Collaboration depth
How this is scored
How much real multi-person project work the tool carries: shared planning, assignments, dependencies, workload, comments, guest access.
0 — A personal task list; a second user has no defined place in it.
3 — Tasks can be shared and assigned, but planning stays per-person — no shared timeline, workload or dependency view.
5 — Solid shared projects with assignments, comments and at least one team-level planning view; gaps appear in cross-project or capacity planning.
8 — Team-level planning is first-class: cross-project views, workload/capacity, dependencies, guest or client access with sane permissions.
10 — Handles the full span from two freelancers to a structured department in one model — planning, capacity, permissions and client involvement all without workarounds.
The Integrator
Assignments of one or more owners, in-task comments with @mentions, shared boards, Gantt charts and dashboards that compile one or more boards are all documented, and workload appears as a named dashboard metric with agents assigning work by capacity and skill set. I found no public information on guest or client access with its own permission model or on explicit dependency management, so shared planning stops short of the full multi-team span. 4 5 7 10