SEO
SEOmonitor
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by SEOmonitor · seomonitor.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
SEOmonitor at a glance
- Vendor
- SEOmonitor
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates SEOmonitor 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. SEOmonitor's captured help pages document a rank-tracking, keyword-research and SERP-feature tool. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 3 Nov 2026; evaluated by the panel 4 Nov 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
SEOmonitor's captured help pages document a rank-tracking, keyword-research and SERP-feature tool. Its strongest area is rank and index data, scored 6 to 8: the pages publish daily dynamic-depth collection on the primary device, a weekly top-100 collection each Saturday, and fail-safe rules that hold a suspicious drop — ten or more positions from positions one to five — for up to two further crawls before recording it. Reporting and API, plus data portability, each scored 6 to 7, built on a documented API at version 3.0 with limits of 10,000 requests a day, ten per second and 1,000 rows per request, Looker Studio connectors, and CSV export without extra costs. Technical audit scored 0 with no higher score recorded: every crawl documented is of Google's results, not the customer's site. Keyword and content sits at 4 to 5, with no public information on difficulty scores or content briefs. No sovereignty attributes are on record, and the captured pages give no public information on hosting location or the contracting entity; no price figures appear either.
Speaks for it
- Rank-collection methodology published in detail — daily dynamic-depth collection on the primary device, a weekly top-100 collection on Saturdays, and stated drop-verification rules with up to two held crawls.
- Documented API at version 3.0 that reads any data in the account and adds keywords, with limits published at 10,000 requests a day, ten per second and 1,000 rows per request.
- CSV export of all daily ranks, competitor ranks and daily Visibility Scores on demand, without extra costs and with current filters respected.
- Vendor-maintained Looker Studio connectors for Campaign, Competition, Forecast and Organic Traffic, plus a newer unified connector with AI Overview and AI Search data, a Google Sheets add-on and a SERP Discrepancy Checker Chrome extension.
- Four-category keyword intent classification built from analysis of the top ten landing pages per keyword, refreshed daily, with per-keyword and per-group breakdowns.
Held against it
- We found no public information on a crawler or technical audit of the customer's own site — the documented crawling collects Google's results pages.
- The vendor states that exporting historical ranking URLs or landing pages is currently not available.
- We found no public information on a backlink database, city-level rank tracking, keyword difficulty scores, or content briefs and a writing assistant.
- We found no public information on white-label client reporting, multi-client management, or Search Console and Google Analytics connections.
- API export requires an active subscription, and we found no public information on retention or a grace period after cancellation.
Best for
- You need rank data you can defend internally, with published collection schedules and drop-verification rules to set against Search Console.
- You want to move SEO data through a documented API with published limits into your own scripts, Looker Studio dashboards or Google Sheets.
- Your work leans on keyword intent and SERP-feature depth, including a dedicated AI Overview snapshot view on both desktop and mobile.
- You research keywords at volume and want Research and Keyword Vault unlimited and included in every plan at no additional cost.
Avoid if
- You need site crawls, technical audits or Core Web Vitals diagnostics in the same platform — the documented crawling collects Google's results, not your own site.
- You depend on bulk export of historical ranking URLs or landing pages, which the vendor states is currently not available.
- You rebill client reporting and need white-label reports or client-facing access — the documented reporting runs through the API, the Looker Studio connectors, the Sheets add-on and CSV export.
- Your procurement requires a documented hosting location, contracting entity or data processing agreement — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Crawling & technical audit | 0 of 5 |
| Keyword research & content guidance | 2 of 5 |
| Rank tracking & index quality | 3.5 of 5 |
| Reporting, integrations & API | 3 of 5 |
| Data portability & exit | 3.5 of 5 |
Crawling & technical audit
n/r
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler or audit; the product is keyword, rank or backlink data only.
3 — A site audit that crawls pages and reports broken links, missing tags and redirect problems.
5 — Scheduled site audits with a stated page limit, issues grouped by category and severity with fix hints, and page speed or Core Web Vitals reported.
8 — JavaScript rendering, log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, crawl comparison over time, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
The captured help pages describe a rank-tracking and keyword-intelligence product: their "Dynamic Depth Crawling" is how far the tool works through Google's results pages to find your site, alongside a weekly top-100 collection on Saturdays — not a crawl of the customer's own site. We found no public information on a site crawler, technical audit findings, Core Web Vitals or indexation diagnosis, and nothing in these pages would turn into a developer ticket for my own domain. 1 4 5
The Agency Owner
The only crawling the captured pages document is of Google's results pages — Dynamic Depth Crawling adjusts how deep the tracker searches the SERP for your site — and that is rank collection, not a site audit. We found no public information on a site crawler, broken links, Core Web Vitals or indexation diagnosis, so I would still be buying a separate audit tool for every client site. 1 4
The Technical SEO
Every crawling fact in the captured pages refers to collecting Google's results pages — daily dynamic-depth tracking, a Saturday top-100 collection, incompleteness and drop checks — not the customer's own site. We found no public information on site auditing, JavaScript rendering, Core Web Vitals, log-file analysis or Search Console comparison; the product these pages document is rank and SERP data. 1 4 5
The Content Strategist
Every crawl the captured pages describe is a crawl of Google's results rather than of the customer's site: Dynamic Depth Crawling searches the SERP to an allowed depth to find your website, with a full weekly top-100 collection on Saturdays. We found no public information on a site crawler, Core Web Vitals, or indexation and canonical diagnosis, so on this evidence the documented product is rank and keyword data only. 1 4
The Data Analyst
The captured help pages describe a rank tracking, keyword research and SERP feature tool end to end, and the Dynamic Depth Crawling they document is how deeply Google's results are searched for the customer's site — not a crawler of the customer's own pages. We found no public information on a site crawler, technical site audit, indexation diagnosis or Core Web Vitals in these captures. 1 3 4
The Skeptic not rated — no public information
We found no public information on the product crawling or auditing the customer's own website: the only "crawling" the captured pages describe is Dynamic Depth Crawling, which adjusts how far the tool searches Google's result pages to find the customer's rank, not a site audit. We also found no public information on broken-link, tag, redirect, Core Web Vitals, rendering or indexation checks. 1 4
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — No keyword research or content guidance; the product is a crawler or rank tracker only.
3 — Keyword suggestions with search volume, for at least one market.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and search intent for Germany and other markets, SERP features shown per keyword, and on-page or content recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor keyword gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs or a writing assistant scored on entity or topic coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
Keyword intent is properly built — four categories derived from analysis of the top ten landing pages per keyword, refreshed daily, with per-keyword and per-group breakdowns and a primary-intent filter — and SERP feature work is deep: daily tracking on both devices, your position inside features, feature counts, computed impact on organic results, and a dedicated AI Overview snapshot view, with Research and Keyword Vault refreshed monthly and unlimited in every plan. The pages do not state which countries or languages the data covers, however, and we found no public information on keyword difficulty scores, content briefs or a writing assistant, topic clustering, or cannibalisation detection. 2 3 4 8
The Agency Owner
Research and the Keyword Vault are unlimited in every plan, search volumes are exportable at keyword level, and intent classification is genuinely built on analysing the top ten landing pages per keyword with a four-category breakdown refreshed daily. SERP feature depth is strong — presence, position within features, impact on organic results, People Also Ask content, desktop and mobile. We found no public information on keyword difficulty, German-market data specifically, or on-page content recommendations, which is what I need before pointing writers at it. 2 3 4 8
The Technical SEO
Search intent is classified four ways with a published method — analysis of the top ten landing pages, brand identification for navigational — and SERP features are tracked daily on desktop and mobile with position, count and computed impact on organic results. Research data and keyword volumes are included and exportable, but we found no public information on difficulty scoring, content briefs, competitor gap analysis or the depth of German-language data. 2 3 4 8
The Content Strategist
The intent work is genuinely deep — four categories classified from daily analysis of the top ten landing pages, with per-keyword percentage breakdowns and group-level aggregation — and SERP features are tracked daily on desktop and mobile with computed impact and your position inside the features. But we found no public information on keyword difficulty, content briefs or a writing assistant, topic clustering, or cannibalisation detection, which is exactly the guidance layer I brief against. Monthly volumes, year-over-year trends and forecast scenarios are all exportable, which at least sizes opportunity honestly. 2 3 4 8
The Data Analyst
Search intent is documented in real depth — four categories classified from analysis of the top ten landing pages per keyword, updated daily, with per-keyword and per-group breakdowns — and SERP feature tracking covers presence, position within features, computed impact and feature counts on both desktop and mobile, with monthly search volumes exportable. We found no public information on a keyword difficulty score, content briefs or a writing assistant, topic clustering or cannibalisation detection, which holds this at the middle level. 2 3 4 8
The Skeptic
Intent classification into four categories comes with a stated method — analysis of the top 10 landing pages per keyword — plus per-keyword and group-level intent breakdowns, and SERP features are tracked daily on both devices with computed impact on organic results. Research is updated monthly with top-20 desktop results and is unlimited, but we found no public information on a difficulty metric, on-page content recommendations, or any market or language coverage including German. 2 3 4 8
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — No rank tracking and no backlink data; the product is an audit or content tool only.
3 — Rank tracking for chosen keywords in a chosen country, or a backlink checker.
5 — Rank tracking with country, device and update frequency selectable or stated (daily or weekly), local results, and a backlink database with referring domains and new and lost links.
8 — Daily rankings across many locations including city level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh frequency published, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
The collection methodology is published in unusual detail, which is what makes rankings defensible against Search Console: daily dynamic-depth collection on the primary device plus a weekly top-100 full collection on Saturdays, incompleteness checks that discard short or rejected responses, and concrete drop-verification rules — a drop of ten or more positions from positions one to five is held and rechecked across up to two further crawls before being recorded. Dated SERP snapshots are viewable and downloadable with the page HTML, and a SERP Discrepancy Checker Chrome extension exists for interrogating odd results. It stays below the very top because the pages state that exporting historical ranking URLs or landing pages is currently not available, and we found no public information on location- or city-level tracking or any backlink database. 1 3 4 5 6 8
The Agency Owner
The rank methodology is documented more honestly than most: daily dynamic-depth collection on the primary device plus a weekly Saturday top-100 collection, with published fail-safe rules for incomplete responses, suspicious drops by position band, held crawls and retries, and all daily ranks exportable in full. Local Pack tracking exists. We found no public information on backlink data, country selection, or city-level and multi-location granularity, which caps the proprietary-data story. 1 4 5 8
The Technical SEO
The vendor documents its own collection methodology in unusual detail: daily dynamic-depth checking on the primary device, weekly top 100 collected Saturdays, completeness checks before a result is recorded, and explicit drop-verification rules with held crawls — accountability few rank vendors publish. Daily ranks are retained and exportable, but the pages say nothing about location or city-level granularity or any backlink database, and the vendor states that exporting historical ranking URLs or landing pages is currently not available. 1 4 5 8
The Content Strategist
Schedules and depth are stated plainly — daily Dynamic Depth Crawling on the primary device, full weekly top-100 collection on Saturdays, weekly secondary-device coverage — and the fail-safe methodology is documented in unusual detail: completeness checks, retries, and suspicious drops held for up to two crawls before being recorded, with the position bands that trigger a check spelled out. We found no public information on city-level locations, a backlink index, or a retention commitment for the life of the account. 1 3 4 5
The Data Analyst
Rank tracking methodology is published with unusual accountability: daily collection on the primary device plus a weekly top-100 competitive refresh each Saturday, weekly secondary-device coverage, and a fail-safe system with stated drop rules, held crawls, retries and discarded rejected attempts. All daily ranks are exportable and Domain Explorer retains keywords historically collected beyond the current depth; we found no public information on backlink data, city-level locations or a stated retention period for the life of the account. 1 3 4 5 8
The Skeptic
The vendor is unusually accountable about their own data: daily collection on the primary device with a weekly top-100 collection on Saturdays is stated, and the fail-safe pages document retries, checks for incomplete responses, and the exact position ranges that trigger a recheck before a large drop is recorded. The gaps a buyer cannot check from outside are equally clear — we found no public information on a backlink database, location or city-level tracking, or how long historical data is retained after events or cancellation. 1 4 5 8
Reporting, integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — No reports, exports or integrations of any kind; results can only be viewed on screen.
3 — Reports as PDF or CSV export, and a Google Search Console or analytics connection.
5 — Customisable or scheduled reports, Search Console and Google Analytics integration, and an API or a Looker Studio connector documented.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with its limits and credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
Data access is the strong suit: a documented API (version 3.0) that can read any data in the account and write new keywords, authenticated by token, with limits published — 10,000 requests a day, ten per second, up to 1,000 rows per request — and no extra costs or tier-based restrictions, plus vendor-maintained Looker Studio connectors (Campaign, Competition, Forecast, Organic Traffic and a newer unified connector with AI Overview and AI Search data) with ready-made templates, a Google Sheets add-on and full CSV export. We found no public information on a direct Search Console or Google Analytics connection, scheduled or white-label client reports, or data-warehouse and BigQuery export. 6 7 8
The Agency Owner
The API is documented, free of extra costs, with published rate limits of 10,000 requests a day, 10 per second and 1,000 rows per request, plus write access to add keywords; Looker Studio has dedicated Campaign, Competition, Forecast, Organic Traffic and a new unified connector with AI Overview data, alongside a Sheets add-on and full CSV export. We found no public information on white-label reporting, client access, multi-client management — exactly what I rebill against — or on Search Console and analytics connections. 6 7 8
The Technical SEO
The API is documented with its limits in numbers — 10,000 requests a day, 10 per second, 1,000 rows — plus a token setup, a write endpoint for adding keywords, and no extra costs, and five Looker Studio connectors are documented down to a stated date-dimension limitation and ready-made templates. We found no public information on scheduled or white-label reports, data-warehouse export, or Search Console and Google Analytics connections. 6 7 8
The Content Strategist
The data-out story is real: a documented API at version 3.0 with write access and published limits of 10,000 requests a day and 10 per second with up to 1000 rows per request, stated as free without extra costs, plus vendor-maintained Looker Studio connectors for Campaign, Competition, Forecast and Organic Traffic, a unified connector including AI Overview data, and a Sheets add-on. We found no public information on white-label client reporting, scheduled report delivery, or Search Console and analytics connections, and the published limits are global rather than per endpoint. 6 7 8
The Data Analyst
A documented API — version 3.0, usable from any programming language, token authentication, read access to any account data, plus a write endpoint for adding keywords — with published limits of 10,000 requests a day, ten per second and up to 1000 rows per request, marketed as free without extra costs. Around it sit multiple Looker Studio connectors with templates, a Google Sheets addon and a Chrome discrepancy checker; we found no public information on data-warehouse or BigQuery export, white-label client reporting, or credit costs published per endpoint — keywords added through the API are charged according to a pricing policy whose figures these pages do not state. 6 7 8
The Skeptic
The API is documented with hard numbers — 10,000 requests a day, a maximum of 10 requests per second with up to 1000 rows per request — and five named Looker Studio connectors, dashboard templates and a Sheets add-on are documented alongside. We found no public information on white-label or client reporting, Search Console or analytics connections, or data-warehouse export, and the only cost statement is that keywords added via the API "will be charged according to our pricing policy". 6 7 8
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — The vendor states that data cannot be exported at all.
3 — CSV or Excel export of the current reports and keyword lists.
5 — Export of rankings, keywords and audit results including historical data, through the interface or an API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
Export terms are unusually generous: any data can be extracted on demand, in the pages' own words "without worrying about limits or extra costs", including all daily ranks, competitor ranks and daily Visibility Scores with current filters respected, and the same raw data is reachable through the API on any active subscription. Two gaps matter for exit planning: the pages state that exporting historical ranking URLs or landing pages is currently not available, and we found no public information on any retention or grace period after cancellation. 6 8
The Agency Owner
Exports are stated as unrestricted and without extra costs — all daily ranks, daily visibility scores for you and competitors, trends, volumes, groups structure and forecast data, with the selected timeframe and applied filters respected — and raw export also runs through the API. Two things hold it back: the vendor states the historical landing pages export is currently not available, and API access requires an active subscription, with no documented retention or grace period after cancellation — precisely the gap that hurts when a client walks. 4 6 8
The Technical SEO
Exports are unrestricted and free of extra costs, covering all daily ranks, volumes, visibility, trends, groups and forecast scenarios, and any account data can be mirrored through the API while a subscription is active. The vendor states that exporting historical ranking URLs or landing pages is currently not available, and we found no public information on a retention period after cancellation, which keeps exit short of fully designed-for. 6 8
The Content Strategist
Exports are unrestricted and without extra costs in the vendor's own words, covering all daily ranks, visibility for you and competitors, groups, forecasts and traffic, exported as you filtered them, with raw data also available through the API while a subscription is active. Two things hold it back: the export of historical ranking URLs or landing pages is stated by the vendor as currently not available, and we found no public information on any retention period after cancellation. 6 8
The Data Analyst
CSV export is documented as unrestricted and free of extra costs — covering all daily ranks, competitor ranks and daily visibility scores, traffic, volumes, trends, groups structure and forecast data — and raw export through the API is available to any account with an active subscription. Two things keep it below the top levels: the captured pages state that exporting historical ranking URLs or landing pages is currently not available, and we found no public information on any retention period or grace window after cancellation. 6 8
The Skeptic
Export is stated to be on demand "without worrying about limits or extra costs", covering all daily ranks, daily Visibility Scores for own and competitors, groups, forecasts and trends, with API export alongside for active subscriptions. Two things hold it back: the pages state that "the option to export historical ranking URLs or landing pages is currently not available", and we found no public information on any retention period after cancellation. 6 8
European sovereignty
panel opinion
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
n/r
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities. Dimensions the sources do not establish are unknown, not non-EU.
0 — Proven non-EU: a non-EU vendor and contracting entity with hosting stated outside the EU.
3 — One European element proven — an EU contracting entity or EU hosting stated — with the rest of the chain undocumented.
5 — An EU contracting entity and EU hosting both stated, and a data processing agreement offered.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, a subprocessor list published with locations, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead not rated — no public information
We found no public information on where the service is hosted, the contracting entity, a data processing agreement or subprocessor locations — none of the captured help pages address the sovereignty chain, so every dimension remains unknown rather than proven either way. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
The Agency Owner not rated — no public information
We found no public information on where accounts and crawl data are hosted, the contracting entity, a data processing agreement, or any subprocessor list in the captured help-centre pages. 1 6
The Technical SEO not rated — no public information
We found no public information on the contracting entity, hosting location, subprocessors or a data processing agreement in any of the captured pages; the sovereignty dimensions are unknown rather than established either way. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
The Content Strategist not rated — no public information
We found no public information on hosting location, contracting entity, or a data processing agreement on any of the captured help pages, so the sovereignty dimensions are unknown rather than European or otherwise. 1 6 8
The Data Analyst not rated — no public information
We found no public information on the contracting entity, hosting location, data processing agreement or subprocessors in any of the captured help pages. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
The Skeptic not rated — no public information
We found no public information on hosting location, contracting entity, data processing agreements or subprocessors — none of the captured help pages addresses where account or collection data lives. The sovereignty dimensions therefore remain unknown rather than proven either way. 6 8
Pricing transparency
not rated — the vendor publishes no price
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A public "from" price or a single tier with its price.
5 — Prices per tier public with the billing period and the main limits (keywords tracked, pages crawled, projects or users) stated.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
The pages confirm a tiered, keyword-priced model — features "included in Pro plans and above at no additional cost", added keywords "charged according to our pricing policy" — and that research, the API and CSV exports carry no extra cost, but no price figures, tier-by-tier keyword limits or keyword rates appear anywhere. A buyer cannot compute an annual cost from what we read. 4 6 8
The Agency Owner
Not one price figure appears in the captured pages — no tier prices, no per-keyword rate, no per-seat cost — while keyword additions through the API are charged according to a pricing policy whose figures are not shown, and features are gated by references to Pro plans and above. The only cost statements in my favour are that research, exports and the API carry no extra costs; for computing a forty-site annual invoice from public pages alone, this is a blank page. 4 6 8
The Technical SEO
The captured pages state that the API, research and keyword vault, exports and draft campaigns carry no additional cost, and that keywords added through the API are charged "according to our pricing policy" — but no tier price, billing period or keyword limit appears in any of them, so a real annual cost cannot be computed from what we read. 4 6 8
The Content Strategist
The captured pages name a Pro tier and above and state that research, exports and the API carry no extra costs and that added keywords are charged according to a pricing policy — but no price figure, billing period, keyword limit or VAT treatment appears on any page read, so an annual invoice cannot be computed from this evidence. 4 6 8
The Data Analyst
The captured pages say research and Keyword Vault are unlimited and included in every plan at no additional cost, draft campaigns are included in Pro plans and above, and keywords added through the API are charged according to a pricing policy. No price figure, billing period or per-tier keyword limit appears anywhere in these captures, so a real annual cost cannot be computed from them. 4 6 8
The Skeptic
The captured pages are generous about the edges — Research and Keyword Vault "unlimited and included in every plan at no additional cost", draft campaigns free on Pro plans and above, API and exports "without worrying about limits or extra costs" — but no captured page shows a tier price, keyword limits, seat costs, minimum term or VAT treatment. A keyword added via the API "will be charged according to our pricing policy", a policy the pages reference but never state, so no annual cost can be computed from what was captured. 4 6 8
Questions about SEOmonitor
Is SEOmonitor European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where SEOmonitor is based.
Where does SEOmonitor store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
Does SEOmonitor have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 3 Nov 2026.
What are the best alternatives to SEOmonitor?
As of 4 Nov 2026, the panel rates SE Ranking (3.5/5), SISTRIX (3/5) and Semrush (3/5) highest among the other 37 SEO products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is SISTRIX (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: SEOmonitor alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 3 Nov 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We found no public information on pricing on the pages we read (help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/5595610-dynamic-depth-crawling-ddc-daily-ranks-and-weekly-serp-coverage, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/9557648-keyword-search-intent, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/5612207-serp-feature-detection-tracking, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/14361231-faq-rank-tracking-daily-ddc-weekly-serps-and-device-coverage, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/6337532-fail-safe-rank-tracking-system, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/5972792-unrestricted-free-api-access and 2 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- We found no public information on compliance on the pages we read (help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/5595610-dynamic-depth-crawling-ddc-daily-ranks-and-weekly-serp-coverage, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/9557648-keyword-search-intent, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/5612207-serp-feature-detection-tracking, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/14361231-faq-rank-tracking-daily-ddc-weekly-serps-and-device-coverage, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/6337532-fail-safe-rank-tracking-system, help.seomonitor.com/en/articles/5972792-unrestricted-free-api-access and 2 more). If the vendor publishes it somewhere else, send us the page. Know more? Tell us
- 8 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (8)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 2 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 3 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 4 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 5 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 6 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 7 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →
- 8 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap help.seomonitor.com Checked 3 Nov 2026 Details →