Stable & Equestrian Management
Stable Manager
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by CMF-Solutions UG · stable-manager.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Stable Manager at a glance
- Vendor
- CMF-Solutions UG
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Stable Manager 2/5, the mean of 6 judges. Stable Manager is a browser-based stable and equestrian management product from CMF-Solutions UG, built in-house since 2024 by the operators of Hof Garlebsen in Einbeck, Germany. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Stable Manager is a browser-based stable and equestrian management product from CMF-Solutions UG, built in-house since 2024 by the operators of Hof Garlebsen in Einbeck, Germany. Boarding and billing is the standout at a flat 6: a booked service becomes a team task and then an invoice, with standardised numbering, optional ZUGFeRD e-invoices, automatic email dispatch and payment-status marking. Pricing transparency is the floor at 0 to 1: no price appears on the captured pages — no per-horse, per-box or module figure, no setup fee, minimum term or VAT statement — while a full-access trial, self-registration and free personal onboarding are published. Horse care records, boarder portal and facilities and lessons score 4 to 5, with vaccinations and the duty roster evidenced but medication logs, farrier schedules and capacity rules not. Staff and operations spans 4 to 6, the widest gap, with the lower marks citing absent time recording; no genuine split was flagged. Sovereignty scores 5 to 6 on AWS EMEA SARL in the Frankfurt region and self-hosted Keycloak logins, with ownership and subprocessors unconfirmed.
Speaks for it
- A booked service can become a team task and then an invoice, with optional ZUGFeRD e-invoices, automatic email dispatch and paid-status marking.
- A stable-wide vaccination plan with a mandatory flag produces weekly overdue emails to the operator and notifications to owners.
- The duty roster offers entry, swapping and one overview for everyone, with obligations set per person or horse.
- Boarders book services for several horses and days under permissions, with prices and booked services communicated transparently.
- The privacy policy names Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL with processing predominantly in the EU, a self-hosted Keycloak for logins, and EU-US Data Privacy Framework plus standard contractual clauses for US transfers.
Held against it
- No price appears on the captured pages — no figure per stable, box, horse or module, no setup fee, no minimum term and nothing on data return on cancellation.
- We found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, credit notes, or an export to DATEV or any other named accounting tool.
- We found no public information on employee time recording, holiday planning or completion records per task.
- We found no public information on a medication log with dose and administrator, worming and farrier schedules, or passport and UELN data.
- Ownership, the contracting entity's jurisdiction and a subprocessor list with locations are not confirmed on the captured pages, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement or a security statement.
Best for
- You run a boarding yard and want every booked extra service to flow into the invoice, with recurring monthly bookings renewing themselves and a forecast for the next month.
- You manage a self-care yard and need boarders to enter, swap and view duties in one place instead of a message flood.
- You want owners notified as vaccinations run out, backed by a stable-wide plan and weekly overdue emails to you.
- You prefer to evaluate with a trial with full access and free personal onboarding before any commitment.
Avoid if
- You need to know the annual cost before speaking to the vendor — ask the vendor: the public pages we read do not show it
- Your bookkeeping depends on SEPA direct debit mandates or an export to DATEV or another named accounting tool — we found no public information on these.
- You must evidence employee working time for minimum-wage purposes — we found no public information on time recording.
- You require a confirmed contracting entity, a data processing agreement or a published subprocessor list before signing — we found no public information on these.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 3 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 2.5 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2.5 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 2 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2.5 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 0.5 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
A booked service becomes a team task and then a line on an invoice, with ZUGFeRD e-invoices, a standardised running invoice number, automatic email dispatch and paid-status marking. But I found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates per service type, credit notes or cancellation, or an export to DATEV or any other accounting tool — the things my tax adviser asks about every quarter. 1 2 5 6 12
The Stable Manager
Booked services flow into invoices with a standardised incrementing invoice number, optional ZUGFeRD e-invoice, automatic email dispatch and a paid marker in the invoice management view, and recurring monthly services renew automatically with a forecast — that is the monthly billing loop done from the system. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, VAT settings per service type, credit notes, prepaid credit or an export to an accounting tool. 5 6 1 2 12
The Boarder
This is the part that works for me: booked services and monthly statements become an invoice inside the system, with payment status tracked, automatic email dispatch and an optional ZUGFeRD e-invoice, so every extra wrap on my bill should trace back to a booking. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, VAT treatment per service type, credit notes or an export to an accounting tool. 1 2 5 6
The Riding-School Lead
Monthly statements and booked services become invoices inside the system, sent automatically by e-mail with payment status marked and ZUGFeRD e-invoices on offer — the path from a booked service to a paid bill is there, and recurring monthly bookings renew themselves with a forecast. I found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates per service type, credit notes, or an export to a named accounting tool, which is what my accountant would ask for. 1 2 5 6 12
The Tax Adviser
Invoices are built from the booked services themselves — a booking can run from team task to invoice, line items are picked from the service overview, numbering follows a standardized incrementing format with a custom format on request, and ZUGFeRD e-invoices are offered alongside automatic email dispatch and payment-status tracking. Before I could run the books on it I would need what the pages do not show: we found no public information on SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, credit notes, or an export to DATEV or any other named accounting tool. 1 2 5 6 12
The Skeptic
A service booking can become a team task and then an invoice, invoices are emailed automatically and marked as paid with a payment-status icon, numbering is standardised and ZUGFeRD e-invoices are an option alongside monthly statements. We found no public information on SEPA direct debit mandates, VAT treatment per service type, credit notes, prepaid credit, or an export to DATEV or any other named accounting tool. 1 2 5 6 12
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Vaccinations are genuinely structured: a stable-wide plan with mandatory and optional types, per-horse entries under a health tab, a weekly overdue email to the operator and notifications to the owners. Horse files and feeding plans are named as modules, but I found no public information on feeding rounds shown to staff, worming and farrier dates with reminders, a medication log with dose and administrator, or an export of the horse's file when it leaves. 1 2 7 13
The Stable Manager
Horse files and feeding plans are named as linked modules, and the vaccination side is properly built: a stable-wide plan with mandatory vaccinations appearing per horse in a health tab, optional ones kept as dated events, weekly overdue emails to the operator and notifications to owners. We found no public information on a medication log showing who gave which dose, farrier and worming schedules, passport or UELN data, or an export of the horse's file when it leaves the stable. 2 1 7 13
The Boarder
Vaccinations are genuinely structured — a yard-wide plan, mandatory jabs appearing on every horse's health tab, weekly overdue alerts to the operator and notices to owners — and feed plans are named as a module alongside the horse files. We found no public information on a medication log with dose and who administered it, on worming and farrier history, or on a documented export of the file when a horse leaves. 1 2 7
The Riding-School Lead
Vaccination handling is genuinely structured — a stable-wide plan with mandatory flags, a health tab per horse, weekly overdue e-mails to the operator and notifications to owners — and feed plans are named as a module. Beyond that I found no public information on worming, farrier or vet appointments, a medication log with dose and who gave it, or an exportable file per horse when it leaves. 1 2 7 13
The Tax Adviser
There are genuine horse records — Pferdeakten and feed plans named as interlocking modules — and the vaccination side is properly structured: a stable-wide plan, mandatory jabs forced onto every horse's health tab, weekly overdue emails to the operator and notices to owners. Beyond feeding and vaccinations the evidence is thin: we found no public information on worming and farrier schedules, a medication log with dose and who administered it, passport or UELN data, or a documented export when the horse leaves. 1 2 7
The Skeptic
Horse files and feed plans exist as modules, and the vaccination side is real: a stable-wide vaccination plan with a mandatory flag, per-horse events, weekly overdue emails to the operator and notifications to owners. We found no public information on worming, farrier and vet appointments, a medication log with dose and administrator, passport or UELN data, or any export of a horse's file when it leaves the stable. 2 7 13
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Tasks per day or in total with morning/noon/evening assignment and a named employee, task creation tied to service bookings, a duty roster with entries, swaps and one overview for everyone, and role-based access for management, team and boarders. I found no public information on completion records, employee time recording for the minimum-wage duties, or holiday and absence planning. 1 6 8 9
The Stable Manager
Tasks can be set per day or in total with morning, noon and evening time slots and optional assignment to a named employee, task creation can be triggered automatically by service bookings, and the duty roster lets people enter, swap and view duties with obligations configurable per person or horse. We found no public information on completion confirmation per task, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, holiday planning, offline use, or an audit trail of who did what. 8 9 1 6 4
The Boarder
Tasks can be planned per day with morning, noon and evening slots and a named employee, a service booking can generate the matching team task, and the duty roster with entry, swapping and an overview for everyone is what ends the WhatsApp flood in a self-care yard. We found no public information on completion ticking, reminders for due work, time recording for employees, or any audit trail of who did what when. 1 8 9
The Riding-School Lead
Tasks can be set per day or in total with morning, noon and evening slots and direct assignment to a worker, and the duty plan with entries, swaps and an overview for everyone is exactly the boarder-duty tool a self-care yard needs. I found no public information on time recording for employees, holiday and absence planning, or a completion history showing who did what and when. 1 6 8 9
The Tax Adviser
Tasks can be set per day with morning, noon and evening slots and optional direct assignment to an employee, service bookings can spawn the matching task, and the Dienstplan handles boarder duties with entry, swapping and an overview for everyone. We found no public information on completion records, shift and holiday planning, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers that would stand up to a minimum-wage inspection — for me the decisive item on a working yard. 1 6 8 9
The Skeptic
Tasks recur by day or in total with time-of-day assignment and optional assignment to a named employee, task creation links to service bookings, and a duty roster with entry, swapping and an overview for everyone is presented for people and horses obligated to duties. We found no public information on completion records per task, employee time recording, holiday and absence planning, or offline use in a barn without signal. 1 6 8 9
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Boarders have their own access per permissions, can book services for several horses and days on their accounts, receive vaccination-expiry notices, and prices plus booked services are communicated transparently. I found no public information on owners seeing their invoices in the portal, a channel for instructions to the stable with acknowledgement, separate scoping for co-owners and ride-shares, or export and deletion of owner data. 1 4 6 7 13
The Stable Manager
Boarders get access according to their permissions alongside management and team, owners are notified about expiring vaccinations, and prices and booked services are communicated transparently, with booking permissions enforced per user. We found no public information on an owner's on-demand view of their own horse's full records and invoices, acknowledgement of instructions by staff, or export and deletion of owner data on request. 1 4 6 7 12
The Boarder
Boarders get role-based access next to stable management and team, services are bookable under permissions with prices and bookings communicated transparently, invoices go out by email, and owners are notified when vaccinations run out. We found no public information on scoping that keeps one owner strictly to her own horse's records, on instructions to the stable being acknowledged by whoever reads them, or on export and deletion of owner data on request. 1 5 7 10
The Riding-School Lead
Role-based access separates management, team and boarders, boarders book services for their own horses under permission rules, and owners are notified of expiring vaccinations. I found no public information on an owner's own view of their horse's records and invoices, separate scoping for co-owners or Reitbeteiligungen, or owner data being exportable and deletable on request. 1 7 10 11 13
The Tax Adviser
Boarders get role-based access — the duty roster for everyone, booking of services for several horses and days at once, vaccination notices to owners, and transparent communication of prices and booked services — which genuinely takes load off the phone. We found no public information on whether owners see their own invoices in the portal, separate scoping for co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen, push notifications, or export and deletion of owner data on request. 1 6 7 9 13
The Skeptic
Boarders have role-based access alongside management and team, are notified about expiring vaccinations, see prices and booked services communicated transparently, and can book services themselves under permissions. The invoice path shown is sending to any email address rather than an owner's own bill view, and we found no public information on per-owner scoping of records, co-owners or riding shares, or instructions acknowledged by staff. 1 5 6 7 12
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Calendars with a direct-booking option, booking rules and lead times configurable to the yard, multi-day and multi-horse bookings, auto-renewal for monthly services, and lesson planning named among the digital tasks, with a booking carrying through to a task and into the invoice. I found no public information on capacity limits and closures per user group, school horses, courses with online registration, or device integration for walker or solarium. 2 6 8 12 13
The Stable Manager
Bookings run with stable-defined rules and lead times, a calendar direct-booking option, multi-day and multi-horse bookings and automatic monthly renewal, and lesson planning is named as part of the daily workflow. We found no public information on arena or equipment capacity rules, school horses and their workload, courses with online registration and payment, guest boxes, or device integration such as gates or walker controllers. 2 8 12 13 6
The Boarder
Bookings run under the yard's own rules and lead times, cover several horses and days at once, and repeat automatically for recurring monthly services, with bookable calendars and lesson planning also described. We found no public information on capacity and closures per facility, courses with online registration, school horses, or device integration. 2 6 12 13
The Riding-School Lead
Bookable calendars with a direct-booking option, configurable rules with lead times, bookings for several horses and days at once, and a mention of lesson planning are evidenced, with bookings flowing onward to tasks and invoicing. For my teaching business I found no public information on slot capacity, school-horse workload tracking, lesson cards, or courses and clinics with registration and payment. 2 6 8 12 13
The Tax Adviser
The booking engine is real and I like that it feeds the money side: direct-booking calendars, configurable rules and lead times per stable, multi-day and multi-horse bookings, auto-renewal with a monthly forecast, and lesson planning named alongside — with every booking able to flow into an invoice. The facilities themselves are barely evidenced: we found no public information on arena, walker or solarium booking with capacity rules, courses and clinics with registration and payment, or any device integration. 2 6 8 12 13
The Skeptic
Services are bookable under stable-defined rules and lead times, calendars offer a direct-booking option, bookings can span several horses, accounts and days with automatic renewal for monthly services, and lesson planning is named. We found no public information on capacity limits, closures per user group, courses with registration, school-horse workload, or device integration for walkers, gates or solariums — so this reads as service booking rather than facility management. 2 6 8 12 13
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The privacy policy names AWS EMEA as operator with processing overwhelmingly in the EU, specifically the Frankfurt region, US transfers for error data rest on the Data Privacy Framework plus standard contractual clauses, and login runs on a self-hosted Keycloak. But we found no public list of subprocessors with locations — the payment provider stays unnamed — no data processing agreement offer, and the ownership and jurisdiction of the entity are not confirmed on the captured pages. 4 8
The Stable Manager
The privacy policy names Amazon Web Services in the Frankfurt region with processing predominantly in the EU, covers error-tracking transfers to the USA on the basis of the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework plus standard contractual clauses, runs login on a self-hosted Keycloak instance, and ships as a browser app with no app-store chain. Ownership, the contracting entity's jurisdiction and the full list of subprocessors with locations are marked unconfirmed, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement offered to the stable or a published security statement. 4 8 10
The Boarder
The privacy policy names AWS with processing predominantly in the Frankfurt region, a self-hosted Keycloak for logins, and Sentry for error data with 90-day retention, with US transfers covered by the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses; as a browser app there is also no app-store link in the chain. The contracting entity's jurisdiction and the ownership are not confirmed on the captured vendor pages, and we found no public information on the payment, email or notification providers in the chain. 4 8 10
The Riding-School Lead
The privacy policy names AWS EMEA SARL with processing in the Frankfurt region, a self-hosted Keycloak for logins, Sentry for error data with ninety-day retention, and transfers to the USA under the Data Privacy Framework plus standard contractual clauses. Beyond that I found no public information confirming the contracting entity and ownership, a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or a published security or certification statement. 2 4 8
The Tax Adviser
The privacy policy does more than most: AWS EMEA SARL named as provider, processing in the AWS region Frankfurt, a self-hosted Keycloak for logins, US transfers only on the basis of the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework plus standard contractual clauses, and retention periods stated down to Sentry's 90 days. It stops short of the full chain — the contracting entity and ownership are not confirmed on the captured pages beyond a German address, and we found no public information on a data processing agreement offered to the stable or a complete subprocessor list with locations for payment and email. 4 12
The Skeptic
The privacy policy names Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL with processing in the AWS Region Frankfurt (eu-central-1) and states EU-US Data Privacy Framework plus standard contractual clauses for US transfers, with error data in Sentry kept 90 days and a self-operated Keycloak for logins. Beyond that the chain goes dark: we found no public information naming the payment provider, a subprocessor list with locations, a data processing agreement, or a security statement, ownership is not confirmed on the vendor's own pages, and the published contact address is the farm at Garlebsen 4, Einbeck. 4 8
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
I found no public information on price per stall, box, horse or module, setup fees, minimum term or data return on cancellation; not one euro figure appears anywhere I looked. Free personal onboarding and a full-access trial are published, but the real annual cost only starts with contacting the vendor. 1 2 9
The Stable Manager
We found no public prices at all — no per-box, per-horse or module figures, no setup fee, no minimum term, no VAT treatment and nothing on what happens to the data on cancellation. The pages describe a free trial with full access and free personal onboarding, and onboarding starts by leaving an email address or phone number. 9 1 2
The Boarder
The only public cost information is a free personal onboarding and a trial with full access, with registration routed through an email or phone contact. We found no public information on any price per stable, box or horse, on module or setup costs, on a minimum term, or on what happens to the data on cancellation. 1 2 9
The Riding-School Lead
I found no public prices at all — nothing per stable, box or horse, no module prices, no setup fee, no minimum term and nothing on what happens to the data on cancellation. The published path is a contact form with a reply within 24 hours, free personal onboarding and a trial with full access, so no stable owner can compute the annual cost from the pages alone. 1 2 9
The Tax Adviser
Across the captured pages we found no public price information at all — no figure per horse, box or module, no setup fee, no minimum term and nothing on VAT — while acquisition runs through a personal conversation or self-registration with a trial period. A stable owner can therefore only learn the real annual cost after talking to the vendor. 1 2 9
The Skeptic
No price appears on the captured pages — no per-horse or per-module figure, no setup fee, no minimum term, no VAT statement and no data-return terms; what is public is self-registration, a trial with all functions, free personal onboarding and a reply within 24 hours. A stable owner cannot compute any annual cost from these pages. 1 2 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Stable Manager
Is Stable Manager European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Stable Manager as EU-Made.
Where does Stable Manager store data?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
Does Stable Manager have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Stable Manager?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Stable Manager alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Ownership, Data residency, Subprocessors. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 20 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 3 sovereignty dimensions could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and are shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (13)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 About page stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Legal notice stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Privacy policy stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Board contracts, extra services & billing — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Board contracts, extra services & billing — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Horse records, feeding & health — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Staff, rotas & daily operations — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Staff, rotas & daily operations — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Boarder portal & communication — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Boarder portal & communication — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Facilities, lessons & events — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 13 Facilities, lessons & events — found from sitemap stable-manager.com Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →