SEO
BrightLocal
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by BrightLocal · www.brightlocal.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
BrightLocal at a glance
- Vendor
- BrightLocal
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Starting price
- “Prices (from) $31 /month” (vendor’s words) source, captured 3 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates BrightLocal 1.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. BrightLocal is a local SEO platform — rank tracking, citations, listings and reviews — and its strongest area is reporting and API at a flat 7: white-label reports on a custom domain, scheduled daily-to-monthly emails, support for up to 250 locations, and a REST/JSON API suite with 99.9% uptime stated. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 4 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
BrightLocal is a local SEO platform — rank tracking, citations, listings and reviews — and its strongest area is reporting and API at a flat 7: white-label reports on a custom domain, scheduled daily-to-monthly emails, support for up to 250 locations, and a REST/JSON API suite with 99.9% uptime stated. Rank and index data scored 5-6 on daily tracking on Google and Bing across desktop, mobile and Maps plus a geo-grid over hundreds of points, though we found no public information on a backlink index or data methodology. Technical audit and keyword and content are weakest: the pages document a citation audit and a free keyword-research course, and we found no public information on site crawling, Core Web Vitals, or keyword volume, difficulty or intent data. The genuine split is sovereignty, 1 to 4: the pages establish a UK chain — BrightLocal Ltd, English law, the ICO, transfers outside the UK and EEA under IDTA and the UK-US Data Bridge — so some judges credited the documented safeguards while others noted no public information on an EU contracting entity or EU hosting.
Speaks for it
- White-label reporting hosted on a custom domain with uploaded logos and brand colours and scheduled daily, weekly or monthly emails
- Documented REST/JSON API suite covering rankings, reviews, listings and citations, with 99.9% uptime stated and full developer documentation
- Daily rank tracking on Google and Bing across desktop, mobile and Maps, with a geo-grid covering hundreds of points and custom grid points
- Management of up to 250 locations per account
- Public headline pricing — the all-in-one platform from $31/mo, citations from $2/citation, managed SEO from $499/mo — plus a 14-day free trial with no card required
Held against it
- Technical audit scored 0-1, with the documented auditing limited to tracking down a business's citations and no public information on site crawling, Core Web Vitals or indexation diagnosis
- Keyword and content scored 0-2, with a free video course and a free SERP viewer standing in for keyword data and no public information on search volume, difficulty or intent
- We found no public information on tier-by-tier keyword, location or user limits, per-seat costs, or API rate limits and credit costs, so the real invoice cannot be computed from the public pages
- Data portability scored 2-4, with the termination clause scoped to personal data and no public information on exporting historical ranking data in open formats
- The documented legal chain is UK rather than EU — BrightLocal Ltd, English law, the ICO — with transfers outside the UK and EEA acknowledged under IDTA and the UK-US Data Bridge and subprocessors described only as based inside or outside the UK or EEA
Best for
- You run an agency delivering local-visibility work and need white-label reports on your own domain for up to 250 locations
- You need granular local rank tracking — daily positions on Google and Bing across desktop, mobile and Maps, plus grid coverage across hundreds of points
- You build your own dashboards or workflows and want a documented REST/JSON API for rankings, reviews, listings and citations
- Your SEO practice is local visibility — rankings, citations, listings, reviews — rather than site auditing or content production
Avoid if
- You need to audit websites technically — the documented toolkit is rank tracking, citations, listings and reviews, and technical audit scored 0-1
- You need keyword research data such as search volume, difficulty or intent to plan content — keyword and content scored 0-2
- You require an EU contracting entity or EU hosting — the documented chain is BrightLocal Ltd under English law with the ICO as regulator, and transfers outside the UK and EEA are acknowledged
- You must budget a full year's cost or API usage before committing — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Crawling & technical audit | 0 of 5 |
| Keyword research & content guidance | 0.5 of 5 |
| Rank tracking & index quality | 3 of 5 |
| Reporting, integrations & API | 3.5 of 5 |
| Data portability & exit | 1.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 1 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 2 of 5 |
Crawling & technical audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler or audit; the product is keyword, rank or backlink data only.
3 — A site audit that crawls pages and reports broken links, missing tags and redirect problems.
5 — Scheduled site audits with a stated page limit, issues grouped by category and severity with fix hints, and page speed or Core Web Vitals reported.
8 — JavaScript rendering, log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, crawl comparison over time, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
The documented product is a local visibility platform — local rank tracking, a map search grid, a citation tracker, listings and reviews — and I found no public information on a site crawler, Core Web Vitals, indexation or canonical diagnosis. For my team, nothing on these pages would ever become a developer ticket. 1 4
The Agency Owner
The documented toolkit is local rank tracking, citation tracking, review and listings management, with citation auditing the nearest thing to an audit workstream. We found no public information on site crawling, page-limit scheduling, Core Web Vitals or indexation diagnosis, so this reads as a different kind of tool from a technical site auditor. 1 4
The Technical SEO
The captured pages describe a local SEO platform whose features are rank tracking, geo-grid monitoring, citation building, listings and reviews — a different kind of tool from a site auditor — and we found no public information on a site crawler, JavaScript rendering, Core Web Vitals reporting or indexation diagnosis. The auditing page that exists is about hunting down a business's citations, not diagnosing what a crawler sees versus what Google fetched. 1 4 6
The Content Strategist
Everything documented is about the business's visibility, not the website's health: citations, listings, map rankings, reviews — the nearest thing to an audit is a citation tracker that hunts down existing listings. We found no public information on site crawling, Core Web Vitals, indexation or canonical diagnosis, so I have nothing to build a technical-SEO workflow around. 1 4
The Data Analyst
The captured pages present a local-visibility toolkit — rank tracking, citations, listings, reviews — and the page offered under auditing describes hunting down a business's directory citations, not crawling the customer's site. That is an audit of listings rather than of pages, and we found no public information on site crawling, Core Web Vitals, indexation diagnosis or structured-data validation. 1 4 9
The Skeptic
Everything documented about auditing points at listings, not websites: the audit page describes hunting down a business's citations, and the headline feature set is rank tracking, search grids, citations and reviews. We found no public information on site crawling, page limits, rendering, indexation diagnosis or Core Web Vitals. 1 4
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — No keyword research or content guidance; the product is a crawler or rank tracker only.
3 — Keyword suggestions with search volume, for at least one market.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and search intent for Germany and other markets, SERP features shown per keyword, and on-page or content recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor keyword gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs or a writing assistant scored on entity or topic coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
I found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification, SERP features per keyword, or any German-language keyword data. 1 5 7
The Agency Owner
What is documented is a free video course on local keyword research, a free SERP checker showing results from any location, and AI insights recommending visibility actions — education and SERP viewing rather than keyword research tooling. We found no public information on search volume, difficulty or intent data in the product itself, let alone German-market depth. 1 5 7
The Technical SEO
The only keyword-research evidence is a free video course about local keyword research rather than a tool, and the AI Insights feature recommends actions on Google Business Profile gaps, listing consistency and competitor advantages — local visibility triage, not keyword discovery or content guidance. We found no public information on search volume, difficulty, intent classification, SERP feature data or content briefs. 5 7
The Content Strategist
Keyword research appears as education rather than tooling: a free video course on mastering local keyword research and a local SERP checker that shows results for any location, while AI Insights recommends fixes for ranking factors like listing consistency rather than content briefs. We found no public information on keyword suggestions with volume and intent, topic clustering, SERP feature analysis or cannibalisation detection — the things I brief writers against. 1 5 7
The Data Analyst
What the pages show on the keyword side is education and advice rather than data: a free video course on mastering local keyword research, and AI Insights that explains ranking factors and recommends actions. We found no public information on keyword suggestions with search volume, difficulty or intent classification, SERP feature data, or content briefs, so there is no keyword dataset here to assess. 1 5 7
The Skeptic
On keyword research the captured pages offer a free video course on mastering local keyword research and a free SERP viewer for any location — teaching material and a viewer, not a data product. We found no public information on keyword suggestions with volume, difficulty or search intent for Germany or any other market, SERP features per keyword, or on-page content guidance. 1 5
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — No rank tracking and no backlink data; the product is an audit or content tool only.
3 — Rank tracking for chosen keywords in a chosen country, or a backlink checker.
5 — Rank tracking with country, device and update frequency selectable or stated (daily or weekly), local results, and a backlink database with referring domains and new and lost links.
8 — Daily rankings across many locations including city level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh frequency published, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
Local rank tracking is genuinely deep: a stated daily view on Google and Bing across desktop, mobile and Maps, the top-three map pack, and a geo-grid across hundreds of points with custom grid points. But I found no public information on a backlink index, ranking methodology, or how historical rankings are retained — exactly what I would need to defend numbers that disagree with Search Console. 1 4 6 7
The Agency Owner
Daily ranking views on Google and Bing across desktop, mobile and Maps, map-pack top-three tracking, and geo-grid coverage across hundreds of points with custom grid points give real hyperlocal granularity. The backlink half of the picture is absent entirely, and no index size, methodology or account-life historical retention is published — the privacy policy retains the account for three years from last activity. 1 3 6 7
The Technical SEO
This is the proprietary core: a stated daily view of rankings on Google and Bing across desktop, mobile and Maps, map-pack top-three positions tracked specifically, and a geo-grid that checks hundreds of points including custom points placed exactly where searchers are — more granular than city level. We found no public information on a backlink index, methodology, or how long historical rankings are retained, which is what holds it below the top of the range. 1 6 7
The Content Strategist
Local rank tracking is documented properly: a daily view across Google and Bing on desktop, mobile and Maps, positions in the top three map spots, and a grid that checks hundreds of geo points with custom point placement — granularity well past city level. We found no public information on a backlink index, data methodology, or how historical rankings are retained and exported, so accountability for the data itself stays unproven. 1 6 7
The Data Analyst
Rank tracking is the core product and it is documented well: a clear daily view on Google and Bing across desktop, mobile and Maps, a geo-grid across hundreds of points with custom grid points, and a rank-tracking API to add and schedule reports. The proprietary-data story stops there — we found no public information on backlink data, index size or freshness, or a documented methodology for their own numbers. 1 6 7 9
The Skeptic
Rank tracking is documented to a frequency and granularity a buyer can hold the vendor to: a stated daily view across Google and Bing on desktop, mobile and Maps, top-three map-pack positions, and grid tracking the vendor says checks 'hundreds of points' rather than one pin, with custom points. We found no public information on data methodology, historical retention of rankings, or any backlink index, so the vendor's proprietary-data claims beyond local rank tracking cannot be checked from these pages. 1 6 7
Reporting, integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — No reports, exports or integrations of any kind; results can only be viewed on screen.
3 — Reports as PDF or CSV export, and a Google Search Console or analytics connection.
5 — Customisable or scheduled reports, Search Console and Google Analytics integration, and an API or a Looker Studio connector documented.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with its limits and credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
White-label reporting is strong — custom logos and brand colors, reports hosted on a custom domain, control over which insights clients see, scheduled daily, weekly or monthly report emails — and there is a documented REST/JSON API suite covering rankings, reviews, listings and citations with 99.9% uptime stated. I found no public information on Search Console or Google Analytics integration, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, or per-endpoint API limits and credit costs. 1 8 9
The Agency Owner
This is the part built for my kind of shop: white-label reports hosted on a custom domain with my logo and colours, monthly white-label updates I can send unedited, control over which insights each client sees, scheduled daily, weekly or monthly report emails, and support for up to 250 locations per account. A documented REST-and-JSON API suite for rankings, reviews, listings and citations with 99.9% uptime and full developer documentation backs it up, though we found no public information on Search Console or Google Analytics integration, data-warehouse export, or published API limits and credit costs per endpoint. 1 8 9
The Technical SEO
White-label reporting is properly built out — logos, brand colors, reports hosted on a custom domain, monthly updates, scheduled daily-to-monthly emails, and control over which insights clients see — alongside a documented REST/JSON developer API suite covering rankings, geo-grid reports, reviews across 80+ directory sites, listings, citations and bulk location management, with 99.9% uptime stated. We found no public information on published API rate limits or credit costs per endpoint, Search Console or Google Analytics connections, or data-warehouse export. 1 8 9
The Content Strategist
The agency side is genuinely strong: white-label reports hosted on a custom domain with control over which insights clients see, scheduled daily, weekly or monthly report emails, and a documented REST API suite in JSON covering rankings, reviews, listings, citations and locations with a stated 99.9% uptime. We found no public information on published rate limits or credit costs per endpoint, or on data-warehouse export — exactly what I would need priced in before commissioning an in-house build. 1 8 9
The Data Analyst
This is the strongest area: white-label reports hosted on a custom domain with control over which insights clients see, scheduled daily to monthly report emails, and a documented REST/JSON API suite covering rankings, reviews, listings, citations and locations with 99.9% uptime, full developer documentation and trial access. But the bill for using it is not computable — no API credit costs or rate limits are published on the captured pages, and we found no public information on Search Console or analytics integration or warehouse export. 1 8 9
The Skeptic
Agency reporting is documented in substance: white-label reports on a custom domain with uploaded logos and brand colours, scheduled daily, weekly or monthly emails, control over which insights clients see, and management of up to 250 locations. The API suite is real and documented — REST with JSON responses for rankings, reviews, listings and citations, with 99.9% uptime stated — but the pages stop short of what a builder needs to budget: we found no public information on per-endpoint rate limits or credit costs, data-warehouse export, or Search Console and Google Analytics integration. 8 9
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — The vendor states that data cannot be exported at all.
3 — CSV or Excel export of the current reports and keyword lists.
5 — Export of rankings, keywords and audit results including historical data, through the interface or an API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
The terms commit, at the customer's direction, to return or delete personal data in a reasonably requested format on termination, and a documented API exists that a team could build on. I found no public information on exporting ranking or report history in open formats, or on a stated grace period after cancellation — the privacy policy's three-year retention runs from the last recorded activity, which describes the account rather than a post-cancellation archive. 2 3 9
The Agency Owner
The terms commit to providing the registered user their data in a reasonably requested format on termination, and deleting it at the user's direction — a genuine exit clause, though scoped to personal data. We found no public information on self-serve export of ranking and grid history in open formats, or on any retention window after cancellation before deletion. 2 9
The Technical SEO
The terms provide for return or deletion of data at the customer's direction on termination, and the documented APIs can pull rankings, reviews and listings into external dashboards; the account is stated as retained for 3 years from last recorded activity. We found no public information on full historical export in open formats, whether exports are credit-metered, or how long the ranking archive stays retrievable after cancellation. 2 3 9
The Content Strategist
The terms address exit directly: data is returned or deleted at termination in a format reasonably requested by the customer, and the account is retained for three years from the last recorded activity. We found no public information on self-serve export of historical rankings, keywords or reports in open formats, so the multi-year history a subscriber accumulates has no documented way out on demand. 2 3
The Data Analyst
The rank-tracking API can pull ranking and geo-grid reports out programmatically, and the terms provide for data to be returned in a reasonably requested format at termination — but that clause covers personal data, and the three-year figure is account retention from last activity, not a stated retrieval window after cancellation. We found no public information on bulk historical export of ranking history, which is the asset a multi-year subscription actually accumulates. 2 3 9
The Skeptic
On exit the terms promise personal data returned or deleted at the customer's direction, and the privacy policy retains the account for 3 years from the last recorded activity — but neither addresses the ranking and citation history a multi-year subscription accumulates. We found no public information on export of historical rankings in open formats, on metering of such exports, or on retrieval of the archive after cancellation. 2 3 9
European sovereignty
panel opinion
panel disagrees
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities. Dimensions the sources do not establish are unknown, not non-EU.
0 — Proven non-EU: a non-EU vendor and contracting entity with hosting stated outside the EU.
3 — One European element proven — an EU contracting entity or EU hosting stated — with the rest of the chain undocumented.
5 — An EU contracting entity and EU hosting both stated, and a data processing agreement offered.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, a subprocessor list published with locations, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead
The contracting chain is proven but British rather than EU: BrightLocal Ltd in Brighton, English law with exclusive English jurisdiction, UK GDPR under the Information Commissioner's Office, and the AI Visibility Platform stated as UK-hosted. The privacy policy states personal data may be transferred outside the EEA, and sub-processors such as Google, Hotjar, PayPal and Stripe are described only as based inside or outside the UK or EEA — a non-EU chain with GDPR-style safeguards, not European Union sovereignty. 2 3
The Agency Owner
BrightLocal Ltd in Brighton contracts under English law with the ICO as regulator, one invite-only product is stated as UK-hosted, and the privacy policy is candid that data is transferred outside the UK and the EEA, with its own DPA, IDTAs and the UK-US Data Bridge as safeguards, and subprocessors named without firm locations. No EU contracting entity or EU hosting is established for the platform, so I can only credit one European element with part of the chain documented. 2 3
The Technical SEO
The captured pages establish a UK chain — BrightLocal Ltd in Brighton as controller, English law and courts, UK GDPR with the ICO, a DPO, DPIAs, an audit right once every 12 months, and a 30-day objection window on new subprocessors — with subprocessors named as based inside or outside the UK or EEA and transfers outside the UK/EEA acknowledged with IDTA and Data Bridge safeguards. General hosting location is not stated beyond one platform stated as UK-hosted, and the contracting entity is not an EU entity, so this sits below the middle of the range. 2 3
The Content Strategist
The chain the pages do establish is British rather than EU: BrightLocal Ltd in Brighton as controller, English law and exclusive English jurisdiction, the ICO as regulator under UK GDPR, and acknowledged transfers of personal data outside the EEA with US service providers relying on the UK-US Data Bridge. Where the main platform's account and tracking data are hosted is not established on the captured pages, and subprocessor locations are given only as inside or outside the UK or EEA. 2 3
The Data Analyst
The chain the pages prove is British rather than EU: BrightLocal Ltd in Brighton as controller under English law with the Information Commissioner's Office as regulator, one product stated as UK-hosted, and acknowledged transfers outside the UK and EEA, including US providers under the UK Extension to the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. There is a real compliance apparatus — a Data Protection Officer, impact assessments, transfer agreements, and named subprocessors such as Google, Hotjar, PayPal and Stripe located inside or outside the UK or EEA — but we found no public information on an EU contracting entity or EU hosting for the main platform. 2 3
The Skeptic
The captured pages prove a UK, not EU, chain: BrightLocal Ltd of Brighton as controller, English law with exclusive English jurisdiction, and the ICO named as regulator under UK GDPR, while the policy acknowledges transfers outside the UK and the European Economic Area relying on IDTA and the UK-US Data Bridge. Hosting for the main platform is not stated, and subprocessors are described only as 'based inside or outside the UK or EEA'. We found no public information on an EU contracting entity, EU hosting, or a located subprocessor list for the platform. 2 3
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A public "from" price or a single tier with its price.
5 — Prices per tier public with the billing period and the main limits (keywords tracked, pages crawled, projects or users) stated.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
There is a public starting price — "All-in-one Platform from $31/mo", citations at $2/citation, managed SEO from $499/mo — plus a 14-day free trial with no card required and terms stating all charges are exclusive of VAT. I found no public information on per-tier prices or the keyword, location and user limits each tier includes, so I cannot compute a real annual invoice for my team. 1 2 7 8
The Agency Owner
Public headline prices exist — the all-in-one platform from $31/mo, citations from $2/citation, managed SEO from $499/mo, with a 14-day trial needing no card — and the terms add useful edges: VAT-exclusive pricing, monthly auto-renewal, 30 days' notice on price changes and annual price protection. But no tier-by-tier limits for locations, keywords or users are published, and we found no public information on per-seat costs or API credit pricing, so I cannot compute the annual invoice for a forty-client book from public pages alone. 1 2 7 8 9
The Technical SEO
Entry prices are public — the all-in-one platform from $31/mo, citations from $2/citation, managed SEO from $499/mo — with a 14-day trial requiring no card, charges stated exclusive of VAT, 30 days' notice on price changes, and monthly auto-renewal with non-refundable charges. We found no public information on per-tier prices with keyword, crawl or project limits, per-seat costs or overage rates, so a real annual invoice cannot be computed from these pages alone. 1 2 7
The Content Strategist
Public pricing is a starting line, not a ladder: an all-in-one platform from $31/mo, citations from $2/citation, managed local SEO from $499/mo, with VAT exclusive treatment, monthly auto-renewal, cancellation, refund and thirty-day price-change notice all documented in the terms. We found no public information on per-tier prices with keyword, location, user or API limits, so a buyer cannot compute the real annual invoice from these pages alone. 1 2 7
The Data Analyst
A buyer gets a genuine starting point — "All-in-one Platform from $31/mo", "Build Citations from $2/citation", "Managed SEO Services from $499/mo", a 14-day free trial with no card — and the terms state VAT-exclusive charges, monthly auto-renewal, thirty days' notice on price changes and non-refundability. The annual invoice is still not computable from these pages: we found no public information on per-tier prices or the keyword, location and user limits each tier carries. 1 2 7 8
The Skeptic
A buyer starts with real numbers — 'All-in-one Platform from $31/mo', 'Build Citations from $2/citation', 'Managed SEO Services from $499/mo', and a 14-day free trial with no card — and the terms state charges are exclusive of VAT, auto-renew monthly, and change only with 30 days' notice. What no buyer can compute from these pages is the actual invoice: we found no public information on tier-by-tier keyword or location limits, per-seat costs, minimum term, or API credit costs, and annual billing appears only in a clause deferring price changes to renewal. 1 2 7 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 6 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hosting location | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Hosting options | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Open source | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data processing agreement | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Transfer impact assessment | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about BrightLocal
Is BrightLocal European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where BrightLocal is based.
Where does BrightLocal store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
Does BrightLocal have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to BrightLocal?
As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates SE Ranking (3.5/5), SISTRIX (3/5) and Semrush (3/5) highest among the other 37 SEO products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is SISTRIX (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: BrightLocal alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 3 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 30 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (9)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Terms of service — found from the homepage www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy — found from the homepage www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 9 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap www.brightlocal.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →