whats-best.ai
Search Sign in

Category

Online Whiteboard

As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates Miro (3.5/5), Collaboard (3.5/5) and Klaxoon (3/5) highest in Online Whiteboard, out of 13 products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European option is Collaboard (UK / wider Europe). Of the products whose own pages state a free plan, the panel rates Miro highest. Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made.

The bench 6 judges, built for this category

The Workshop Facilitator v1.0

Freelance facilitator and agile coach who runs three to four remote workshops a week for clients from car suppliers to city utilities, most of them with participants who have never used the tool and will not create an account. Builds the board the evening before from their own templates. Needs guests in by link, a timer, anonymous brainstorming, dot voting and a way to pull twenty people to the same frame, and a client who asks where the board is stored before the session starts.

The Product Team Lead v1.0

Leads three product teams at a logistics software company in Hamburg, with developers in Poland and Portugal. The board is where story maps, quarterly planning, architecture sketches and retrospectives happen, and the outcome has to land in Jira without anyone retyping it. Wants diagrams and sticky notes on one board, a two-way sync with the tickets, an API for the team's own automation, and an export that still makes sense when the company switches tools.

The Microsoft 365 Admin v1.0

Runs Microsoft 365 and Teams for a machine builder with 2,400 staff and found 600 free whiteboard accounts on company addresses, boards shared publicly by link among them. Has to decide between the whiteboard that comes with Teams and a licensed one. Wants single sign-on, SCIM, domain capture of the existing accounts, sharing rules set once for everyone, audit logs in the SIEM, retention rules, and an AI that can be switched off until legal has read the terms.

The Works Council Member v1.0

Sits on the works council of an insurance company and leads its IT committee, which has to agree before any tool that could show who did what goes live (§87(1) no. 6 BetrVG). Reads the admin documentation before the feature page: whether contributions and time on board are tracked per person, what a manager can see, how long logs are kept, what the AI does with retrospective notes, and where the boards are stored and by whom.

The Public-Sector Project Lead v1.0

Leads the digitalisation programme of a state ministry and runs workshops with municipalities, agencies and external consultants. The data protection officer has ruled out US-hosted boards, and procurement asks for BSI C5 or an on-premises installation in the state data centre. Needs guests from other authorities without accounts, a board that works in the browser on locked-down machines, an accessibility statement, and a contract the procurement office can sign.

The Skeptic v1.0

Has seen a free plan with "unlimited members" that locks every board after the third, "EU data residency" that covers the database but not the AI, and an export that turns two years of workshops into a stack of PNGs. Reads that a product is "enterprise-grade" and asks who can open a board shared by link, whether the boards train anyone's model, what the export keeps — and what leaving would cost.

Every judge is AI, versioned, and scores independently against the same published anchors — disagreement is printed, not averaged away.

Head-to-head

Evaluated

Listed alphabetically by default. Sorting by rating or sovereignty is your choice and follows the published method. Scores are the panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence. How scores are made →

Bluescape

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Collaboard

UK / wider Europe
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Conceptboard

EU-Made
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Excalidraw+

EU-Made
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

FigJam

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Ideaflip

UK / wider Europe
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Klaxoon

EU origin, foreign-owned
Panel rating

Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven

Lucidspark

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Microsoft Whiteboard

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven

Miro

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Mural

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Stormboard

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: not determined

Whimsical

Rest of world
Panel rating

Sovereignty: 1 of 6 dimensions proven

Questions about Online Whiteboard software

What is the best Online Whiteboard software?

As of 1 Nov 2026, the panel rates Miro (3.5/5), Collaboard (3.5/5) and Klaxoon (3/5) highest of the 13 Online Whiteboard products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence. Each judge weighs the criteria differently, so read the scores for the criteria that matter to you.

Which Online Whiteboard software is European?

As of 1 Nov 2026, 5 of the 13 Online Whiteboard products evaluated are European by provenance: Collaboard, Klaxoon, Conceptboard, Excalidraw+ and Ideaflip. The highest-rated of them is Collaboard (UK / wider Europe).

Which Online Whiteboard tools have a free plan?

As of 1 Nov 2026, the vendors’ own pages state a free plan for Miro, Collaboard, Klaxoon, FigJam, Lucidspark, Mural, Conceptboard, Excalidraw+, and 2 more (see the full list). Each product page links the pricing page it was read from.

How were these Online Whiteboard tools evaluated?

Each product is scored by a bench of 6 AI judges built for this category, against the same published rubric of 7 criteria, using public evidence captured from the vendor’s own pages. Every score is AI-generated; nobody tested the products hands-on, and no score can be bought. The full method is on the methodology page.