Time Tracking & Attendance

Crewmeister

EU-Made Report an error

Panel rating · 6 judges · How to read the stars

Category median

Sovereignty: 2 of 4 dimensions proven

0–5 in half steps. 5 means the rubric's top anchor is met on the evidence.

by Crewmeister GmbH · www.crewmeister.com

An AI-assisted analysis of public evidence — not a hands-on test.

Every score, rationale and verdict on this page is AI-generated. Every claim cites the source it was read from. Nothing here is a human star review — and no score can be bought. How scores are made →

Method and versions

The Operations Lead v1.0 · The Payroll Officer v1.0 · The Works Council Advocate v1.0 · The Agency Owner v1.0 · The Field Supervisor v1.0 · The Skeptic v1.0 · rubric v1 · evaluated 5 Oct 2026

Report an error on this page Is this your product? →

Read this page as one judge. Each weighs the same scores by what they care about.

The Operations Lead

Weighted verdict

Runs a 200-person operation with office, workshop and field staff, and has to record all of them since the BAG ruling. Wants capture that fits each of those groups and a roster that reflects reality. Unmoved by a beautiful desktop timer that half the workforce cannot use.

Same scores as the panel view — this lens weights them the way this judge cares.

Scored by The Operations Lead

Capture in the real workplace

How this is scored

How time actually gets recorded across the workforces a buyer has — desk staff, field and site crews, shift and deskless workers — and what happens when the network is not there.

0 — One browser timer and nothing else; anyone away from a desk records nothing.

3 — Web plus a mobile app, but no offline capture, no shared terminal, and corrections are an admin task rather than a workflow.

5 — Web, mobile and at least one shared capture point (kiosk, terminal or badge), with offline capture that syncs, and a correction workflow with approval.

8 — Several capture paths including hardware terminals or badge readers, reliable offline handling, GPS or geofenced check-in where the vendor states its limits, and bulk correction with an audit trail of who changed what.

10 — Capture fits the workforce rather than the reverse: desk, deskless, field and shift models all first-class, offline as a designed state rather than a failure mode, and every correction attributable, reasoned and reversible.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Stamp-in runs through an iOS and Android app, the PC, and a terminal mode that turns any standard tablet into a punch clock, with offline capture that syncs and GPS stamp location — that genuinely covers my office, workshop and field crews. Corrections are the weak spot: times can be adjusted online, but we found no public information on a correction workflow with approval, an audit trail of who changed what, or bulk correction. 1 6 7 8

Report an error

Working-time law & audit record

How this is scored

Whether the record satisfies the German recording duty (BAG 2022, § 3 ArbSchG) and the ArbZG rules around it — breaks, maximum hours, rest periods, retention — and whether it survives being inspected.

0 — Hours are summed and nothing else; no break handling, no limits, no retention statement.

3 — Break deduction exists but is a flat rule; no daily maximum or rest-period checks, and no stated retention period.

5 — Configurable break rules, warnings on the 8/10-hour daily maximum and the 11-hour rest period, and per-employee reports covering the recording duty.

8 — The ArbZG rules are modelled rather than approximated: break and rest enforcement with documented exceptions, overtime and time-account rules, the two-year retention handled by the system, and an export built for an inspection.

10 — The vendor treats the record as evidence: tamper-evident entries with full change history, retention and deletion executed per statute, documented handling of on-call, standby and travel time, and published guidance mapping features to the ArbZG sections they serve.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The pages promise the recording duty is met automatically under the EuGH and BAG rulings and that hours are stored per the Minimum Wage Act documentation rules, with overtime landing on an automatic time account and a one-click per-employee timesheet. But we found no public information on break rules, warnings at the daily maximum or the 11-hour rest period, or a stated retention period for the working-time record itself — a compliance claim without the ArbZG rulebook visible behind it. 4 6 8

Report an error

Absence & shift planning

How this is scored

Vacation, sickness and the shift or duty roster — the half of attendance that decides whether the time data means anything.

0 — No absence handling; vacation lives in a separate calendar or spreadsheet.

3 — Vacation requests with approval, but entitlement is manual, carry-over is not handled and there is no rostering.

5 — Automatic entitlement and carry-over, sickness recording, an absence calendar, and basic shift planning with availability.

8 — Public-holiday calendars per location, pro-rata entitlement, substitution and swap workflows, shift templates with qualification and rest-period checks, and coverage warnings before publication.

10 — Planning and recording are one system: rosters that respect statutory rest and the works agreement, absence that reflows the plan automatically, and forecast-versus-actual reporting a team lead can act on.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Vacation requests go in with one click and come back approved by email, a leave calculator keeps annual entitlement and current balance, sickness and time-off-in-lieu are recorded and draw down the overtime account, and the shift planner handles automatic shifts, weekly templates and employee notifications. That is a real absence-and-roster core; we found no public information on carry-over of untaken leave, holiday calendars per location, substitution or swap workflows, or rest and coverage checks before a plan is published. 2 7 10

Report an error

Project, cost-centre & billing

How this is scored

Whether recorded time can carry the allocation an agency, workshop or professional-services firm needs — project, task, cost centre, billable status — through to an invoice or a client report.

0 — Attendance only; no project, task or cost-centre dimension at all.

3 — A free-text note or a single project field, with no rates, no billable flag and no per-project reporting.

5 — Projects and tasks with a billable flag and per-project reports, plus a rate per person or per project.

8 — Multi-level structure (client, project, task, cost centre), rate cards by person, role and project, budget tracking with warnings, and an invoice-ready export.

10 — Time becomes revenue without re-entry: approval before billing, rate rules that survive a rate change mid-project, client-facing reports, and a maintained handoff into named accounting or invoicing systems.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

Minutes can be booked against projects, customers and activities, and evaluated per project in two clicks with Excel export — enough to see where workshop and field hours actually went. We found no public information on rates per person or project, a billable flag, budget tracking, or an invoice-ready handoff into a named accounting system; the extended project recording in the top package appears as a feature line and is not detailed. 6 7 8

Report an error

Payroll handoff

How this is scored

How the recorded month reaches payroll — DATEV, Lohn und Gehalt, an in-house system or the tax adviser — and how much of it is automated rather than retyped.

0 — No payroll path stated; the month leaves as a spreadsheet someone retypes.

3 — Generic CSV said to be usable for payroll, with no named system, no defined format and no handling of surcharges.

5 — A named payroll integration or a documented export format for at least one major system, covering hours, absences and overtime.

8 — Vendor-maintained integration with a named provider, covering night, Sunday and holiday surcharges, time accounts and mid-month changes, with a lock step before transmission.

10 — Payroll is designed for, not exported to: several named systems maintained, an auditable approval and lock, retro handling for corrections after the close, and the tax adviser given their own scoped access.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

As a licensed DATEV partner with a direct interface, they meet the named-system requirement my payroll lives on, and absences flow to DATEV or Excel with a few clicks alongside hours and overtime. The top package only states surcharges are included, and we found no public information on night, Sunday and holiday surcharge detail in the interface, time-account transfer, a lock step before transmission, or correction handling after the month closes. 6 7 10

Report an error

European sovereignty

How this is scored

Where the data lives, who the contracting entity is, who the subprocessors are, and whether that is documented rather than assumed. Independently sourced by the sovereignty pipeline; scored here as this buyer weighs it.

0 — Non-EU vendor and contracting entity, hosting region unstated or non-EU, subprocessors not named.

3 — EU hosting offered as an option, but the contracting entity is non-EU or the subprocessor list is absent.

5 — EU hosting as standard and an EU contracting entity, but the subprocessor chain includes non-EU providers without an explained safeguard.

8 — EU or DACH hosting with a named data-centre provider, EU contracting entity, full subprocessor list published, and any non-EU processing named with its legal basis.

10 — Sovereign end to end and evidenced: vendor, entity, hosting and every subprocessor in the EU, data-centre certification published, and an on-premises or private-cloud option for buyers who need it.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

The imprint names a German company on the Munich commercial register, the pages state servers exclusively in Germany, and the data-protection page names AWS serving from Frankfurt with a change log of added processors — the right ground for my people's data. But the same page confirms processors from the USA, and we found no public information on ownership, data-centre certification, or the complete processor chain; the product runs entirely in the cloud, and we found no public information on an on-premises or private-cloud option. 3 1 5 8

Report an error

Pricing transparency

How this is scored

Whether a buyer can compute the real annual invoice for their headcount — including terminals, modules and minimums — from public pages alone.

0 — No public prices at all; every tier is a sales conversation.

3 — A per-user headline exists, but hardware, modules or a minimum seat count are unpriced or unmentioned.

5 — Per-user prices public for the main tiers with the billing period stated, but at least one commonly needed piece (terminal hardware, planning module, payroll export) sits in an unpriced bundle.

8 — Every tier and module priced publicly with per-user maths, billing period, minimum term and VAT treatment stated; only genuinely custom work lacks a number.

10 — Complete price computability: a calculator or table producing the annual invoice for a given headcount and module selection, including hardware, setup and renewal terms.

Report an error

The Operations Lead

All three packages are public at from-prices of 1,50 €, 2 € and 3 € per user per month with annual billing, the shift planner sits at ab 2€ pro Monat und Nutzer, and VAT treatment is stated as zzgl. gegebenenfalls anfallender MwSt. But every figure is an "ab" alongside an invitation for the vendor to compute the price for your requirements, and the vendor positions itself for teams of 1-50 employees — so my 200 heads would face a quote, not a computable page; we found no public information on minimum term or terminal-variant pricing. 2 6

Report an error

European sovereignty — proven facts

2 of 4 dimensions proven

Built only from facts shown on the vendor's own pages. A dimension we could not prove is left open, not scored as zero.

Legal entity	Incorporated in DE ⚠ unverified	3/3 pts	3 Report an error
Ownership	Not determined	—	uncited Report an error
Data residency	Not determined ⚠ unverified	—	uncited Report an error
Subprocessors	US CLOUD Act reach ⚠ unverified	0/2 pts	5 Report an error

Where this could be wrong

Evidence ages. The oldest capture behind this page is from 15 Sep 2026. Vendors change pricing and policies without notice; every fact reflects its source as of the capture date shown in the registry.
Weak sourcing — Legal entity. No country is named outright on the imprint; DE is derived from the Munich commercial register and the German VAT-ID prefix.
Weak sourcing — Data residency. Not confirmed on the vendor’s own pages as captured.
Weak sourcing — Subprocessors. AWS serves the product only from the Frankfurt data center per the same page, so exposure stems from the US parent company rather than server location; the excerpt also confirms 'Auftragsverarbeiter aus den USA' exist.
AI can misread a source. Extraction and judgement are automated; a citation guarantees traceability, not infallibility. If something here is wrong, say so — no account needed, every report is decided within 5 business days, and accepted corrections are published.

What we left out

A claim that does not survive our checks costs us the claim, not the page. This is what was taken off this one.

55 product facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
25 pricing facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
21 compliance facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
12 support facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
5 legal facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
4 hosting facts could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and were left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 data fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 integrations fact could not be confirmed on the vendor’s page as captured and was left out of this page and of the panel’s material. Know more? Tell us
1 sovereignty dimension could not be confirmed on the vendor’s own pages and is shown as unknown. Know more? Tell us

Do you know more about Crewmeister? Tell us Report an error on this page

Sources (10)

The pages every claim on this page was read from — each one checked, dated, and kept verifiable.

1 Vendor homepage www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 +1 earlier capture: 15 Sep 2026 Details →
2 Pricing www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
3 Imprint www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
4 Privacy policy www.crewmeister.com Checked 16 Sep 2026 Details →
5 Security / trust page crewmeister.com Checked 30 Sep 2026 Details →
6 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
7 Capture in the real workplace — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
8 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
9 Working-time law & audit record — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →
10 Absence & shift planning — found from sitemap crewmeister.com Checked 1 Oct 2026 Details →