Stable & Equestrian Management
Equicty
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Equicty NV · www.equicty.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Equicty at a glance
- Vendor
- Equicty NV
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Equicty 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Equicty NV is a Belgian company in Waregem selling EQUstable for stables and EQUclub for riding clubs. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Equicty NV is a Belgian company in Waregem selling EQUstable for stables and EQUclub for riding clubs. The bench's strongest mark is boarding and billing at 6-7: invoices are created inside the system, with a pro-forma-to-paid flow, recurring and subscription invoices, credit notes and per-line VAT rate and currency, and billable items linked to planned tasks land automatically in the owner's open costs. Its weakest is pricing transparency at 0-2: the pricing page names the two products and a public API as a plan option, but we found no public price figures at all, so the annual cost cannot be computed from anything published. The remaining categories run 4-6. The boarder portal and facilities and lessons span 4-6: judges crediting member self-service bookings and online payment score high, while others dock marks because the captured portal pages describe riding-club members rather than livery boarders. Sovereignty spans 4-6 too — high marks credit the privacy policy's named EU hosting and deletion timelines, low marks weigh the unconfirmed ownership and subprocessor picture.
Speaks for it
- Invoices are created inside the system, with a pro-forma-to-booked-to-paid flow, recurring and subscription invoices, credit notes and per-line VAT rate and currency selection.
- Products and services linked to a health task flow automatically into the owner's open costs.
- Dewormings and vaccinations auto-schedule with reminders, every health task names the responsible staff member, and the per-horse health report can be downloaded or printed.
- Members book lessons and arena slots themselves and pay online by card or Bancontact or offline by cash, transfer or invoice.
- The privacy policy states all personal data is hosted in the EU on GCP and Firebase, with Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers outside the EEA and deletion spelled out (soft-deleted after 90 days, permanent within 180 days).
Held against it
- Pricing transparency scores 0-2, with no public price per horse, box or module and no setup fee, minimum term or VAT treatment anywhere captured.
- We found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, or an export to a named accounting tool such as DATEV.
- We found no public information on structured feeding or supplement plans, a medication log with dose, or passport and UELN data.
- We found no public information on shift or holiday planning or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers.
- The independently checked attributes mark ownership, entity jurisdiction and subprocessor exposure unknown, with Google Analytics and a Freshdesk helpdesk in the chain and no public information on a data processing agreement or security statement.
Best for
- You run a riding club and want members to book lessons and the arena themselves, buy packages upfront and pay online.
- You want invoicing inside the stable software, with services from the daily plan flowing into owners' open costs.
- You want an attributed per-horse health record — dates, tasks and the responsible staff member — that you can print or hand to a vet.
- Your daily round runs on recurring tasks assigned to named, colour-coded staff, with reminders and a completion check mark.
Avoid if
- You need to compute an annual cost from published prices before a sales conversation — the captured pricing page shows no figures.
- You run a livery yard where boarders send instructions staff acknowledge and you control which records are released — the captured portal pages describe riding-club members.
- You require confirmed ownership and subprocessor transparency before signing — the independently checked attributes mark them unknown, and Google Analytics and a Freshdesk helpdesk sit in the processing chain.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 3 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2.5 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 2.5 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2.5 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 3 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 0.5 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The chain I lose money on today is documented: services and products linked to a health task land automatically in the owner's open costs, invoices start from those open costs or a blank invoice, and there is a flow from pro-forma to a booked, numbered invoice to confirmed paid with a transfer date, plus VAT rate and currency selection, recurring invoices and credit notes. What holds it back is that I found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, or an export to a named accounting tool such as DATEV. 2 6 9
The Stable Manager
Invoices are made inside the system: a subscription prepares the invoices, billable items from the planning land automatically in the owner's open costs, and there is a pro-forma-to-booked-to-sent-to-paid flow with credit notes, per-line VAT and currency selection, and e-invoicing ready where available. What holds it back is the money handling: we found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, or an export to a named accounting tool. 2 3 6 9
The Boarder
Products and services linked to a health task flow automatically into the owner's open costs, and from there invoices are generated in the system with a pro-forma-to-paid flow, recurring invoices and a subscription system, credit notes and per-item VAT rate selection. But we found no public information on board contracts per box, SEPA direct debit, prepaid credit, dunning or an export to an accounting tool. 6 2 9 3
The Riding-School Lead
Invoices are genuinely made inside the system: recurring and subscription invoices, services linked to a task that land automatically in the owner's open costs, a pro-forma to booked to paid flow with invoice numbers, credit notes, VAT rate and currency per line, and a cost-note photo taken on the phone. What keeps me from going higher: I found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, multiple payers sharing one horse, or an export to a named accounting tool. 6 2 9 3
The Tax Adviser
Invoices are genuinely produced inside the system: recurring and subscription invoices, a pro-forma to booked-invoice flow that assigns an invoice number, currency and VAT rate selected per item, credit notes, and paid status confirmed with a transfer date; products and services linked to a planned task land automatically in the owner's open costs. What my clients' accountant would ask for is where it thins out — we found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, an export to DATEV or any other named accounting tool, prepaid credit or dunning, and the e-invoicing claim is only 'ready where available'. 2 3 6 9
The Skeptic
Invoices genuinely live in the system: recurring and subscription-prepared invoices, a pro-forma-to-booked flow with invoice numbering, VAT rate and currency per line, credit notes, and logged services pushed automatically into the owner's open costs. But we found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, prepaid credit, dunning, or any export to a named accounting tool, and e-invoicing is stated only as ready where available. 2 3 6 9
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Health tasks per horse with automatic recurrence proposals, reminders and a named responsible staff member, plus a printable health report carrying identity data, task date and who carried it out, give me a real file. But I found no public information on structured feeding plans by feeding round, blanket or turnout instructions, medication with dose, or passport and UELN data — what a vet or inspector asks for. 2 8 9
The Stable Manager
Health is genuinely organised — auto-scheduled recurring dewormings and vaccinations with reminders, health tasks assigned to a named staff member with reminders and auto-proposed follow-ups, and a per-horse health report with identity data, dates and responsible staff that can be downloaded or printed. But the boarding-yard core is missing: we found no public information on structured feeding or supplement plans, medication given with dose and who administered it, blanket or turnout instructions, or passport and UELN data. 2 8 9
The Boarder
Deworming and vaccination recurrences are auto-scheduled with reminders, every health task carries the responsible staff member and date, and a per-horse health overview with identity data can be downloaded or printed. We found no public information on feeding or supplement plans shown on the feeding round, medication logs with dose, or passport and UELN data. 2 8 9
The Riding-School Lead
Recurring deworming and vaccination tasks with reminders, health tasks plannable for several horses at once, and a downloadable or printable health report per horse carrying identity data plus who did what and when — that report I could hand a vet. But I found no public information on structured feeding plans per feeding round, a medication log with dose, or passport and UELN data held on the horse's file. 2 8 9
The Tax Adviser
Vaccinations and dewormings are auto-scheduled with reminders, health tasks name the responsible staff member and are confirmed with a check mark, and a per-horse health report with identity data, dates and responsible staff can be downloaded or printed — that is a real, attributed history. We found no public information on structured feeding plans per horse, a medication log with dose, FN/LPO-aligned vaccination due dates, or passport and UELN data, so the file would not yet satisfy an inspector's scrutiny. 2 8 9
The Skeptic
Dewormings and vaccinations auto-schedule with reminders, every health task carries the responsible staff member, and the per-horse report with identity data can be downloaded or printed — that is a traceable history. But we found no public information on structured feeding or supplement plans, a medication log with dose, or owner instructions such as turnout and blankets, which is what the daily round actually runs on. 2 8 9
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Tasks repeat daily, every workday, weekly or monthly, are assigned to one or more staff with due date, optional time and priority, and overdue work surfaces on the dashboard; health tasks show a tick beside the staff member who carried them out. I found no public information on a shift or holiday plan, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, boarder duty rotas, role permissions, or offline use in a barn without signal. 2 8 10 11
The Stable Manager
Recurring general tasks (daily, every workday, weekly, monthly) can be assigned to one or more staff with priority, due date and reminders, completion is marked with a check next to the responsible person's name, and sub-teams can be linked to stable groups with colour coding per groom. The roster side is silent: we found no public information on a shift or holiday plan, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, or boarder duty rotas — general tasks are assignable to staff only. 2 8 10 11
The Boarder
Tasks are assigned to one or more staff with recurrence from daily to monthly, priorities, reminders and a completion tick showing who carried out what, plus teams linked to stable groups. We found no public information on shift or holiday planning, time recording, or boarder duty rotas. 10 8 11 2
The Riding-School Lead
My daily round would work: tasks repeat daily, every workday, weekly or monthly, go to one or more named staff colour-coded in the dashboard, and a check mark against the staff member records completion, with reminders before due work. I found no public information on shift plans, time recording for mini-jobbers, holiday planning, or boarder duty rotas. 10 11 8
The Tax Adviser
Task handling is solid: recurring daily, workday, weekly or monthly work assigned to one or more staff with priority, due time, overdue views and colour-coding by responsible person, and teams can be linked to stable groups. We found no public information on shift or holiday planning, and on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers — the piece a customs minimum-wage check asks to see — the captured pages say nothing, which caps it well short of the higher marks. 8 10 11
The Skeptic
Tasks recur daily, weekly or monthly, are assigned to one or more staff, colour-coded per person, with completion ticked next to the name and reminders sent to whoever is in charge — sub-teams can be tied to stable groups. Beyond that the trail goes cold: we found no public information on shift or holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, boarder duty rotas, or any location-based clock-in. 2 8 10 11
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The member portal shows each member only the horse profiles they are engaged with, their purchase history, payment statuses and upcoming lessons, with self-service bookings and cancellations and even parents switching between children's linked accounts. For a boarding stable it falls short because I found no public information on owners sending instructions or requests to the stable, push notifications, or owner data export and deletion on request. 5 12 13
The Stable Manager
There is a member portal where riders manage their own profile, see the profiles of horses they are engaged with, follow purchase history and payment status, retrieve expense notes and make lesson and arena bookings, with family members able to switch between linked accounts. We found no public information on owners sending instructions to the stable and staff acknowledging them, on the stable deciding which records are released, or on owner data being exported or deleted on request — and the captured portal pages describe riding-club members rather than boarders of a livery yard. 2 5 12 13
The Boarder
Members get a portal with horse profiles of the horses they are engaged with, purchase history, payment status and expense receipts, and family members can switch between linked accounts — but the captured pages are about riding-club members, not stable boarders. We found no public information on boarders sending instructions to the stable, staff acknowledging them, or the stable deciding which records are released to whom. 12 13 5 2
The Riding-School Lead
Members book lessons and arena slots themselves, buy packages or single lessons, manage their own profile, see the horses they are engaged with, follow purchase history and payment status, and cancel before expiry; parents get separate access to children's accounts, which hints at proper scoping. I found no public information on owners sending instructions to the stable and staff acknowledging them, or on owner data being exported or deleted on request. 12 13 2
The Tax Adviser
The member portal shows each member their purchase history, payment statuses, expense notes and upcoming lessons, plus the profiles of horses they are engaged with, with self-service lesson and arena bookings, cancellation before expiry and linked family accounts. We found no public information on an owner sending instructions to the stable with staff acknowledgment, or on the stable controlling what is released per owner and per co-share, so it reads as a riding-club member portal rather than a full boarder portal. 12 13
The Skeptic
The club portal gives members their own profile, purchase history, payment statuses, cancellable bookings and the profiles of only the horses they are engaged with, and parents can be granted access to children's accounts — so scoping by account exists. But this is riding-club evidence, and we found no public information on a stable-side owner view of released records, or on owners sending instructions that staff acknowledge. 2 12 13
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Members book lessons and arena reservations themselves, buy lesson packages or single lessons upfront with online and offline payment options, and can cancel bookings before expiry — that covers the teaching side of my yard. I found no public information on booking rules per user group, capacity and closures, equipment such as walker, treadmill or solarium, school-horse workload, or guest riders. 2 12 13
The Stable Manager
Members book lessons and reserve the arena themselves and buy lesson packages or single lessons upfront, paying online by card or Bancontact or offline by cash, transfer or invoice — the paying teaching business is covered. We found no public information on booking rules, capacity or closures per user group, equipment such as horse walker, treadmill or solarium, school-horse workload tracking, or courses and clinics with participant management. 2 12 13
The Boarder
Arena reservations and lesson bookings are self-service for members, with lesson packages or single lessons purchased online by card or Bancontact or offline. We found no public information on time slots and booking rules, capacity limits, courses with registration, or equipment like walker and solarium. 12 13 2
The Riding-School Lead
Lesson bookings, arena reservations and ten-lesson-style packages bought upfront with online and offline payment, plus cancellations before expiry and an upcoming schedule — the riding-club side of my business is covered, and payments are managed in the same product as the stable's invoices. What stops me going higher: I found no public information on booking rules or capacity that would stop two lessons landing on the same arena slot, on school-horse workload tracking, or on courses and clinics with participant management. 12 13 2
The Tax Adviser
Arena reservations and lesson bookings run as member self-service with lesson packages and individual lessons, paid online by credit or debit card and Bancontact or offline by cash, transfer or invoice, and cancellable before expiry — booking, payment and lesson cards are connected. We found no public information on booking rules or capacity per user group, school-horse scheduling and workload, or events and clinics with registration and participant payment. 2 12 13
The Skeptic
Members reserve the arena and book lessons themselves, buy packages or single lessons upfront, and pay online with card or Bancontact — bookings and money do meet. We found no public information on booking rules or capacity per user group, equipment such as walker or solarium, school-horse workload, or courses and clinics with registration; the optional 32-inch touchscreen is described as a display board, and we found no public information on gate, walker or solarium controllers. 2 12 13
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The privacy policy states all personal data is hosted in the EU with GCP and Firebase named and Standard Contractual Clauses as safeguard, and the vendor is a Belgian company. But the independently computed attributes mark entity, ownership and subprocessor exposure unknown, and I found no subprocessor list with locations, no data processing agreement offer and no security or certification statement — with Google analytics and a Freshdesk helpdesk in the chain, I want that list. 5 6
The Stable Manager
The privacy policy states all personal data is hosted in the EU with Standard Contractual Clauses for any transfer outside the EEA, names Google Cloud and Firebase as hosts plus Google Analytics and Firebase Analytics, and documents deletion after the contract ends (soft after 90 days, permanent within 180). The independently sourced sovereignty attributes leave the contracting entity's jurisdiction, ownership, data residency and subprocessor exposure unconfirmed on the vendor's captured pages, and we found no public information on subprocessor locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or a security or certification statement. 5 6
The Boarder
The privacy policy states all personal data is hosted in the EU on GCP and Firebase with Standard Contractual Clauses for outside-EEA transfers, and names Google Analytics and Firebase Analytics for product improvement alongside an AI assistant with zero data retention. But processor locations are not given, no data processing agreement offer is published, the helpdesk runs on a US-named provider, and there is no security or certification statement — and the independent sovereignty check could not confirm residency or subprocessor exposure. 5 6 3
The Riding-School Lead
The privacy policy states all personal data is hosted in the EU with cloud providers GCP and Firebase, Standard Contractual Clauses for any transfer outside the EEA, and concrete retention and deletion timelines, and the vendor is a Belgian company per the provenance line. But I found no public information on a subprocessor list with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or a security or certification statement, and the independently gathered attributes leave ownership and jurisdiction unconfirmed. 5
The Tax Adviser
The privacy policy states all personal data is hosted in the EU, with Standard Contractual Clauses for any transfer outside the EEA, names Google Cloud and Firebase as hosting providers and Google and Firebase Analytics as processors, and sets out deletion (soft-deleted after 90 days, permanently deleted within 180). But Google and Firebase sit in the chain, the helpdesk runs on Freshdesk, and we found no public information on subprocessor locations, a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data, or a security or certification statement; the independently checked attributes return ownership and entity jurisdiction as unknown. 5 6
The Skeptic
The privacy policy states that all personal data is hosted in the EU on named providers (GCP, Firebase), with Standard Contractual Clauses where data leaves the EEA, and retention and deletion timelines are spelled out. But Google and Firebase sit in the analytics chain and the helpdesk runs on Freshdesk, and we found no public information on ownership, subprocessor locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or any security or certification statement. 5 6
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
A pricing page exists and names the two products, a public API as a plan option and an AI assistant, but I found no public price figures at all — nothing per box, horse or user, no setup fees, no minimum term, no VAT treatment, and no cancellation or data-return terms. For forty boxes I cannot begin to compute the annual cost. 3
The Stable Manager
A pricing page exists naming the two product lines, with the public API as a plan option and free support and free trial support stated, but no price figure, scaling rule, setup fee, minimum term, VAT treatment or cancellation and data-return terms appear anywhere we captured. A stable owner cannot compute any annual cost from the public pages alone; everything points to a sales conversation. 3 4
The Boarder
A pricing page exists and mentions plan options like the public API and e-invoicing, but the captured pages contain no price figure at all — only free support and free-trial support are stated. We found no public information on prices per horse or module, setup fees, minimum term, VAT treatment, or what happens to the data on cancellation. 3 4
The Riding-School Lead
The captured pricing page shows product tiers and a public API as a plan option, and free support comes with a free trial, but I found no price figures anywhere: nothing per horse or per module, no setup fee, no minimum term, no VAT treatment. As a stable owner I could not begin to compute what a year would cost me from these pages. 3 4
The Tax Adviser
The captured pricing page shows product names, a public API as a plan option and free support, but no figures anywhere: we found no public information on price per horse, box or module, which modules cost extra, setup fees, minimum term or VAT treatment. From these pages a stable owner cannot begin to compute an annual cost, which for my clients means the sales call comes first. 3 4
The Skeptic
A pricing page exists and distinguishes the two products and plan options such as a public API, but we found no public price figures at all — no price per box, horse or user, no setup fee, no minimum term, no VAT treatment. The real annual cost of a yard cannot be computed from anything published; the conversation with sales is the only route to a number. 3
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Equicty
Is Equicty European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Equicty as EU-Made.
Where does Equicty store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
Does Equicty have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Equicty?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Equicty alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 8 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 legal fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (13)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (EQUstable) www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Pricing page www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Legal notice www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Privacy policy www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Board contracts, extra services & billing — found from sitemap support.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Board contracts, extra services & billing — found from sitemap www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Horse records, feeding & health — found from sitemap support.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Horse records, feeding & health — found from sitemap support.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Staff, rotas & daily operations — found from sitemap support.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Staff, rotas & daily operations — found from sitemap support.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Boarder portal & communication — found from sitemap www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Boarder portal & communication — found from sitemap www.equicty.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →