SEO
XOVI
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 1 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by XOVI GmbH · www.xovi.de
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
XOVI is a German SEO suite from XOVI GmbH in Cologne, operated by WebPros Germany GmbH, for German agencies and SMEs. Strongest is reporting and API at 6-7: white-label reports in client branding, unlimited in number, automated weekly or monthly as PDFs, with Search Console, Google Analytics and Matomo as sources and a documented JSON and XML API. Keyword and content scores 5-7 on weekly crawl data for eight markets including Germany, Austria and Switzerland, with volume, cost per click and competitor density per keyword and text optimisation benchmarked against the top ten. Pricing transparency follows at 5-7; technical audit and rank and index data sit at 5-6, with judges citing no public information on log-file analysis, structured-data validation or the vendor's own backlink index size. Weakest is data portability at 3-4: documented export is per-issue URL lists and credit-metered API pages capped at 1000 results. Sovereignty scored 4 with no spread, the judges citing a German operating entity but no public information on where account and crawl data is hosted. No criterion spread the judges by more than two points.
Speaks for it
- White-label reporting with client branding, unlimited reports and automated weekly or monthly PDF delivery, drawing on Search Console, Google Analytics and Matomo.
- Keyword research with search volume, cost per click, competitor density and current position per keyword, plus competitor keywords and user questions with relevance scoring.
- Onpage crawler with stated caps of 50,000 subpages per domain in Pro, 100,000 in Business and 500,000 in Enterprise, plus a JavaScript crawler in all paid plans.
- All three tiers priced publicly — XOVI PRO 99€/Monat, XOVI BUSINESS 149,00 €/Monat, XOVI ENTERPRISE 499 €/Monat — with crawl add-ons from 29,90€ mtl. to 299,90€ mtl. and VAT stated as 'zzgl. 19% MwSt.'.
- A 14-day free trial with no credit card required and no cancellation needed.
Held against it
- We found no published price for API credits, although the API's error catalogue ('cost error') confirms it runs on a credit system.
- Accounts beyond a plan's included seats are described only as 'jederzeit kostenpflichtig zubuchbar', with no published price.
- We found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history, or on any retention period after cancellation.
- We found no public information in the onpage audit on log-file analysis, indexation or canonical diagnosis, or structured-data validation.
- We found no public information on where account and crawl data is hosted, and data-subject rights are handled centrally by WebPros International GmbH in Schaffhausen.
Best for
- You are an agency delivering branded SEO reports to clients on a schedule — reporting and API is the strongest category at 6-7, with read-only client accounts included on Business (3) and Enterprise (30).
- Your keyword work centres on German-speaking markets — the tool delivers weekly crawl data for Germany, Austria and Switzerland, plus France, Italy, Spain, the UK and the USA.
- You rank-track internationally — daily or weekly ranking queries across 197 countries, including Bing and Yandex, are documented.
- You want most of the invoice computable before a sales call — tier prices, crawl caps and add-on prices are public.
Avoid if
- You need JavaScript rendering as a stable, supported capability — the JavaScript crawler is documented as included in all paid plans within an unlimited beta.
- You must take years of accumulated ranking history with you on exit — the documented export path is per-issue URL lists and credit-metered API pagination capped at 1000 results.
- You need the full invoice computable from published prices alone — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
Crawling & technical audit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Site crawling at real scale: what the crawler finds, how deeply it checks, whether Core Web Vitals and indexation problems are diagnosed rather than merely listed.
0 — No site crawler; the product is keyword data only.
3 — A crawler with a low page cap that reports broken links and missing tags, with no prioritisation and no rendering of JavaScript.
5 — Scheduled crawls at a stated page limit, JavaScript rendering, issue categories with severity, and Core Web Vitals pulled per template.
8 — Log-file or Search Console integration to compare what the crawler sees against what Google fetched, indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, and issues prioritised by traffic impact rather than count.
10 — The audit is diagnostic rather than a list: crawl budget analysed, rendering differences surfaced, regressions detected between crawls with the deploy that caused them inferrable, and remediation guidance specific enough for a developer ticket.
The In-House SEO Lead
The onpage crawler runs at stated per-domain limits of 50,000 to 500,000 subpages with JavaScript rendering, a prioritised advisor generating to-dos, and per-issue export of the affected URLs — that export is what turns a finding into a developer ticket on my side. I found no public information on scheduled crawl runs, Core Web Vitals per template, log-file or Search Console comparison for indexation and canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, or regression detection between crawls, so this stays a well-prioritised list rather than a diagnosis. 2 5 9
The Agency Owner
An onpage crawler with stated per-domain page caps (50.000 in Pro up to 500.000 in Enterprise), a JavaScript crawler for dynamic sites currently in an open-ended beta, and issue coverage from duplicate content and click depth to status codes and image alt-texts. The Advisor delivers priorisierte To-Dos and affected URLs can be exported per warning, which lifts it past a plain list. We found no public information on log-file analysis, indexation or canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, or Core Web Vitals pulled per template. 2 5 9
The Technical SEO
Crawling runs at stated scale — 50.000 to 500.000 pages per domain with paid add-ons up to half a million, plus a JavaScript crawler for SPAs in an unlimited beta across all paid plans — and the issue set covers status codes, duplicate content, click depth, image checks and pagespeed from YSLOW and Google Pagespeed, exportable per affected URL, with the Advisor handing out prioritised to-dos. What I can't see is the diagnosis layer: we found no public information on log-file analysis, crawl budget, canonical or indexation diagnosis, structured-data validation, or regressions compared between crawls. 5 2 9
The Content Strategist
Stated page caps per tier reaching 500,000 pages, a JavaScript crawler in every paid plan, and an Advisor that returns prioritised to-dos rather than a bare error list put this solidly in the middle band. Speed data comes from Google PageSpeed and YSLOW with concrete prioritised recommendations. We found no public information on log-file or Search Console comparison, indexation or canonical diagnosis, structured-data validation, or prioritisation of issues by traffic impact, so the audit reads as thorough listing with prioritised tasks rather than a diagnostic. 2 5 9
The Data Analyst
The crawler is documented at real scale — 50,000 to 500,000 pages per domain by plan with a priced expansion ladder, weekly cadence across eight countries, and a JavaScript crawler for dynamic sites — and the Advisor turns findings into prioritised to-dos. We found no public information on Core Web Vitals per template, log-file analysis, indexation or canonical diagnosis, or structured-data validation, so the audit remains a well-prioritised list rather than a diagnosis. 2 5 6 9
The Skeptic
The onpage tool states real page caps per plan (50,000 rising to 500,000, with paid extensions published) and checks HTTP headers, images, click depth, duplicate content and pagespeed via YSLOW and Google Pagespeed, with a JavaScript crawler the pricing page itself flags as an unlimited beta. The Advisor delivers prioritised to-dos, which is more than a bare list. We found no public information on log-file analysis, indexation or canonical diagnosis against Search Console data, or structured-data validation — the diagnostic layer that would lift this above a well-equipped checklist. 2 5 9
Keyword research & content guidance
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Keyword discovery, intent classification, SERP feature analysis and on-page guidance — judged on the depth of the German-language data as much as the English.
0 — A keyword list with volumes from one source and no intent or difficulty signal.
3 — Volume and difficulty for major markets, with thin or stale German data and no SERP feature detail.
5 — Keyword research with volume, difficulty and intent across German and other EU markets, SERP feature presence, and basic on-page recommendations.
8 — Topic clustering, competitor gap analysis, SERP composition tracked over time, content briefs with entity coverage, and cannibalisation detection.
10 — Research and guidance close the loop: opportunity sized against realistic traffic, content scored against what currently ranks rather than against a keyword density heuristic, and recommendations that reference the specific pages in the customer's own site.
The In-House SEO Lead
The German-language data is native rather than an afterthought: weekly crawl data for Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Italy and Spain, with search volume, CPC and competitor density, competitor keywords, user questions, filters for keywords just below page one and long-tail terms, and a SERP analysis comparing my content against the current top ten. I found no public information on intent classification, SERP composition tracked over time, entity-based content briefs or cannibalisation detection, and the text optimisation recommends term frequencies rather than scoring a page against what actually ranks. 2 5 6 7
The Agency Owner
Keyword research with Suchvolumen, Cost per Click, Mitbewerberdichte and current position, plus competitor keywords, user questions with relevance scoring, and filters for keywords close to page one and longtail that feed a keyword planner. Content guidance is benchmarked against the top-10 ranking pages, and a content-relevance search shows which of your own pages rank for a term. We found no public information on topic clustering, content briefs with entity coverage, intent classification, or SERP composition tracked over time. 5 6 7
The Technical SEO
The German core is real — weekly crawl data for DE, AT and CH plus FR, IT, ES, UK and USA, volume, CPC and competitor density per keyword, competitor keywords, user questions scored for relevance, a top-50 SERP read, and threshold and longtail filters feeding a keyword planner. But the guidance tops out at term-frequency comparison against the top ten, and we found no public information on intent classification, SERP-feature tracking, topic clustering or cannibalisation detection. 6 7 5
The Content Strategist
The German-first depth is real — volume, CPC and competitor density, competitor keywords, user questions scored for relevance, and a planner to group what you find — and the SERP analysis explicitly tells you what content has to look like to compete in the top ten. Text optimisation benchmarks your draft against the current top ten rather than a keyword density heuristic, and ranking value sizes an opportunity by what that traffic would cost to buy in ads. We found no public information on topic clustering, SERP composition tracked over time, or explicit cannibalisation detection, which is what keeps it out of the top band. 2 1 5 6 7
The Data Analyst
Keyword research carries volume, CPC, competitor density and current position across 197 countries on a German-first vendor, with competitor keywords, user questions, a keyword planner and SERP analysis for what the top ten demand. We found no public information on intent classification or SERP feature tracking, and the text optimisation sets term-frequency targets against the top ten rather than scoring content against the customer's own pages. 2 5 6 7
The Skeptic
Keyword research carries search volume, cost per click, competitor density and current position across 197 countries including Bing and Yandex, plus user questions with relevance scoring, filters for keywords poised near page one and longtail terms, and a planner for grouping and labelling. The SERP analysis page explains how content should look to compete in the top ten, and text optimisation compares term frequencies against those top ten results. We found no public information on topic clustering, cannibalisation detection or SERP composition tracked over time. 5 6 7
Rank tracking & index quality
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The proprietary data: ranking accuracy and frequency, backlink index size and freshness. Scored on what the vendor documents about their own data, because nothing here can be verified from outside.
0 — Rankings and backlinks with no stated update frequency, no country or device granularity, and no documentation of how either is collected.
3 — Weekly rankings for one country and device, a backlink index with no stated refresh cadence or size.
5 — Daily rankings with country, language and device selection, local results, and a backlink index with a documented crawl frequency.
8 — Rankings at stated frequency across many locations including city-level, SERP feature attribution, backlink index size and refresh published, lost-and-found link detection, and historical data retained for the life of the account.
10 — The vendor is accountable for their own data: methodology documented, index size and freshness published and updated, historical rankings retained and exportable in full, and discrepancies against Search Console explained rather than hidden.
The In-House SEO Lead
Daily or weekly rank queries are documented across 197 countries with organic, local, mobile and universal results, alongside a stated weekly crawl cadence for the eight index countries and the OVI visibility index — that is defensible monitoring. But the vendor documents little about its own index: I found no public information on backlink index size and refresh, lost-and-found link detection, how long historical rankings are retained, or how discrepancies against Search Console are explained, which is exactly what I need when the numbers disagree. 5 6 9 11
The Agency Owner
Rankings can be queried daily or weekly across 197 countries including Bing and Yandex, covering organic, local, mobile and universal search, with live checks on desktop, mobile and tablet and a weekly crawl cadence described in the developer pages. Backlink tooling covers anchor texts, status codes, source and target plus a disavow workflow. We found no public information on backlink index size or refresh cadence, historical ranking retention, city-level tracking or lost-and-found link detection. 5 6 11
The Technical SEO
Rankings are documented at a stated daily or weekly frequency across 197 countries including Bing and Yandex, with device and local/universal splits and a live check across up to 197 search engines. The backlink side carries no documentation of its own data: anchor texts, status codes and a disavow tool are described, and we found no public information on index size, crawl or refresh cadence, lost-and-found link detection, or how long ranking history is retained. 6 5 9
The Content Strategist
Daily or weekly ranking queries across 197 countries with organic, local, mobile and universal breakdowns, plus a stated weekly crawl of eight core markets, is more frequency and reach documentation than most tools publish. But the vendor's accountability for their own index is thin: we found no public information on backlink index size or refresh cadence, no statement on how long historical rankings are retained, and nothing on how discrepancies against Search Console are handled. The granularity earns a mid score; the undocumented data provenance holds it there. 5 6 9 11
The Data Analyst
Ranking collection is documented: daily or weekly per keyword, 197 countries including Bing and Yandex, organic, local, mobile and universal results, and the developer notes state which search engines are crawled weekly. We found no public information on backlink index size or refresh cadence, city-level granularity, lost-and-found link detection, or how long historical rankings are retained, so accountability for the proprietary data covers only the ranking half of the product. 5 6 9 11
The Skeptic
Rankings are queried daily or weekly at the customer's choice across 197 countries with organic, local, mobile and universal monitoring, and desktop/mobile/tablet live checks — that is a stated frequency and stated granularity I can hold anyone to. The API documentation confirms the search engines are crawled weekly, the only refresh cadence on public record. We found no public information on backlink index size, city-level tracking, lost-and-found link detection or how long historical rankings are retained. 5 6 11
Reporting, integrations & API
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Getting the data out and in front of someone: dashboards, white-label reporting for agencies, Search Console and analytics integration, and an API a team can build on.
0 — On-screen views only; export is a manual CSV and there is no API.
3 — Scheduled PDF reports and CSV export, one analytics integration, no API worth building against.
5 — Customisable dashboards, scheduled reports, Search Console and analytics integration, and a documented API with stated limits.
8 — White-label reporting with client access, data-warehouse or BigQuery export, multi-site and multi-client management, and an API with credit costs published per endpoint.
10 — The tool is a data source rather than a destination: full historical export in open formats, a versioned API with a deprecation policy, integrations the vendor maintains, and reporting an agency can hand a client unedited.
The In-House SEO Lead
White-label reports with customer branding and unlimited count, automated weekly or monthly PDF delivery, and Search Console, Google Analytics and Matomo wired directly into the reporting are all documented, and the API is real with JSON or XML output, pagination and a credit system. I found no public information on data-warehouse or BigQuery export or on credit costs per endpoint, so the true price of building on the API stays unknowable. 9 10 11
The Agency Owner
This is the part I resell: white-label reports in my or the client's branding, unlimited projects, read-only customer accounts on Business and Enterprise, automated weekly or monthly PDF delivery, and Search Console, Analytics and Matomo data in the same report. The API is documented in JSON and XML with pagination and a credit system. We found no public information on data-warehouse or BigQuery export, or on per-endpoint credit costs. 2 9 10 11
The Technical SEO
White-label reports with client branding and configurable layouts ship weekly or monthly as automated PDFs, customer read-only accounts exist for agencies, and Search Console, Google Analytics and Matomo feed directly into the tool, alongside a documented JSON/XML API with stated result limits and pagination. Two gaps hold it below the top band: the API runs on a credit meter and we found no public information on per-endpoint credit costs, nor on any data-warehouse or BigQuery export. 9 10 11 2
The Content Strategist
White-label reports with client branding, unlimited reports on weekly or monthly schedules, and Search Console, Google Analytics and Matomo as data sources make the agency handover story genuinely complete, and multi-client project and account limits are stated per tier. The API is documented with JSON and XML output, pagination and error codes, running on a credit system — but we found no published credit costs per endpoint. We found no public information on data-warehouse or BigQuery export. 2 9 10 11
The Data Analyst
Reporting is agency-grade and well evidenced: white-label design with customer read-only accounts, unlimited scheduled PDF reports, and Search Console, Google Analytics and Matomo merged in. The API is documented with JSON and XML output, a 1,000-result page and skip pagination, but we found no public information on per-endpoint credit costs — the documented error codes confirm a credit system exists without pricing it — nor on warehouse export or an API versioning and deprecation policy. 2 9 10 11
The Skeptic
White-label reporting with customer branding, colours and fonts, unlimited reports, weekly or monthly automated PDF delivery, and Google Analytics, Search Console and Matomo as data sources — the agency story is documented, and read-only customer accounts are part of Business and Enterprise. The API is documented with JSON and XML output, a 1000-result limit, pagination, and even fetches generated report PDFs. The error catalogue reveals a credit system ("cost error" when credits run out) and an API add-on appears in the booking list, yet we found no public information on credit costs per endpoint, nor any data-warehouse export such as BigQuery. 2 9 10 11
Data portability & exit
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the ranking and crawl history — the only thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — remains the customer's when they leave.
0 — No bulk export; history is visible in the interface and nowhere else, and ends with the subscription.
3 — CSV export of current views only, with historical data capped or unavailable in bulk.
5 — Bulk export of rankings, keywords and crawl results including history, via interface or API.
8 — Complete historical export in open formats without credit metering that prices it out of reach, plus a documented retention period after cancellation.
10 — Exit is designed for: the full account exportable including every historical data point, API access sufficient to mirror the data continuously, and a stated grace period during which the archive remains retrievable.
The In-House SEO Lead
What is evidenced is narrow: export of the affected URL list per audit message, and an API that paginates keyword data and returns generated reports as PDF, JSON or XML. I found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history, retention after cancellation, or any grace period — and because API calls are credit-metered, the multi-year history a subscription actually accumulates has no evidenced way out. 5 10 11
The Agency Owner
What a decade of subscription accumulates here is hard to take out: the captured pages show export of affected URLs per onpage warning and PDF retrieval via the API, on a credit-metered system returning at most 1000 results per call. We found no public information on bulk export of historical rankings or crawl history, nor any stated retention period after cancellation. 5 10 11
The Technical SEO
What's evidenced is narrow: per-issue export of affected URL lists, and PDF reports retrievable through the API — the API itself is credit-metered, with credit capacity sold as paid add-ons. We found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history, on any retention period after cancellation, or on API access sufficient to mirror the account's accumulated history. 5 10 11 2
The Content Strategist
Crawl findings export as URL lists per issue and the API can pull keyword and domain data in open formats with pagination, so the data is not trapped behind a screen. But we found no public information on bulk export of historical rankings, and no stated retention period after cancellation — with the API itself sitting behind a paid add-on. For a multi-year subscription, the ranking history a customer accumulates is not shown to be retrievable on exit. 2 5 10 11
The Data Analyst
Export is documented only in fragments: the affected-URL list per audit finding, PDF reports via API, and ranking data paged 1,000 at a time through an interface metered by credits whose price is not published. We found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history, or on any retention period after cancellation, so whether years of ranking history leave with the customer is not answered on the public pages. 5 10 11
The Skeptic
Onpage findings can be exported as the list of affected URLs, and the API returns keyword and report data in JSON or XML with pagination. We found no public information on bulk export of ranking or crawl history, on API access sufficient to mirror the account, or on any retention period after cancellation. The one thing a multi-year subscription actually accumulates — the history — has no documented exit. 5 10 11
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the account and crawl data live and who the contracting entity is. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; weighted lower here than in categories holding personal data, because an SEO tool mostly holds the customer's own strategy rather than their customers' identities.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and site or user data of unclear scope leaving the EU.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessor list published, and any analytics or Search Console data handling described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that covers the crawl and analytics data the tool ingests.
The In-House SEO Lead
The operating entity is German — WebPros Germany GmbH in Cologne with a Köln register entry — and non-EU group transfers to the US, Switzerland, Japan, the UK, New Zealand, Canada and India are documented with standard contractual clauses, adequacy decisions and Data Privacy Framework certification, plus a published group subprocessor list. I found no public information on where the account and crawl data is hosted, so EU storage as standard cannot be confirmed, and central handling of data-subject rights sits with the Swiss group entity. 3 4
The Agency Owner
The contracting and operating entity is WebPros Germany GmbH in Köln with a German commercial register entry, and a group-level subprocessor list is published, naming processors such as HubSpot and Zendesk with standard contractual clauses and Data Privacy Framework safeguards for US and India transfers. The group's central privacy entity sits in Schaffhausen, though, and we found no public information on where the suite's account and crawl data are hosted. 3 4
The Technical SEO
The operating and contracting entity for XOVI is WebPros Germany GmbH in Cologne, with the register court Köln and a German VAT ID, and the privacy policy points to a published subprocessor list at webpros.com; transfers to US and Indian group companies are covered by standard contractual clauses and Data Privacy Framework certification. But we found no public information on where the account and crawl data is hosted, and the group's central privacy contact sits in Schaffhausen — the chain is EU-rooted but not evidenced end to end. 3 4
The Content Strategist
The contracting and operating entity for the product is German (WebPros Germany GmbH, Cologne, register court Cologne), a subprocessor list is published, and transfers to US and Indian group companies are documented with framework certification and standard contractual clauses. What we cannot see is where account and crawl data are actually hosted, and ownership is not confirmed on the vendor's own captured pages. Solid legal scaffolding with the infrastructure question unanswered. 3 4
The Data Analyst
The operating and contracting entity is WebPros Germany GmbH in Cologne with a Köln register entry, and the policy publishes where the subprocessor list lives and documents US and India transfers under the Data Privacy Framework plus standard contractual clauses. We found no public information on where the hosting actually runs, and data-subject rights are centralised with a Swiss group entity, so the residency of account and crawl data stays unevidenced. 3 4
The Skeptic
The operating company is WebPros Germany GmbH in Cologne with a Cologne commercial register entry, and the privacy policy names subprocessors (HubSpot and Zendesk in the USA, AEB in Stuttgart) while explaining transfers under the Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses. But the central data-rights entity for the group is WebPros International GmbH in Schaffhausen, Switzerland, with group companies in the USA, India, Japan, the UK, New Zealand and Canada. We found no public information on where the account and crawl data are actually hosted. 3 4
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The category where the headline price is least often the invoice. Whether a buyer can compute the real annual cost including keyword limits, crawl credits, API units, extra users and client seats — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A monthly headline exists, but keyword limits, crawl credits or the cost of an additional user are unstated — the invoice is unknowable.
5 — Tier prices public with the main limits given, but at least one commonly needed piece (extra seats, API credits, historical data) is unpriced or metered opaquely.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with keyword, crawl and API limits, overage rates, per-seat costs, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given keyword count, crawl volume, API usage and team size, with overage and every credit cost published.
The In-House SEO Lead
All three tiers are public — XOVI Pro at 99€/Monat, Business at 149,00 €/Monat, Enterprise at 499 €/Monat — with per-tier crawl limits of 50,000 to 500,000 subpages, priced crawl add-ons up to 500,000 Unterseiten at 299,90€ mtl.*, parallel-processing and AI add-ons, and VAT stated on top at 19 percent. The gaps keep the annual invoice from being computable: I found no public information on the keyword quota per tier, the price of an additional user account, or what an API credit costs. 2 5 6
The Agency Owner
Prices are on the page: 99€/Monat for Pro, 149,00 €/Monat for Business and 499 €/Monat for Enterprise, each with page caps and included full-access and read-only seats stated, crawl add-ons in a published ladder from 29,90€ mtl.* to 299,90€ mtl.*, VAT stated at 19%, and a 14-day trial without card. The gaps are the ones my invoice feels: additional accounts beyond the plan are described only as "kostenpflichtig zubuchbar" with no price, API credits are metered without published costs, and we found no public information on minimum term or the yearly discount. 2 5 6 9
The Technical SEO
The tiers are fully public — "XOVI PRO 99€/Monat", "XOVI BUSINESS 149,00 €/Monat", "XOVI ENTERPRISE 499 €/Monat" — with per-domain page limits, crawl add-ons from "29,90€ mtl.*" for 50.000 pages to "299,90€ mtl.*" for 500.000, keyword packages from "20,00€ mtl.*", parallel domain analysis at "29,90€ mtl.*", and VAT called out as "* zzgl. 19% MwSt.". The invoice still isn't computable for a team: additional user seats are described only as "kostenpflichtig zubuchbar" with no price, the API is credit-metered with no published credit costs, and we found no public information on minimum term or overage rates. 6 5 2 9
The Content Strategist
Tier prices, crawl caps per tier, VAT treatment and an unusually granular crawl add-on ladder are all public, so most of the invoice is computable before a sales call. But additional seats are described only as bookable at any time at a cost, with no per-seat price, API credits are metered without published credit costs, and we found no public information on minimum contract term or base keyword limits per tier. The last fifth of the annual invoice still requires asking a human. 2 5 6 9
The Data Analyst
All three tiers are public — 99€/Monat, 149,00 €/Monat, 499 €/Monat — with crawl limits per plan, a priced add-on ladder for keywords and crawl volume, parallel processing at 29,90€ mtl. and VAT stated as "zzgl. 19% MwSt.". Additional seats are described only as "jederzeit kostenpflichtig zubuchbar" without a price, and we found no public information on API credit costs, the base keyword allowance per plan, or a minimum term, so the real annual invoice is still not computable from the public pages. 2 5 6 9
The Skeptic
All three plan prices are public (XOVI PRO 99€/Monat, XOVI BUSINESS 149,00 €/Monat, XOVI ENTERPRISE 499 €/Monat), VAT treatment is stated at 19% on top, and the add-on catalogue is unusually open: crawl extensions from 29,90€ mtl. to 299,90€ mtl., keyword packages from 20,00€ mtl. to 175,00€ mtl., parallel processing at 29,90€ mtl. and the AI add-on at €29,00/Monat. The invoice is still not computable end to end: further accounts are "jederzeit kostenpflichtig zubuchbar" with no price published, we found no public information on the keyword quota included in each plan, and API credits are metered without published costs. We also found no public information on minimum contract terms. 2 5 6 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
1 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in DE ⚠ unverified | 3/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 2 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Ownership, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. The imprint names no country word, so DE is derived from the German commercial register entry (Registergericht Köln, HRB) and the Köln address; the operating legal entity is WebPros Germany GmbH, not XOVI GmbH itself.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 15 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 10 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 8 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 6 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 support fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (11)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.xovi.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 11 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Pricing www.xovi.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Imprint www.xovi.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Privacy policy www.xovi.de Checked 16 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 2 Sep 2026 Details →
- 5 Crawling & technical audit — found from sitemap www.xovi.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap www.xovi.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Keyword research & content guidance — found from sitemap www.xovi.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Rank tracking & index quality — found from sitemap www.xovi.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Reporting, integrations & API — found from sitemap www.xovi.de Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap developers.xovi.net Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Data portability & exit — found from sitemap developers.xovi.net Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →