Online Whiteboard
Ideaflip
UK / wider Europe Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Biggerflip Ltd · ideaflip.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Ideaflip at a glance
- Vendor
- Biggerflip Ltd
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Yes, per the vendor’s own page source, captured 1 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Ideaflip 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Ideaflip is Biggerflip Ltd's online sticky-note board for remote meetings, brainstorms and retrospectives — the bench reads it as a shared sticky-note workspace, not a full whiteboard. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 1 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 1 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Ideaflip is Biggerflip Ltd's online sticky-note board for remote meetings, brainstorms and retrospectives — the bench reads it as a shared sticky-note workspace, not a full whiteboard. Pricing transparency scored highest, at 5-6, with public per-user prices on the Personal, Basic and Professional tiers, a 14-day free trial, a 30-day no-questions refund and self-service plan changes; the Enterprise tier carrying single sign-on and single tenancy is contact-sales only. Facilitation scored 4 with no variation, on guest invites, voting, and anonymous or embedded drop-in sessions. Security and deployment is weakest, a flat 2: the privacy policy holds data "for some period" after account deletion and in backups, and no public information exists on encryption or AI controls. Sovereignty split between 2 and 3: lower scores cite the England-registered contracting entity, Google Analytics storing data on servers in the United States, and no stated hosting location for boards or published data processing agreement; higher scores found only part of the chain visible. Integrations and export scored 2-3. Overall totals range from 3.0 to 3.6.
Speaks for it
- Personal, Basic and Professional carry public per-user prices — Basic at "$12 MONTHLY @ $6 / user / month", Professional at "$24 MONTHLY @ $12 / user / month" — with VAT included at EU and UK checkout.
- A 14-day free trial with no charge if cancelled, a 30-day no-questions refund, and self-service plan, seat and cancellation changes.
- Guests are first-class: up to 2 on Personal and Basic, unlimited on Professional, with drop-in sessions that can be anonymous or embedded in other web pages.
- Brainstorm, organise, vote, annotate, connect and export run as core actions on real-time sticky-note boards, with a Sailboat Retrospective template and custom public templates on Professional.
- Boards created while subscribed stay available when you downgrade to the free Personal plan.
Held against it
- Security and deployment scored a flat 2, with data kept "for some period" after account deletion, removed content persisting in backup copies, and employees and contractors able to access personal information.
- We found no public information on where boards and user data are hosted, on a published data processing agreement, or on certifications such as ISO 27001.
- Export is a named core action with no format stated, and Google sign-in is the only documented integration — no public information on an API, webhooks or apps for Teams, Zoom or Slack.
- Single Sign On, Single Tenancy and whitelabelling sit only in an Enterprise tier reached by contacting sales, so the price of those controls cannot be computed from public pages.
- The terms grant a "non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license" to everything created on the boards until it is deleted.
Best for
- You run remote retrospectives or brainstorms with outside participants and want anonymous or embeddable drop-in sessions with per-plan guest limits.
- You are a small team that wants to know its exact monthly cost from public pages, backed by a free trial and a 30-day refund.
- You want a focused sticky-note board for brainstorming, organising, voting and annotating rather than a full whiteboard with an infinite canvas, frames or diagrams.
Avoid if
- You need single sign-on or single tenancy at a computable price — both sit only in the Enterprise tier, which is contact-sales only.
- Your security review requires statements on encryption, retention periods or certifications such as ISO 27001 — the captured pages give no public information on these.
- Your data protection rules require a stated hosting location for board content or bar US-stored analytics data — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your workflow depends on documented integrations — Google sign-in is the only one named, with no public information on an API, Jira sync or Teams, Zoom or Slack apps.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Canvas, templates & content | 2 of 5 |
| Workshop facilitation & participation | 2 of 5 |
| Integrations, import & export | 1.5 of 5 |
| Sharing, permissions & administration | 1.5 of 5 |
| Security, AI controls & deployment | 1 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 3 of 5 |
Canvas, templates & content
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What can be put on the board and how fast: an infinite canvas, sticky notes, text, shapes and connectors, freehand drawing and pen input, frames and sections, images, files, documents and video embedded on the board, tables, mind maps, diagrams and flowcharts, a template library for workshops, retrospectives and planning, own templates for the organisation, search across boards, performance on large boards, and AI that clusters, summarises or generates content.
0 — Not a whiteboard; there is no shared canvas to put content on.
3 — A shared board with sticky notes, text, shapes and drawing; templates, embeds, diagrams and large boards are basic or not described.
5 — An infinite canvas with sticky notes, shapes and connectors, frames, images and files on the board, a template library for workshops, retrospectives and planning, own templates saved for the team, and the board usable on desktop, browser and tablet with pen input.
8 — Diagrams, mind maps, tables and kanban on the same board, embeds of live documents and video, templates managed centrally for the organisation, search across all boards, documented limits for large boards (objects, participants), and AI that clusters or summarises notes with its data use stated.
10 — A canvas a whole organisation builds on: structured data on the board (cards linked to records, custom fields), smart diagramming with shape libraries for named notations, offline work with conflict-free sync described, board performance at stated scale, and every content type exportable with its structure.
The Workshop Facilitator
This is a shared sticky-note board with real-time collaboration, vote, annotate and connect actions, a named Sailboat retrospective template, custom templates on the paid plans, and image import via upload, webshots or copy/paste. I found no public information on an infinite canvas, shapes and freehand drawing, frames, document or video embeds, or how boards hold up at workshop scale. 1 3 4
The Product Team Lead
Real-time sticky-note boards with organise, vote, annotate and connect actions, content import via image upload, webshots and copy/paste, a Sailboat Retrospective template, and custom templates from the Professional tier up. Everything above sticky notes — infinite canvas, shapes, frames, embedded documents, tables, large-board limits, AI — we found no public information on, so this reads as a shared board, nothing more. 1 3 4
The Microsoft 365 Admin
The homepage sells sticky-note boards with real-time collaboration and the actions brainstorm, organise, vote, annotate, connect and export, plus a Sailboat retrospective template and custom public templates on the Professional plan. We found no public information on an infinite canvas, frames, tables and diagrams, search across boards, large-board limits, or AI that clusters or summarises — a solid workshop board, one step above basic. 1 3
The Works Council Member
The captured pages show sticky-note boards for brainstorming with connect, annotate, vote and export among the core actions, a Sailboat retrospective template, and custom public templates from the Professional plan upward. We found no public information on an infinite canvas, frames, images and files on the board, search across boards or AI assistance, so the canvas description stays at a basic level. 1 3
The Public-Sector Project Lead
Sticky notes with real-time collaboration are the core, the homepage lists brainstorm, organise, vote, annotate, connect and export as actions, and paid plans add custom templates alongside a named Sailboat Retrospective; images can be imported via upload, webshots and copy/paste. We found no public information on an infinite canvas, frames, tables, diagrams, search across boards or AI assistance, so this reads as a capable sticky-note board rather than a full workshop whiteboard. 1 3 4
The Skeptic
What the pages show is sticky notes with brainstorm, organise, vote, annotate and connect actions, image upload, and a Sailboat Retrospective template with custom public templates gated to paid tiers. We found no public information on the canvas itself — infinite canvas, frames, tables, diagrams, board search, performance at scale — and no AI features of any kind are described. 1 3 4
Workshop facilitation & participation
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What it takes to run a session on the board: guests who join without an account, a timer, voting and dot voting, a private or anonymous mode for notes, bringing everyone to the facilitator's view (summon, follow), a presentation or frame mode, locking objects, reactions, breakout areas, an agenda or session plan, built-in audio or video or the call apps the board runs inside, participant limits, and accessibility for participants (keyboard, screen reader, contrast).
0 — No real-time collaboration; only one person can work on a board at a time.
3 — Several people edit the same board in real time and see each other's cursors; facilitation tools and guest access are basic or not described.
5 — Guests join by link without an account, a timer, voting, bringing participants to the facilitator's view, a presentation mode through frames, locking objects, and comments with mentions.
8 — A private or anonymous mode for brainstorming, voting with results and export, breakout areas or assigned frames, a session agenda or facilitator panel, the board running inside Teams, Zoom or Webex meetings, participant limits per session stated, and an accessibility statement for the board.
10 — Facilitation that a large event runs on: hundreds of participants per board with stated limits, facilitator controls over who may edit what and when, session recordings or summaries with their data use stated, a published accessibility conformance report (WCAG), and facilitation features documented step by step.
The Workshop Facilitator
Guests sit at the centre of the pitch: unlimited outside guests and drop-in sessions that can be anonymous on the Professional plan, voting among the core actions, and guest sharing capped at two on the Personal and Basic plans. The pricing page names facilitator tools without describing them, and I found no public information on a timer, bringing everyone to one view, a presentation mode, locking objects or accessibility for participants. 1 3
The Product Team Lead
Guests are invited to boards, drop-in sessions can be anonymous or embedded in other web pages, and voting and annotating are listed as core actions — enough to run a retro with outsiders. The pricing comparison lists Facilitator Tools as a row but its values were not readable in the capture, and we found no public information on a timer, follow mode, presentation mode or participant limits. 1 3
The Microsoft 365 Admin
Guests can be invited to boards, voting is a named core action, and drop-in sessions can be anonymous or embedded in other web pages, which fits quick remote sessions. The plan comparison shows a Facilitator Tools row whose values are not readable in the capture, and we found no public information on timers, follow or summon modes, presentation mode, object locking, participant limits or accessibility for participants. 1 3
The Works Council Member
Real-time collaboration on shared boards, guest invitations, voting and anonymous or embedded drop-in sessions are documented, with guest numbers capped per plan (up to two on Personal and Basic, unlimited on Professional) and a Facilitator Tools row whose values were not readable. We found no public information on a timer, bringing participants to the facilitator's view, a presentation mode, object locking, participant limits or accessibility for participants. 1 3
The Public-Sector Project Lead
Guests are invited with stated limits — up to two on Personal and Basic, unlimited on Professional — drop-in sessions can be anonymous or embedded in other web pages, and voting is a named core action; facilitator tools appear as a Professional feature but without a readable description. We found no public information on timers, follow-me, presentation mode, locking objects or an accessibility statement, which I would need for participants from other authorities on locked-down machines. 1 3
The Skeptic
Real-time collaboration and guest invites are real, guests are capped at two on the free and Basic tiers with unlimited guests on Professional, and drop-in sessions can be anonymous or embedded in other web pages. A Facilitator Tools row appears on the pricing comparison but its contents are not readable, and we found no public information on timers, a presentation mode, bringing participants to one view, locking, or accessibility. 1 3
Integrations, import & export
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the board connects to the work around it and whether the content can leave: apps for Teams, Zoom, Webex, Slack and Google or Microsoft files, a two-way sync with Jira, Azure DevOps or other work tools, embedding boards in Confluence, SharePoint or intranets, a documented REST API and webhooks, import from Miro, Mural or other boards and from CSV or images, and export as PDF, image, CSV of the notes or an editable file another tool can open.
0 — No integration and no export of any kind; content can only be viewed on the vendor's board.
3 — Export as image or PDF and a few named integrations; an API, imports and structured export are basic or not described.
5 — Apps for at least Teams or Zoom and Slack, an integration with Jira or another work tool, embedding a board in other tools, export as PDF, image and CSV of the notes, and a documented API.
8 — A two-way sync with Jira or Azure DevOps that keeps cards and issues aligned, a REST API with webhooks covering boards and items, import from other whiteboards documented, an export in an editable or open format, and a marketplace or app framework for extensions.
10 — Integration and exit both complete: an API that can read and write everything the board holds, a full account export in an open format that another tool imports with structure kept, SDKs or an embeddable board for own applications, and the export and deletion on termination documented.
The Workshop Facilitator
Export appears as a core action and content can be imported as images, webshots or by copy/paste, with Google sign-in the only named integration. The pages never say what format an export produces, and I found no public information on a documented API, apps for Teams, Zoom or Slack, or import from another whiteboard. 1 4 5
The Product Team Lead
Export appears as a single word in the homepage action list with no format named on the captured pages, import runs through image upload, webshots and copy/paste, and the only integration documented is signing in with Google. For a team like mine the deciding point is that we found no public information on a Jira sync, a documented API, or an export format another tool can open. 1 4
The Microsoft 365 Admin
Export appears as a core action, content comes in via image upload, webshots and copy/paste, and sessions can be embedded in other web pages, with Google sign-in offered. We found no public information on a documented API or webhooks, apps for Teams, Zoom or Slack, sync with Jira or Azure DevOps, import from other whiteboards, or which formats the export produces. 1 3 4
The Works Council Member
Export is named as a core action, drop-in boards can be embedded in other web pages, and the privacy policy describes importing content via image upload, webshots and copy/paste. We found no public information on export formats, a documented API, or integrations with Teams, Zoom, Slack or work-tracking tools beyond Google sign-in. 1 3 4
The Public-Sector Project Lead
Export is listed as a core action and content can be imported via image upload, webshots and copy/paste, with Google sign-in as the one named integration. Export formats are not specified in the captured pages, and we found no public information on an API, webhooks, imports from other whiteboards or apps for Teams, Zoom or Slack. 1 4 5
The Skeptic
Export is named as a core action with no format stated anywhere, and the only named integrations are Google sign-in plus image, webshot and copy/paste import; drop-in boards can be embedded in other web pages. We found no public information on an API, Teams, Zoom or Slack apps, Jira, import from other whiteboards, or a structured export — so what leaving would actually keep is unanswered. 1 3 4
Sharing, permissions & administration
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who can see and change a board and how the organisation controls it: sharing by link with expiry and password, guest and external-user rules, roles per board, project and team, default sharing settings set by the admin, single sign-on (SAML, OpenID Connect), user provisioning (SCIM), domain capture and control of shadow accounts, audit logs, content retention and legal hold, transfer of boards when a person leaves, and admin reports.
0 — No accounts or permissions; anyone with a board's address can see and edit it, with no way to restrict it.
3 — Boards are shared with named people or by link with view or edit rights; admin controls, SSO and audit are basic or not described.
5 — Roles per board and per team, link sharing that can be restricted or switched off, guest access controlled by the admin, single sign-on with SAML, a user and board admin console, and boards transferred when a person leaves.
8 — SCIM provisioning, domain capture of existing accounts, sharing policies set centrally (no public links, guests only from allowed domains), audit logs exportable to a SIEM, retention rules and legal hold, data classification labels on boards, and admin roles split by scope.
10 — Administration that a regulated organisation can sign off: every sharing and access setting the admin controls listed with its effect, complete audit trails with a stated retention, eDiscovery and export for investigations, delegated administration across subsidiaries, and every control documented in the help centre.
The Workshop Facilitator
Sharing scales by plan — two guests on Personal and Basic, unlimited on Professional — and the Enterprise plan adds Single Sign On, single tenancy and whitelabelling. I found no public information on per-board roles, an admin console, link sharing restrictions, SCIM provisioning or audit logs. 1 3
The Product Team Lead
Guest sharing is capped at up to 2 on Personal and Basic and unlimited on Professional, and the Enterprise plan adds Single Sign On and Single Tenancy. That is a start for an organisation, but we found no public information on board-level roles, admin-controlled sharing policies, SCIM provisioning or audit logs. 1 3
The Microsoft 365 Admin
Guest sharing is capped per plan — up to two on Personal and Basic, unlimited on Professional — and single sign-on is named as an Enterprise feature alongside single tenancy. For my 600 free accounts on company addresses, we found no public information on SCIM provisioning, domain capture, admin-set sharing policies, audit logs, retention or legal hold, so adopting this would leave the shadow-account sprawl I already have. 3 1
The Works Council Member
Boards are shared within the team and with guests whose numbers are limited by plan, single sign-on and single tenancy appear only on the Enterprise plan that requires contacting sales, and repeat infringers' accounts can be terminated. We found no public information on link-sharing rules, role structures, user provisioning, audit logs, retention control or an administration console, which for a works council is the heart of the matter. 3 4
The Public-Sector Project Lead
Boards are shared within a team and with guests under per-plan limits, sign-in runs through Google accounts, and the Enterprise plan names Single Sign On, Single Tenancy and whitelabelling as a feature list only. We found no public information on roles per board or team, an admin console, link-sharing controls, SCIM provisioning or audit logs — nothing here procurement could verify before signing. 1 3 5
The Skeptic
Boards are shared with team members and guests, guest counts are limited by plan, and users are told they are responsible for all activity under their account. Single sign-on, single tenancy and whitelabelling exist only in an Enterprise tier reached through sales contact; we found no public information on link-sharing controls, an admin console, SCIM provisioning, audit logs, or board transfer when someone leaves. 1 3 5
Security, AI controls & deployment
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the content of the boards is protected and where the product can run: encryption in transit and at rest, customer-managed encryption keys, a dedicated or private-cloud tenant and an on-premises edition, AI features that the admin can switch off and that do not train on customer boards, which AI providers process board content, data loss prevention, deletion of boards and accounts with stated periods, and whether individual activity (logins, contributions, time on board) is tracked and shown to managers, with a statement for works councils. Who processes the data and where, and the certifications, are scored under sovereignty.
0 — Content is not protected in transit, or boards are used for the vendor's own purposes by default with no way to opt out.
3 — Encryption is mentioned and the product is described as secure or GDPR-compliant; AI use, deletion and deployment options are basic or not described.
5 — Encryption in transit and at rest stated, AI features that the admin can switch off, a statement that customer content is not used to train AI models, deletion of boards and accounts with a stated period, and a security page describing the measures.
8 — Customer-managed keys or a dedicated tenant, a private-cloud or on-premises edition documented, the AI providers that process board content named with their location, data loss prevention or classification controls, individual activity tracking described with what managers can see, and a statement or template for works council agreements.
10 — Protection that can be verified: client-side or end-to-end encryption for boards with the method published, an on-premises or sovereign-cloud edition with feature parity stated, no AI processing outside the customer's chosen region, a published penetration test summary, and every security and AI control listed with its effect.
The Workshop Facilitator
The privacy policy describes account deletion with data possibly remaining on the system for some period, backups retaining removed content, and employees and contractors having access to personal information; the Enterprise plan offers single tenancy. I found no public information on encryption in transit or at rest, a security page, or any AI features and the controls around them. 3 4
The Product Team Lead
Account deletion is available, though "your data may remain on our system for some period" and removed content persists in backup copies; Single Tenancy appears as an Enterprise option. We found no public information on encryption, on AI features and their controls, or on anything approaching a statement for a works council. 3 4
The Microsoft 365 Admin
The privacy policy allows account deletion with data persisting 'for some period' and in backups, and the Enterprise plan mentions single tenancy with more control over where data is stored. We found no public information on encryption in transit or at rest, on any AI features an administrator could switch off, on data loss prevention, or on whether individual activity is tracked and shown to managers. 4 3
The Works Council Member
Account deletion can be requested, but the policy says only that data "may remain on our system for some period" and that removed content may persist in backup copies for a reasonable period, with no periods stated. We found no public information on encryption, AI features and their control, whether individual contributions or time on board are tracked and shown to anyone, or a works council statement; single tenancy on the Enterprise plan is the only deployment-adjacent option described. 3 4
The Public-Sector Project Lead
The captured pages state that account deletion is available but data may remain on the system for some period, that removed content persists in backup copies, that employees and contractors may access personal data, and the Enterprise plan names single tenancy with control over where data is stored. We found no public information on encryption, AI use, data loss prevention or a works-council statement, so this would not survive a security questionnaire from our ministry. 3 4
The Skeptic
Account deletion is available with data remaining 'for some period' and removed content persisting in backups, and Enterprise offers single tenancy with 'more control over where their data is stored' — the only deployment option described. We found no public information on encryption, a security page, or AI controls, and the terms take a 'non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license' to everything created on the boards until it is deleted. 3 4 5
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boards, files and user data are stored and processed, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, CDN, real-time collaboration servers, AI providers, email, support and payment tools). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; boards hold personal data of participants and often of customers, so the whole chain counts, not only the database. An on-premises or self-hosted edition the customer runs on its own European servers counts as the customer's chain, whatever the vendor's seat.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no data processing agreement offered.
3 — A privacy policy and a data processing agreement exist, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the subprocessors are not listed.
5 — EU hosting available and an EU contracting entity or EU representative, but parts of the chain (AI features, CDN, real-time servers, email, support, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard, or EU residency is an option of the top tier only.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with their locations, a data processing agreement published, and security certifications (ISO 27001, BSI C5, SOC 2) stated — or an on-premises edition documented that keeps every board on the customer's own servers.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor including AI, or an on-premises or open-source edition with no call home, data export and deletion documented, and certifications published with their scope rather than implied.
The Workshop Facilitator
The contracting entity is Biggerflip Ltd, registered at 128 City Road, London, England, and the privacy policy names Google Analytics, which stores information on servers in the United States, plus Intercom and Recurly for analytics and payment. Where the boards themselves are hosted is not stated on any page I read, and I found no public information on a data processing agreement or EU data residency. 4
The Product Team Lead
The contracting entity is Biggerflip Ltd, registered in England, and the named subprocessors — Google Analytics with data stored in the United States, plus Intercom and Recurly — are US services. Where boards and user data are hosted is not stated in anything we captured, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or EU hosting. 4
The Microsoft 365 Admin
The contracting entity is Biggerflip Ltd, registered in England, number 09401527, at 128 City Road, London, and the privacy policy names Google Analytics — with data stored in the United States — plus Intercom and Recurly in the chain. We found no public information on where boards and user data are hosted, on a published data processing agreement, or on certifications such as ISO 27001, so only part of the chain is visible. 4 2
The Works Council Member
The contracting entity is Biggerflip Ltd, registered at 128 City Road, London, England, and the privacy policy names Google Analytics (with data transmitted to and stored by Google on servers in the United States), Intercom and Recurly in the processing chain. We found no public information on where boards and user data are hosted or on a data processing agreement; the Enterprise page speaks only of more control over where their data is stored and how it is managed, without naming a location. 3 4
The Public-Sector Project Lead
The contracting entity is Biggerflip Ltd, registered in England and outside the EU, the hosting location for boards is not stated in the captured pages, and the named chain includes Google Analytics storing data on servers in the United States plus Intercom and Recurly; we found no public information on a data processing agreement, EU residency or BSI C5 / ISO 27001. For us that fails both the data protection officer's rule on US-hosted boards and procurement's C5 or on-premises requirement before a contract could even be drafted. 3 4
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is Biggerflip Ltd of London, and the privacy policy names Google Analytics, Intercom and Recurly as subprocessors, with cookie data including IP addresses stored on servers in the United States by Google. We found no public information on where the boards themselves are hosted, a published data processing agreement, or certifications; the Enterprise tier's promise of more control over data storage is the only residency statement, with nothing concrete behind it. 3 4
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per user and tier, how guests, viewers and external participants are counted, limits of the free plan (number of boards, objects, members), which features (SSO, SCIM, audit logs, EU data residency, AI credits, on-premises) cost extra, the enterprise tier's price or minimum, annual versus monthly billing, minimum seats and term.
0 — No public prices at all; every customer is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or a free plan exists, but how cost scales with users, guests or features is unclear.
5 — Tiers are public with their price per user and main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (SSO, EU data residency, guests, AI credits, the enterprise tier) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier priced publicly with its scaling rule (members, guests, boards), free-plan limits stated, add-ons and AI credits priced, the on-premises or dedicated edition's cost or licence stated, minimum seats, term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given team size, guest count and feature set, with every add-on, setup, support and AI fee and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Workshop Facilitator
The pricing page is unusually clear for a small vendor: Personal free forever with three boards and two guests, Basic at $6 per user per month, Professional at $12 per user per month with unlimited boards and guests, VAT included at checkout in the EU and UK, a 14-day trial with no charge if cancelled, a 30-day no-questions refund, and self-service plan and seat changes. The Enterprise tier — the one carrying Single Sign On and single tenancy — is contact-sales only, so the cost of the controls a corporate client asks for is not computable from public pages. 3
The Product Team Lead
Personal is free forever with a stated three-board cap, Basic is "$12 MONTHLY @ $6 / user / month", Professional "$24 MONTHLY @ $12 / user / month", board and guest limits per tier are shown, and "In the EU and UK, prices will include VAT at checkout". The Enterprise plan — the only tier with Single Sign On — is contact-sales only, so the annual cost for a team needing SSO cannot be computed from public pages. 3
The Microsoft 365 Admin
Prices are public: Personal is free with 3 boards and up to 2 guests, Basic (Team) is quoted as '$12 MONTHLY @ $6 / user / month' and Professional (Team) as '$24 MONTHLY @ $12 / user / month', with VAT treatment, a 14-day trial, a 30-day no-questions refund and self-service plan and seat changes stated. The Enterprise plan — where single sign-on and single tenancy sit — is contact-sales only, and we found no public information on annual billing, minimum seats or term, so the tier I would actually need has no computable price. 3
The Works Council Member
Personal (free forever), Basic at $12 monthly @ $6/user/month and Professional at $24 monthly @ $12/user/month are public, together with free-plan limits (3 boards, up to 2 guests), a 14-day trial, a 30-day no-questions refund, immediate plan and seat changes, and the statement that in the EU and UK prices will include VAT at checkout. The Enterprise tier, where single sign-on and single tenancy sit, is available only by contacting sales, and we found no public information on annual billing, minimum seats or term length. 3
The Public-Sector Project Lead
The Personal plan is free with three boards, Basic is "$12 MONTHLY @ $6 / user / month" and Professional "$24 MONTHLY @ $12 / user / month" with unlimited boards, per-tier guest counts, a 14-day free trial, a 30-day no-questions refund and VAT included at EU/UK checkout — genuinely computable for the lower tiers. The Enterprise tier carrying Single Sign On is contact-sales only, and annual billing, minimum seats and term are not described, which is where my procurement office would have to pick up the phone. 3
The Skeptic
Personal, Basic and Professional are publicly priced per user with free-plan limits of three boards and two guests, VAT treatment, a 30-day no-questions refund and self-service cancellation, so a small team can compute its cost. But single sign-on, single tenancy and whitelabelling sit in an Enterprise tier priced only on request, and we found no public information on annual billing, minimum seats, or term length. 3
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Ideaflip
Is Ideaflip European?
Yes, though not from the EU. whats-best.ai classifies Ideaflip as UK / wider Europe.
Where does Ideaflip store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 1 Nov 2026.
Does Ideaflip have a free plan?
Yes. Ideaflip has a free plan, per the vendor’s page captured 1 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Ideaflip?
As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates Miro (3.5/5), Collaboard (3.5/5) and Klaxoon (3/5) highest among the other 12 Online Whiteboard products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Collaboard (UK / wider Europe). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Ideaflip alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 1 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (ideaflip.com, ideaflip.com/about, ideaflip.com/plan/pricing, ideaflip.com/privacy, ideaflip.com/terms). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 2 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (5)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage ideaflip.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Company page ideaflip.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Pricing page ideaflip.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Privacy policy ideaflip.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Terms of service ideaflip.com Checked 1 Nov 2026 Details →