Social Media Marketing
PromoRepublic
Provenance unknown Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by PromoRepublic · promorepublic.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
PromoRepublic at a glance
- Vendor
- PromoRepublic
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates PromoRepublic 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. PromoRepublic is an AI-powered local marketing platform for multi-location brands and franchises. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 20 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 21 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
PromoRepublic is an AI-powered local marketing platform for multi-location brands and franchises. The scoring is clearest at the edges: analytics and reporting lands at 6-7, the strongest area here, while pricing transparency sits at 1, with a pricing page that states no prices at all. In between, publishing and the engagement inbox both rest at 4, collaboration governance and platform coverage at 4-5, and sovereignty at 3-4. The analytics case is concrete: scheduled recurring reports delivered daily, weekly or monthly by email, HTTP or SFTP in CSV or JSON, ad performance alongside organic, and a published comparison of native versus PromoRepublic metrics. The weaknesses are equally concrete: the documented inbox covers Facebook business pages only, and we found no public information on bulk import, per-network variants, overnight failure handling, or a subprocessor list. Judge scores never differ by more than one point on any criterion, so no genuine split emerged; the nearest thing to one is sovereignty, where the data protection officer's score of 3 sits below the rest.
Speaks for it
- Scheduled recurring reports deliver daily, weekly or monthly by email, HTTP or SFTP in CSV or JSON, with dynamic date ranges
- A published comparison of native versus PromoRepublic metrics, and a written account of the March 2024 Facebook metric deprecation
- Drag-and-drop calendar in weekly and monthly views with three scheduling routes, AI-timed queues via Autopilot, and repeating posts that expire by date or count
- Proposed posts are stated not to publish without approval, with an email nudge when a client misses the deadline and clients able to edit time, caption, image or boost
- Contracting entity PromoRepublic Oy of Helsinki under Finnish law, with EEA processing stated in the privacy policy and servers the vendor describes as ISO 27001-compliant
Held against it
- The pricing page states no prices, so no tier, seat count or invoice figure can be computed from public pages
- The documented engagement inbox covers Facebook business pages only, and we found no public information on assignment, internal notes, or inboxes for other networks
- The approval feature is excluded from some subscription plans, and those plans are not named
- We found no public subprocessor list, the AI service providers are unnamed, and the captured pages give both a Helsinki and a Palo Alto address
- We found no public information on bulk import, per-network text variants, or how a failed overnight publish is surfaced
Best for
- You need recurring analytics exports delivered automatically into your own systems — email, any HTTP endpoint, or SFTP in CSV or JSON
- You run a multi-location brand or franchise and want client approval in the loop before posts publish
- Your reporting spans Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest and TikTok, with ad performance alongside organic
Avoid if
- You need to know your invoice before talking to sales — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your community operation answers comments and direct messages across networks — the documented inbox covers Facebook business pages only
- You need approvals on every plan and a hard gate — the approval feature is excluded from some subscription plans, and the approve button changes to Publish Now when the deadline passes
- Your data protection review starts from a subprocessor list and located AI providers — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Publishing & calendar | 2 of 5 |
| Engagement & community inbox | 2 of 5 |
| Analytics & reporting | 3.5 of 5 |
| Approvals, roles & brand safety | 2 of 5 |
| Network coverage & API resilience | 2.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 0.5 of 5 |
Publishing & calendar
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Scheduling across networks: per-network formatting, the calendar as a working surface, bulk operations, and what happens when a post fails at 3am.
0 — One post to several networks at once with no per-network variation and no calendar.
3 — A calendar with scheduling and basic per-network text variants; failures are discovered by noticing the post never appeared.
5 — Per-network content, media and first-comment variants, drafts, a usable calendar with drag-and-drop, and failure notifications with a retry.
8 — Bulk upload and CSV import, evergreen or queue-based scheduling, link shortening with UTM rules, preview matching each network's actual rendering, and stories, reels or shorts supported where the API allows.
10 — Publishing is dependable at volume: hundreds of scheduled items across many accounts without collision, best-time recommendations from the account's own history, and every failure surfaced with the platform error and a one-click recovery.
The Community Manager
The calendar is a real working surface — weekly and monthly drag-and-drop, three scheduling methods including AI-timed queues via Autopilot, and repeating posts with expiry by date or count. But I found no public information on per-network text variants, drafts, bulk import, or what happens when a scheduled post fails, and that last silence is exactly the 3am scenario that decides whether I trust a publisher. 4 5
The Agency Lead
The calendar is a real working surface — drag-and-drop in weekly and monthly views, three scheduling methods including an AI-managed queue called Autopilot, and repeating posts with expiry by date or count. For an operation my size, though, we found no public information on bulk upload, per-network formatting variants, or what happens when a scheduled post fails overnight. 4 5 12
The Brand Governance Officer
The calendar is a genuine working surface — drag-and-drop rescheduling in weekly and monthly views, three scheduling methods including a queue with an automatic mode, and repeating posts with expiry by date or count. But we found no public information on per-network content or first-comment variants, bulk upload or CSV import, or what happens when a scheduled post fails overnight. 4 5 12
The Analyst
The calendar is a real working surface: three scheduling modes, manual or Autopilot queues, repeating posts with expiration by date or count, and drag-and-drop across weekly and monthly views. I found no public information on bulk upload, per-network variants, previews, or how an overnight failure is surfaced, and that silence is what holds this down. 4 5 12
The Data Protection Officer
The captured help pages show a real working surface: a drag-and-drop calendar in weekly and monthly views, three scheduling routes including a queue whose timetable can be set by their Autopilot AI, and repeating posts with expiry by date or count. I found no public information on per-network text or first-comment variants, bulk import, network-accurate previews, or any notification and retry when a post fails overnight. 4 5 12
The Skeptic
The calendar is a real working surface: drag-and-drop in weekly and monthly views, three scheduling routes including a queue that Autopilot can timetable, and repeating posts that expire by date or count. What decides the number is the overnight-failure question — we found no public information on failure notifications, retries, bulk import, per-network text variants or previews, and the nearest thing to failure handling is a prompt asking whether to publish now after you drag a post into the past. 4 5
Engagement & community inbox
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Comments, mentions and messages in one queue — the half of the job that is customer service wearing a marketing badge.
0 — No inbox; engagement happens in each native app.
3 — Mentions and comments listed per network with no assignment, no status and no history.
5 — A unified inbox across the connected networks with assignment, status and internal notes, and the conversation history visible per person.
8 — Direct messages included where the API allows, saved replies, SLA timers, sentiment or priority flags, spam and hidden-comment handling, and escalation to a helpdesk.
10 — The inbox is a service desk: every public and private interaction in one queue with ownership and response-time reporting, moderation rules that act automatically, and a per-person history spanning networks.
The Community Manager
The inbox I can see documented is Facebook-only — direct messages, comments and questions with thread navigation, reply at any level, and an auto-reviewed checkmark when you answer, which lifts it above a bare per-network list. But I found no public information on assignment, internal notes, saved replies, or an inbox for any network other than Facebook, so LinkedIn, Instagram or TikTok comments still get answered in the native apps. 3 6 7
The Agency Lead
The inbox covers Facebook business pages well — direct messages, comments and questions with thread views, filters, sort by reviewed status and automatic review marking — but we found no public information on inboxes for the other connected networks, assignment to teammates, internal notes, or per-person conversation history. Running twelve client brands on a single-network inbox is not a service desk; the option to jump to Facebook's own interface is honest but it is work leaving the tool. 7
The Brand Governance Officer
The documented inbox covers Facebook business pages, and it does include direct messages, comment threading, attachment sending and a reviewed-status marker, which is more than a bare listing. We found no public information on assignment, internal notes, or an inbox spanning the other connected networks, so a multi-network service queue is not evidenced. 6 7
The Analyst
The inbox is documented only for Facebook business pages — direct messages, comments and questions with threading, filters, attachments and a reviewed status that marks itself when answered. I found no public information on assignment, internal notes, per-person history, or inbox coverage for the other connected networks, so the customer-service half of the job stays largely unevidenced. 6 7
The Data Protection Officer
The inbox is documented for Facebook business pages, covering page direct messages, comments and questions, with threaded replies at any level, filters, sorting and an automatic reviewed checkmark on answered messages. I found no public information on assignment, internal notes, a per-person cross-network history, or — the part that matters to me — any retention period for this archive of other people's personal messages. 6 7
The Skeptic
Seven networks can be connected, but the documented inbox covers Facebook business pages only — comments, questions and page direct messages with threading, PNG and JPEG attachments, and a reviewed/unreviewed status that marks itself when you answer, plus an escape hatch to jump into Facebook natively. That is a single-network queue with a rudimentary status; we found no public information on assignment, internal notes, helpdesk escalation, or a per-person history spanning networks. 2 7
Analytics & reporting
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Measurement across networks with different metrics and retention windows, plus the reporting an agency hands a client.
0 — Per-network vanity counts pulled live; no history kept.
3 — Basic post and profile metrics with a short history and no cross-network comparison.
5 — Metrics stored beyond the networks' own retention, cross-network comparison, competitor benchmarking, and scheduled exports.
8 — Custom dashboards, white-label client reporting, paid and organic combined where the API allows, UTM-based attribution into web analytics, and audience demographics over time.
10 — Reporting answers what worked and why: metrics normalised across networks with the differences documented rather than hidden, full historical retention independent of platform windows, and exports an agency can hand over unedited.
The Community Manager
Exports are genuinely agency-grade: scheduled recurring reports delivered daily, weekly or monthly by email, SFTP or any HTTP endpoint in CSV or JSON that BI tools can consume, plus ad insights and an aggregated cross-network view. They even publish a comparison of native versus tool-reported metrics and a documented walkthrough of Facebook's March 2024 metric deprecation — but I found no public information on custom dashboards, competitor benchmarking, or UTM-based attribution into web analytics. 8 9 13
The Agency Lead
There is depth here: analytics across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest and TikTok, scheduled recurring reports delivered by email, HTTP or SFTP in machine-readable formats, a documented comparison between native and PromoRepublic metrics, and a written account of Facebook's March 2024 metric deprecation rather than a silent change. We found no public information on competitor benchmarking, custom dashboards or UTM-based attribution, and the white-label claim is a single homepage line without supporting detail — which matters because client-ready reporting is the deliverable I bill for. 8 9 13 1
The Brand Governance Officer
Measurement across Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest and TikTok is documented in depth, with scheduled recurring exports to email, HTTP and SFTP in machine-readable form, paid ad performance reports, a white-labeled platform, and a published comparison of native versus tool metrics. We found no public information on custom dashboards or UTM-based attribution into web analytics, and historical retention independent of platform windows is not stated. 1 8 9 13
The Analyst
Analytics spans five networks plus Google Business Profile and Facebook ads, with scheduled recurring exports by email, SFTP or any HTTP endpoint in CSV or JSON that a warehouse can consume — and, to my liking, the differences between native and PromoRepublic metrics are documented, alongside public notes on the March 2024 Facebook metric change. I found no public information on UTM attribution into web analytics, competitor benchmarking, or retention of metrics beyond the networks' own windows, which is what separates this from the top band. 8 9 13
The Data Protection Officer
Analytics spans five networks plus Google Business Profile, combines paid ad performance with organic, and exports are genuinely operational: scheduled recurring reports by email CSV, HTTP or SFTP in machine-readable form, with an article explicitly comparing native metrics against the vendor's own. I found no public information on UTM-based attribution into web analytics or on historical retention independent of the platforms' windows. 1 8 9 13
The Skeptic
Thirty-one help-centre articles cover per-network insights for Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Pinterest and TikTok, ad performance reports alongside organic, CSV and JSON export, and scheduled recurring reports delivered daily, weekly or monthly by email, HTTP or SFTP with dynamic date ranges — delivery an agency can genuinely wire into its own systems. They also document how their own metrics differ from the networks' native numbers, which is rarer than it should be; we found no public information on custom dashboards, UTM-based attribution, or retention beyond the platforms' own windows. 1 8 9
Approvals, roles & brand safety
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How a team of several people and an agency publish to a brand account without an accident — and who can be shown to have approved what.
0 — Shared login, no roles, no approvals.
3 — Separate users with a coarse admin split and an optional single approval step.
5 — Roles per network and account, multi-step approval workflows, comments on drafts, and an activity log.
8 — Client or brand workspaces with strict separation, configurable approval chains including legal review, content locking after approval, and an audit trail of who changed and published what.
10 — Governance a regulated brand could pass an audit on: complete audit trail of edits, approvals and publications, enforced approval before anything reaches a network, granular permissions per account and action, and no shared credentials anywhere in the design.
The Community Manager
There is a working single-step approval: propose a post, the client gets an email if it is not approved on time, and unapproved posts do not publish — though the approval feature itself sits outside some subscription plans. Role-based permissions are claimed on the homepage and report scheduling is scoped to what each user can access, but I found no public information on multi-step chains, comments on drafts, or an audit trail of who changed and published what. 1 9 10
The Agency Lead
Client-in-the-loop approvals exist and are enforced — proposed posts are stated not to publish without approval, clients can edit time, caption, image or reject outright, and a missed approval triggers an email notification with a Publish Now fallback — and role-based permissions are claimed on the homepage. We found no public information on multi-step approval chains, comments on drafts, content locking after approval or an audit trail of who changed what, and the approval feature itself is disclosed as not included in some plans. 10 1 9
The Brand Governance Officer
An approval flow exists — proposed posts will not be published without approval, with an email notification when approval runs late — but it is optional and excluded from some plans, and the fallback turns the approve button into a publishing button, so enforced approval before anything reaches a network is not evidenced. A role-based permissions claim appears as homepage copy and report scheduling respects data access, yet we found no public information on multi-step approval chains, content locking after approval, or an audit trail of who wrote, changed and released each item. 1 9 10 11
The Analyst
A single approval step is real and enforced: proposed posts will not publish unapproved, a late approval flips to a publish-now button, and the client can edit date, image, caption or boost — while the marketing pages claim role-based permissions for multi-brand, multi-location work. I found no public information on multi-step approval chains, comments on drafts, content locking after approval, or an audit trail of who changed and published what. 1 10
The Data Protection Officer
Posts proposed for approval are stated not to publish without approval, a stalled client gets an email nudge, and role-based permissions plus multi-brand white-label control are claimed on the homepage; scheduled reports respect what data a user may access. I found no public information on multi-step approval chains, comments on drafts, content locking after approval, or an audit trail of who edited and published what. 1 9 10
The Skeptic
There is exactly one approval step — a toggle in the editor, proposed posts that will not go out unapproved, and an email nudge when a client misses the deadline — though once the deadline passes the button changes to publish now, so the gate is time-limited rather than hard. Permissions appear as a homepage bullet plus one working instance in report scheduling, and the approval feature sits in unnamed subscription plans; we found no public information on multi-step chains, comments on drafts, or an audit trail of who approved what. 1 9 10
Network coverage & API resilience
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Which networks are supported through official APIs, how quickly the vendor follows platform changes, and what the customer keeps when a network breaks or leaves.
0 — A few networks, some through unofficial means, with no statement about API status or platform changes.
3 — The major networks through official APIs, but feature gaps undocumented and platform changes communicated after they bite.
5 — Official API integrations across the main networks with the per-network limitations documented, and a changelog when platform behaviour changes.
8 — Broad official coverage including the newer networks, a public status page for integrations, advance notice of deprecations, and full export of the customer's own publishing and engagement archive.
10 — Platform dependency handled as an engineering commitment: official partner status where it exists, per-network capability documented and kept current, rapid response to API changes with the history to show it, and an archive that stays the customer's whatever a network does next.
The Community Manager
The main networks plus TikTok are supported, official API use is explicit for YouTube, per-network capability is documented (such as which networks allow post deletion), and there is a written account of Facebook's March 2024 metric deprecation — the kind of changelog I want when a platform moves the goalposts. I found no public information on an integration status page, advance notice of deprecations, or export of the full publishing and engagement archive. 2 3 4 12 13
The Agency Lead
Coverage spans the majors plus TikTok and Google Business Profile, the YouTube integration is stated as API-based, the help centre documents per-network capability differences such as delete support, and a platform change like Facebook's March 2024 metric deprecation is written up publicly. We found no public information on an integration status page, advance notice of deprecations, or full export of my own publishing and engagement archive if a network walks away. 2 3 13 4 12
The Brand Governance Officer
The captured pages give different lists of supported networks — one includes TikTok, another YouTube — and coverage of the major networks through the platform is stated, with YouTube via its official API, per-network delete capability documented, and TikTok's AI-disclosure requirement supported. A published article documents how Facebook's March 2024 metric deprecation was handled, though we found no public information on a public integration status page, advance notice of deprecations, or export of the customer's own publishing and engagement archive. 2 3 4 12 13
The Analyst
The main networks plus TikTok and YouTube are supported, the YouTube API is named as the integration route, and per-network capability is tabled alongside articles reacting to platform changes such as the March 2024 Facebook metric deprecation and TikTok's AI-labeling requirement. I found no public information on a public integration status page, advance notice of deprecations, or export of the customer's full publishing and engagement archive. 2 3 4 12 13
The Data Protection Officer
Seven networks are named including TikTok and Google Business Profile, the YouTube API is explicit, per-network delete support is tabulated, and help articles work through a March 2024 Facebook metric deprecation and TikTok's AI-label requirement — real evidence of following platform changes. I found no public information on a public integration status page, advance notice of deprecations, official partner status, or export of the customer's own publishing and engagement archive. 2 3 4 12 13
The Skeptic
Eight networks appear across the captured pages — Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, Pinterest, Google Business Profile, YouTube, TikTok — and only YouTube is stated to connect through the official API; for the rest we found no public information on the integration method. To the credit the evidence shows, the March 2024 Facebook metric deprecation is written up with exactly which numbers changed, and TikTok's AI-disclosure requirement is supported, which is the vendor doing something after a platform moved. Beyond that we found no public information on an integration status page, advance notice of deprecations, or export of the publishing and engagement archive itself. 2 3 12 13
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the archive and the community conversations are processed, who the contracting entity is, which subprocessors touch them. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline. Note that the networks themselves are non-EU by definition — this criterion judges the tool, not the platforms it talks to.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option while the contracting entity is non-EU, or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain — AI features, analytics, support tooling — are non-EU without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or DACH hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, complete subprocessor list published, and the handling of message content from the networks described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor European, certification published, and a DPA that squarely addresses the personal data arriving from the networks in comments and messages.
The Community Manager
The contracting entity is PromoRepublic Oy of Helsinki with Finnish governing law, personal data is stated to be processed in the EEA with adequacy decisions or standard contractual clauses for transfers, and the AI terms promise no training on customer data. But both a Helsinki legal address and a US office address appear across the captured pages, and I found no public information on where the data is hosted, a named subprocessor list, or a published certification. 1 2 3
The Agency Lead
The contracting entity is PromoRepublic Oy under Finnish law with personal data stated to be processed in the EEA, a data processing agreement referenced, ISO 27001 servers, and adequacy decisions or standard contractual clauses for transfers outside the EEA. The captured pages give different addresses for the company (Helsinki and Palo Alto), and we found no public information on hosting infrastructure, a published subprocessor list, or where the AI service providers process message content arriving from the networks. 2 3 1
The Brand Governance Officer
The contracting entity is PromoRepublic Oy in Helsinki under Finnish law, personal data is stated to be processed in the European Economic Area, and transfers outside the EEA rely on adequacy decisions or standard contractual clauses. The captured pages give both a Finnish and a United States address, the EEA statement leaves service-provider facilities unspecified, and we found no public information on named hosting infrastructure or any subprocessor list. 1 2 3
The Analyst
The contracting entity is PromoRepublic Oy under Finnish law with the District Court of Helsinki as venue, and the privacy policy states personal data is processed in the European Economic Area with adequacy decisions and standard contractual clauses for transfers outside it. The captured pages give different addresses for the company's seat — Helsinki in the privacy policy, Palo Alto on the site — and I found no public information on a subprocessor list or on where the AI providers that process prompts statelessly are located. 1 2 3
The Data Protection Officer
PromoRepublic Oy of Helsinki is the contracting entity under Finnish law with a stated EEA-processing claim and adequacy or SCC safeguards, but the captured pages also carry a Palo Alto address, and I found no public information on the named hosting infrastructure or the subprocessor list — the AI providers that process prompt and output text for inference stay unnamed and unlocated. Nothing on the captured pages describes the legal basis or retention applied to the personal data of the people commenting on and messaging the connected networks, which is the heart of the matter for a DPA. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is PromoRepublic Oy of Helsinki under Finnish law with venue in the District Court of Helsinki, and the privacy policy states personal data is processed at the company's offices in the European Economic Area — but the same sentence continues into any data processing facilities operated by the service providers, with adequacy decisions and standard contractual clauses cited for transfers outside the EEA, so the chain visibly extends past the border. We found no public subprocessor list — the only named provider is Braintree for payments — and the AI assistant's providers are unnamed with no location stated, while a Palo Alto address also sits on the vendor's own site. 2 3
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a team can compute the real annual invoice for their account and user count — including the tier where approvals and the inbox begin — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-user headline exists, but the number of social accounts included, or the tier where approvals and the inbox appear, is unstated.
5 — Per-user or per-account prices public with billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed capability (inbox, approvals, reporting) sits in an unpriced tier.
8 — Every tier priced publicly with account and user limits, feature boundaries, the cost of an extra account or seat, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual invoice derivable for a given number of social accounts, users and client workspaces, with every add-on priced.
The Community Manager
A pricing page exists but no prices are stated on it, so no invoice figure can be derived from public pages. The billing mechanics are published — monthly or annual, charged in advance, taxes not included, no fee increases during the subscription, cancellation at least three days before renewal — and approvals are known to be excluded from some unnamed plans, which is the opposite of knowing which tier to buy. 1 2 10
The Agency Lead
The public pricing page shows no figures, so my real annual invoice for twelve client brands is a sales conversation, and the approval workflow is disclosed as not included in some plans with no prices shown for any plan. Billing cycles, advance charging, VAT treatment and trial rules are public in the terms of service, but we found no public information on a per-user or per-account price, so I cannot even sanity-check whether a small client stays profitable. 1 2 10
The Brand Governance Officer
A pricing page exists with no prices stated on it, so no tier, account limit or seat cost can be computed from public pages. The terms do state billing periods charged in advance, taxes excluded, renewal and cancellation mechanics — but not a single figure, and the tier where approvals appear is known only to be absent from some plans, without which plan being priced. 1 2
The Analyst
The pricing page carries no prices at all, and the terms disclose only that billing is monthly or annual, charged in advance, exclusive of taxes, with a single trial per user and cancellation three days before renewal. The approval workflow is stated to be plan-dependent, but on which plans and at what price we found no public information — a team cannot compute its annual invoice from these pages. 1 2 10
The Data Protection Officer
The captured pricing page states no prices at all, and the terms document only billing mechanics: monthly or annual charging in advance, taxes excluded, a renewal reminder and a three-day cancellation window. I found no public information on per-user or per-account figures, account and seat limits, or the tier in which approvals and the inbox appear — a team cannot compute its invoice from public pages. 1 2
The Skeptic
The public pricing page states no prices, and the terms fill in only the mechanics — monthly or annual billing charged in advance, taxes not included, no fee increase mid-subscription, cancellation three days before renewal — so every tier is a sales conversation. The approval feature is documented as excluded from some unnamed subscription plans, which means a buyer cannot even see from public pages where governance begins. 1 2 10
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about PromoRepublic
Is PromoRepublic European?
Not determined: the vendor’s pages as captured do not say where PromoRepublic is based.
Where does PromoRepublic store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
Does PromoRepublic have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 20 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to PromoRepublic?
As of 21 Oct 2026, the panel rates Swat.io (3.5/5), Hootsuite (3/5) and Agorapulse (3/5) highest among the other 28 Social Media Marketing products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is Swat.io (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: PromoRepublic alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 20 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 32 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 data facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 subprocessors fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (13)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor page promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Terms of service — found from the homepage promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Privacy policy — found from the homepage promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Publishing & calendar — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Publishing & calendar — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Engagement & community inbox — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Engagement & community inbox — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Analytics & reporting — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Analytics & reporting — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Approvals, roles & brand safety — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Approvals, roles & brand safety — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Network coverage & API resilience — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Network coverage & API resilience — found from sitemap help.promorepublic.com Checked 20 Oct 2026 Details →