial is offered.
- Your meetings run in German or other languages — 58 are supported, and translation add-ons are priced monthly and annually.
- You record in-person meetings or import recordings — uploaded files up to 1 GB audio and 10 GB video are accepted.
Avoid if
- You must contract under EU law or host data in the EU — the terms name Notta Pte. Ltd. in Singapore with Singapore courts for users registered outside Japan, and we found no public information on EU hosting or a data processing agreement.
- Your rollout depends on works-council agreement — the terms make informing recorded participants the customer's responsibility, and we found no public information on works-council material, DPIA support or participant opt-out.
- You need a firm per-seat budget — the captured pages show only the free tier's limits and Enterprise at a custom price from 51 seats, with no per-seat price for Pro or Business.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Recording, transcription & languages | 3.5 of 5 |
| Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge | 3 of 5 |
| Integrations, API & workflow | 3.5 of 5 |
| Consent, participant rights & works council | 1.5 of 5 |
| Retention, AI training & administration | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2 of 5 |
Recording, transcription & languages
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the conversation gets in and how faithfully it is written down: a bot that joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet and Webex, botless capture from a desktop or mobile app, in-person meetings and phone calls, file upload, live transcription, speaker identification and names, the languages supported with German stated, meetings that switch language, custom vocabulary for names and jargon, timestamps linked to the recording, and editing of the transcript.
0 — Does not record or transcribe meetings; a note template or agenda tool without capture.
3 — A bot that joins one or two conferencing tools and produces a transcript; languages, speaker names, in-person capture and accuracy are basic or not described.
5 — A bot for Zoom, Teams and Google Meet, a desktop or mobile app for in-person meetings, file upload, speaker identification, German among the supported languages, timestamps linked to the recording, and an editable transcript.
8 — Botless capture documented next to the bot, Webex and phone or dialer calls, live transcription, mixed-language meetings handled, custom vocabulary, speaker names learned across meetings, and the transcription engine or its accuracy per language stated.
10 — Capture a regulated team relies on: every channel above with accuracy published per language and method, dialects and specialist vocabulary documented, on-device or customer-hosted transcription as an option, and how errors are corrected and fed back stated.
The Management Consultant
The captured pages document a bot for Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and Webex, an in-person and file-upload path with desktop and mobile apps, speaker identification, German among 58 languages, real-time transcription, custom vocabulary, and an editable transcript with timestamps. I found no public information on phone or dialer calls, mixed-language meetings, or accuracy per language, and the pages give different figures for accuracy (98.86%, 98%+, and 98% under stated room conditions), which matters when I need German client names written correctly. 1 4 9 10 11
The Sales Team Lead
The bot joins Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and Webex, calendar auto-join is documented, and desktop and mobile apps plus file upload would cover our in-person meetings and uploaded call recordings; German is named among 58 languages, with speaker identification, custom vocabulary, timestamps and an editable transcript. We found no public information on phone or dialer capture, accuracy per language, or the transcription engine itself, which keeps it a notch below the top band. 1 2 4 9 10 13
The Data Protection Officer
The bot joins Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Webex, a Chrome extension captures Meet without the bot, and desktop and mobile apps plus file upload cover in-person meetings and imported recordings, with real-time transcription, speaker identification with editable speaker names, custom vocabulary, timestamps and an editable transcript in 58 languages including German. Accuracy figures of 98 percent and above are published, one with the measurement conditions stated on the enterprise page, but we found no public information on accuracy per language, phone or dialer capture, or how meetings that switch language are handled. 1 2 4 9 10 13
The IT Lead
The Notta Bot auto-joins Zoom, Teams, Google Meet and Webex meetings, a Chrome extension covers Google Meet next to the bot, and desktop and mobile apps plus file upload cover in-person and imported recordings across 58 languages including German, with speaker identification, timestamps, editable transcripts, real-time transcription and custom vocabulary on paid plans. Accuracy is claimed at 98%+ overall but not per language, and we found no public information on phone or dialer capture or mixed-language meetings. 1 2 4 9 10 11 13
The Skeptic
The bot joins Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex, a Chrome extension and desktop and mobile apps cover online, in-person and uploaded files, and speaker identification, custom vocabulary, real-time transcription and an editable, timestamped transcript are all documented, with 58 languages including German and headline accuracies of 98.86% and 98%+ under stated test conditions. We found no public information on phone or dialer capture, on mixed-language meetings beyond the paid bilingual add-on, or on accuracy broken down per language, and the transcription engine itself is not named. 1 2 4 9 10 11
Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the tool makes of the transcript: summaries and minutes by meeting type with editable templates, decisions and action items with owners and due dates, summaries in the meeting's language or a chosen one, follow-up emails, clips and highlights, search across all meetings, questions answered over the archive with citations back to the transcript passage, shared team folders or channels, and the minutes exported to Word, PDF or a wiki.
0 — No summaries of any kind; only the raw transcript or recording.
3 — One generic summary per meeting; templates, action items, search across meetings and citations are basic or not described.
5 — Summaries with templates per meeting type, action items and decisions extracted, the summary language selectable with German available, search across meetings, questions answered over one or several meetings, and sharing or export of the minutes.
8 — Custom templates per team, action items with owners pushed to task tools, answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, topic or keyword tracking across meetings, team libraries with permissions, and the AI models used for summaries named.
10 — Meeting knowledge a company can audit: every generated statement traceable to its source passage, hallucination handling and human review documented, summary quality by language stated, and the archive queryable through an API or MCP server with the same permissions as in the app.
The Management Consultant
AI summaries, automatically tagged action items, custom templates that paid plans can shape into minutes and reports, search across meetings with an assistant extracting insights, team workspaces, and sharing by link or email with export to TXT, DOCX, PDF and more are all documented. I found no public information on decisions extracted with owners and due dates, on answers that cite the transcript passage they rest on, or on the AI models used for summaries. 1 9 11 12
The Sales Team Lead
Summaries come with custom templates that sit in a private or shared workspace tab, action items are extracted and tagged automatically, and meeting notes and action items sync to the customer profile in Pipedrive — close to what my reps need after a discovery call. The cross-meeting AI chat, annotations and export to Word, PDF and SRT are documented; we found no public information on answers that cite the transcript passage, named summary models, or follow-up email drafts. 1 9 11 12 14
The Data Protection Officer
Summaries come with automatically tagged action items, custom templates that default to private or workspace-shared, prompt-based customization into minutes and reports on paid plans, and Notta Brain searching across all meetings and generating slides and infographics, with sharing by link or email and export to TXT, DOCX, PDF, XLSX and SRT. We found no public information on answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, on the AI models used, or on choosing the summary language. 1 4 9 11 12
The IT Lead
Summaries can be customized with prompt templates that stay private or are shared with the whole workspace, action items are automatically tagged, Notta Brain searches across meetings and generates slides and infographics, and minutes export to Word, PDF or SRT with sharing by link or email. We found no public information on action items with owners and due dates, on answers that cite the transcript passage they rest on, or on which AI models produce the summaries. 1 4 9 10 11 12
The Skeptic
Summaries, custom templates with private and workspace visibility, prompt-driven minutes and reports on paid plans, automatically tagged action items, search and Q&A across meetings, and export to TXT, DOCX, PDF, XLSX and SRT are documented. We found no public information on action items carrying owners and due dates, on answers that cite and link the transcript passage they rest on, or on which AI models write the summaries — the first things I would ask for before trusting a generated minute. 1 4 9 11 12
Integrations, API & workflow
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the notes reach the place where work happens: calendar connection with rules for which meetings are recorded, CRM fields filled from the call (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, Microsoft Dynamics), project and task tools, Slack and Microsoft Teams channels, Notion, Confluence and SharePoint, Zapier, Make or n8n, a documented REST API and webhooks, an MCP server for AI assistants, and browser extensions and native apps.
0 — No integrations and no export; the notes stay in the app.
3 — A calendar connection and an email or Slack summary; CRM, API and task tools are basic or not described.
5 — Google and Microsoft calendars, a native CRM integration (HubSpot or Salesforce), Slack or Teams, a task or wiki tool, Zapier or Make, and a documented API or webhooks.
8 — CRM field mapping per meeting type, several CRMs including Microsoft Dynamics or Pipedrive, a full REST API with webhooks and reference documentation, an MCP server, SharePoint or Confluence export, and recording rules per calendar or meeting type.
10 — An integration layer a company builds on: every object reachable by API with rate limits and versioning stated, granular OAuth scopes, data residency kept across integrations, and the integrations administered centrally with logs.
The Management Consultant
Google and Outlook calendars with auto-join, seven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, Slack, Teams, Notion, SharePoint, ClickUp, cloud storage, Zapier, native automations, and an MCP and CLI for AI assistants are documented. I found no public information on a documented REST API or webhooks, on Make or n8n, or on CRM field mapping per meeting type, which is what a consultancy would build on. 1 4 13 14
The Sales Team Lead
Seven CRMs including HubSpot, Salesforce and Pipedrive, plus Slack, Notion, ClickUp, SharePoint, several storage tools, Zapier, a native automation feature, and an MCP and CLI for AI assistants — breadth I rarely see at this price point. But we found no public information on a documented REST API or webhooks, and no field-level CRM mapping per meeting type, which is exactly the HubSpot hygiene I would need for eight reps. 3 4 13 14
The Data Protection Officer
Google and Outlook calendars connect with auto-join for scheduled meetings, transcripts and summaries flow to seven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive and on to Slack, Notion, SharePoint, ClickUp, the cloud storage services and Zapier, and an MCP server with a CLI serves AI assistants alongside the Chrome extension and native apps. We found no public information on a documented REST API or webhooks, which is what I would need for controlled internal workflows. 3 4 13 14
The IT Lead
Google and Outlook calendars drive auto-join, seven CRMs including Pipedrive sync notes to the customer profile, and Slack, Teams, Notion, SharePoint and four cloud storage services plus Zapier are documented, along with an MCP server and CLI for AI assistants and browser/desktop/mobile apps. We found no public information on a documented REST API or webhooks, which is what I would need to wire the notes into our own tooling. 3 4 13 14
The Skeptic
Google and Outlook calendars with auto-join, seven CRMs including Salesforce, HubSpot and Pipedrive, Slack, SharePoint, Box and Dropbox, Zapier, an MCP server with a CLI, and web, desktop, mobile and Chrome apps are all documented. We found no public information on a documented REST API or webhooks, on CRM field mapping per meeting type, or on recording rules per calendar or meeting type, which keeps this short of the top band. 3 4 13 14
Consent, participant rights & works council
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether every person in the meeting knows and can decide, and whether the tool can be introduced under German co-determination: a recording notice to all participants including external guests, consent or opt-out before the recording starts, a visible bot or a stated notice for botless capture, rules for when the assistant joins automatically, stopping and deleting a recording on request, per-person analytics (talk time, sentiment, engagement scores) off by default or switchable per organisation, material or a template for a works agreement (Betriebsvereinbarung, § 87 (1) no. 6 BetrVG), and support for a data protection impact assessment.
0 — Built to record people without their knowledge, or sells covert recording or individual performance scoring as a feature.
3 — A general privacy statement and a bot that appears in the participant list; notices to guests, opt-out, per-person analytics and works councils are basic or not described.
5 — A recording notice to participants by chat message, email or the bot's name, a way for a participant to stop the recording or opt out, admin rules for when the assistant joins, recordings deletable on request, and per-person analytics described with how to switch them off.
8 — Consent collected before recording starts for external participants, per-person analytics off by default or switchable per organisation, botless capture with its notice method documented, a works-council information pack or works-agreement template published, DPIA support, and the EU AI Act classification stated.
10 — Co-determination built into the product: every analytic and its granularity documented for the works council, consent and opt-out logged per participant, configuration changes logged, minimum group sizes for any team statistics, and references of works-council-approved rollouts published.
The Management Consultant
The terms place the burden on the customer — "It is your responsibility to follow applicable foreign, federal and local laws when using such features, including informing the participants in your meetings that the discussion is being recorded" — alongside a general privacy policy with access, correction, deletion and restriction rights. I found no public information on recording notices to external guests, a participant opt-out, per-person analytics and how to switch them off, works-council or works-agreement material, DPIA support, or an EU AI Act classification. 7 8
The Sales Team Lead
A privacy policy exists and the Notta Bot joins meetings visibly, but the terms put the duty squarely on the customer: it is "your responsibility... including informing the participants in your meetings that the discussion is being recorded." We found no public information on participant opt-out, per-person analytics, works-council material or DPIA support — for a German rollout I would be building the notice process myself. 2 7 8
The Data Protection Officer
The terms place the duty squarely on the customer — informing participants that the discussion is recorded is stated as the user's responsibility — alongside a general privacy policy and a bot that visibly joins the meeting. We found no public information on a participant notice or opt-out mechanism, on per-person analytics and how to switch them off, on works-council or Betriebsvereinbarung material, on DPIA support, or on the EU AI Act classification, which makes a co-determined rollout hard to prepare from these pages. 2 7 8
The IT Lead
The terms put informing participants that a discussion is recorded squarely on the customer, and the bot does join meetings visibly; the privacy policy gives individuals access, correction, deletion and restriction rights towards Notta itself. We found no public information on participant notices or opt-out mechanisms, per-person analytics, works-council materials or DPIA support. 2 7 8
The Skeptic
The terms put the burden on the customer — it is "your responsibility... including informing the participants in your meetings that the discussion is being recorded" — while a bot joins meetings visibly and a privacy policy exists. We found no public information on participant opt-out, consent collected before recording starts, per-person analytics and how to switch them off, a works-council information pack or works-agreement template, DPIA support, or the EU AI Act classification. 2 7 8
Retention, AI training & administration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the employer can govern: retention periods and automatic deletion of recordings, transcripts and summaries, whether audio and video can be discarded after transcription, sharing defaults and link permissions, customer content excluded from model training by contract, the AI and transcription providers named with their region and their own retention, encryption, single sign-on (SAML), SCIM, roles and workspaces, admin policies on auto-recording and sharing, audit logs, export of the whole archive, and security certifications such as ISO 27001 and SOC 2.
0 — No administration and no deletion; every user decides alone and recordings are kept indefinitely.
3 — Users can delete their own recordings and a security page exists; retention policies, model training, SSO and audit logs are basic or not described.
5 — Retention settings per workspace, customer content excluded from model training, team workspaces with roles, single sign-on, admin control over sharing and auto-recording, encryption at rest and in transit, and ISO 27001 or SOC 2 stated.
8 — Automatic deletion by policy with audio discardable after transcription, the AI and transcription subprocessors named with region and zero retention, SAML with SCIM, granular roles, audit logs, legal hold or export of the full archive, and certifications with their scope published.
10 — Governance an auditor accepts: every retention, sharing and recording policy enforceable centrally and logged, models run on the vendor's own or the customer's infrastructure as an option, audit logs exportable to a SIEM, and the deletion of every copy, including at subprocessors, documented.
The Management Consultant
AES-256 at rest and TLS 1.2 in transit, SAML single sign-on on the Enterprise tier, role-based permissions, activity audit logs, IP restrictions, and ISO 27001 plus SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 reports with dates are documented. The only training statement I found covers Google Workspace APIs ("not used to develop, improve, or train generalized/non-personalized AI and/or ML models"); I found no public information on retention settings, automatic deletion, audio discardable after transcription, or a contractual exclusion of customer content from model training — the written promise my clients would demand is not on these pages. 4 5 8 15
The Sales Team Lead
Encryption is concrete (AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2 in transit), SAML SSO, role-based permissions, an activity audit log, SOC 2 Type 2 with dates and ISO 27001 are stated, and transcripts export to TXT, DOCX, PDF, XLSX and SRT. But we found no public information on retention periods or automatic deletion, no statement that customer content is excluded from model training, and no SCIM or admin controls over sharing and auto-recording — the retention question alone would stall a procurement here. 4 5 7 8 9 15
The Data Protection Officer
Deletion exists as a privacy-request right, and the Enterprise tier brings SAML SSO, audit logs, role-based permissions, IP restriction and full data access control, with AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2 in transit, ISO 27001 and a SOC 2 Type 2 report dated 12 February 2023. We found no public information on retention periods or policy-driven automatic deletion, and on training the only statement is that Google Workspace API data is not used to train models — nothing covering the transcripts themselves — with SCIM and audio-discard-after-transcription also undocumented. 4 5 8 15
The IT Lead
SAML SSO, audit logs, role-based permissions, IP restrictions and full data access control are listed for the Enterprise plan, encryption is TLS 1.2 in transit and AES-256 at rest, and ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are stated with SOC 2 report dates. We found no public information on centrally set retention periods, SCIM provisioning or a contractual statement excluding customer content from model training — the only training statement covers Google Workspace API data. 4 5 9 15
The Skeptic
SAML SSO, role-based permissions, audit logs, IP restrictions, encryption with TLS 1.2 and AES-256, SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2 reports with their dates plus ISO 27001 are stated, and users can request deletion of their personal information. We found no public information on retention settings or automatic deletion by policy, the only training-related statement covers Google Workspace API data specifically rather than customer content generally, and export is described only for transcripts, not the full archive. 4 5 7 8 15
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where recordings, transcripts, summaries, voice profiles and account data are stored and processed, which language model and transcription providers read them and where, and who the other subprocessors are (hosting, email, support, analytics and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. A conferencing platform outside Europe that the customer already uses is part of the meeting, not counted against the notetaker; where the notetaker stores and processes the conversation is.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (language models, transcription, email, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors including the AI providers listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC 2) stated.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, with transcription and language models run in Europe by European operators, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Management Consultant
The contracting entity for users outside Japan is Notta PTE. LTD., incorporated in Singapore and under Singapore law, with hosting on Amazon Web Services and no region stated on the captured pages; subprocessors appear as categories — cloud storage, payment processing, voice transcriptions, video creation, analytics, customer service — with only Stripe named. I found no public information on a data processing agreement or on any European hosting option, though ISO 27001 and SOC 2 are stated. 5 7 8 15
The Sales Team Lead
The contracting entity is Notta Pte. Ltd. in Singapore for users outside Japan (Notta K.K. for Japan), with Singapore or Japanese governing law, software hosted on AWS with no region stated, and Stripe as the only named subprocessor; no data processing agreement is documented. A GDPR compliance line appears on the security pages, but nothing captured shows EU hosting, an EU entity or a subprocessor list — for a Mittelstand buyer this is where the conversation ends. 5 7 8 15
The Data Protection Officer
For users registered outside Japan the contracting party is Notta Pte. Ltd. in Singapore under Singapore law and courts; hosting is on AWS with no region stated, backups go to a data center the vendor calls domestic on its Japanese pages, and of the subprocessor categories — cloud storage, voice transcriptions, analytics, customer service — only Stripe for payment is named. GDPR compliance is claimed as a badge, but we found no public information on a data processing agreement, an EU representative, or the name and region of the transcription and language-model providers that would read my bank's transcripts. 5 7 8 15
The IT Lead
The contracting entity is Notta Pte. Ltd. in Singapore (Notta K.K. for users registered in Japan) under Singapore or Japanese law, all software is hosted on AWS, and backups are described in a domestic Japanese datacenter. Subprocessors appear only as categories plus Stripe for payment, and we found no public information on EU hosting, EU data processing terms, or a published data processing agreement. 5 7 8 15
The Skeptic
Users registered outside Japan contract with Notta Pte. Ltd., incorporated in Singapore, under Singapore law and courts; Japan-registered users fall under the Japanese entity. Hosting is on AWS with no region stated, the service-provider chain appears only as categories — cloud storage, voice transcriptions, analytics, customer service — with Stripe named for payment, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or on EU hosting; none of the sovereignty attributes is established for Europe. 5 7 8
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per seat and tier, what counts as a seat (every invited user, only recording users), transcription minutes or credits included, storage limits, which features (CRM integrations, API access, SSO, custom retention, EU hosting, AI credits) cost extra, the free tier and its limits, monthly versus annual billing, minimum seats and VAT.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free tier exists, but how cost scales with seats, minutes or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their seat price and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, CRM integration, API, custom retention, EU hosting, minute or credit limits) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (seats, minutes, credits, storage), add-ons priced, what counts as a seat stated, overage handling stated, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size and meeting volume, with every add-on, overage and support fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Management Consultant
The free tier is precisely stated — €0, one seat, 120 transcription minutes per month, three minutes per conversation, 50 file uploads and 10 AI summaries — add-ons carry exact prices such as "Bilingual Transcription & Translation € 8,63 /month" billed annually, Enterprise is listed as "Custom" starting from 51 seats, and taxes are stated as exclusive with monthly and annual billing, auto-renewal and refund terms published. The captured pages give no per-seat price for the paid tiers, and I found no public information on what counts as a seat or on minute quotas between the free and Enterprise tiers, so I cannot compute a year's cost for a twelve-person firm. 4 7
The Sales Team Lead
The free plan is fully specified (€0, one seat, 120 transcription minutes a month, up to 3 minutes per conversation, 50 file uploads, 10 AI summaries), add-ons are priced with both billing cycles, the annual discount is 40 percent and fees are stated exclusive of taxes. But the captured pricing page did not show per-seat prices for the paid tiers or their included minutes, and Enterprise is simply custom from 51 seats, so I could not compute the annual cost for my team from what I read. 4 7 12
The Data Protection Officer
The free tier is fully specified (one seat, 120 transcription minutes a month, up to 3 minutes per conversation, 50 file uploads, 10 AI summaries), add-ons are priced exactly as shown (Bilingual Transcription & Translation € 8,63/month billed annually with monthly plan cost € 14,39; Monolingual Translation € 5,75/month billed annually with monthly plan cost € 9,59; Notta Brain $ 93,59 USD/year with 8,000 AI credits/month), the annual discount is 40 percent, taxes are stated as excluded, and Enterprise starts from 51 seats at a custom price. We found no public information on the Pro and Business seat prices, on what counts as a seat, or on overage fees, so the real annual cost for a given team is not computable from these pages. 4 7
The IT Lead
The free plan is fully specified (120 transcription minutes per month, 3 minutes per conversation, 50 uploads, 10 AI summaries), add-ons are priced monthly and annually (Bilingual Transcription € 8,63/month billed annually; Notta Brain $ 93.59 USD/year for 8,000 AI credits/month), Enterprise is custom from 51 seats, the annual discount is 40% off, taxes are stated as excluded and a 7-day Business trial exists. The captured pricing pages do not show the Pro or Business seat price, what counts as a seat, or overage handling, so a 400-user annual cost is not computable from them. 4 7
The Skeptic
The free tier is precise to the minute — 120 transcription minutes per month, up to 3 minutes per conversation, 50 file uploads, 10 AI summaries — and add-ons carry both monthly and annual prices with a stated 40% annual discount, taxes stated exclusive, and auto-renewal and refund terms published. The captured pricing pages never show the per-seat price for the Pro or Business tiers — Enterprise is "Custom" from 51 seats — and we found no public information on what counts as a seat or on overage handling, so a buyer cannot yet compute a real annual cost. 4 7
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Notta
Is Notta European?
No. whats-best.ai classifies Notta as Rest of world.
Where does Notta store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 5 Nov 2026.
Does Notta have a free plan?
Yes. Notta has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 5 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Notta?
As of 6 Nov 2026, the panel rates MeetGeek (3.5/5), Noota (3.5/5) and Jamie (3.5/5) highest among the other 14 AI Meeting Assistants & Notetakers products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is MeetGeek (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Notta alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 5 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 15 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 10 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 9 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 hosting fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (16)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (transcription) www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Integrations page www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Pricing page www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Security / trust page www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 About page www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Terms of service (names the operating companies) www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Privacy policy www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 10 Recording, transcription & languages — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 11 Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 12 Summaries, action items & meeting knowledge — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 13 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 14 Integrations, API & workflow — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 15 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →
- 16 Retention, AI training & administration — found from sitemap www.notta.ai Checked 5 Nov 2026 Details →