Stable & Equestrian Management
Stall Manager
EU-Made Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by received.eu · stallmanager.eu
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Link to this page
Add ?theme=dark to the image address for dark backgrounds.
The badge shows the category and the month of the latest evaluation, and EU-Made where
that is the product’s provenance. It never shows a score.
Stall Manager at a glance
- Vendor
- received.eu
- Headquarters
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Data hosting
- Default not stated; pages mention Germany source, captured 16 Oct 2026
- Free plan
- Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026
- Panel verdict
- The AI panel rates Stall Manager 2.5/5, the mean of 6 judges. Stall Manager, from received.eu — a sole trader in Nuremberg per the imprint — serves riding stables, riding schools and livery yards in the browser and app. how scores are made
- As of
- Vendor pages captured 16 Oct 2026; evaluated by the panel 16 Oct 2026. all sources
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Stall Manager, from received.eu — a sole trader in Nuremberg per the imprint — serves riding stables, riding schools and livery yards in the browser and app. Facilities and lessons score highest, at 7 to 8: arena and zone booking with conflict check and waitlist, lessons with trainer and school horses, subscriptions, credit with a forecast, and riding shares with weekly quota and automated monthly billing. Pricing transparency scores lowest, at 2 to 3: the billing module carries the only public price, EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year, and we found no public price for the base subscription, the SEPA & Dunning add-on or the website package. Horse care records sit at 4 — profiles, feeding, inventory — with no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules or a medication log. Staff and operations and the boarder portal span 4 to 6: lower scores cite no public information on time recording or owners seeing their horse's records, higher ones credit the task-and-calendar base and family accounts. Sovereignty scores 4 to 5: servers stated in Germany, hosting rented from an unnamed web hoster.
Speaks for it
- Arena and zone booking comes with conflict check, waitlist and recurring series.
- Lesson units carry time, lesson type, trainer and school horses, with capacities showing available spots.
- The billing module runs invoicing from fixed costs and add-ons through to PDF exports, extended by a SEPA & Dunning add-on for mandate management, collection runs and structured dunning levels.
- Fixed riding shares on school horses carry a weekly quota with automated monthly billing.
- Free WhatsApp and email support comes with a free 30-day trial that ends automatically.
Held against it
- Only the billing module, at EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year, carries a public price, and we found no public price for the base subscription, the SEPA & Dunning add-on or the website package.
- We found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules with reminders, a medication log, or an exportable horse file for the vet or the next stable.
- We found no public information on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, shift planning, or a completion history showing who did which task.
- We found no public information on boarders viewing their own horse's records or invoices, as the portal evidence shown covers the riding-school family side.
- The privacy policy describes rented space from a web hoster it does not name, and we found no public information on subprocessors for push, email and payments or on a data processing agreement.
Best for
- You run a riding school and need double-booking protection on arenas and zones, online family lesson booking with credit balances, and lesson subscriptions.
- You collect board and add-on services by direct debit and want mandate management, collection runs and dunning levels alongside the invoices.
- You want one place for the yard's day — tasks, calendar, absences, feeding and inventory — that keeps working offline in the barn.
Avoid if
- You must compute a full annual cost before signing — the pages publish one module price and we found none for the base subscription or the add-ons.
- Your bookkeeper needs bookings exported to a named accounting tool — the evidenced output is PDF invoices.
- Your vet or inspector needs vaccination, worming, farrier and medication documentation — the evidenced horse care covers profiles, feeding and inventory.
- You are buying chiefly so livery owners can see their own horse's records and invoices — the portal evidence shown is the riding-school family side.
The scores
| Criterion | Panel median |
|---|---|
| Board contracts, extra services & billing | 3 of 5 |
| Horse records, feeding & health | 2 of 5 |
| Staff, rotas & daily operations | 2.5 of 5 |
| Boarder portal & communication | 2.5 of 5 |
| Facilities, lessons & events | 3.5 of 5 |
| European sovereignty | 2 of 5 |
| Pricing transparency | 1.5 of 5 |
Board contracts, extra services & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the stable gets paid: board contracts per box and horse, extra services logged at the moment they are done, prepaid credit, recurring invoices, SEPA direct debit, VAT treatment that a tax adviser accepts, and an export to the accountant.
0 — No billing at all; services are noted somewhere and invoiced by hand in another tool.
3 — A list of services or a price table per horse, but invoices are written outside the system and nothing connects a logged service to a charge.
5 — Board contracts and extra services billed from the system: monthly invoices generated from contracts plus logged services, sent to the boarder, with payment status tracked.
8 — Services logged on the phone where they happen flow into the invoice or a prepaid balance automatically, SEPA direct debit with mandates, VAT rates configurable per service type, cancellation and credit notes, and an export to DATEV or a named accounting tool.
10 — The money side is discharged inside the system: GoBD-compliant numbering and archiving stated, e-invoices (XRechnung/ZUGFeRD) supported, prepaid credit with low-balance warnings, dunning, multiple payers per horse (shares, Reitbeteiligung) split correctly, and every charge traceable to the logged service and the staff member who logged it.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The billing module handles fixed costs and add-on services through to clean PDF exports, and the SEPA & Dunning extension adds mandate management, collection runs and structured dunning levels — that is the direct-debit piece I need so I stop chasing boarders by hand. We found no public information on VAT rates configurable per service type, credit notes, or an export to DATEV or another named accounting tool, and nothing shows a service logged in the barn landing on the invoice by itself. 1 2
The Stable Manager
The billing module digitises the invoicing workflow from fixed costs and add-ons through to clean PDF exports, and the SEPA and dunning add-on brings mandate management, collection runs and structured dunning levels — direct debit done properly. Fixed riding shares also bill automatically each month with capacity shown, so the money side is real. We found no public information on configurable VAT rates per service, credit notes, or an export to a named accounting tool, which is what my tax adviser would ask for. 1 2 3
The Boarder
The Billing Module, at EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year, covers the full invoicing workflow from fixed costs and add-ons to clean PDF exports, and a SEPA & Dunning extension adds mandate management, collection runs and structured dunning levels. That gets the money side past contract-plus-services billing. But we found no public information on VAT rates per service type, credit notes, an export to a named accounting tool, or a charge tracing back to the logged service and the person who logged it — which is exactly what I need to query three extra wraps on my monthly bill. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
The billing module runs the full invoicing workflow from fixed costs and add-ons to clean PDF exports, SEPA & Dunning adds mandate management, collection runs and structured dunning levels, and riding shares on school horses are billed automatically each month — board, extras and collection in one place. We found no public information on VAT rates configurable per service type, credit notes, or an export to DATEV or another named accounting tool, which is what my tax adviser will ask about. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
The billing add-on digitizes the invoicing workflow from fixed costs and add-ons to clean PDF exports, with SEPA mandate management, collection runs, structured dunning levels, prepaid credit plus a cost forecast, and automated monthly billing for riding shares — solid direct-debit and recurring-billing machinery. But we found no public information on VAT rates configurable per service type, credit notes, or an export to DATEV or any named accounting tool, so at year-end I would still be handling PDFs instead of a booking-file export. That sits between the paid-from-the-system level and the fully integrated one. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
The billing module handles fixed costs and add-ons with clean PDF exports, SEPA mandate management, collection runs and structured dunning levels, and fixed riding shares get an automated monthly bill — real money handling, not a price list. I found no public information on VAT treatment per service, credit notes, an export to a named accounting tool, or multiple payers per horse. Prepaid credit with forecasts exists on the riding-school side; I found no public information on boarders' invoices arriving with payment status or low-balance warnings. 1 2 3
Horse records, feeding & health
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The record per horse: master data and passport details, feeding and supplement plans, vaccinations, worming, farrier and vet appointments, medication given, turnout and blanket instructions — kept so that a vet, an inspector or the owner can rely on it, and exportable when the horse leaves.
0 — No horse records beyond a name; care instructions live on a whiteboard.
3 — A profile per horse with free-text notes and perhaps a photo, but no structured feeding plan, no health schedule and no history.
5 — Structured feeding plans per horse shown to staff by feeding round, vaccinations, worming and farrier dates recorded with reminders, and appointments per horse in a calendar.
8 — Health records with due dates to the FN/LPO vaccination schedule, a medication log with dose, date and who administered it, owner instructions (blankets, turnout, special feed) visible to whoever does the round, and a full history per horse exportable as a document.
10 — A record that stands up to scrutiny: medication documentation meeting the TAMG duties for food-producing equines stated, passport and UELN data held, every change attributed and dated, vet and farrier entries from external professionals possible, and the complete file handed to a new stable in a documented export format.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Horse profiles plus documented feeding and stock and a calendar of appointments are listed as base functions, which beats my whiteboard. We found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules with reminders, a medication log with dose and who administered it, or an exportable file handed over when the horse leaves the yard. 1 2
The Stable Manager
Horse profiles with feeding and stock documentation plus appointments in a calendar are in the base package, which is more than a whiteboard. But we found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules with reminders, on a medication log, or on exporting the horse's file when it moves to a new stable. Without health dates and medication with who gave what, this is a profile rather than a record I could hand a vet or inspector. 1 2
The Boarder
Horse profiles and feeding documentation sit in the base package, appointments live in a calendar, and an AI assistant answers horse and appointment questions. We found no public information on vaccination or worming schedules, farrier and vet history, a medication log with dose and administrator, or an export of the horse's file when it moves to a new stable. From these pages I could not check what the farrier actually did to my mare last visit. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
Horse profiles with documented feeding and stocks, plus tasks, appointments and a calendar, give each of my twelve school horses a home in the system. We found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules with reminders, on a medication log with dose and who administered it, or on an exportable horse file for the vet or the next stable. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
Horse profiles and documented feeding and inventory are confirmed base modules, and appointments run in a calendar alongside tasks. We found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules with reminders, a medication log with dose and administrator, passport or UELN data, or an exportable horse file — the health documentation a vet or inspector would ask for is not evidenced. 1 2
The Skeptic
Horse profiles, feeding documentation, inventory and per-horse appointments are base modules — more than a whiteboard, less than a health record. I found no public information on vaccination, worming or farrier schedules with reminders, a medication log, passport or UELN data, or an export of the horse's file when it leaves. For a yard whose selling point is horse records, the health side of that record is entirely absent from the captured pages. 1 2
Staff, rotas & daily operations
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The daily running of the yard: tasks and feeding rounds, shift and holiday planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, help from boarders (Stalldienst), and reminders — and, where staff are clocked in by location, how that is done and documented.
0 — No staff or task features; the day is organised by phone and paper.
3 — A shared to-do list or chat, with no assignment, no recurrence and no record of who did what.
5 — Recurring tasks and rounds assigned to people with completion ticked on the phone, a shift plan, and reminders for due work.
8 — Time recording for employees that meets the minimum-wage and working-time documentation duties, holiday and absence planning, boarder duty rotas for self-care stables, completion history per task, and any location-based clock-in documented as opt-in with its purpose stated.
10 — Operations run and are evidenced in the system: rotas, time records and absences exported to payroll, permissions per role (owner, manager, groom, boarder), offline use in a barn without signal, and an audit trail answering who fed, medicated or turned out which horse when.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Tasks, a calendar, absences and recurring processes give a reliable overview for the day and the coming week, and there are roles with permissions plus offline content in the app. We found no public information on tasks assigned to and ticked off per person, a shift plan, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, which is what my working-time documentation duties actually hinge on. 1 2
The Stable Manager
Recurring tasks, calendar, absences and team communication with roles and permissions give the day structure, and content stays usable without a stable connection with push notifications — that matters at the far end of my barn. We found no public information on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, on holiday planning beyond a mention of absences, or on an audit trail answering who did which task when. 1 2
The Boarder
Recurring tasks, a calendar, absences and team communication are covered, the app works offline with push notices, and roles and permissions govern who sees what. We found no public information on tasks being assigned to named people with completion ticked on the phone, shift planning, time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, or boarder duty rotas for self-care yards. So the yard runs its day here, but the evidence trail of who did what is thin. 1 2
The Riding-School Lead
Tasks with recurring processes, a calendar, absence planning and team communication give a dependable overview of the day and the week, and roles and permissions plus offline use in the app are both stated. We found no public information on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, on boarder duty rotas, or on a completion history showing who did which task. 1 2
The Tax Adviser
Recurring tasks, a calendar, absences and role-based permissions are confirmed, with offline use in the app and push notices for due work. We found no public information on time recording for employees and mini-jobbers, shift planning, or a completion history per task — the working-time documentation a minimum-wage check demands is not visible. 1 2
The Skeptic
Tasks, a calendar, absences and recurring processes are advertised, with roles and permissions, push notes and an offline mode for a barn without signal. I found no public information on tasks being assigned to and ticked off by a person, a shift plan, or time recording for employees and mini-jobbers — the working-time and minimum-wage documentation a yard actually gets audited on. I found no public information on location-based clock-in either. 1 2
Boarder portal & communication
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
What the horse owner sees and does: their horse's records and the services billed to them, instructions to the stable, bookings, news from the yard — and how their personal data and their horse's data are scoped, so each owner sees their own horse and nothing else.
0 — No owner access; everything goes by WhatsApp, phone or a notice board.
3 — A group chat or news feed for the whole yard, with no per-owner view of their own horse or bill.
5 — Owner login showing their own horse's released records, logged services and invoices, with a way to send instructions or requests to the stable.
8 — Owners, co-owners and Reitbeteiligungen scoped separately with the stable deciding what is released, push notifications for due dates and charges, bookings and requests with status, and the privacy policy naming how owner data is processed.
10 — The portal replaces the phone calls: every record and charge an owner is entitled to see available on demand, instructions acknowledged by the staff member who reads them, owner data exportable and deletable on request, and roles that keep one boarder's data out of another's view by design.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Member management with roles and permissions means each person only sees fitting information, and riding-school families get their own accounts with bookings, credit balances and a wallet forecast. We found no public information on a boarding owner's view of their own horse's records, services and invoices, or a way for owners to send instructions and requests to the stable. 1 2 3
The Stable Manager
Members get one login for app and browser, roles keep each person to fitting information, and families hold credit, book lessons and see their own appointments and riding minutes — scoping by design rather than by luck. The privacy policy sets out data-subject rights including portability. We found no public information on owners seeing their own horse's records and invoices, or on instructions to the stable being acknowledged by the staff member who reads them. 1 2 3 5
The Boarder
Family accounts see their own appointments, riding minutes, attendance and credit, children get profiles separate from the paying account, and roles and permissions are stated to keep each person to fitting information — a good sign for keeping one boarder out of another's data. But that evidence is all from the riding-school side. We found no public information on a livery boarder's view of her own horse's records and invoices, or on instructions to the stable being acknowledged by the staff member who reads them. 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
Families log in on app or browser, see their own appointments, riding minutes and attendance versus cancellations, book lessons online and hold credit, roles and permissions are stated to keep each person to fitting information, and the privacy policy grants export and deletion rights. We found no public information on owners viewing their own horse's records or their invoices in the portal, or on instructions to the stable being acknowledged. 2 3 5
The Tax Adviser
Member management with roles so each person sees only fitting information, online lesson booking where attendance and different cancellation types stay distinguishable, family accounts keeping children separate from the paying account, credit balances and a wallet forecast are all evidenced. We found no public information on boarders viewing their own horse's records and invoices, or sending instructions that staff acknowledge — the owner-facing horse-and-bill view is not demonstrated. 2 3
The Skeptic
The riding-school side has a genuine per-family portal: online lesson booking, credit balances with a forecast for top-ups, attendance versus cancellations with riding minutes, and children kept separate from the paying account. For the livery side the captured pages show member management and role-scoped visibility, but I found no public information on an owner seeing their own horse's records, logged services or bills. Riding shares appear as billing for school horses with weekly quotas, not as separate scoping for co-owners or part-boarders in the portal. 1 2 3
Facilities, lessons & events
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
The yard's shared resources and teaching business: arena and indoor school bookings, horse walker, treadmill and solarium use, lessons and school horses, courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes.
0 — No booking or lesson features.
3 — A shared calendar where anyone can type an entry, with no rules, no capacity and no link to billing.
5 — Arena and equipment booking with time slots and rules, lessons scheduled with riders and school horses, and courses with online registration.
8 — Bookings with capacity, closures and booking rules per user group, equipment use linked to billing or credit, lesson cards or subscriptions, school-horse workload tracked, and events with participant management and payment.
10 — The facility runs on the system: device integration (NFC, gates, walker or solarium controllers) recording use automatically, external riders and guests bookable with their own terms, lesson and course revenue flowing into the same accounts as board, and utilisation reported per facility.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
Zones like the indoor, outdoor and roundpen can be booked with conflict check, waitlist and recurring series, lessons carry time, type, trainer and school horses with visible free capacity, and subscriptions plus fixed riding shares with weekly quota bill automatically each month. We found no public information on events with registration and payment, closures and booking rules per user group, or which devices the IoT connection actually covers. 1 2 3
The Stable Manager
Arena and zones book with conflict check, waitlist and recurring series; lessons carry time, type, trainer and school horses with capacities shown; Abos and credit balances tie bookings to money, and participation statistics separate attendance from different kinds of cancellation. Support for connecting compatible IoT devices is named as a capability. We found no public information on courses and clinics with registration and payment, guest boxes, closures or booking rules per user group, or utilisation reported per facility. 1 2 3
The Boarder
This is the deepest part of the product: arenas and zones book with conflict checks, waitlists and recurring series, lessons carry time, type, trainer and school horses with visible capacity, recurring lessons run on subscriptions, riding shares carry weekly quotas with automated monthly billing, and IoT device integration is mentioned. Attendance statistics even distinguish cancellation types and show riding minutes. We found no public information on booking rules per user group, closures, equipment use linked to billing, or clinics and events with registration and payment. 1 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
Arena and zone bookings come with conflict check, waitlist and recurring series — the double-booking protection I live on — and lesson units carry time, lesson type, trainer and school horses with live capacity, while subscriptions and prepaid credit with a cost forecast handle my ten-lesson cards. IoT device connection is named in a single line without specifics, and we found no public information on closures and booking rules per user group, on workload limits per school horse, or on clinics and courses with registration and payment. 1 2 3
The Tax Adviser
Zone booking for arena, Platz and roundpen with conflict check, waitlist and series, lesson units with trainer, lesson type, school horses and visible capacities, subscriptions, riding shares with weekly quota and automated monthly billing, plus a connection for compatible IoT devices, cover most of a busy yard's needs. We found no public information on booking rules per user group, closures, courses or clinics with registration and payment, or utilisation reporting per facility. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
Arena and zone booking with conflict check, waitlist and recurring series, lessons with trainer, type and school horses with visible capacities, subscriptions for regular lessons, credit-linked family booking and attendance statistics — this is the yard the product actually lives in. I found no public information on closures, booking rules per user group, walker or solarium use tied to billing or credit, or events with registration and payment. Device integration appears as one line about compatible IoT hardware, with no named device or controller. 1 2 3
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Who the contracting entity and the parent company are, where boarder, staff and horse data are hosted, and who the subprocessors are (hosting, push notifications, payments, email). Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; a phone app also sends data through the app-store and push providers, so the chain counts, not only the server.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting unstated, subprocessors unnamed, and no privacy policy that covers the app.
3 — A privacy policy exists, but hosting location is unstated or non-EU and the processors behind the app (analytics, push, payment) are not named.
5 — EU hosting stated and an EU contracting entity, but parts of the chain (push notifications, analytics, email, payment) run through non-EU providers without a stated safeguard.
8 — EU hosting on named infrastructure, EU contracting entity, subprocessors listed with locations, a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, and location tracking of staff described with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: European ownership, entity, hosting and every subprocessor, data export and deletion documented, and a security or certification statement published rather than implied.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The homepage states servers are located in Germany and the imprint shows a sole trader in Nuremberg, while the privacy policy describes only rented space from an unnamed hoster alongside GDPR rights and retention periods. We found no public information on the subprocessors behind hosting, push notifications, payment and email, on a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data, or on a security or certification statement. 1 4 5
The Stable Manager
The homepage states that servers are located in Germany, and the imprint names a sole trader in Nuremberg behind the product, so hosting and contracting party look European. The privacy policy speaks only of rented space from an unnamed web hoster, and we found no public information on named subprocessors for push, payment or email, on a data processing agreement offered to the stable, or on a published security or certification statement. 1 4 5
The Boarder
The homepage states servers are located in Germany and the imprint the site links names a sole trader in Nuremberg, while the privacy policy lists GDPR rights and retention periods including ten years for books and records. However, the hosting is described only as rented space from an unnamed provider. We found no public information on the subprocessors behind the app — push, email, payments, analytics — or on a data processing agreement offered to the stable for boarder and staff data, which matters to me since I do not want an analytics company anywhere near my horse's file. 1 4 5
The Riding-School Lead
The homepage states servers are in Germany, the imprint names a sole trader in Nuremberg, and a privacy policy grants the GDPR rights and sets retention periods for invoices and books. The processors behind hosting, push notifications, email and payments are not named, we found no public information on a data processing agreement for stable data or on a security statement, and the independently sourced review left entity jurisdiction, ownership and data residency unconfirmed. 1 4 5
The Tax Adviser
The captured homepage states servers in Germany, the imprint shows a sole trader in Nuremberg, and the privacy policy sets GoBD-style retention periods of 6, 8 and 10 years plus data-subject rights including portability. But the policy describes hosting space rented from a web hoster it does not name, and we found no public information on subprocessors for push, email or payment, on a processing agreement offer, or on a security statement; the independently sourced assessment itself lists residency as unconfirmed on the vendor's own pages, so the captured pages give an unclear picture. 1 4 5
The Skeptic
Servers in Germany, a German sole trader in the imprint, and a privacy policy with the full rights catalogue — that clears the floor for hosting and jurisdiction. But the policy rents its server space from an unnamed "web hoster", no push, analytics or payment processor is named, and I found no public information on a data processing agreement for boarder and staff data or on any security statement. The contracting party is a sole trader who also sells hosting, managed services and aerial photography — a stable should ask in writing what happens to its horse and billing records if that one person stops. 1 4 5
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a stable owner can compute the real annual cost from public pages alone: price per stable, box, horse or module, which modules (billing, staff, portal, devices) cost extra, setup fees, minimum term, and what happens to the data on cancellation.
0 — No public prices at all; every stable is a sales call.
3 — A starting price or "from" figure exists, but what is included and how it scales with horses or modules is unclear.
5 — Prices per tier or module are public with the main inclusions, but at least one commonly needed piece (billing, device integration, extra users, setup) is unpriced or "on request".
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with its scaling rule (per box, horse or user), setup fees and add-ons listed, minimum term and VAT treatment stated.
10 — Complete price computability: annual cost derivable for a given yard size and module set, with every add-on, setup, hardware and support cost and the cancellation and data-return terms published.
The Boarding-Stable Owner
The billing module is priced publicly at EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year, the trial runs 30 days free and ends automatically, and onboarding and support are free. We found no public information on the base price per box or horse, on prices for the SEPA and school modules and the separately available website package, or on cancellation and data-return terms — so I cannot compute my annual cost from the public pages. 1 2 3
The Stable Manager
The billing module carries the only public figure I can find, quoted as EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year, and the 30-day trial ends automatically with no auto-renewal — that part is honest. We found no public information on the price of the core subscription per stable or horse, on the SEPA and dunning add-on, the separately available website package, setup fees, minimum term or VAT treatment, so I cannot compute what a year on this system costs. 1 2 3
The Boarder
The only price we found is the Billing Module at EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year; the SEPA & Dunning extension and the separately available website package carry no price at all. We found no public information on the base subscription cost, scaling per box or horse, setup fees, minimum term or VAT treatment, so no stable owner can compute an annual cost from these pages. The 30-day free trial ending automatically with no renewal is at least stated plainly. 1 2 3
The Riding-School Lead
The only public price is the billing module at EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year, and the 30-day trial is free and ends automatically; the SEPA & Dunning add-on and the separately available website package carry no published figure. We found no public information on the base subscription price, per-horse or per-box scaling, setup fees, minimum term, or data return on cancellation, so I cannot compute my annual cost from the public pages. 1 2 3
The Tax Adviser
Only the billing add-on carries a public price, quoted as EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year; we found no public information on prices for the base subscription, the SEPA & dunning extension that requires the billing module, the separately available website package or the optional modules, so a stable owner cannot compute the real annual cost. The 30-day free trial that ends automatically with no unwanted costs is the one clearly published term; we found no public information on setup fees, minimum term, VAT treatment or data return on cancellation. 1 2 3
The Skeptic
The only figure the captured pages give is the billing module at EUR 2.50/month or EUR 30.00/year; the base subscription, the SEPA and dunning add-on that requires it, the separately available website package and the optional modules are all unpriced. A stable owner cannot compute an annual cost from this, and I found no public information on scaling per horse or box, minimum term, VAT, or data return on cancellation. The 30-day free trial that ends automatically without renewal is the one term stated plainly. 1 2 3
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Questions about Stall Manager
Is Stall Manager European?
Yes. whats-best.ai classifies Stall Manager as EU-Made.
Where does Stall Manager store data?
The default storage location for customer data is not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026. The vendor’s pages mention Germany as hosting location, per the vendor’s page captured 16 Oct 2026.
Does Stall Manager have a free plan?
Not stated on the vendor’s pages as of 16 Oct 2026.
What are the best alternatives to Stall Manager?
As of 16 Oct 2026, the panel rates horsemanager+ (3/5), Equimondo (2.5/5) and LIVERYLive (2.5/5) highest among the other 12 Stable & Equestrian Management products evaluated. Ratings that look equal are rounded to half stars; the order uses the unrounded rating, then the name. The highest-rated European alternative is horsemanager+ (EU-Made). Ratings are the AI panel’s opinion, formed from public evidence: how scores are made. The full list, with European products first: Stall Manager alternatives.
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 16 Oct 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 10 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 subprocessors facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 pricing fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
- 6 of the readings below were written against an earlier fact sheet — a fact has been corrected, added or pulled since. Until the panel next runs on this product you are reading the older judgement. Know more? Tell us
Sources (5)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage stallmanager.eu Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 2 Features page (stables) stallmanager.eu Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 3 Features page (riding schools) stallmanager.eu Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Legal notice received.eu Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Privacy policy received.eu Checked 16 Oct 2026 Details →