Time Tracking & Attendance
Crewmeister
EU-Made Report an errorPanel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars
Category median
Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven
0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.
by Crewmeister GmbH · www.crewmeister.com
Report an error on this page Is this your product? →
Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.
The panel's verdict
Crewmeister is a cloud time-tracking and attendance suite from a German vendor, aimed at trades and deskless teams of 1-50 employees. The bench is strongest on payroll export at 5 to 7 — a licensed DATEV partnership with a direct interface and automatic overtime accounts — and on time capture at 5 to 6, with offline stamping, terminal mode on any tablet or PC, and GPS at clock-in. It is weakest on working time law at 3 to 4: the pages state the EuGH and BAG rulings and §17 MiLoG are automatically fulfilled, but we found no public information on break rules, the 11-hour rest period or record retention. Project and billing holds at 4, with recorded time stopping at evaluations and Excel export rather than an invoice handoff. Sovereignty scores 4 to 5: hosting is stated exclusively in Germany, yet the trust pages name processors from the USA. No judge disagreement was flagged; pricing transparency scores 5 to 6 on published from-prices of 1,50 €, 2 € and 3 € per user per month at annual billing.
Speaks for it
- Licensed DATEV partnership with a direct interface moves hours and absences into payroll without retyping
- Offline capture on iOS and Android apps syncs automatically, and any standard tablet or PC becomes a terminal without extra hardware
- Leave requests get one-click approval with email notice, beside a vacation calculator and an automatic overtime account
- All three tiers carry public per-user prices at annual billing with VAT treatment stated, and the 14-day trial requires no payment and does not auto-renew
Held against it
- Working-time compliance rests on the assertion that the EuGH and BAG rulings and §17 MiLoG are automatically fulfilled
- We found no public information on break rules, the 11-hour rest period, daily maximums, or a retention period for the time records
- We found no public information on an approval step or an audit trail when stamped times are adjusted online
- Recorded project time stops at evaluations and Excel export, with no public information on rates, a billable flag, budgets or an invoice-ready handoff
- Every tier price is an 'ab' from-price with the vendor offering to calculate the price, so the annual invoice cannot be computed from the pages
Best for
- You run a trades or deskless team within the vendor's stated 1-50 employee segment and need clock-in that keeps working with no signal
- Your payroll runs on DATEV and you want hours and absences to reach the tax adviser through a direct, licensed interface
- You want leave requests, balances and sickness handled in the same suite as time recording, with a shift planner available as an add-on
Avoid if
- You bill clients for recorded project hours and need rates, a billable flag or an invoice-ready export — the pages show minute-exact allocation, evaluations and Excel or timesheet export
- Your compliance case must rest on modelled break, rest and daily-maximum rules rather than the stated automatic fulfilment of the rulings
- You need an approval trail when times change — the pages state times are adjustable online and we found no public information on a workflow or change history behind that
- You need to compute the annual invoice from public prices — every tier figure is an 'ab' price under flexible calculation by functions, user count and payment modality
The scores
Capture in the real workplace
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.
0 — One browser timer and nothing else; anyone away from a desk records nothing.
3 — Web plus a mobile app, but no offline capture, no shared terminal, and corrections are an admin task rather than a workflow.
5 — Web, mobile and at least one shared capture point (kiosk, terminal or badge), with offline capture that syncs, and a correction workflow with approval.
8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.
10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.
The Operations Lead
Stamp-in runs through an iOS and Android app, the PC, and a terminal mode that turns any standard tablet into a punch clock, with offline capture that syncs and GPS stamp location — that genuinely covers my office, workshop and field crews. Corrections are the weak spot: times can be adjusted online, but we found no public information on a correction workflow with approval, an audit trail of who changed what, or bulk correction. 1 6 7 8
The Payroll Officer
Web, iOS and Android apps and a terminal mode that turns any standard tablet or PC into a shared clocking point cover desk and deskless crews, and the vendor states capture keeps working with no internet connection and syncs automatically afterwards. GPS location at stamp time is stated, though without stated limits, and the only correction evidence is that times can be adjusted online; we found no public information on a correction approval flow or an audit trail of who changed what. 1 6 7 8
The Works Council Advocate
App, PC and any standard tablet turned into a terminal without special hardware cover the deskless crew, and offline capture with automatic sync is stated plainly. But the GPS feature is marketed as knowing where employees were at the moment of clocking, with no statement of what is stored, who may read an individual's day, or what can be switched off — and we found no public information on a correction workflow with approval or on any audit trail of who changed what. 1 6 8 9
The Agency Owner
Mobile punch-clock apps, the browser and any standard tablet or PC turned into a terminal cover my desk and site crews, with offline capture and GPS stamping at check-in — that is the capture spread I need. What I do not see is a correction workflow with approval or any trail of who changed a stamped time, which is exactly where a billing dispute gets ugly. 1 6 7 8
The Field Supervisor
The clock app is stated to keep recording with no signal and sync when it returns, and any standard tablet or PC becomes a punch terminal without special hardware — the basement test is addressed head-on, with GPS location at stamping included. Times are adjustable online, but we found no public information on a correction approval flow, a change history of who edited what, badge readers, or stated limits on geofencing. 1 6 7 8
The Skeptic
PC, iOS/Android apps and any standard tablet or PC turned into a terminal, with offline capture that syncs and GPS location at the clock-in — that is a credible spread for a trades workforce. Corrections are adjustable online, but we found no public information on an approval step, an audit trail of who changed what, or stated limits on the GPS feature. 1 6 7 8
Working-time law & audit record
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.
0 — Hours are summed and nothing else; no break handling, no limits, no retention statement.
3 — Break deduction exists but is a flat rule; no daily maximum or rest-period checks, and no stated retention period.
5 — Configurable break rules, warnings on the 8/10-hour daily maximum and the 11-hour rest period, and per-employee reports covering the recording duty.
8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, and an export built for an inspection.
10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.
The Operations Lead
The pages promise the recording duty is met automatically under the EuGH and BAG rulings and that hours are stored per the Minimum Wage Act documentation rules, with overtime landing on an automatic time account and a one-click per-employee timesheet. But we found no public information on break rules, warnings at the daily maximum or the 11-hour rest period, or a stated retention period for the working-time record itself — a compliance claim without the ArbZG rulebook visible behind it. 4 6 8
The Payroll Officer
The pages claim the EuGH and BAG rulings and the §17 MiLoG documentation duties are fulfilled automatically, with hours stored per the minimum-wage documentation rules and overtime feeding a time account — that addresses the recording duty, but only by blanket assertion. We found no public information on break rules, the eleven-hour rest period or the eight and ten-hour daily maximums, on a stated retention period for the time records, or on an inspection-ready export. 6 8
The Works Council Advocate
The vendor says the EuGH ruling, the BAG ruling and §17 MiLoG documentation are automatically fulfilled, with overtime and the working-time account calculated automatically. I found no public information on break handling, the daily 8/10-hour maximum, the 11-hour rest period, or the retention period of the working-time record itself — a record I cannot see into does not survive an inspection. 4 6 8
The Agency Owner
They name the EuGH and BAG rulings and the minimum-wage documentation rules with automatic storage and overtime accounts, which is the floor a German shop needs. We found no public information on break handling, rest-period or daily-maximum checks, or change history that would survive an inspection. 6 8
The Field Supervisor
The pages state the EuGH and BAG rulings and §17 MiLoG are "automatisch erfüllt" and that hours are stored per the Minimum Wage Act's documentation rules, with an automatic overtime account — claims rather than modelled rules. We found no public information on break handling, daily maximum or 11-hour rest checks, or a stated retention period for the time record itself. 6 8
The Skeptic
The pages assert compliance by naming the EuGH and BAG rulings and §17 MiLoG, with storage said to follow the Minimum Wage Act's documentation rules and a one-click per-employee timesheet — the claim is there, the feature is not shown. We found no public information on break rules, the 8/10-hour daily maximum, the 11-hour rest period, or a retention period for the time records themselves. 6 8
Absence & shift planning
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.
0 — No absence handling; vacation lives in a separate calendar or spreadsheet.
3 — Vacation requests with approval, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no rostering.
5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic shift planning with availability.
8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.
10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.
The Operations Lead
Vacation requests go in with one click and come back approved by email, a leave calculator keeps annual entitlement and current balance, sickness and time-off-in-lieu are recorded and draw down the overtime account, and the shift planner handles automatic shifts, weekly templates and employee notifications. That is a real absence-and-roster core; we found no public information on carry-over of untaken leave, holiday calendars per location, substitution or swap workflows, or rest and coverage checks before a plan is published. 2 7 10
The Payroll Officer
Vacation requests with one-click approval and email notification, a leave calculator with annual entitlement and current balance, sickness, training and time off in lieu as absence types, and a shift planner with automatic shifts, notifications and weekly templates put planning and recording in one suite. We found no public information on carry-over of untaken leave, availability, public-holiday calendars per location, or substitution and swap workflows. 2 7 10
The Works Council Advocate
Leave requests with one-click approval, an entitlement calculator, sickness and time off in lieu flowing through the overtime account, and a separately priced shift planner with templates, notifications and automatic shifts — that is the working half of attendance present. We found no public information on carry-over rules, availability, or per-location public-holiday calendars. 2 7 10
The Agency Owner
Vacation requests with one-click approval, a holiday calculator, sickness and time-off-in-lieu that draws down the overtime account, plus a shift planner with automatic shifts and weekly templates — that covers the basics. We found no public information on carry-over, per-location holiday calendars or substitution and swap workflows. 2 1 7 10
The Field Supervisor
Vacation requests go in with one click and get approved or rejected with an email to the employee, sickness and training are recorded absence types, a vacation calculator with annual entitlement is listed, and a shift planner with templates and automatic shifts is priced separately. We found no public information on carry-over, per-location public-holiday calendars, substitution or swap workflows, or rest checks and coverage warnings in the roster. 2 7 10
The Skeptic
Leave requests with one-click approval and email notice, a vacation calculator with annual entitlement and balance, sickness and other absence types, overlap visibility on who is already off, and a shift planner with templates and notifications — though the planner sits at ab 2€ pro Monat und Nutzer on top of the time tiers. We found no public information on carry-over, availability planning, public-holiday calendars or substitution and swap workflows. 2 7 10
Project, cost-centre & billing
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.
0 — Attendance only; no project, task or cost-centre dimension at all.
3 — A free-text note or a single project field, with no rates, no billable flag and no per-project reporting.
5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag and per-project reports, plus a rate per person or per project.
8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.
10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.
The Operations Lead
Minutes can be booked against projects, customers and activities, and evaluated per project in two clicks with Excel export — enough to see where workshop and field hours actually went. We found no public information on rates per person or project, a billable flag, budget tracking, or an invoice-ready handoff into a named accounting system; the extended project recording in the top package appears as a feature line and is not detailed. 6 7 8
The Payroll Officer
Recorded time is minute-precise and allocated to projects, customers and activities, with evaluations by project or customer and a one-click timesheet export for week or month. We found no public information on rates, a billable flag, budget tracking, or any invoice-ready handoff into a named accounting or invoicing system — for a professional-services buyer the allocation stops at the report. 6 7 8
The Works Council Advocate
Times are allocated minute-precisely to projects, customers and activities and can be evaluated per project with a two-click export, plus the construction diary export for the trades. We found no public information on rates, a billable flag, budget tracking or any invoice-ready handoff — for a workshop billing its hours, that gap decides the purchase. 6 7 8
The Agency Owner
Minute-precise allocation to customers, projects and activities with a two-click export by project or customer gives me the skeleton my billing runs on. But we found no public information on rate cards, a billable flag, budget warnings or an invoice-ready handoff into an accounting system — the parts that turn recorded time into money — so my team would still re-key into invoicing. 6 7 8
The Field Supervisor
Time allocates minute-accurate to projects, customers and activities, with evaluations per project or customer and freely formulable time categories — more than a single note field. We found no public information on a billable flag, rate cards or budget tracking, and the outputs shown are Excel exports and printable timesheets rather than an invoice-ready handoff. 6 7 8
The Skeptic
Minute-exact allocation to projects, customers and activities, automatic assignment of hours, per-project evaluation with a two-click export, and extended project tracking in the top tier. We found no public information on a billable flag, rates, budget tracking or an invoice-ready export, so recorded time stops at reporting rather than revenue. 6 8
Payroll handoff
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.
0 — No payroll path stated; the month leaves as a spreadsheet someone retypes.
3 — Generic CSV said to be usable for payroll, with no named system, no defined format and no handling of surcharges.
5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system, covering hours, absences and overtime.
8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.
10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.
The Operations Lead
As a licensed DATEV partner with a direct interface, they meet the named-system requirement my payroll lives on, and absences flow to DATEV or Excel with a few clicks alongside hours and overtime. The top package only states surcharges are included, and we found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharge detail in the interface, time-account transfer, a lock step before transmission, or correction handling after the month closes. 6 7 10
The Payroll Officer
A licensed DATEV partnership with a direct interface is stated, covering hours per period and absences including vacation, sickness and time off in lieu, with the Pro package listing surcharges included and overtime feeding a time account automatically. We found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharge specifics, on a lock step before transmission, or on retro corrections after the month closes — and with the Excel export offered as the alternative path, the tax adviser may still end up retyping. 6 7 8 10
The Works Council Advocate
A licensed DATEV partnership with a direct interface covering hours and absences, with surcharges named in the Pro package, is more than a spreadsheet someone retypes. We found no public information on a lock or approval step before transmission, on night, Sunday and holiday surcharges in detail, or on handling of mid-month changes. 6 7 10
The Agency Owner
A licensed DATEV partnership with a direct interface, absence exports by Excel or that interface, surcharges named in the Pro package and automatic overtime accounts means the month reaches payroll without retyping. We found no public information on a lock or approval step before transmission, or on handling of mid-month changes. 6 7 8 10
The Field Supervisor
The vendor is a licensed DATEV partner offering a direct interface, absences export via DATEV or Excel, an automatic overtime account feeds the month, and the top package lists surcharges included. We found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharge detail, mid-month changes, or a lock step before transmission. 6 7 10
The Skeptic
A licensed DATEV partnership with a direct interface is more than a generic CSV, and absences go to Excel or DATEV while times export by week or month. But we found no public information on whether surcharges (named only as a top-tier feature, "Zuschläge inklusive") travel through the interface, on a lock step before transmission, or on handling corrections after the month closes. 7 10
European sovereignty
panel opinion
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.
0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting region unstated or non-EU, subprocessors not named.
3 — EU hosting offered as an option, but the contracting entity is non-EU or the subprocessor list is absent.
5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.
8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.
10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.
The Operations Lead
The imprint names a German company on the Munich commercial register, the pages state servers exclusively in Germany, and the data-protection page names AWS serving from Frankfurt with a change log of added processors — the right ground for my people's data. But the same page confirms processors from the USA, and we found no public information on ownership, data-centre certification, or the complete processor chain; the product runs entirely in the cloud, and we found no public information on an on-premises or private-cloud option. 3 1 5 8
The Payroll Officer
Hosting is stated as secure servers exclusively in Germany, served from the Frankfurt data centre, the contracting entity is a German limited company in the Munich commercial register, and a subprocessor list with change history is published. The chain names Amazon Web Services and other processors from the USA, and we found no public information on a safeguard or legal basis covering that non-EU exposure, on data-centre certification, or on an on-premises option. 3 1 5
The Works Council Advocate
The contracting entity is a German GmbH with a Munich register entry, servers run exclusively in Germany, and a subprocessor change history names Amazon Web Services and 1Blue Hosting — but US-based processors sit in the chain, including website components from Google Analytics and Facebook with no explained safeguard. We found no public information on ownership or on an on-premises option; the product is stated to run completely in the cloud. 3 4 1 5
The Agency Owner
A German contracting entity in the Munich commercial register, servers stated to be exclusively in Germany, and a processing agreement concluded automatically with the terms are the basics I want for client data. Ownership is unknown, actual data residency is not confirmed beyond that statement, and the subprocessor chain includes processors from the US, which is where my exposure would sit. 3 1 5
The Field Supervisor
A German contracting entity on the Munich register with a German VAT ID, servers stated exclusively in Germany with AWS named as serving only from Frankfurt, and a data-processing agreement concluded automatically with the terms. The same pages confirm US-based processors exist, and we found no public information on ownership, data-centre certification, or a complete published subprocessor list beyond a change-history entry. 3 1 5
The Skeptic
The contracting entity is German by Munich commercial register and VAT prefix, hosting is stated as exclusively in Germany, and the trust page names AWS serving from Frankfurt — yet the same page names processors from the USA, so exposure runs through the US parent rather than server location. We found no public information on ownership, a full published subcontractor list beyond one changelog entry, or an explained safeguard for those US transfers. 3 1 5
Pricing transparency
Show reasoningHide reasoning
How this is scored
Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.
0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.
3 — A per-user headline exists, but hardware, modules or a minimum seat count are unpriced or unmentioned.
5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) sits in an unpriced bundle.
8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.
10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.
The Operations Lead
All three packages are public at from-prices of 1,50 €, 2 € and 3 € per user per month with annual billing, the shift planner sits at ab 2€ pro Monat und Nutzer, and VAT treatment is stated as zzgl. gegebenenfalls anfallender MwSt. But every figure is an "ab" alongside an invitation for the vendor to compute the price for your requirements, and the vendor positions itself for teams of 1-50 employees — so my 200 heads would face a quote, not a computable page; we found no public information on minimum term or terminal-variant pricing. 2 6
The Payroll Officer
The tiers are public with per-user prices and the billing period stated — Go at '1,50 € ab pro Monat und Nutzer bei jährlicher Abrechnung', Easy at '2 € ab', Pro at '3 € ab' — VAT treatment is stated, and the shift planner carries its own price of 'Preis ab 2€ pro Monat und Nutzer'. Every price is a from-price that varies with user count and payment modality, flexible packages are a sales conversation, and we found no public information on monthly-billing rates or a minimum term, so the real annual invoice is not computable from the pages. 2 6
The Works Council Advocate
Three tiers carry per-user prices with annual billing and VAT treatment stated, the shift planner is priced separately ab 2 € pro Monat und Nutzer, and the trial is free without auto-renewal. But every tier price is an 'ab' price under flexible calculation, and we found no public information on minimum term or on which tier includes the DATEV interface — so the real annual invoice is not computable from the public pages alone. 2 6 10
The Agency Owner
Headline prices of 1,50 €, 2 € and 3 € per user per month "ab" with annual billing, VAT treatment stated, and the shift planner priced separately at from 2 € is a decent start. But every figure is a starting price and the vendor offers to calculate an individual price on request, so I cannot compute the real annual invoice for my headcount from the public pages. 2 6 10
The Field Supervisor
Three tiers carry public per-user from-prices of 1,50 €, 2 € and 3 € per month at annual billing with VAT stated as excluded, the shift planner is priced separately, and the terminal runs on existing tablets so no hardware line item arises. But from-pricing combined with openly custom pricing by functions, user count and payment modality means a buyer cannot compute the real annual invoice, and we found no public information on monthly billing rates or a minimum term. 2 6 9
The Skeptic
Three tiers carry public from-prices — 1,50 €, 2 € and 3 € ab pro Monat und Nutzer bei jährlicher Abrechnung — with VAT treatment stated and no extra hardware needed since terminals are own tablets or PCs. The "ab" hedging, an unpriced offer to "berechnen wir den Preis", and no public information on minimum contract term or which tier carries the DATEV interface mean the real annual invoice still cannot be computed from the pages. 2 6 9
European sovereignty — proven facts
2 of 4 dimensions provenBuilt only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.
| Legal entity | Incorporated in DE ⚠ unverified | 3/3 pts | 3 Report an error |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Not determined | — | uncited Report an error |
| Data residency | Not determined ⚠ unverified | — | uncited Report an error |
| Subprocessors | US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified | 0/2 pts | 5 Report an error |
Where this could be wrong
- Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
- Weak sourcing — Legal entity. No country is named outright on the imprint; DE is derived from the Munich commercial register and the German VAT-ID prefix.
- Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
- Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. AWS serves the product only from the Frankfurt data center per the same page, so exposure stems from the US parent company rather than server location; the excerpt also confirms 'Auftragsverarbeiter aus den USA' exist.
- AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.
What we left out
A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.
- 55 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 25 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 21 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 12 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 4 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
- 1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us
Sources (10)
The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.
- 1 Vendor homepage www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 15 Sep 2026 Details →
- 2 Pricing www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 3 Imprint www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 4 Privacy policy www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
- 5 Security / trust page crewmeister.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
- 6 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 7 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 8 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 9 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
- 10 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →