Time Tracking & Attendance
Clockify
Rest of world Report an error0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by CAKE.com Inc. · clockify.me
Compare with Toggl Track → Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Clockify, a time tracker and timesheet app from CAKE.com Inc., scored strongest on project and billing, where scores cluster at 7-8: tracked time and expenses import into invoices only when uninvoiced and billable, with guards against double invoicing, task rates, budgets and a named QuickBooks handoff. Time capture follows at 6-7 across desktop, web, mobile and kiosk apps with offline tracking; pricing transparency sits at 5-6 across five published tiers from Free at €0 for up to 5 users to Enterprise at €11.99 per seat per month billed annually. Weakest is sovereignty at 0-2: the contracting entity on the captured pages is CAKE.com Inc., a US entity, the hosting region is unstated, and we found no public information on subprocessors — the only signal is a Data region option listed among Pro features, alongside a bundle note that Data regions are not included.
Speaks for it
- Project and billing scores cluster at 7-8, with invoicing that imports only uninvoiced billable time and expenses and guards against double invoicing.
- Time capture scores 6-7 across desktop, web, mobile and kiosk apps with offline tracking that syncs automatically on reconnect.
- All five tiers from Free to Enterprise carry published per-seat prices with the billing period stated, from €0 up to €11.99 per seat per month billed annually.
- Absence and planning scores range 4-5, with policies for sickness, vacation and holidays, balances, accruals, a shared PTO calendar and named approvers.
- A vendor-maintained QuickBooks Payroll add-on is priced at $6.99 per month for the whole workspace from the Standard plan.
Held against it
- Sovereignty scores range 0-2, with CAKE.com Inc. as a US entity, the hosting region unstated and no public information on subprocessors.
- Working time law scores 3-4, with no public information on rest-period or daily-maximum checks, retention, or tamper-evident history outside the Enterprise audit log.
- The only named payroll destination is QuickBooks, and we found no public information on DATEV or other German payroll systems, surcharges, or a lock step before transmission.
- Kiosk limited-user seats are described only as 'a separate fee' with no figure, and VAT treatment and minimum term are unstated.
- The captured pages give different figures for the per-user price, euros in one capture and $3.99 per user in another.
Best for
- You run a client-billing team that needs tracked time and expenses to become invoices without re-entry, with task rates and budget tracking.
- You need time capture spread across desks, phones and a shared kiosk, including offline tracking that syncs on reconnect.
- You want published per-seat pricing across Free, Basic, Standard, Pro and Enterprise tiers before committing.
- Your payroll runs through QuickBooks Online and the bench's scoring of plain hours and billable status suffices for the handoff.
Avoid if
- You must document where employee data is hosted or name subprocessors before signing — the captured pages show neither, and sovereignty scores 0-2.
- You need a record built for German working-time inspection, including rest-period checks and tamper-evident history outside the Enterprise audit log.
- Your payroll runs on DATEV or another German payroll system, or needs night, Sunday and holiday surcharges in the handoff.
- Your works council requires stated limits on what GPS tracking and visited-sites-and-routes data record, who can read an individual's day, and how to switch it off.
The scores
Capture in the real workplace
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.
0 — One browser timer and nothing else; anyone away from a desk records nothing.
3 — Web plus a mobile app, but no offline capture, no shared terminal, and corrections are an admin task rather than a workflow.
5 — Web, mobile and at least one shared capture point (kiosk, terminal or badge), with offline capture that syncs, and a correction workflow with approval.
8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.
10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.
The Operations Lead
We can put a timer on every desk, a phone in every van and a kiosk in the workshop — desktop, web, mobile and kiosk apps are all documented, with offline tracking that syncs on reconnect and GPS plus kiosk photo capture on the top paid tier. Corrections are stated as "you can always go back and edit your time records" alongside timesheet approval, but we found no public information on geofenced check-in with stated limits, hardware terminals or badge readers, or an audit trail attributing each correction to a person on the plans most of my workforce would sit on. 1 1 2 3 4
The Payroll Officer
Timer, timesheet and manual entry run on web, desktop and mobile, a kiosk app clocks people in from a shared device, offline tracking syncs on reconnect, and GPS sits in the higher tiers — the capture paths are real. Corrections, though, are plain edits with approval sitting on timesheet submission, and the audit log that would tell me who changed what is an Enterprise-tier item. I found no public information on hardware terminals or badge readers. 1 3 4 2
The Works Council Advocate
Timer, manual entry, weekly timesheets, mobile and a shared kiosk with QR sign-in cover the capture paths a mixed workforce needs, offline time syncs on reconnect, and entries can be edited and submitted for approval. My concern is what the location features actually record: GPS tracking and "See visited sites and routes" are sold with no statement of what is stored, who can read an individual's day, or how a council could switch it off, and the log of who changed an entry only appears in the top plan's feature list. 1 1 2 3 4
The Agency Owner
Desktop, web, mobile and kiosk apps plus a stated offline mode with automatic sync cover every team I bill for, and timesheet submission with approval exists on both web and mobile. GPS tracking sits at Pro with no stated limits, kiosk seats are 'limited users' on a separate fee, the audit log is gated to Enterprise, and we found no public information on hardware terminals, badge readers, or an attributable trail around corrections. 1 1 2 3 4
The Field Supervisor
There is a real spread of capture paths — timer, timesheet, web, desktop and mobile apps plus a shared kiosk with QR clock-in for limited users, offline tracking that syncs automatically on reconnect, and GPS on Pro. What I could not see: whether the kiosk itself keeps working offline, any stated limits on the GPS check-in, and the audit trail for corrections sits behind the Enterprise plan, so I found no public information on a foreman-level correction path with attributable change history. 1 2 3 4
The Skeptic
Web, desktop, mobile and a kiosk app for shared devices are all named, with offline tracking that syncs automatically on reconnect and an approval flow for submitted time. GPS tracking appears as a paid-tier line item with no stated limits or geofencing language, the audit trail behind corrections sits only in the Enterprise plan, and we found no public information on hardware terminals or badge readers. 1 1 2 3 4
Working-time law & audit record
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.
0 — Hours are summed and nothing else; no break handling, no limits, no retention statement.
3 — Break deduction exists but is a flat rule; no daily maximum or rest-period checks, and no stated retention period.
5 — Configurable break rules, warnings on the 8/10-hour daily maximum and the 11-hour rest period, and per-employee reports covering the recording duty.
8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, and an export built for an inspection.
10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.
The Operations Lead
The attendance report shows start time, end time, break and work time per person per day with configurable daily, weekly and monthly overtime against a set capacity, which covers the minimum the recording duty asks for. Beyond that the pages are silent: we found no public information on warnings for the eight- or ten-hour daily maximum, the eleven-hour rest period, a stated retention period, or tamper-evident change history outside an enterprise-tier audit log. 2 5 6
The Payroll Officer
The attendance report carries start, end, break 'if enabled', work time, and overtime measured daily, weekly or monthly against capacity, plus a lock-time feature — the shape of a record, but breaks appear only as a column, and I found no public information on rest-period checks, daily-maximum warnings, retention periods, or tamper-evident history outside the Enterprise audit log. Nothing in the captured pages maps any of this to the German recording duty. 5 2
The Works Council Advocate
The attendance report holds start, end, break, capacity and overtime per person, overtime can be computed daily, weekly or monthly with a time-off-in-lieu conversion in beta, and a lock-time feature exists. But we found no public information on warnings for the eight- or ten-hour daily maximum or the eleven-hour rest period, on any retention period, or on on-call, standby and travel time — without those I cannot tell a works council this record satisfies the German recording duty. 2 5 6
The Agency Owner
Attendance reporting models capacity, breaks (if enabled), daily/weekly/monthly overtime and undertime per person, a Lock time step exists at Standard, and TOIL converts overtime to leave. Nothing maps to the German recording duty: we found no public information on rest-period or daily-maximum checks, retention, tamper-evident entries, or an export built for inspection — the overtime logic is capacity maths, not working-time-law enforcement. 2 5 6
The Field Supervisor
The attendance report logs start, end, breaks (if enabled), work time, capacity and overtime per person per day, which is a usable record of the working day, and overtime is calculated daily, weekly or monthly against a set capacity with a beta TOIL conversion carrying balances. I found no public information on daily-maximum or eleven-hour rest-period checks, a retention period, tamper-evident entries, or German recording-duty guidance; a change history appears only as an Enterprise audit log. 2 5 6
The Skeptic
The attendance report covers breaks (when enabled), daily, weekly and monthly overtime against a set capacity, and Time Off in Lieu runs through approvals — but everything a German inspection turns on is absent: we found no public information on warnings for the 8/10-hour maximum or the 11-hour rest period, no retention period, and no guidance mapping features to working-time law. Change history exists only as an Enterprise audit log, so whether the record is evidence is a question of which tier you buy. 2 5 6
Absence & shift planning
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.
0 — No absence handling; vacation lives in a separate calendar or spreadsheet.
3 — Vacation requests with approval, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no rostering.
5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic shift planning with availability.
8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.
10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.
The Operations Lead
Vacation, sick leave and half-day policies come with approval routing to admins, team managers or named members, balance and accrual tracking, a shared PTO calendar and overtime converted into time off — that handles the absence half for my office and workshop crews. Scheduling is stated as "schedule work, assignments, and shifts" with forecasting on the paid tiers, but we found no public information on holiday calendars per location, carry-over of vacation entitlement, or substitution and swap workflows. 1 2 6 7 8
The Payroll Officer
Sickness, vacation, national holiday and half-day policies, balances with accruals, a leave timeline, approvers you can name, and a scheduling feature for shifts and assignments give a buyer the basics. I found no public information on vacation carry-over, per-location public-holiday calendars, or substitution and coverage checks before a roster is published. The beta overtime-to-time-off conversion at least keeps overtime and time off in one ledger. 7 8 6
The Works Council Advocate
Leave policies including sick leave and vacation with accrual balances, an approval workflow whose approvers the workspace can define, a shared leave calendar and a scheduling feature are all evidenced. We found no public information on carry-over of untaken vacation, on availability or rest-period checks inside scheduling, or on public-holiday calendars per location — for us that is half of whether the plan is lawful. 6 7 8
The Agency Owner
Policies for sickness, vacation and holidays, balance accruals, an approval workflow with named approvers, a PTO calendar and beta TOIL are all documented, and a scheduling feature is named. We found no public information on carry-over, public-holiday calendars per location, substitution or swap workflows, or rest and qualification checks in the roster, so the planning half is a feature name rather than an evidenced system. 1 7 8
The Field Supervisor
Policies cover sick leave, vacation, national holiday and half-days with balances and accruals, a shared PTO calendar and timeline, approval routing, and TOIL with rejected hours reverting; scheduling handles work, assignments and shifts. I found no public information on carry-over, pro-rata entitlement, per-location holiday calendars, substitution or swap workflows, or rest and coverage checks on published rosters. 6 7 8
The Skeptic
Unlimited policies for sick leave, vacation, business trips and more, with assignable approvers, visible balances and accruals, a shared PTO calendar and a scheduling module for work, assignments and shifts — though all of it requires the paid Standard plan or above. We found no public information on carry-over, substitution or swap workflows, availability in scheduling, or coverage and rest checks before a roster is published. 1 7 8
Project, cost-centre & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.
0 — Attendance only; no project, task or cost-centre dimension at all.
3 — A free-text note or a single project field, with no rates, no billable flag and no per-project reporting.
5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag and per-project reports, plus a rate per person or per project.
8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.
10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.
The Operations Lead
Projects and tasks carry a billable flag, task rates, budgets and a full invoicing module that imports only uninvoiced billable time and expenses, groups them by client, project, user or date, and exports invoices as PDF, CSV or Excel — my workshop's recorded time becomes an invoice without re-entry. We found no public information on cost centres, budget warnings, or how rates behave when a rate changes mid-project, which is what keeps this short of the top band for a professional-services buyer. 2 4 9 10 12 10
The Payroll Officer
Clients, projects and tasks with billable flags and rates, budgets with progress tracking, and an invoicing engine that imports only uninvoiced billable time, taxes it, and follows it through sent, paid and void — a genuine revenue pipeline rather than a report. Handoffs into named systems exist, QuickBooks and a Peppol e-invoicing add-on among them. I found no public information on cost centres as their own dimension, rate cards by role, budget overrun warnings, or how an open invoice behaves when a rate changes mid-project. 9 10 12
The Works Council Advocate
Projects and tasks carry rates per person and per task, budgets track progress, and the invoicing module imports only uninvoiced billable time and expenses, so time reaches the invoice without retyping, with a QuickBooks handoff beside it. Branded and attached reports face the client; we found no public information on how a rate change mid-project is treated. 2 9 10 10
The Agency Owner
This is the money path done properly: client/project/task time with billable flags, task rates, cost against charge for profit, budgets on billable projects, invoices generated from billable time and expenses with grouping by project, user or date, a guard against double-billing, branded client-facing reports, and a named QuickBooks handoff plus a Peppol e-invoicing add-on. We found no public information on how rates behave when they change mid-project, or on a cost-centre dimension as such. 1 2 9 10 12
The Field Supervisor
Client, project and task carry billable flags, task rates, budgets on billable projects, and the invoicing module imports only uninvoiced billable time and expenses with guards against double invoicing, recurring invoices, payment status and CSV, Excel and PDF export — with a named QuickBooks handoff and a Peppol e-invoicing add-on for European clients. The captured pages show no rate rules that survive a mid-project rate change and no cost-centre dimension by that name; custom fields exist only from Pro upward. 2 9 10 12 10
The Skeptic
Projects, tasks, clients, task rates and budgets feed an invoicing module that imports only uninvoiced billable time, guards against double-invoicing, tracks invoice status and payments, and exports to CSV, Excel and PDF — with a named QuickBooks handoff and a Peppol e-invoicing add-on on top. We found no public information on cost centres, rate-change handling mid-project, or budget warnings, which is what keeps it out of the top band. 2 9 10 12 10
Payroll handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.
0 — No payroll path stated; the month leaves as a spreadsheet someone retypes.
3 — Generic CSV said to be usable for payroll, with no named system, no defined format and no handling of surcharges.
5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system, covering hours, absences and overtime.
8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.
10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.
The Operations Lead
The only named payroll path is the QuickBooks Payroll add-on at $6.99 per month for the whole workspace, sending user name, date, project, duration, description and billable rate to QuickBooks Online from a Standard plan or higher. For a German payroll that is thin — the sent fields stop at plain hours, and we found no public information on DATEV or any local payroll system, night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, or a lock step before transmission. 5 12
The Payroll Officer
The QuickBooks Payroll add-on is named, documented and priced, but what it transmits is a billing payload — user, date, project, duration, description, billable status, billable rate — with no absence totals, no overtime, and above all no night, Sunday or holiday surcharges. The month-end trap is that once sent, entries cannot be sent again, so a corrected entry surfaces in a filter while the fix lands by hand in payroll; a lock-time feature exists, but I found no public information tying the lock to transmission. Everything else leaves as CSV or Excel, which tells me the handoff was never designed. 12 5
The Works Council Advocate
The one documented payroll route is the QuickBooks Payroll add-on at $6.99 per month for the whole workspace, pushing user, date, project, duration, description and billable status, with sent entries never resendable. That is a named system with a defined format, but the captured field list shows no absences or overtime, and we found no public information on DATEV or any other German payroll path, on surcharges, or on a lock step before transmission. 5 12
The Agency Owner
The QuickBooks Payroll add-on is a genuine vendor-maintained path — $6.99 per month for the whole workspace, requiring Standard or above, pushing user, date, project, duration, billable status and billable rate — with CSV and Excel exports as fallback. For my payroll reality it stops there: we found no public information on DATEV or any German payroll system, on surcharge, time-account or absence and overtime handling in the payroll push, or on a lock step before transmission. 5 11 12
The Field Supervisor
The QuickBooks Payroll add-on is a vendor-maintained, separately priced integration pushing user, date, project, duration and billable status, and the attendance report exports overtime, breaks and time off to CSV or Excel. For a German payroll run I found no public information on DATEV or any Lohn und Gehalt system, on night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, or on a lock step before transmission. 5 9 12
The Skeptic
A vendor add-on syncs entries to QuickBooks Online for payroll at a stated $6.99 per month per workspace, sending user, date, project, duration, description and billable status with sent and not-sent tracking — but QuickBooks is the only named payroll destination. We found no public information on DATEV or any German payroll system, night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, or a lock step and retro handling after the close, and the documented synced fields carry hours but no absences. 5 9 12
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting region unstated or non-EU, subprocessors not named.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option, but the contracting entity is non-EU or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.
The Operations Lead
The contracting entity named on the pages is CAKE.com Inc., a US company, and we found no public information on where the data is hosted, who the subprocessors are, or any data-centre certification — for a system holding every employee's daily hours, that is not something I can put in front of my works council. The one pointer is a "Data region" option on the Pro tier, which suggests hosting location can be chosen, but the captured pages do not name the regions or any safeguard behind them. 2 5
The Payroll Officer
The contracting entity is CAKE.com Inc., a US company, and I found no public information on where the data is hosted or which subprocessors touch it. A data region is sold as a higher-tier feature, but the captured pages do not say which regions. For attendance data feeding a German payroll, that is not a footing I would sign. 2 9
The Works Council Advocate
The contracting entity is CAKE.com Inc., a US company, and we found no public information on where the data is hosted, which data-centre provider runs it, or any subprocessor at all. A data-region choice appears only in a paid plan's feature list and even then the regions on offer are not named on the captured pages, so a works agreement on storage location cannot rest on anything public. 2 9
The Agency Owner
CAKE.com Inc. is the contracting entity on a US footing, the hosting region is unstated, and we found no public information on subprocessors. The only regional signal is a Data region option listed at Pro, with a bundle note stating Data regions are not included — an assumption, not documentation, for a European buyer. 2 9
The Field Supervisor
The contracting and copyright entity is CAKE.com Inc., a non-EU company, and I found no public information on the hosting region or any subprocessor list. "Data region" appears only as a Pro-plan feature and the bundle note says it is not included, so where the crews' time data actually sits is unevidenced. 1 2
The Skeptic
The contracting entity on every captured page is CAKE.com Inc., and the sovereignty attributes all come back unknown — we found no public information on hosting region, data-centre provider or a single named subprocessor. "Data region" appears as a paid plan feature name, but the captured pages never say which regions are offered, so there is no evidencing of EU hosting anywhere. 2 9
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-user headline exists, but hardware, modules or a minimum seat count are unpriced or unmentioned.
5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.
The Operations Lead
All five tiers carry a public per-seat price with the billing period spelled out — free up to five users, Basic at €3.99 per seat per month billed annually or €4.99 monthly, through to Enterprise at €11.99 or €14.99 — and the QuickBooks add-on is a stated $6.99 per month for the whole workspace. What I still cannot compute from public pages is the kiosk limited-user fee, which is described only as a separate fee, along with VAT treatment and the minimum contract term. 2 7 12
The Payroll Officer
All five tiers are priced publicly with the billing period stated — Free €0 for up to 5 users, Basic €3.99 per seat/month billed annually or €4.99 monthly, through Enterprise €11.99 or €14.99 — and the QuickBooks add-on carries its own price, $6.99 per month for the whole workspace. The kiosk's limited users come 'for a separate fee' that I found no number for, and I found no public information on VAT treatment or minimum term. The captured pages also give different figures for the per-user price, dollars on one page and euros on another, and I leave both as stated. 2 7 12 2
The Works Council Advocate
Every plan tier from Free to Enterprise carries a published per-seat price with the billing period stated, and the QuickBooks add-on has its own workspace price. But kiosk-only employees are sold at "a separate fee" with no figure on any captured page, VAT treatment and minimum term are not stated, and the captured pages give different currency figures for paid seats. 2 7 12 2
The Agency Owner
All five tiers carry exact per-seat prices with both annual and monthly billing stated — from €3.99 per seat per month billed annually at Basic to €11.99 at Enterprise — so the core invoice is computable. But kiosk seats are named as carrying 'a separate fee' with no figure, Data region pricing is not shown, and we found no public information on VAT treatment or minimum term, which leaves the real annual total short of fully computable. 2 12 2
The Field Supervisor
Every tier carries a public per-seat price with the billing period stated (Free at €0 for up to five users; Basic, Standard, Pro and Enterprise each with annual and monthly figures), and the QuickBooks add-on is priced at $6.99 per month for the whole workspace. Kiosk limited-user seats carry a separate fee with no figure shown, VAT treatment and minimum term are unstated, and the captured pages give different figures for the per-user price ($3.99 in one place, €3.99 in another), so the annual invoice is close but not fully computable. 2 7 12 2
The Skeptic
Four paid tiers carry per-user prices with annual and monthly figures and the billing period stated, and the QuickBooks add-on has an explicit workspace fee — but the kiosk's limited users are "a separate fee" with no number, and we found no public information on VAT treatment or minimum terms. The captured pages also give different figures for the per-user price, euros with annual and monthly variants in one capture and "$3.99 per user" in another. 2 7 12 2
European sovereignty — proven facts
0 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 30 Aug 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- We could not confirm any compliance information on the vendor’s own pages as captured, so this page shows none rather than a statement we cannot stand behind. Know more? Tell us
- 65 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 62 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 22 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 8 integrations facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 8 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 2 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
Sources (12)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 +3 earlier captures: 15 Sep 2026, 30 Aug 2026, 30 Aug 2026 Details →
- 2 Pricing clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 +3 earlier captures: 15 Sep 2026, 11 Sep 2026, 30 Aug 2026 Details →
- 3 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 4 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 5 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 6 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Project, cost-centre & billing — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 +1 earlier capture: 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 11 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →
- 12 Payroll handoff — found from sitemap clockify.me Checked 5 Oct 2026 Details →